Jump to content
Patented Phil

Transgender Slaughters 3 Kids and 3 Adults at Christian Elementary School in Nashville

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

No. They have a field for "Sex" 

I would call that a designation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, squistion said:

I would call that a designation. 

Squidly thinks men can menstruate 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Squidly thinks men can menstruate 

No, Straw Man, I don't. I've never said that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, squistion said:

No, Straw Man, I don't. I've never said that. 

So trans men aren’t men ? Then what are they? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, squistion said:

I would call that a designation. 

Yes, however it was asked if "gender" was on a cert. No, it says sex. 

Because in our human biology we are binary. Only two sexes exist and that's determined by the sex organs that are present at birth. 

Gender is a social construct. If you have more than one sex present at birth (which happens but is rare) you're determined as "intersex" but I imagine parents have to choose what goes on the cert itself. 

This isn't that difficult, it's biological science; we are a binary mammal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

Yes, however it was asked if "gender" was on a cert. No, it says sex. 

Because in our human biology we are binary. Only two sexes exist and that's determined by the sex organs that are present at birth. 

Gender is a social construct. If you have more than one sex present at birth (which happens but is rare) you're determined as "intersex" but I imagine parents have to choose what goes on the cert itself. 

This isn't that difficult, it's biological science; we are a binary mammal. 

transphobic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the long awaited manifesto was released, and all we get is more tranny hate.  Real shocker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

So the long awaited manifesto was released, and all we get is more tranny hate.  Real shocker.

nobody has shown any hate towards trans, as a matter of fact you calling them trannies is more hateful than anything factually stated 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

transphobic

I really hope you're being sarcastic. I am not transphobic. I believe in science, but I also believe that transgendered individuals can call themselves what they'd like and live how they want. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheNewGirl said:

I really hope you're being sarcastic. I am not transphobic. I believe in science, but I also believe that transgendered individuals can call themselves what they'd like and live how they want. 

of course I am, just read the last page and you will know

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

So the long awaited manifesto was released, and all we get is more tranny hate.  Real shocker.

You really shouldn't call them trannies. It's extremely derogatory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

transphobic

No, just pedantic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TheNewGirl said:

You really shouldn't call them trannies. It's extremely derogatory

I agree that is now considered pejorative. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, squistion said:

No, just pedantic.

So stating the obvious is pedantic? 

It was asked if "gender" is on a cert. It is not. I have mine sitting here in front of me and it has a field for "sex." Sex is not gender. 

 Sex is biology. Gender takes into account behaviors and/or identities. This isn't pedantic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

So stating the obvious is pedantic? 

It was asked if "gender" is on a cert. It is not. I have mine sitting here in front of me and it has a field for "sex." Sex is not gender. 

 Sex is biology. Gender takes into account behaviors and/or identities. This isn't pedantic. 

It certainly is if the only purpose seems to be to deflect from the point CNN was actually making.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This Manifesto sucks.

We have some great manifestos out there. The unabomber and Karl Marx and the crazy chick that shot Andy Warhol know how to write first rate mainfestos. I don't know if this three page bullsh*t should count.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

So the long awaited manifesto was released, and all we get is more tranny hate.  Real shocker.

And the manifesto didn’t even talk about anti-trans people…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RogerDodger said:

Tranny calling the little white kids faggots.  :lol:  Half the libbies here have the exact same talking points.  

After all, isn't a transexual mostly just a homosexual playing dress up anyways?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TheNewGirl said:

Yes, however it was asked if "gender" was on a cert. No, it says sex. 

Because in our human biology we are binary. Only two sexes exist and that's determined by the sex organs that are present at birth. 

Gender is a social construct. If you have more than one sex present at birth (which happens but is rare) you're determined as "intersex" but I imagine parents have to choose what goes on the cert itself. 

This isn't that difficult, it's biological science; we are a binary mammal. 

Squidly is a science denier, so you bringing up scientific facts with him is falling on deaf ears.

There are just Virtues to acquire (so everyone can see how "good" you are) and feelings to assuage.  There is nothing else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

So the long awaited manifesto was released, and all we get is more tranny hate.  Real shocker.

Except, of course, for the actual transexual that shot the place up and killed a bunch of people?  GTFO you disingenuous, straw-man POS.  :lol:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

After all, isn't a transexual mostly just a homosexual playing dress up anyways?

