Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Patriotsfatboy1

Trump revokes press passes for Washington Post

Recommended Posts

Not a single member of the 72 reporters in the White House press corps is a Republican. Not a single one. Not even from so-called conservative or Republican sites. Not a single one. There are 72 reporters in the White House press corps and accordng to a poll of them, not a one of them in the White House press corps is a Republican.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a single member of the 72 reporters in the White House press corps is a Republican. Not a single one. Not even from so-called conservative or Republican sites. Not a single one. There are 72 reporters in the White House press corps and accordng to a poll of them, not a one of them in the White House press corps is a Republican.

looks like poor Donnie better develop thicker skin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a single member of the 72 reporters in the White House press corps is a Republican. Not a single one. Not even from so-called conservative or Republican sites. Not a single one. There are 72 reporters in the White House press corps and accordng to a poll of them, not a one of them in the White House press corps is a Republican.

So?

Posted about this in the Trump tweets thread...guy cares nothing about the 1st amendment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a single member of the 72 reporters in the White House press corps is a Republican. Not a single one. Not even from so-called conservative or Republican sites. Not a single one. There are 72 reporters in the White House press corps and accordng to a poll of them, not a one of them in the White House press corps is a Republican.

My guess is that most of them are not affiliated with any party. Why would you out the number of Dems?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a single member of the 72 reporters in the White House press corps is a Republican. Not a single one. Not even from so-called conservative or Republican sites. Not a single one. There are 72 reporters in the White House press corps and accordng to a poll of them, not a one of them in the White House press corps is a Republican.

The Liberal Media red herring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a single member of the 72 reporters in the White House press corps is a Republican. Not a single one. Not even from so-called conservative or Republican sites. Not a single one. There are 72 reporters in the White House press corps and accordng to a poll of them, not a one of them in the White House press corps is a Republican.

Wow, poor Ed Henry Is going to be very disappointed to find out that he's a Democrat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not one of member of the White House press corps is a registered republican. 27 percent are registered democrats. 60 percent are not registered to vote and the rest are not registered with a party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha nobody says a word when buzzfeed doesnt report on trump...but trump axes a wackjob liberal joke of a paper and its a big deal? GTFO.

 

Good for him..paper is garbage anyway all but lying about trump or the right constantly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not one of member of the White House press corps is a registered republican. 27 percent are registered democrats. 60 percent are not registered to vote and the rest are not registered with a party.

 

Again...so what

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha nobody says a word when buzzfeed doesnt report on trump...but trump axes a wackjob liberal joke of a paper and its a big deal? GTFO.

 

Good for him..paper is garbage anyway all but lying about trump or the right constantly

 

any links to them actually lying about him or being "unfair"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha nobody says a word when buzzfeed doesnt report on trump...but trump axes a wackjob liberal joke of a paper and its a big deal? GTFO.

 

Good for him..paper is garbage anyway all but lying about trump or the right constantly

Dude, put down the kool-aid :wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So?

Posted about this in the Trump tweets thread...guy cares nothing about the 1st amendment.

 

Uh, do you even know what the 1st amendment is about? Hint: It's not about presidential press conferences.

 

This post is really pathetic, even for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Uh, do you even know what the 1st amendment is about? Hint: It's not about presidential press conferences.

 

This post is really pathetic, even for you.

 

Is it about abridging the freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Do you think candidates or presidents should revoke press credentials because they are mean to them? or try to charge them with libel (as Trump has stated in the past)?

 

Pathetic is your ignorance on the topic and attempted insults.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Is it about abridging the freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Do you think candidates or presidents should revoke press credentials because they are mean to them? or try to charge them with libel (as Trump has stated in the past)?

 

Pathetic is your ignorance on the topic and attempted insults.

Hillary is on day one hundred and change without holding a a press conference of any importance and were talking about Trump being fed up with the media now?

 

Fawking amazing! She's a coward who has the MSM in her back lesbian pocket and Trump is now the poosay? She won't hold a presser and is forgiven? Too Fawking funny!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hillary is on day one hundred and change without holding a a press conference of any importance and were talking about Trump being fed up with the media now?

 

Fawking amazing! She's a coward who has the MSM in her back lesbian pocket and Trump is now the poosay? She won't hold a presser and is forgiven? Too Fawking funny!

 

Yes...in a Trump thread we are talking about him taking away credentials because they hurt his feelings. Yes...given his previous stances on the media and libel...he is a who is very thin skinned.

 

No presser!!! what a ridiculous straw man deflection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It might not matter if Trump revoked press passes for every newspaper. In a recent Gallup Poll, 20% of respondents have a great deal of confidence in newspapers. They ranked just above big business and congress.

 

http://www.gallup.com/poll/192581/americans-confidence-institutions-stays-low.aspx?g_source=Politics&g_medium=newsfeed&g_campaign=tiles

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Yes...in a Trump thread we are talking about him taking away credentials because they hurt his feelings. Yes...given his previous stances on the media and libel...he is a ###### who is very thin skinned.

 

No presser!!! what a ridiculous straw man deflection.

Straw man? It's a fact. Cunton is deliberately avoiding the press because of her handlers and shrill message that will make her weaker. Obama taught her a thing or two. Shut up b!ch! The men are speaking!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Straw man? It's a fact. Cunton is deliberately avoiding the press because of her handlers and shrill message that will make her weaker. Obama taught her a thing or two. Shut up b!ch! The men are speaking!

 

Yes...a straw man and deflection. Thread about what trump is doing and how he has talked about and now revoked credentials for people saying mean things.

It has zero to do with Hillary...and her not doing press conferences (while not a good thing) is no where near as bad as revoking credentials and claiming he will push libel laws if people say bad things about him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Is it about abridging the freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Do you think candidates or presidents should revoke press credentials because they are mean to them? or try to charge them with libel (as Trump has stated in the past)?

 

Pathetic is your ignorance on the topic and attempted insults.

 

Wow, the irony.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Yes...a straw man and deflection. Thread about what trump is doing and how he has talked about and now revoked credentials for people saying mean things.

It has zero to do with Hillary...and her not doing press conferences (while not a good thing) is no where near as bad as revoking credentials and claiming he will push libel laws if people say bad things about him.

Too funny. You think Obama appointed Hiilay SOS because she was qualified? Or because he kicked her Fawking dumpy ass and needed to shut her trout mouth up and get with the program of moving forward with hope and change? She became a rook once he was the nominee.

 

The MSM loves her. Until she went up against Obama.

 

Revoking credentials is nothing new. I don't agree with it, but it's nothing new.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Wow, the irony.

 

Not at all...which is why you bring nothing to refute what I have stated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Too funny. You think Obama appointed Hiilay SOS because she was qualified? Or because he kicked her Fawking dumpy ass and needed to shut her trout mouth up and get with the program of moving forward with hope and change? She became a rook once he was the nominee.

 

The MSM loves her. Until she went up against Obama.

 

Revoking credentials is nothing new. I don't agree with it, but it's nothing new.

 

Did I say anything about Obama and Hillary?

Holy fock...way to one up yourself and deflect further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And I agree with it. The media is so fawked up when it comes to balance, send a message. Start doing responsible journalism or piss the fawk off! Their choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Not at all...which is why you bring nothing to refute what I have stated.

 

What do I need to refute? Your description of the 1st amendment is completely inaccurate. Not worth debating if that's your understanding of it. But, a simple google search yields this:

 

Amendment I. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

How would this affect a private citizen deciding not to talk to a specific newspaper?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Did I say anything about Obama and Hillary?

Holy fock...way to one up yourself and deflect further.

You didn't have to dumb ass. Your implication is there. And is the weak ass argument you use continually. Implying much?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump expressed displeasure over a piece that appeared on the Washington Post's website earlier on Monday.

"I am no fan of President Obama, but to show you how dishonest the phony Washington Post is, they wrote, 'Donald Trump suggests President Obama was involved with Orlando shooting' as their headline. Sad!" Trump wrote on Facebook.

The article's headline was changed to "Donald Trump seems to connect President Obama to Orlando shooting" within an hour after it was published.

The Washington Post, based in the U.S. capital and one of the nation's largest newspapers, has assigned a team of reporters to produce a book about Trump that is scheduled to be released later this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You didn't have to dumb ass. Your implication is there. And is the weak ass argument you use continually. Implying much?

There's the problem. Plenty of people are against Trump, and against Hillary. Saying one of the two is a scumbag isn't supporting the other one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps he tired of the daily Hitler references? :dunno:

 

The WaPo makes the Huffington Post look like Fox News. It is no longer a serious news organization, take it from someone who has read it daily for almost 40 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps he tired of the daily Hitler references? :dunno:

 

The WaPo makes the Huffington Post look like Fox News. It is no longer a serious news organization, take it from someone who has read it daily for almost 40 years.

but is he tired enough to stop acting like Hitler?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

please educate yourself son.

 

Another White House flack, Eric Schultz, didn’t like being pressed for answers about the Fast and Furious scandal in which American agents directed guns into the arms of Mexican drug lords. “Goddammit, Sharyl!” he screamed at her. “The Washington Post is reasonable, the LA Times is reasonable, The New York Times is reasonable. You’re the only one who’s not reasonable!”

Two of her former bosses, CBS Evening News executive producers Jim Murphy and Rick Kaplan, called her a “pit bull.”

That was when Sharyl was being nice.

Now that she’s no longer on the CBS payroll, this pit bull is off the leash and tearing flesh off the behinds of senior media and government officials. In her new memoir/exposé “Stonewalled: My Fight for Truth Against the Forces of Obstruction, Intimidation, and Harassment in Obama’s Washington” (Harper), Attkisson unloads on her colleagues in big-time TV news for their cowardice and cheerleading for the Obama administration while unmasking the corruption, misdirection and outright lying of today’s Washington political machine.

http://nypost.com/2014/10/25/former-cbs-reporter-explains-how-the-liberal-media-protects-obama/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but is he tired enough to stop acting like Hitler?

What's truly sad is your side actually thinks that someone who speaks their mind equates to someone who terminated millions. The Post knows who they are selling to. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×