Jump to content
JustinCharge

nuclear war - doomsday⌛

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, craftsman said:

Move on with your inability to know what's going on. Go lie to others. I'm done. 

Did you ever bother to ask yourself why Russia doesn't own the Ukrainian skies?  Russia tried to take out the Ukrainian AF and the air defense systems with cruise missiles.  They were ineffective against Soviet era missile defense batteries.  

The only thing the US needs to worry about is hypersonic missiles, and I highly doubt Russia even strapped enough nukes to hypersonics to tilt the equation in their favor.  Let's pause while you feverishly Google what a hypersonic missile is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Biden should be impeached and removed from office because he attacked Russia unprovoked by aming and funding Ukraine while leaving our borders wide open which makes it super easy for them to nuke us.  If Trump was president, you can damn well be sure those borders would be shut.  in fact it would be really fine if we just removed every focking democrat from office for supporting this shiit.

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

Biden should be impeached and removed from office because he attacked Russia unprovoked by aming and funding Ukraine while leaving our borders wide open which makes it super easy for them to nuke us.  If Trump was president, you can damn well be sure those borders would be shut.  in fact it would be really fine if we just removed every focking democrat from office for supporting this shiit.

Go to bed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as far as I can tell, the 101st has never been deployed to a new war theater and NOT entered the war.  weve deployed the 2nd brigade to Romania on the Ukraine border, constituting thousands of troops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

as ive said before, with Biden leaving the US southern border wide open, you can be certain Russia has smuggled in small tactical nukes and / or dirty bombs and set them up in strategic areas inside the US already.  Putin needs not fire 1 missile.  its also annoying that the MSM keeps saying stuff like "theres no sign that Russia is setting up to fire nukes".  the nukes are already HERE.

Yeah I thought I saw a dirty bomb at Wawa the other day.  Màkes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Yeah I thought I saw a dirty bomb at Wawa the other day.  Màkes sense.

oh boy. good one skippy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rumors bleeding into the new york times.

 

https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-720552

'New, troubling developments' with Russia's nuclear arsenal -US official

The report comes as Russia accuses Ukraine of preparing to use a dirty bomb or even a nuclear bomb as Russia continues its invasion in Ukraine.

By ROMAN MEITAV

Published: OCTOBER 25, 2022 15:42 Updated: OCTOBER 25, 2022 21:16

A senior US official told The New York Times on Tuesday that there are "new, troubling developments" involving Russia's nuclear arsenal. The official, who asked to remain anonymous, would not provide any further details, according to the report.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

rumors bleeding into the new york times.

 

https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-720552

'New, troubling developments' with Russia's nuclear arsenal -US official

The report comes as Russia accuses Ukraine of preparing to use a dirty bomb or even a nuclear bomb as Russia continues its invasion in Ukraine.

By ROMAN MEITAV

Published: OCTOBER 25, 2022 15:42 Updated: OCTOBER 25, 2022 21:16

A senior US official told The New York Times on Tuesday that there are "new, troubling developments" involving Russia's nuclear arsenal. The official, who asked to remain anonymous, would not provide any further details, according to the report.

Odd that I don't see this story anywhere on the New York Times' website front page. 

Tick, tock, tick, tock ...

https://w2.countingdownto.com/4328562

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CNBC: White House warns of 'severe consequences' if Putin uses nuclear weapons in Ukraine; Russian court upholds Griner’s 9-year term.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/25/russia-ukraine-live-updates.html

Meanwhile Russia says they will go to the UN about Ukraine using a dirty bomb.  Doesn't sound like a move by a country ready to unleash full scale global thermonuclear war.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Putin denies intent on using "nukes" in "ukraine".  didnt say anything about using them on the us tho.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2022/10/27/ukraine-russia-war-live-updates/10613303002/

Despite his repeated veiled references to Russia's nuclear arsenal in recent months, Putin said he has no intention of using such a weapon in Ukraine: “There is no point in that, neither political, nor military,” he said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/26/2022 at 3:35 AM, Shooter McGavin said:

CNBC: White House warns of 'severe consequences' if Putin uses nuclear weapons in Ukraine; Russian court upholds Griner’s 9-year term.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/25/russia-ukraine-live-updates.html

Meanwhile Russia says they will go to the UN about Ukraine using a dirty bomb.  Doesn't sound like a move by a country ready to unleash full scale global thermonuclear war.

this general topic was already discussed in this thread months ago, look for "open negotiations".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

Putin denies intent on using "nukes" in "ukraine".  didnt say anything about using them on the us tho.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2022/10/27/ukraine-russia-war-live-updates/10613303002/

Despite his repeated veiled references to Russia's nuclear arsenal in recent months, Putin said he has no intention of using such a weapon in Ukraine: “There is no point in that, neither political, nor military,” he said.

Why do you keep insisting he's going to nuke the US?  It doesn't make any sense for Russia to nuke the US.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Why do you keep insisting he's going to nuke the US?  It doesn't make any sense for Russia to nuke the US.

i already explained that in this thread as well.  look up my skyscraper analogy.  you are just going to keep asking the same questions that have already been answered and pretend you are in the right when you just have a swiss cheese memory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JustinCharge said:

i already explained that in this thread as well.  look up my skyscraper analogy.  you are just going to keep asking the same questions that have already been answered and pretend you are in the right when you just have a swiss cheese memory.

I don't think what you've said makes sense though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I don't think what you've said makes sense though.

thats not what you said before.  you asked me why do i keep insisting he will nuke.  now you are saying you DO know why i insist such a thing and you just disagree with it.  get your story straight.   its impossible to have a conversation with someone who keeps changing their position every 2 minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JustinCharge said:

thats not what you said before.  you asked me why do i keep insisting he will nuke.  now you are saying you DO know why i insist such a thing and you just disagree with it.  get your story straight.

I don't think the threat is as imminent as you claim it to be.  I don't think your reasoning for it is good enough to nuke the US.  I struggle to understand why you are so confident in everything you've been posting on here every day.  Maybe I've just been asking you the wrong questions.  What makes you so confident that you are willing to guarantee that Putin is going to nuke the US in the next couple months?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I don't think the threat is as imminent as you claim it to be.  I don't think your reasoning for it is good enough to nuke the US.  I struggle to understand why you are so confident in everything you've been posting on here every day.  Maybe I've just been asking you the wrong questions.  What makes you so confident that you are willing to guarantee that Putin is going to nuke the US in the next couple months?

ive been reading Putin's speeches for years, ive seen their construction projects, the changing mood of the russian people.  russia is a fundamentalist christian country and they all have family members that were murdered by left wing atheist savages.  they see left wing atheists ascendant in the West.  I guarantee you that, given the Russian people's national history and harrowing nightmares, they will nuke the US before kneeling to yet another group of left wing atheist savages.  Even if it means their own death.  

you do not share that history so you cant understand it.

but the moment they invaded Ukraine, i knew it meant nuclear war because there was no scenario where they win a conventional war.  im sure russia knew it as well.  but russia feels compelled to do this to stop the Western liberals.

we are locked in to global nuclear war.  and no amount of Western propaganda, or arming the Ukrainians, or sending in the 101st airborne, will change it now.  the only thing stopping it was Trump as president.  the Russians had hope it wouldn't come to this, when Biden entered the Oval Office, it meant doom.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

you do not share that history so you cant understand it.

 

You're right, I don't.  I'm curious what your fascination is with Russia?  Why would you read Putin's speeches for years and pay attention to the Russian people?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i mean, you gotta understand, a lot of these people running Russia in their 50s, 60, 70s, some of them had DOZENS of family members and loved ones marched into camps or executed by left wing atheists fanatics.  they would love NOTHING better than to drop 2000 nukes on the US and the leftist atheists running the show here.  even if they die.  it is VENGEANCE.

thats why Russian state TV shows pictures of London getting bombed or nukes flying into Florida, and they are giddy and laugh and applaud.  retribution for their mothers, sisters, brothers.  burn in hell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

You're right, I don't.  I'm curious what your fascination is with Russia?  Why would you read Putin's speeches for years and pay attention to the Russian people?

