Atheists: How stupid are people really?

[Utilit99 4,099]

19 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

You gave us your own definition of words that nobody accepted: atheists belive there is no god.

I gave 1 definition. The real one. Atheism = a belief there is NO God.  And no one debated it until they couldn't defend themselves anymore. 

It's fine. You don't know if there is a God or not. i get it. At least you admit it.

[Voltaire 5,425]

19 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

I gave 1 definition. The real one. Atheism = a belief there is NO God.  And no one debated it until they couldn't defend themselves anymore. 

It's fine. You don't know if there is a God or not. i get it. At least you admit it.

That's not the definition. Likewise, it's not what I said. But since you don't read what I write anyway, I don't care to try to discuss it anymore.

 

[edjr 6,784]

On 12/26/2020 at 4:08 PM, Utilit99 said:

You believe so strongly in atheism, prove the faith you have in what you practice is true. Use that great mind of yours to prove the existence of no God.

 

Wrong. I don't believe in make believe. 

[TimHauck 3,208]

7 hours ago, Utilit99 said:

How long have no Gods been hanging around? Forever? Got the proof of that? I would love to see it.

I think you’re confused.   You’re the one supposed to be proving God/Gods have actually been hanging around.   People writing books about them doesn’t count as them existing.

My point was the longest any human has lived has been 122 years.  And we’re supposed to believe God has been “alive” for millions of years?

[Horseman 2,683]

This moron wakes ups and first thing in the morning starts right back with his kindergarten "I know you are, but, what am I" logic again?  

You must be a hit at parties.  LOL. 

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,433]

37 minutes ago, Horseman said:

This moron wakes ups and first thing in the morning starts right back with his kindergarten "I know you are, but, what am I" logic again?  

You must be a hit at parties.  LOL. 

Don't worry. He will have a meltdown, will get banned and then will come back as some other handle. Rinse, repeat. 

I do hope that we figure out how to get people the mental health support they need.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,477]

5 hours ago, Utilit99 said:

Who said that to you? Some homeless freak on a corner? This is your biggest problem with religious folks?

Every single pastor and perishoner ever

[Utilit99 4,099]

5 hours ago, TimHauck said:

I think you’re confused.   You’re the one supposed to be proving God/Gods have actually been hanging around.   People writing books about them doesn’t count as them existing.

My point was the longest any human has lived has been 122 years.  And we’re supposed to believe God has been “alive” for millions of years?

I don't believe in atheism. Nothing for me to prove.. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

7 hours ago, Voltaire said:

You gave us your own definition of words that nobody accepted: atheists belive there is no god. Then you want to discuss things on that level. But atheism is a lack of belief in gods. So, when somebody posted the real defintion of words, you didn't like it and ignored it and want to argue over your definition. Then, I was like fine, whateverfloats your boat, here's my thinking on the subject, and I made a couple of nice posts. Then you ignore everything I say and you're like "I want to talk about my definition of atheism with you instead."

Also, for the record, Richard Feynman who I would argue is the smartest man of our lifetime, certainly the most humorous smart man of our lifetime, never got caught up in semantics and had some funny stories to tell in that matter that maybe I can dig up but is buried in loads of content online about his wit and wisdom.

It's the opposite of Theism.

Atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings. As such, it is usually distinguished from theism, which affirms the reality of the divine and often seeks to demonstrate its existence. Atheism is also distinguished from agnosticism, which leaves open the question whether there is a god or not, professing to find the questions unanswered or unanswerable.

[Utilit99 4,099]

4 hours ago, Horseman said:

This moron wakes ups and first thing in the morning starts right back with his kindergarten "I know you are, but, what am I" logic again?  

You must be a hit at parties.  LOL. 

You have been posting more than anyone on this topic and have been wrong the whole time. Now you resort to name calling cause you got nothing else. 

 

Atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings. As such, it is usually distinguished from theism, which affirms the reality of the divine and often seeks to demonstrate its existence. Atheism is also distinguished from agnosticism, which leaves open the question whether there is a god or not, professing to find the questions unanswered or unanswerable.

[Utilit99 4,099]

5 hours ago, TimHauck said:

I think you’re confused.   You’re the one supposed to be proving God/Gods have actually been hanging around.   People writing books about them doesn’t count as them existing.

My point was the longest any human has lived has been 122 years.  And we’re supposed to believe God has been “alive” for millions of years?

Atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings. As such, it is usually distinguished from theism, which affirms the reality of the divine and often seeks to demonstrate its existence. Atheism is also distinguished from agnosticism, which leaves open the question whether there is a god or not, professing to find the questions unanswered or unanswerable.