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

So the long awaited manifesto was released, and all we get is more tranny hate.  Real shocker.

We got the motive dumbass.  :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the most disappointing manifesto I have ever read. :sadbanana:

I am wholly unimpressed. To write a proper manifesto, you need pages and pages of utter insanity. This hakf-ass attempt is far too short and doesn't make my head explode.

F

We've had great manifestos, this isn't one. Our untalented trannny needs her membership in the evil psycho screed writing club rejected.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, squistion said:

I agree that is now considered pejorative. 

How about piece of shitt? Gutterboy throws that around every other post.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If any of you ever decide to become sociopathic mass murderers, or to shoot a celebrity, or to overturn the capitalist economic system, please learn how to write a proper manifesto.

Because when people wonder why that chick shot Andy Warhol.... that OMG :shocking: reaction is what you're going for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

 

cr*cker?  You can't say cracker?

Also brainwashed into being a mass murderer?  The system wants people to be mass murderers?  Elmo has lost it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Squidly thinks men can menstruate 

 

If he has children, I would genuinely feel sorry for them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

cr*cker?  You can't say cracker?

Also brainwashed into being a mass murderer?  The system wants people to be mass murderers?  Elmo has lost it

You can say cracker until you’re blue in the face. Doesn’t bother me or really any white people I know but we know the meaning.

 

yes social media and the MSM have pushed an anti white agenda 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

If he has children, I would genuinely feel sorry for them. 

Uncle Squissy has no kids

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

If any of you ever decide to become sociopathic mass murderers, or to shoot a celebrity, or to overturn the capitalist economic system, please learn how to write a proper manifesto.

Because when people wonder why that chick shot Andy Warhol.... that OMG :shocking: reaction is what you're going for.

 

That's wasn't the design by Team Blue, the DNC, the corporate establishment and the remnants of the Obama/Biden machine. 

There is a majority of Conservative Catholics, from the Federalist Society feeder system, on SCOTUS right now. The point of having so much propaganda against Christians and the false claims that the entire LGBT community was under constant threat of death/attack/full on cleansing was to incite fringe radical leftists, the hard edge extremists, to pick off Conservative SCOTUS. 

You can only reload SCOTUS through death or retirement. Since 2024 looks hazy to hold onto POTUS for Team Blue, they wanted and needed to wipe out Conservative Catholics TODAY. RIGHT NOW. Which is why so many attacks on Pro Life centers and Catholic Churches was simply ignored by Merrick Garland. 

All the people that Audrey Hale murdered, and all the suffering and damage created was simply collateral damage to the identity politics fueled radical activist left. ( I am not dragging traditional liberals into that. I have no quarrel with traditional liberals) 

There are many good people out there who happened to be "liberal"  They see problems differently. They see solutions differently. But many are just trying to get by and survive like everyone else. 

However I've never met a "leftist" worth a single damn anywhere. Never met one I respected. Never met one worthy of trust. Never met one who was a good parent. Never met one who wasn't defective in the head in some way. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

That's wasn't the design by Team Blue, the DNC, the corporate establishment and the remnants of the Obama/Biden machine. 

There is a majority of Conservative Catholics, from the Federalist Society feeder system, on SCOTUS right now. The point of having so much propaganda against Christians and the false claims that the entire LGBT community was under constant threat of death/attack/full on cleansing was to incite fringe radical leftists, the hard edge extremists, to pick off Conservative SCOTUS. 

You can only reload SCOTUS through death or retirement. Since 2024 looks hazy to hold onto POTUS for Team Blue, they wanted and needed to wipe out Conservative Catholics TODAY. RIGHT NOW. Which is why so many attacks on Pro Life centers and Catholic Churches was simply ignored by Merrick Garland. 

All the people that Audrey Hale murdered, and all the suffering and damage created was simply collateral damage to the identity politics fueled radical activist left. ( I am not dragging traditional liberals into that. I have no quarrel with traditional liberals) 

There are many good people out there who happened to be "liberal"  They see problems differently. They see solutions differently. But many are just trying to get by and survive like everyone else. 

However I've never met a "leftist" worth a single damn anywhere. Never met one I respected. Never met one worthy of trust. Never met one who was a good parent. Never met one who wasn't defective in the head in some way. 

BH keeping it real, as usual.  :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×