Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2017 Everyone knows exactly what you will do and say. You repeat the same things on a daily basis. I think you may be clinically insane. No you don't know a damn thing...which is why I just posted my thoughts on the rumored three (which of course you ignore because it doesn't fit your little narrative). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,167 Posted January 31, 2017 No you don't know a damn thing...which is why I just posted my thoughts on the rumored three (which of course you ignore because it doesn't fit your little narrative). Well, I predicted this post with about 70% accuracy, so there is that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2017 Well, I predicted this post with about 70% accuracy, so there is that. Still no comment about what I have actually said about the SC Noms...talk about predictable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
patweisers44 712 Posted January 31, 2017 Hopefully he doesn't try to nominate some hardcore ideologist though. We can be socially moderate and fiscally conservative like most of the country. And why would anyone want something so centrist and logical to take place? My thoughts all along...the party that comes back to the center first will take control for awhile until the other catches up. Throwing third parties out of it, you have SO many Trump voters that would voted "D" in a heartbeat if they put up a candidate that was close to the middle and vice versa. What will end up happening is that the Democrats will throw out "the best qualified" black woman candidate to insure they cover all the bases. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,087 Posted January 31, 2017 So are the prime time networks gonna carry this? Hopefully there will be a proper intro. Out with that woman Carrie Underwood, and back in the saddle with Hank Jr baby!@#! Are you ready for some Supreme Court? A Tuesday night Partay This is Rockin' Randall Hank Ready to get the nomination started Cause all my rowdy friends Are here on Tuesday Night! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2017 BTW...if its Pryor...I will bash it as the guy is not fit for the SC much less some of the lower courts. Gorsuch Id have some reservations (hard to paint him as pro women or worker). But it could be worse than him. Hardiman Id be ok with for the most part. Any thoughts of your own in those three? Anyone? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mobb_deep 919 Posted January 31, 2017 Both Hardiman and Gorsuch seem sane enough. Neither one seems to be too concerned with taking away a woman's reproductive rights. Both look to be pretty strict constitutionals, which I got no problem with. Hardiman seems like the more moderate of the two, so I'd favor him over Gorsuch. Gorsuch got a little too much bible in him for my taste. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted January 31, 2017 Good, all of the Obama leftovers should be canned. Elections have consequences. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,564 Posted January 31, 2017 Good, all of the Obama leftovers should be canned. Elections have consequences. which leftovers exactly? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 470 Posted January 31, 2017 which leftovers exactly? Well...technically... That would include William Pryor no? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted January 31, 2017 Wouldn't matter who he picked, you are going to bash it no matter what. Cognitive bias at its finest. Your a focking clown. What does "cognitive bias" have to do with the fact that we ALL know that Trump is an attention-seeking, narcissistic, publicity whoore who is far more concerned with what kind of ratings the announcement pulls than with who the nominee is? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,564 Posted January 31, 2017 Hearing Gorsuch Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,696 Posted January 31, 2017 Once a reality hack, a lways a reality hack. He's bringing in two candidates - and had his staff leak "He could change his mind at the last moment!" He already came out and said he wanted to do this at night (usually done during the day) because he wanted "bigger ratings". Sheesh. "Welcome to Celebrity SCOTUS! Who'll Get the Rose Tonight?!" Couldn't pay me enough. I've been saving Roast Battle for just such an occasion. Seriously, If I'm the 'decoy'? I tell the guy to go screw. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2017 Hearing Gorsuch Not an awful choice by any means. Not very key on his Hobby Lobby arguments...but overall...ok pick. Far better than Pryor. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 31, 2017 Hearing Gorsuch Once a reality hack, a lways a reality hack. He's bringing in two candidates - and had his staff leak "He could change his mind at the last moment!" He already came out and said he wanted to do this at night (usually done during the day) because he wanted "bigger ratings". Sheesh. "Welcome to Celebrity SCOTUS! Who'll Get the Rose Tonight?!" Couldn't pay me enough. I've been saving Roast Battle for just such an occasion. Seriously, If I'm the 'decoy'? I tell the guy to go screw. Will the leaked info make him change it to Hardiman or someone else for the ratings? And yes...the whole suspense and prime time thing is just dumb as absolute fock. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 470 Posted January 31, 2017 Gorsuch is a solid pick IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,711 Posted February 1, 2017 Gorsuch, solid pick. Let the all out character assassination begin by people who just heard of him today. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 1, 2017 What a shitty partisan hack choice this is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,838 Posted February 1, 2017 What a shitty partisan hack choice this is. Surprise surprise.... Think he was going to pick a liberal? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 1, 2017 Surprise surprise.... Think he was going to pick a liberal? Relax...hook wasn't even in the water a few seconds and you couldn't wait to jump in the boat. Look up in this thread. I don't have a problem with Gorsuch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,838 Posted February 1, 2017 Relax...hook wasn't even in the water a few seconds and you couldn't wait to jump in the boat. Look up in this thread. I don't have a problem with Gorsuch. Ha I gotcha. Actually wouldnt have minded the other guy. Liberals supported him more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 1, 2017 Once a reality hack, a lways a reality hack. He's bringing in two candidates - and had his staff leak "He could change his mind at the last moment!" He already came out and said he wanted to do this at night (usually done during the day) because he wanted "bigger ratings". Sheesh. "Welcome to Celebrity SCOTUS! Who'll Get the Rose Tonight?!" Couldn't pay me enough. I've been saving Roast Battle for just such an occasion. Seriously, If I'm the 'decoy'? I tell the guy to go screw. cool cnn talking point regurgitation....can you ever form a coherent thought on your own ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 1, 2017 Ha I gotcha. Actually wouldnt have minded the other guy. Liberals supported him more. Hardiman is a bit more moderate. But I like Gorsuch other than the whole hobby lobby thing but that's not even a huge deal with me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,838 Posted February 1, 2017 Hardiman is a bit more moderate. But I like Gorsuch other than the whole hobby lobby thing but that's not even a huge deal with me. Yeah that wasnt a good one. Hes a little too bible thumper for me...but whatevs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,564 Posted February 1, 2017 Dems got to drag this out as long as possible, right? Fair is fair. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 1, 2017 Dems got to drag this out as long as possible, right? Fair is fair. They very well may after the Garland crap. Should save that "fight for something else". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,696 Posted February 1, 2017 hehe "Was that a Surprise? Well Was it? Were you Surprised?" Good lord. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mobb_deep 919 Posted February 1, 2017 Good, all of the Obama leftovers should be canned. Elections have consequences. Wrong thread, retard. The "Trump fired so and so" thread is down a bit further. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 1, 2017 hehe "Was that a Surprise? Well Was it? Were you Surprised?" Good lord. Most transparent ever and the rest of the patting himself in the back for nothing was fun too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,564 Posted February 1, 2017 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38807783 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 1, 2017 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38807783 Because they lied to congress like jackasses Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 1, 2017 http://119coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Judge-Neil-Gorsuch-rev2.pdf Good summary of Gorsuch 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 4,130 Posted February 1, 2017 http://119coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Judge-Neil-Gorsuch-rev2.pdf Good summary of Gorsuch I see that you're stealing material from FBG's again. Good job. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 1, 2017 I see that you're stealing material from FBG's again. Good job. I find info from all over...I did find that there. So? BTW...what name are you hiding under over there these days? I doubt you will answer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,367 Posted February 1, 2017 Dems got to drag this out as long as possible, right? Fair is fair. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alias Detective 1,207 Posted February 1, 2017 I see that you're stealing material from FBG's again. Good job. I'm not a cereal forearm guy. Was this info at this other place given the proper credit or are you just being a toolbag! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted February 1, 2017 http://119coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Judge-Neil-Gorsuch-rev2.pdf Good summary of Gorsuch Much Scalia in there which I love. A protector of the people which the left should love. Doesn't like the over-reach of government which everyone should love. The left has to hate him, but he'll get through. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 6,013 Posted February 1, 2017 Columbia, Harvard AND Oxford University??? Couldn't they find a qualified graduate from SUNY Fredonia or something? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alias Detective 1,207 Posted February 1, 2017 Columbia, Harvard AND Oxford University??? Couldn't they find a qualified graduate from SUNY Fredonia or something? Dickenson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted February 1, 2017 hehe "Was that a Surprise? Well Was it? Were you Surprised?" Good lord. You KNOW he wanted to change the pick at the last minute for the plot twist! factor. They must have cranked the shock collar up to 11 to keep him from doing it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites