Media Event!! Jan 6th Propaganda!! Tonight!! Official Thread!!

[craftsman 1,045]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

Weird, I thought this dude was a centrist...

Fantasy Football Centrist. 

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

2 minutes ago, Reality said:

Weird, I thought this dude was a centrist...

I am.

But I can see what people are. Case in point- you are someone who doesn't know what the word "Headline" means. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

Look at these deluded, lunatic MAGAtard focks doing Clownzo's bidding while he saw on his fat, orange ass in the White House and rooted for it.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2022/10/16/alex-holder-jan-6-capitol-insurrection-acostanr-vpx.cnn

[craftsman 1,045]

34 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

I am.

 

#metoo 

[craftsman 1,045]

13 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Look at these deluded, lunatic MAGAtard focks doing Clownzo's bidding while he saw on his fat, orange ass in the White House and rooted for it.

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2022/10/16/alex-holder-jan-6-capitol-insurrection-acostanr-vpx.cnn

I hate that Trump is sending billions to fund a war in Ukraine. 

Oh wait....nevermind, that would be Biden.  Put your skirt back on Rusty and cheer away!!!

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

4 minutes ago, craftsman said:

I hate that Trump is sending billions to fund a war in Ukraine. 

Oh wait....nevermind, that would be Biden.  Put your skirt back on Rusty and cheer away!!!

That money was better spent than the billions of wasted taxpayer dollars that Clownzo caused regarding frivolous election challenges and U.S. agriculture subsidies, among other things.

GO ELECTION MUH FRAUD! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[craftsman 1,045]

8 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

That money was better spent than the billions of wasted taxpayer dollars that Clownzo caused regarding frivolous election challenges and U.S. agriculture subsidies, among other things.

GO ELECTION MUH FRAUD! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

January 6th!!!!! We need to spend 7 years paying a whole congress and additional to a non-partisan committee looking into it and then setting up a production for months of prime time TV!!!!!

The democrats in congress haven't worked a second on anything but "Get Trump" since before Trump even took office.

Glad you love paying for that with your taxes. Bozo. 

[Masshole 642]

Yup:

 

[Reality 3,121]

I'm sorry you all fell for this literal dog and pony show.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,484]

Disgraced former FBI agent Peter Strzok states that Jan 6 was much worse than 9/11. 

[Voltaire 5,317]

Are they finally done, or are they going to continue this nonsense during the Dems lame duck session? I mean they're talking about subpoenaing President Trump after all. Give it a focking rest. 

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

37 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Disgraced former FBI agent Peter Strzok states that Jan 6 was much worse than 9/11. 

The man is a complete moron if he actually believes that.  That's right up there with believing Sandy Hook was a hoax.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,484]

Just now, Hawkeye21 said:

The man is a complete moron if he actually believes that.  That's right up there with believing Sandy Hook was a hoax.

There’s no if about it. His words. Trump!

[craftsman 1,045]

12 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

The man is a complete moron if he actually believes that.  That's right up there with believing Sandy Hook was a hoax.

Many people in the MDM has echoed that numerous times. Jan. 6 was the worst thing to happen in the US since the civil war it's been said. Worse the 9/11, Katrina, sending our soldiers to fight in meaningless wars, widespread riots of 2020, mass murder school shootings, murder rates in cities across the country, drunken drivers crashing into innocent drivers all the time, fentanyl now running through our country sourced by China and came through our open border.

All not as bad as the dreaded Comicon on January 6, 2021.  

 

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

There’s no if about it. His words. Trump!

Just because someone says something doesn't always mean they actually believe it.  Especially anyone in a political position.  Regardless, he's a moron.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,484]

7 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Just because someone says something doesn't always mean they actually believe it.  Especially anyone in a political position.  Regardless, he's a moron.

Oh. Ok. He didn’t mean it.  What a kidder 

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Oh. Ok. He didn’t mean it.  What a kidder 

I didn't say that either.  I don't know whether he means it or not.  It doesn't really matter though since he said it and it was stupid.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,484]

1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I didn't say that either.  I don't know whether he means it or not.  It doesn't really matter though since he said it and it was stupid.

You didn’t say much at all.  As usual. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

Ruh roh!

 

[craftsman 1,045]

8 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Ruh roh!

 

What, are we in year 8 of "We got him now!!"?

