War in Israel

[IGotWorms 4,058]

Just now, Mark Davis said:

And that's fine.  I have no issue with that.  I wouldn't let my middle school daughter watch them.  But we shouldn't hide from the truth either.  When groups do these types of things we should witness them, as uncomfortable as it may be to know how strong our stance against them should be.  

Like I said, it’s an argument. This debate has gone on since media was created and will continue to go on

[GutterBoy 2,899]

5 minutes ago, Mark Davis said:

You spew some strong language for someone who can't stomach the reality of what's happening in the world.  Maybe you should consider these atrocities you don't want to witness when you defend politicians who give quarter to these type of groups.  I would hope you could have some self reflection here and see that.  My expectation is more childish language which is absolute nonsense.  

I can stomach it, it just doesn't need to be seen by everyone like some sick fetish you have.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

Just now, Mark Davis said:

And that's fine.  I have no issue with that.  I wouldn't let my middle school daughter watch them.  But we shouldn't hide from the truth either.  When groups do these types of things we should witness them, as uncomfortable as it may be to know how strong our stance against them should be.  

I agree so every young girl should witness an abortion video before making the choice.  See the baby fight for its life in the womb.  See its arms and legs ripped off, its skull crushed and sucked out with a hose. 

[Patented Phil 1,469]

2 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Yeah it takes a real man to watch a girl get raped and murdered .  Great take.

Wtf are you blabbing about Pedo?  Nothing in that video showed the girl being raped and murdered.

You are one strange dude.

[KSB2424 3,148]

11 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

It was never touched you stupid ass hole.

That’s wasn’t his question.  Jesus man. 

[wiffleball 4,790]

48 minutes ago, Patented Phil said:

I posted three tweets about a young lady who was raped, tortured, all her limbs snapped, then paraded through the streets half naked while people spit on her.   

Can size?

[Mark Davis 398]

Just now, GutterBoy said:

I can stomach it, it just doesn't need to be seen by everyone like some sick fetish you have.

You can't even have a civil discussion, so I doubt you can stomach much.  It's pretty clear there are going to be some heinous things in these videos, if that bothers you, please don't watch.  But to go on a profanity laced childish fit because people want to see the truth about what is happening to the victims is not a normal response. 

[BrahmaBulls 767]

53 minutes ago, Fnord said:

You guys never miss an opportunity to completely misinterpret something, do you?

I was making fun of the MAGAhack Dan Bongino, not murder or rape, c0cknocker.

Obtusity is a goddam art form with the MAGAmooks.

How liberal of you

[Reality 3,121]

Who do people respond to gutter...

He's gone, move on.

[KSB2424 3,148]

Just now, Reality said:

Who do people respond to gutter...

He's gone, move on.

I didn’t know it was this bad.  Damn. 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

I would not want to be in new york city or dc right now

[Strike 5,555]

7 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

https://thehill.com/policy/international/4244543-6b-in-frozen-iranian-funds-remain-unspent-in-wake-of-hamas-attack-blinken-says/

And? They aren't frozen either.  His answer is a non-answer.  They should immediately re-freeze those funds before they CAN be spent.   Sometimes your posts are pretty dumb and your posts in this thread are a really good example of that.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,450]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

Who do people respond to gutter...

He's gone, move on.

I tried to. I gave him what he wanted for a week but he kept talking shitt. I will try again. 

[RogerDodger 798]

7 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Yeah it takes a real man to watch a girl get raped and murdered .  Great take.

Neither of those made the final cut.   

Someone is complaining about a video that they didn't even watch.  

Give it a go before you start crying about it:

 

 

 

 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,450]

Just now, Strike said:

And? They aren't frozen either.  His answer is a non-answer.  They should immediately re-freeze those funds before they CAN be spent.   Sometimes your posts are pretty dumb and your posts in this thread are a really good example of that.

If they do that then they can kiss buying hostages again goodbye. 

[Patented Phil 1,469]

15 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Unaltered? I highly doubt that 

Don’t worry Sally, they blurred out her body.  https://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2023/10/09/israel-music-festival-shani-louk-mother-vpx.cnn

[GutterBoy 2,899]

6 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

That’s wasn’t his question.  Jesus man. 

He asked why didn't we halt the release when nothing has been released.  It's a dumb question.