Uh, Russia has remained the #1 rival to US global power ever since 1991.  if you are at ALL genuinely interested in politics, you keep up with what our main rival is up to.  a better question is why the hell do you pretend to care about politics if you dont watch what is happening to Russia and the former USSR?  Putin has been going around with major speeches for 15 years.  at a minimum, you just grab the transcripts and skim for a couple minutes to figure out what is going on.  takes zero effort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

DOZENS of family members and loved ones marched into camps or executed by left wing atheists fanatics.

This is what I'm not familiar with.  This was done by by US?  I'm trying to get the US connection to Russia here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, JustinCharge said:

Uh, Russia has remained the #1 rival to US global power ever since 1991.  if you are at ALL genuinely interested in politics, you keep up with what our main rival is up to.  a better question is why the hell do you pretend to care about politics if you dont watch what is happening to Russia and the former USSR?  Putin has been going around with major speeches for 15 years.  at a minimum, you just grab the transcripts and skim for a couple minutes to figure out what is going on.  takes zero effort.

I do not have a major interest in politics.  I do not talk politics with friends or family.  I try to keep up with some current stuff but that's it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

This is what I'm not familiar with.  This was done by by US?  I'm trying to get the US connection to Russia here.

so, you are saying if nazis rise up in the US, you can draw a connection to hitler, but if communists rise in the US, you dont draw a conection to lenin and stalin?  got it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lemme tell ya buddy, Russia damn sure draws a connection betweeen the US democrats and the murderous soviet regime in the USSR.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JustinCharge said:

so, you are saying if nazis rise up in the US, you can draw a connection to hitler, but if communists rise in the US, you dont draw a conection to lenin and stalin?  got it.

Not sure how you got that out of what I said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

lemme tell ya buddy, Russia damn sure draws a connection betweeen the US democrats and the murderous soviet regime in the USSR.

I don't know about that, pal.

Bub, you got a lot of nerve making these connections. 

You're going off the rails a little early today, chum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JustinCharge said:

thats why Russian state TV shows pictures of London getting bombed or nukes flying into Florida, and they are giddy and laugh and applaud.  retribution for their mothers, sisters, brothers.  burn in hell.

I'd be delighted to see nukes flying into Florida.

:banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

but the moment they invaded Ukraine, i knew it meant nuclear war because there was no scenario where they win a conventional war.  im sure russia knew it as well. 

You seemed to predict Russia would roll over Ukraine and be invading all of Europe by now.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I don't think the threat is as imminent as you claim it to be.  I don't think your reasoning for it is good enough to nuke the US.  I struggle to understand why you are so confident in everything you've been posting on here every day.  Maybe I've just been asking you the wrong questions.  What makes you so confident that you are willing to guarantee that Putin is going to nuke the US in the next couple months?

Wait, you weren't convinced that the US is attempting to build a skyscraper but Russia owns a shack where the US wants to build, and, therefore, Russia has all the power and the US will need to surrender to Russia or get nuked.  Shìt, I immediately purchased Rosetta Stone to learn Russian after that compelling argument.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, nobody said:

Wait, you weren't convinced that the US is attempting to build a skyscraper but Russia owns a shack where the US wants to build, and, therefore, Russia has all the power and the US will need to surrender to Russia or get nuked.  Shìt, I immediately purchased Rosetta Stone to learn Russian after that compelling argument.

Yeah I just wanna know when we become Russians.  Maybe Russia is doing this because they want to improve their Olympic medal count 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

basically whats been happening in this thread is the forum lefties completely understand that there is no way Russia wins a conventional war, but for some reason they are incapable of seeing that it obviously leads to Russia nuking.   there's just a mental block there.  you ask them "why would Russia enter a war they will obviously lose if they arent nuking?" and it gets blank stare.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Putin thought he would roll over Ukraine because his corrupt military and intelligence leaders fed him bad information.  Russia is currently digging in for a protracted defense of Donbass.  They'll be fighting over that land for years.  Eventually Ukraine either cedes it as part of negotiating peace or Russia loses control of it and still claims it was a victory since they cleared out Nazis or whatever other BS reason they want to claim victory on.  How is that not self-evident?  Maybe you've read too many Putin propaganda speeches.

I like how you went from - it's clear Russia will take control of Ukraine and will invade Europe by winter - to -it was obvious Russia knew they could never win a conventional war.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tulsi Gabbard says elect republcans to stop warmongering democrats from pushing the world into nuclear war.  right on.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/nuclear-war-utah/2022/10/29/id/1094035/

Former Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii implored Utah voters to reelect Republican Sen. Mike Lee to prevent "warmonger" Democrats' escalations towards nuclear war.

Speaking at a packed gymnasium in Draper, Utah, Thursday, Gabbard, according to Deseret News, called Democrats "warmongers" who are "subservient to the military industrial complex" and are escalating the United States closer to nuclear war with Russia.

Gabbard encouraged voters to send politicians like Lee to the Senate to "push the brakes on this and stop them [Democrats] from destroying life as we know it."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.newsweek.com/will-putin-drop-nuclear-bomb-ukraine-heres-what-americans-think-1755599

a poll of Americans on Russia nuking Ukraine

When asked: "Do you think it is a realistic possibility that Russian President Vladimir Putin may use a nuclear bomb in Ukraine?" 14 percent of eligible U.S. voters said "very realistic," with 44 percent saying it was "realistic."

Another 19 percent said nuclear use is "neither realistic nor unrealistic," whilst just 12 percent of Americans described it as either "unrealistic" or "very unrealistic."

Between October 23 and 24, 1,500 "eligible voters in the United States" were surveyed, with the poll conducted by Redfield & Wilton Strategies for Newsweek.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/27/2022 at 8:57 AM, Pimpadeaux said:

Maybe we should go ahead and put submit on layaway for the nuclear-holocaust holiday season. 

Dashing through NATO

With a one-horse open nuke

O'er suborbital we go

Laughing 'til we puke

Mushroom clouds they form

Taking out the porn

Oh what fun it is to laugh and sing

An atom bomb song tonight

Oh!

Putin bells

Justin smells

HT laid an egg

craftsman makes the lamest posts

And Voltaire got away

Hey!

:mad: No Christmas songs before Thanksgiving :mad:

But I like the happy ending :wub:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russian official says Ukraine's liberation of former Ukrainian lands justifies nuclear war.  he also expresses that the West are cowards and will kneel.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/medvedev-threatens-ukraine-nuclear-weapons-135500843.html

 

Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, has announced that Ukraine's liberation of its territories is a "direct reason" for Russia to use nuclear weapons.

Source: Medvedev on his Telegram channel

Quote from Medvedev: "The well-known thesis of Western countries is ‘Russia cannot be allowed to win the war.’ But what does this really mean?

Follow simple formal logic. If Russia does not win, then obviously Ukraine will.

Ukraine’s goal in the war has been stated by the Kyiv regime: to take back all the territories that previously belonged to it.

That is, to tear them away from Russia. This is a threat to the existence of our state and [it would mean] the disintegration of present-day Russia.

And that means it is a direct reason for the application of Clause 19 of the Basic Principles of the State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence."

Details: At the same time, the Russian politician declares quite seriously that by acting like this, Ukraine is "planning a nuclear conflict": "What is this if not a direct provocation of a world war involving nuclear weapons?"

According to Medvedev, Western countries are pushing the world towards a global war.

He also stated that "only Russia’s complete and final victory is a guarantee against a global conflict."

Background:

On 10 October, Medvedev was put on the wanted list by the Security Service of Ukraine (SSU).

Medvedev believes that Russia could launch a nuclear attack on Ukraine with impunity because NATO countries will be too worried about their own security to take direct action in response.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×