Jump to content
edjr

10 year old rape victim that couldn't get an abortion in Ohio. FAKE STORY? Maybe?

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, wiffleball said:

You know, I bet that 10 year old had sex just knowing scotus was adjudicating roe v wade. F****** sneaky little b****.

Maybe she was wearing a short tutu and was asking for it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, edjr said:

No one is wondering how within 24 hours of people questioning this story, some illegal was magically arrested for it?  I'm not saying this story is 100% fake, but.

c'mon man!

Are you at all concerned that they might arrest you retroactively for having an abortion? I mean kind of end of the day, you killed the f*****. Or at  a minimum, put out a hit on him. 

 

Or possibly, they would just beat your mother for not having one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, edjr said:

Maybe she was wearing a short tutu and was asking for it. 

well God dammit. Now I have an erection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, edjr said:

No one is wondering how within 24 hours of people questioning this story, some illegal was magically arrested for it?  I'm not saying this story is 100% fake, but.

c'mon man!

I know, it’s tough for the GC to decide which angle they like better. 
 

1) If an illegal immigrant did it, we need to fix the border!

or

2) government conspiracy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, edjr said:

No one is wondering how within 24 hours of people questioning this story, some illegal was magically arrested for it?  I'm not saying this story is 100% fake, but.

c'mon man!

I'm 75/25, that's the move if you want to claim some sort of victory later on little girls getting raped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

USA Today

Gershon Fuentes, 27, whose last known address was an apartment in Columbus, was arrested Tuesday after police said he confessed to raping the child on at least two occasions. He's charged with rape – a felony of the first degree in Ohio – and is held in the Franklin County jail on a $2 million bond.

The child's mother reported the girl's pregnancy to Franklin County Children Services on June 22, which informed Columbus police, Detective Jeffrey Huhn said Wednesday at Fuentes' arraignment. The girl underwent a medical abortion in Indianapolis on June 30, Huhn said.

"I raped the girl?"  "I raped the girl?" 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, it’s tough for the libs to decide which angle they like better. 
 

1) 10 year old gets raped and needs an abortion (forget they support what led to the rape)

or

2) the abortion was not reported to the authorities in order to protect the rapist (who they support being in the country)

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

I know, it’s tough for the libs to decide which angle they like better. 
 

1) 10 year old gets raped and needs an abortion (forget they support what led to the rape)

or

2) the abortion was not reported to the authorities in order to protect the rapist (who they support being in the country)

I thought it was reported to authorities though?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Reality said:

I'm 75/25, that's the move if you want to claim some sort of victory later on little girls getting raped.

So you think it could be a conspiracy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I observe this story to be true, then all this back and forth among the government officials is likely just bad internal systems and processes that initially had the officials thinking it was more media lies....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

I know, it’s tough for the libs to decide which angle they like better. 
 

1) 10 year old gets raped and needs an abortion (forget they support what led to the rape.

I'm sorry. Who supports what now?

 

And to make it really clear, are you saying that a 10-year-old should go through childbirth? Yes or no. Nothing else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I guess what I’m trying to say is that under the post R/W Ohio law that there would be an exemption, based on the health of the mother? 

Correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

I'm sorry. Who supports what now?

 

And to make it really clear, are you saying that a 10-year-old should go through childbirth? Yes or no. Nothing else.

Hi. How you doing? Just letting you know I'm still here. G'head. Answer the kweshion. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Correct.

But that would be subjective to a doctor making that determination. The pro abortion side says it shouldn’t be, IMO. They appear to be making a good point. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

No

Aren't you curious as to HOW that particular doctor knew but no other doctor did?  No other entity knew, until AFTER the abortion?  That doesn't trigger any alarms?  Here's what I think happened.  Little girl was raped by someone the family knew (wouldn't be surprised if mom and family are illegals as well, that aside), and then took the girl to the doctor... didn't file a report.  The doctor (a liberal activist type), did a rape kit and what not and found out she was pregnant.  Decided to wait until after the 6-week window and then told the mother to alert authorities.  Prior to that, she told another doctor who let the cat out of the bag... probably on purpose, but no else knew.  The article gets written with certain people knowing about it specifically to get to the White House, and boom, it turns into a national story after JOE BIDEN of all freaking people, says it.

In today's world of social media and news cycles and what not, there is virtually a 0.0% chance that Joe Biden brings any story to the national forefront.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

But that would be subjective to a doctor making that determination. The pro abortion side says it shouldn’t be, IMO. They appear to be making a good point. 

I would think that both the doctor and patient would both be involved in determining what is or isn't a threat to the mother.  But maybe that's just me.  There's also a second exemption as well, if I read that article right, I just don't remember what it was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Aren't you curious as to HOW that particular doctor knew but no other doctor did?  No other entity knew, until AFTER the abortion?  That doesn't trigger any alarms?  Here's what I think happened.  Little girl was raped by someone the family knew (wouldn't be surprised if mom and family are illegals as well, that aside), and then took the girl to the doctor... didn't file a report.  The doctor (a liberal activist type), did a rape kit and what not and found out she was pregnant.  Decided to wait until after the 6-week window and then told the mother to alert authorities.  Prior to that, she told another doctor who let the cat out of the bag... probably on purpose, but no else knew.  The article gets written with certain people knowing about it specifically to get to the White House, and boom, it turns into a national story after JOE BIDEN of all freaking people, says it.