Focking boring. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

Just now, craftsman said:

What, are we in year 8 of "We got him now!!"?

Focking boring. 

The Jan. 6 was less than two years ago, and the committee's work is ongoing. Active investigations on multiple fronts are under way.

Whenever all that concludes, I'm fine with accepting whatever happens and will move on while MAGAtards will continue to deflect and deny anything that doesn't match their beliefs.

[craftsman 1,045]

1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

The Jan. 6 was less than two years ago, and the committee's work is ongoing. Active investigations on multiple fronts are under way.

Whenever all that concludes, I'm fine with accepting whatever happens and will move on while MAGAtards will continue to deflect and deny anything that doesn't match their beliefs.

So you have no posts on this site about Russia Russia Russia get Trump collusion?  

I'm not interested enough to go looking for them but I bet you've been in "get Trump" mode since before he was elected back in 2015. 

 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

4 minutes ago, craftsman said:

So you have no posts on this site about Russia Russia Russia get Trump collusion?  

I'm not interested enough to go looking for them but I bet you've been in "get Trump" mode since before he was elected back in 2015. 

 

No, I don't. I've made wisecracks about Russian prostitutes allegedly whizzing on him. 

It's a fact that a group of Russians tried to interfere in the 2016 elections, that Putin and Trump had some close ties and that Russia is pro-Trump.

But I've never thought the 2016 election was stolen and that whatever the Russians did significantly affected the election's outcome. Trump won the thing fair and square, and I laughed at Democrats that night as the victory celebration they were certain they were going to have went down the crapper as one state after another unexpectedly went for Trump. 

[craftsman 1,045]

Just now, Pimpadeaux said:

No, I don't. I've made wisecracks about Russian prostitutes allegedly whizzing on him. 

It's a fact that a group of Russians tried to interfere in the 2016 elections, that Putin and Trump had some close ties and that Russia is pro-Trump.

But I've never thought the 2016 election was stolen and that whatever the Russians did significantly affected the election's outcome. Trump won the thing fair and square, and I laughed at Democrats that night as the victory celebration they were certain they were going to have went down the crapper as one state after another unexpectedly went for Trump. 

Yeah....there you are. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

1 minute ago, craftsman said:

Yeah....there you are. 

Are you saying the Russians didn't try to interfere?

[Mike Honcho 5,287]

4 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

No, I don't. I've made wisecracks about Russian prostitutes allegedly whizzing on him. 

It's a fact that a group of Russians tried to interfere in the 2016 elections, that Putin and Trump had some close ties and that Russia is pro-Trump.

But I've never thought the 2016 election was stolen and that whatever the Russians did significantly affected the election's outcome. Trump won the thing fair and square, and I laughed at Democrats that night as the victory celebration they were certain they were going to have went down the crapper as one state after another unexpectedly went for Trump. 

Facebook has a market cap today of 350B+, I'm pretty sure some of it has to do with the effectiveness of their advertising---just saying that targeted ads might be more effective than you think.  Specially when you consider if you flip or eliminate 80K votes from 3 states the election goes the other way.  

[OldMaid 2,130]

2 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Facebook has a market cap today of 350B+, I'm pretty sure some of it has to do with the effectiveness of their advertising---just saying that targeted ads might be more effective than you think.  Specially when you consider if you flip or eliminate 80K votes from 3 states the election goes the other way.  

Look what the Lincoln Project managed to do in 2020. The problem is that it is not a measurable data point (that I know of) so there’s no point in going down that road.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,484]

1 hour ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Are you saying the Russians didn't try to interfere?

Are you saying they only interfered in 2016? If you are you should stop. Been going on forever. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Are you saying they only interfered in 2016? If you are you should stop. Been going on forever. 

Of course it has. I'm sure we interfere with other countries' elections and politics as well.

That's the game, baby.

I'd be more surprised if Russia didn't try to mess with our elections.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,484]

2 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Of course it has. I'm sure we interfere with other countries' elections and politics as well.

That's the game, baby.

I'd be more surprised if Russia didn't try to mess with our elections.

So why was 2016 so important? 

[jerryskids 6,824]

4 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Facebook has a market cap today of 350B+, I'm pretty sure some of it has to do with the effectiveness of their advertising---just saying that targeted ads might be more effective than you think.  Specially when you consider if you flip or eliminate 80K votes from 3 states the election goes the other way.  

