Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
kutulu

Supreme Court nominee to be announced Tuesday

Recommended Posts

 

Everyone knows exactly what you will do and say. You repeat the same things on a daily basis. I think you may be clinically insane.

 

No you don't know a damn thing...which is why I just posted my thoughts on the rumored three (which of course you ignore because it doesn't fit your little narrative).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

No you don't know a damn thing...which is why I just posted my thoughts on the rumored three (which of course you ignore because it doesn't fit your little narrative).

 

Well, I predicted this post with about 70% accuracy, so there is that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Well, I predicted this post with about 70% accuracy, so there is that.

Still no comment about what I have actually said about the SC Noms...talk about predictable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

:thumbsup:

 

Hopefully he doesn't try to nominate some hardcore ideologist though.

 

We can be socially moderate and fiscally conservative like most of the country.

And why would anyone want something so centrist and logical to take place? :lol:

 

My thoughts all along...the party that comes back to the center first will take control for awhile until the other catches up. Throwing third parties out of it, you have SO many Trump voters that would voted "D" in a heartbeat if they put up a candidate that was close to the middle and vice versa.

 

What will end up happening is that the Democrats will throw out "the best qualified" black woman candidate to insure they cover all the bases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So are the prime time networks gonna carry this? Hopefully there will be a proper intro.

 

Out with that woman Carrie Underwood, and back in the saddle with Hank Jr baby!@#!

 

Are you ready for some Supreme Court?

A Tuesday night Partay

This is Rockin' Randall Hank

Ready to get the nomination started

 

Cause all my rowdy friends

Are here on Tuesday Night!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

BTW...if its Pryor...I will bash it as the guy is not fit for the SC much less some of the lower courts.

Gorsuch Id have some reservations (hard to paint him as pro women or worker). But it could be worse than him.

Hardiman Id be ok with for the most part.

Any thoughts of your own in those three?

Anyone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both Hardiman and Gorsuch seem sane enough. Neither one seems to be too concerned with taking away a woman's reproductive rights. Both look to be pretty strict constitutionals, which I got no problem with. Hardiman seems like the more moderate of the two, so I'd favor him over Gorsuch. Gorsuch got a little too much bible in him for my taste.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good, all of the Obama leftovers should be canned. Elections have consequences.

which leftovers exactly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

which leftovers exactly?

 

Well...technically...

 

That would include William Pryor no?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Wouldn't matter who he picked, you are going to bash it no matter what. Cognitive bias at its finest. Your a focking clown.

 

What does "cognitive bias" have to do with the fact that we ALL know that Trump is an attention-seeking, narcissistic, publicity whoore who is far more concerned with what kind of ratings the announcement pulls than with who the nominee is? :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once a reality hack, a lways a reality hack.

He's bringing in two candidates - and had his staff leak

"He could change his mind at the last moment!"

 

He already came out and said he wanted to do this at night

(usually done during the day) because he wanted "bigger ratings".

Sheesh.

 

"Welcome to Celebrity SCOTUS! Who'll Get the Rose Tonight?!"

 

Couldn't pay me enough. I've been saving Roast Battle for just such an occasion.

 

Seriously, If I'm the 'decoy'? I tell the guy to go screw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hearing Gorsuch :unsure:

 

Not an awful choice by any means. Not very key on his Hobby Lobby arguments...but overall...ok pick.

Far better than Pryor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hearing Gorsuch :unsure:

 

 

Once a reality hack, a lways a reality hack.

He's bringing in two candidates - and had his staff leak

"He could change his mind at the last moment!"

 

He already came out and said he wanted to do this at night

(usually done during the day) because he wanted "bigger ratings".

Sheesh.

 

"Welcome to Celebrity SCOTUS! Who'll Get the Rose Tonight?!"

 

Couldn't pay me enough. I've been saving Roast Battle for just such an occasion.

 

Seriously, If I'm the 'decoy'? I tell the guy to go screw.

 

 

Will the leaked info make him change it to Hardiman or someone else for the ratings?

 

And yes...the whole suspense and prime time thing is just dumb as absolute fock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gorsuch, solid pick. Let the all out character assassination begin by people who just heard of him today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a shitty partisan hack choice this is.

Surprise surprise....

 

Think he was going to pick a liberal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprise surprise....

 

Think he was going to pick a liberal?

Relax...hook wasn't even in the water a few seconds and you couldn't wait to jump in the boat.

 

Look up in this thread. I don't have a problem with Gorsuch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Relax...hook wasn't even in the water a few seconds and you couldn't wait to jump in the boat.

 

Look up in this thread. I don't have a problem with Gorsuch.

Ha I gotcha.

 

Actually wouldnt have minded the other guy. Liberals supported him more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once a reality hack, a lways a reality hack.

He's bringing in two candidates - and had his staff leak

"He could change his mind at the last moment!"

 

He already came out and said he wanted to do this at night

(usually done during the day) because he wanted "bigger ratings".

Sheesh.

 

"Welcome to Celebrity SCOTUS! Who'll Get the Rose Tonight?!"

 

Couldn't pay me enough. I've been saving Roast Battle for just such an occasion.

 

Seriously, If I'm the 'decoy'? I tell the guy to go screw.

cool cnn talking point regurgitation....can you ever form a coherent thought on your own ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha I gotcha.

 

Actually wouldnt have minded the other guy. Liberals supported him more.

Hardiman is a bit more moderate. But I like Gorsuch other than the whole hobby lobby thing but that's not even a huge deal with me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hardiman is a bit more moderate. But I like Gorsuch other than the whole hobby lobby thing but that's not even a huge deal with me.

Yeah that wasnt a good one. Hes a little too bible thumper for me...but whatevs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dems got to drag this out as long as possible, right? Fair is fair.

They very well may after the Garland crap.

Should save that "fight for something else".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good, all of the Obama leftovers should be canned. Elections have consequences.

Wrong thread, retard. The "Trump fired so and so" thread is down a bit further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe "Was that a Surprise? Well Was it? Were you Surprised?"

 

Good lord. :rolleyes: :wall:

Most transparent ever and the rest of the patting himself in the back for nothing was fun too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I see that you're stealing material from FBG's again. Good job. :thumbsup:

I find info from all over...I did find that there. So?

BTW...what name are you hiding under over there these days? I doubt you will answer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dems got to drag this out as long as possible, right? Fair is fair.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that you're stealing material from FBG's again. Good job. :thumbsup:

I'm not a cereal forearm guy. Was this info at this other place given the proper credit or are you just being a toolbag!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Columbia, Harvard AND Oxford University??? Couldn't they find a qualified graduate from SUNY Fredonia or something? :mad: :thumbsdown:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Columbia, Harvard AND Oxford University??? Couldn't they find a qualified graduate from SUNY Fredonia or something? :mad: :thumbsdown:

Dickenson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe "Was that a Surprise? Well Was it? Were you Surprised?"

 

Good lord. :rolleyes: :wall:

 

You KNOW he wanted to change the pick at the last minute for the plot twist! factor. They must have cranked the shock collar up to 11 to keep him from doing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×