[Utilit99 4,099]

You all just backtrack and now say the word means something different than it means.

[Utilit99 4,099]

3 hours ago, Patriotsfatboy1 said:

Don't worry. He will have a meltdown, will get banned and then will come back as some other handle. Rinse, repeat. 

I do hope that we figure out how to get people the mental health support they need.

Let me know when that happens. 

[TimHauck 3,208]

1 hour ago, Utilit99 said:

Atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings. As such, it is usually distinguished from theism, which affirms the reality of the divine and often seeks to demonstrate its existence. Atheism is also distinguished from agnosticism, which leaves open the question whether there is a god or not, professing to find the questions unanswered or unanswerable.

Ok then I guess to answer your question from the OP,  in order of most to least stupid:

religious people

atheists

agnostics

 

fair?

[Utilit99 4,099]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Ok then I guess to answer your question from the OP,  in order of most to least stupid:

religious people

atheists

agnostics

 

fair?

Fair, but incorrect. You get D+ for being one of few here who actually understands what the words mean. 

[TimHauck 3,208]

22 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Fair, but incorrect. You get D+ for being one of few here who actually understands what the words mean. 

What’s the correct order?

[Utilit99 4,099]

11 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

What’s the correct order?

Using your scale:

Liberals

English speaking adults who don't know what 'athiest' means but pretend to know.

People who rail on others because of their beliefs.

Atheists

.

.

.

.

.

.

Agnostics, Theists

[t.j 35]

Either way agnostics are the smartest 

[TimHauck 3,208]

9 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Using your scale:

Liberals

English speaking adults who don't know what 'athiest' means but pretend to know.

People who rail on others because of their beliefs.

Atheists

.

.

.

.

.

.

Agnostics, Theists

Ok now that you’ve put theists as a tie for the smartest, please prove God exists.  Thanks in advance 

[Utilit99 4,099]

Just now, t.j said:

Either way agnostics are the smartest 

Hahaha. I have no problem with what people believe. It just makes me ill seeing people attack other people for their religious or non religious personal views. I only started this thread to watch all the atheits deflect when they themselves are in the position they often put theists in. It's just a spin off thread from all the Christian bashing in the other thread. Seems pure atheists here can't handle their own. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

Just now, TimHauck said:

Ok now that you’ve put theists as a tie for the smartest, please prove God exists.  Thanks in advance 

That's in another thread you can reply to.

[Horseman 2,683]

3 hours ago, Utilit99 said:

Atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings. As such, it is usually distinguished from theism, which affirms the reality of the divine and often seeks to demonstrate its existence. Atheism is also distinguished from agnosticism, which leaves open the question whether there is a god or not, professing to find the questions unanswered or unanswerable.

That isn't contradictory to anything I've said.   Is English your second language?  Do we need to send ICE over to your house because you're talking like a foreigner that doesn't understand the language.  

[Horseman 2,683]

1 hour ago, Utilit99 said:

Hahaha. I have no problem with what people believe. It just makes me ill seeing people attack other people for their religious or non religious personal views. I only started this thread to watch all the atheits deflect when they themselves are in the position they often put theists in. It's just a spin off thread from all the Christian bashing in the other thread. Seems pure atheists here can't handle their own. 

First Bold:

On 12/28/2020 at 2:48 PM, Horseman said:

You must have got your feelings hurt then? 

Second Bold: You can't put us in the position of playing in the land of make believe.

[nospk 230]

1 hour ago, Utilit99 said:

Hahaha. I have no problem with what people believe. It just makes me ill seeing people attack other people for their religious or non religious personal views. I only started this thread to watch all the atheits deflect when they themselves are in the position they often put theists in. It's just a spin off thread from all the Christian bashing in the other thread. Seems pure atheists here can't handle their own. 

So if I am correct, you admit that you are ok with attacking someone based on their political beliefs, but against attacks based on religious beliefs. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

6 minutes ago, Horseman said:

First Bold:

Second Bold: You can't put us in the position of playing in the land of make believe.

This makes no sense.

8 hours ago, Horseman said:

This moron wakes ups and first thing in the morning starts right back with his kindergarten "I know you are, but, what am I" logic again?  

You must be a hit at parties.  LOL. 

Thanks for posting so often. It is funny.

[Utilit99 4,099]

1 minute ago, nospk said:

So if I am correct, you admit that you are ok with attacking someone based on their political beliefs, but against attacks based on religious beliefs. 

I never attacked anyone for their beliefs in this thread. I just put it upon atheists to prove what they say just like they do to me. Remember, this is an offshoot thread from the religion bashing thread. 