So, big tech can influence elections.  Hmm... good thing they are unbiased and don't promote Leftist interests.   

[dogcows 1,030]

41 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

So, big tech can influence elections.  Hmm... good thing they are unbiased and don't promote Leftist interests.   

And some liberals think the big social media sites create dangerous right-wing echo chambers.

The common denominator is that neither side trusts social media.

I think it creates echo chambers on both sides because the algorithms are built to increase engagement.

[jerryskids 6,824]

6 minutes ago, dogcows said:

And some liberals think the big social media sites create dangerous right-wing echo chambers.

The common denominator is that neither side trusts social media.

I think it creates echo chambers on both sides because the algorithms are built to increase engagement.

Wait, you think big social media sites are completely unbiased?  I thought everyone knew it was a given that they promote Left issue and censor Right posters.  I'm honestly not quite sure how to respond to that.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,484]

36 minutes ago, dogcows said:

And some liberals think the big social media sites create dangerous right-wing echo chambers.

The common denominator is that neither side trusts social media.

I think it creates echo chambers on both sides because the algorithms are built to increase engagement.

Yeah. Zuckerberg put 350 million into the election to help democrats. No bias in big tech. Stfu. 

[Reality 3,121]

51 minutes ago, dogcows said:

And some liberals think the big social media sites create dangerous right-wing echo chambers.

The common denominator is that neither side trusts social media.

I think it creates echo chambers on both sides because the algorithms are built to increase engagement.

[dogcows 1,030]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Wait, you think big social media sites are completely unbiased?  I thought everyone knew it was a given that they promote Left issue and censor Right posters.  I'm honestly not quite sure how to respond to that.  

It’s a “given” that social media is biased against the right? Sorry, I don’t accept stuff as given unless there’s some pretty solid evidence. Research shows that the bias is from the users, not the platform itself.

https://research.impact.iu.edu/key-areas/social-sciences/stories/social-media-platform-bias.html

If one looks at Facebook, its most popular posts are dominated by right-wing content (the quote below is from 2020). That doesn’t square with the idea that they’re being censored.

Quote

Data from CrowdTangle, a public insights tool owned by Facebook, puts together the most popular posts for each day on Facebook. On any given day the top 10 most popular political posts are dominated by right-leaning commentators like Dan Bongino and Ben Shapiro, along with posts by Fox News and President Trump.

Here’s the rest of that discussion from the BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54698186

I’d love to see more evidence that social media is biased towards anything other than making the maximum amount of money. Not talking about a couple of anecdotes, but some actual data.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,484]

Big tech suppresses info on behalf of the democrats, funds  the democrats and Zuckerberg kicks in hundreds of millions directly out of his own pocket into the election on behalf of the democrats  but no bias. Sigh. 

[Reality 3,121]

4 minutes ago, dogcows said:

It’s a “given” that social media is biased against the right? Sorry, I don’t accept stuff as given unless there’s some pretty solid evidence. Research shows that the bias is from the users, not the platform itself.

https://research.impact.iu.edu/key-areas/social-sciences/stories/social-media-platform-bias.html

If one looks at Facebook, its most popular posts are dominated by right-wing content (the quote below is from 2020). That doesn’t square with the idea that they’re being censored.

Here’s the rest of that discussion from the BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54698186

I’d love to see more evidence that social media is biased towards anything other than making the maximum amount of money. Not talking about a couple of anecdotes, but some actual data.

No, seriously...

[TimHauck 2,905]

8 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Wait, you think big social media sites are completely unbiased?  I thought everyone knew it was a given that they promote Left issue and censor Right posters.  I'm honestly not quite sure how to respond to that.  

They do censor right posters far more than the left, but I think it’s mostly the ones with big followings.

It’s depressing to me to see the amount of extreme right wing crazies on twitter though (sure I guess some could be bots, most only have 100 followers or so), blaming pretty much every death on the vax, etc

[Hardcore troubadour 15,484]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

They do censor right posters far more than the left, but I think it’s mostly the ones with big followings.

It’s depressing to me to see the amount of extreme right wing crazies on twitter though (sure I guess some could be bots, most only have 100 followers or so), blaming pretty much every death on the vax, etc

It’s depressing? Really? You care that much?  Lol.  Buck up little camper. It gets better.