In today's world of social media and news cycles and what not, there is virtually a 0.0% chance that Joe Biden brings any story to the national forefront.

The original report said that the quoted doctor received a call from a different, unnamed doctor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if she really wanted a baby?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Aren't you curious as to HOW that particular doctor knew but no other doctor did?  No other entity knew, until AFTER the abortion?  That doesn't trigger any alarms?  Here's what I think happened.  Little girl was raped by someone the family knew (wouldn't be surprised if mom and family are illegals as well, that aside), and then took the girl to the doctor... didn't file a report.  The doctor (a liberal activist type), did a rape kit and what not and found out she was pregnant.  Decided to wait until after the 6-week window and then told the mother to alert authorities.  Prior to that, she told another doctor who let the cat out of the bag... probably on purpose, but no else knew.  The article gets written with certain people knowing about it specifically to get to the White House, and boom, it turns into a national story after JOE BIDEN of all freaking people, says it.

In today's world of social media and news cycles and what not, there is virtually a 0.0% chance that Joe Biden brings any story to the national forefront.

God, you're f****** insane. You know that right? Just read what you wrote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

The original report said that the quoted doctor received a call from a different, unnamed doctor.

Yeah, not shocked.  I stand by my assessment.  The pregnancy was known well before 6 weeks and was noted after 6 weeks by an activist doctor, on purpose, to create more support for RvW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

God, you're f****** insane. You know that right? Just read what you wrote.

Did you say that about Russia Collusion?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, 5-Points said:

"I raped the girl?"  "I raped the girl?" 

 

 

He better get a hold of his cousin Vicente. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Did you say that about Russia Collusion?

Go ahead and quote me about anything I said about the Russian collusion. No seriously, go ahead. I mean I'll wait. I still have a little bit of a beer left. No. Seriously. Just go on do what you got to do. I'm kind of interested myself. Just waiting.

 

No. Seriously. Go ahead.

 

Still? Nothing? I bet you probably got distracted with a rerun of Matlock or something. Hey, I get that. That's fine. But come back to me when you get a minute okay?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's like I keep saying. Sneaky 10-year-olds. Same reason I can't go to family reunions anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, wiffleball said:

Go ahead and quote me about anything I said about the Russian collusion. No seriously, go ahead. I mean I'll wait. I still have a little bit of a beer left. No. Seriously. Just go on do what you got to do. I'm kind of interested myself. Just waiting.

 

No. Seriously. Go ahead.

 

Still? Nothing? I bet you probably got distracted with a rerun of Matlock or something. Hey, I get that. That's fine. But come back to me when you get a minute okay?

I asked you what you said, meaning, I don't know what you said.  My point is, you seem to think I've cooked up some conspiracy.  My guess is that you thought that when conservatives said that Trump didn't collude with Russia, you said it was a conspiracy.  Turns out, he didn't and it was all crap created by Hillary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this doctor or any doctor didn’t report the rape immediately then they need to be executed.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, wiffleball said:

It's like I keep saying. Sneaky 10-year-olds. Same reason I can't go to family reunions anymore.

You and Biden both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I asked you what you said, meaning, I don't know what you said.  My point is, you seem to think I've cooked up some conspiracy.  My guess is that you thought that when conservatives said that Trump didn't collude with Russia, you said it was a conspiracy.  Turns out, he didn't and it was all crap created by Hillary.

Wow. So after all that word salad I'm hearing that you guessed that I made up a conspiracy that I didn't? And therefore you can't quote it? Because you guessed it?  

Hey, did you guess that Thanos killed princess diana? Because there's not a threat about that either. But hey you go girl.

God damn man. I'm owning this f****** board today. And you people are just f****** stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, wiffleball said:

Wow. So after all that word salad I'm hearing that you guessed that I made up a conspiracy that I didn't? And therefore you can't quote it? Because you guessed it?  

Hey, did you guess that Thanos killed princess diana? Because there's not a threat about that either. But hey you go girl.

God damn man. I'm owning this f****** board today. And you people are just f****** stupid.

I've learned my lesson.  I can't argue against stupid.  :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I've learned my lesson.  I can't argue against stupid.  :doh:

I've seen yellow labs that argue against card tricks better than you can.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, TimHauck said:

The original report said that the quoted doctor received a call from a different, unnamed doctor.

Probably not a shock, but now it appears the quoted doctor was actually the doctor that performed the abortion: 

https://www.wrtv.com/news/state-news/doctor-who-provided-abortion-to-10-year-old-rape-victim-issues-first-public-statement

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

so they lied about the her having to goto another state to get an abortion? Ohio has exemptions for this situation

 

For now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

so they lied about the her having to goto another state to get an abortion? Ohio has exemptions for this situation

 

Actually doing some more reading it’s not immediately clear if the exemption (medical, as Ohio’s law has no exception for rape or incest) would have actually applied here, at least not without a potential legal battle.  It only applies in “emergencies,” and it could be argued that it wouldn’t be an “emergency” until later in the pregnancy

 

So it certainly makes sense to travel a couple hours where there’s no chance of a legal battle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Cloaca du jour said:

I can play the tweet game.

 

😲

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×