[nospk 230]

Just now, Utilit99 said:

I never attacked anyone for their beliefs in this thread. I just put it upon atheists to prove what they say just like they do to me.

You didn’t just make a list that says liberals are “the most stupid” group of people? 
I am going to let you argue with someone who is actually a liberal atheist commie because I am none of those

[Utilit99 4,099]

2 minutes ago, nospk said:

You didn’t just make a list that says liberals are “the most stupid” group of people? 
I am going to let you argue with someone who is actually a liberal atheist commie because I am none of those

Well, I do put current day American liberal socialists at the top. I think they are stupid. Really stupid. Really really really stupid. Can't help it. Too much evidence of that. 

[Fnord 2,443]

22 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Well, I do put current day American liberal socialists at the top. I think they are stupid. Really stupid. Really really really stupid. Can't help it. Too much evidence of that. 

But " It just makes me ill seeing people attack other people for their religious or non religious personal views."

I cannot believe you have this thread up to 6 pages. Good job on your fishing trip. You are a completely hypocritical ignoramus who can't even seem to figure out what's going on in your own head, assuming there's any measurable activity there in the first place. Why don't you start with working on that sewage heap, and then get back to us with the rest of your multitudinous mental and religious contortions. Or better yet, don't. No one cares that you can't figure out words or thoughts, even when having definitions presented directly to your face.

[Utilit99 4,099]

6 minutes ago, Fnord said:

But " It just makes me ill seeing people attack other people for their religious or non religious personal views."

I cannot believe you have this thread up to 6 pages. Good job on your fishing trip. You are a completely hypocritical ignoramus who can't even seem to figure out what's going on in your own head, assuming there's any measurable activity there in the first place. Why don't you start with working on that sewage heap, and then get back to us with the rest of your multitudinous mental and religious contortions. Or better yet, don't. No one cares that you can't figure out words or thoughts, even when having definitions presented directly to your face.

You got nothing but name calling. Typical liberal proving his party proud.

[OldMaid 2,134]

Why do you people respond to this freak? He’s never been able to have a decent conversation and acts like a 12 year old girl. At some point you have to figure out it’s not worth your time.

[Fnord 2,443]

1 minute ago, OldMaid said:

Why do you people respond to this freak? He’s never been able to have a decent conversation and acts like a 12 year old girl. At some point you have to figure out it’s not worth your time.

Mostly I ignore his drivel but sometimes I just feel the need to remind him of his inferiority. I don't like to trash people generally, but I won't shrink away from doing it to people that are asking for it. And this dude asks for it like none other.

[Utilit99 4,099]

6 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Why do you people respond to this freak? He’s never been able to have a decent conversation and acts like a 12 year old girl. At some point you have to figure out it’s not worth your time.

Dispute anything I said old hag. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

7 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Mostly I ignore his drivel but sometimes I just feel the need to remind him of his inferiority. I don't like to trash people generally, but I won't shrink away from doing it to people that are asking for it. And this dude asks for it like none other.

Dispute anything I said liberal puke. Feel free. But I'm sure you got nothing.

[Voltaire 5,425]

14 hours ago, OldMaid said:

He’s never been able to have a decent conversation and acts like a 12 year old girl. At some point you have to figure out it’s not worth your time.

He can and does have decent conversations, just not in this thread.

[nospk 230]

16 hours ago, Utilit99 said:

Well, I do put current day American liberal socialists at the top. I think they are stupid. Really stupid. Really really really stupid. Can't help it. Too much evidence of that. 

So you are ok with attacking people based on their political beliefs but not for religious beliefs then. Got it, thanks 

[Utilit99 4,099]

Just now, nospk said:

So you are ok with attacking people based on their political beliefs but not for religious beliefs then. Got it, thanks 

You mean the liberals who want to cancel culture, capitalize the B in black, call people racists for wanting  small government and a conservative nation and voting for Trump to assist in that,  give billions of tax payer dollars to other countries and museums and giving members of the house of representatives raises all in the name of covid relief while only giving out a couple hundred bucks to people in this country that don't have jobs and are losing businesses, spend tax payer dollars on a 4 year wild goose chase trying to oust the president, etc, etc.... Too many things to mention.

Yes, I'm ok with not liking those people in the least and standing by my statement.

[OldMaid 2,134]

7 hours ago, Voltaire said:

He can and does have decent conversations, just not in this thread.

You’d need a lobotomy to dumb it down to his level.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,879]

Calling religious people stupid, and some of them are, doesn’t make you smart for pointing it out all the time. HTH. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

1 hour ago, OldMaid said:

You’d need a lobotomy to dumb it down to his level.

Angry old had.