[RLLD 4,232]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

And? They aren't frozen either.  His answer is a non-answer.  They should immediately re-freeze those funds before they CAN be spent.   Sometimes your posts are pretty dumb and your posts in this thread are a really good example of that.

Correct.  These funds can still be frozen, and should be.  But in general, these funds have nothing at all to do with this attack.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

Theres a really really good chance of a global jihad in the next 24 hours as israeli military enter gaza.    Hamas is NOT focking around. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,351]

Mia Khalifa celebrating the murders

 

[GutterBoy 2,899]

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

And? They aren't frozen either.  His answer is a non-answer.  They should immediately re-freeze those funds before they CAN be spent.   Sometimes your posts are pretty dumb and your posts in this thread are a really good example of that.

So we made a deal, and no you want to back out of the deal?  That's not how things work.

You can argue that it's a dumb deal, but we shouldn't go against our word, when none of the money has been spent and won't be spent on weapons.

[KSB2424 3,148]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

If they do that then they can kiss buying hostages again goodbye. 

As sad as it is to say, they are gone anyway. You cannot negotiate with Hamas, Hezbollah, ISIS or Iran. They are terrorists and trading hostages only fuels their fire to get more. 

[GutterBoy 2,899]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Correct.  These funds can still be frozen, and should be.  But in general, these funds have nothing at all to do with this attack.

Correct, it's just a political point made by db people, first twatadour tried and failed yesterday, now strike is trying again.

[GutterBoy 2,899]

3 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

Theres a really really good chance of a global jihad in the next 24 hours as israeli military enter gaza.    Hamas is NOT focking around. 

He just never stops.

[Reality 3,121]

Don't believe a word they say about the frozen money. They'll revise the story after the fact just like they did when Obama sent Iran a massive amount of money. Unfrozen money was absolutely spent to supply Hamas and other terrorist organizations.

(On Jan. 5, in the aftermath of the airstrikes, Iran said it no longer will comply with limits on uranium enrichment provided under the deal.)

It’s worth noting that it was not clear what became of the unfrozen funds. 

In January 2016, then-Secretary of State John Kerry said he expected that some of the money ultimately would end up with organizations involved in terrorism. 

These people lie through their teeth, they have no idea how Iran spends this money. Every cent we unfreeze frees up other money for terrorism. Only the absolute dumbest among us wouldn't understand that.

[GutterBoy 2,899]

6 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

Neither of those made the final cut.   

Someone is complaining about a video that they didn't even watch.  

Give it a go before you start crying about it:

 

 

 

 

 

I'm just going off what the op said, but no I didn't watch it because I'm not a demented fock.

[RLLD 4,232]

1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

Correct, it's just a political point made by db people, first twatadour tried and failed yesterday, now strike is trying again.

Agreed. Its a distraction we should avoid.  In fact, I submit that a big problem leading to this issue not being taken seriously was Israel being distracted, mainly by Bebe's actions with the courts....I know he was told.....

[Strike 5,555]

5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Correct.  These funds can still be frozen, and should be.  But in general, these funds have nothing at all to do with this attack.

The Iranians are behind this attack.   Limiting their ability to fund terrorist attacks is absolutely something we should do.

[Patented Phil 1,469]

4 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

Neither of those made the final cut.   

Someone is complaining about a video that they didn't even watch.  

Give it a go before you start crying about it:

Threads like this tell you a lot about posters.  I post three tweets tying together the story of the brutal terrorism going on.  Fnord jokes about it, then GutterPedo gets his panties in a bunch about stuff I never posted.  Some real weirdos in this place.

[RLLD 4,232]

Just now, Strike said:

The Iranians are behind this attack.   Limiting their ability to fund terrorist attacks is absolutely something we should do.

I do not disagree.  This attack is clearly Irainian in design and implementation. So not giving them that money makes perfect sense. But.....there could be another shoe to drop, we should not presume this is the main effort....I have heard a few things that suggest there is something else afoot.

[RogerDodger 798]

Just now, GutterBoy said:

I'm just going off what the op said, but no I didn't watch it because I'm not a demented fock.

Thank you for acknowledging that you don't know what the fok you're crying about, as usual.

This might be a good one for you.  Doesn't show the bodies, but, you get the idea:

 

 

 

 

[KSB2424 3,148]

7 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

So we made a deal, and no you want to back out of the deal?  That's not how things work.

You can argue that it's a dumb deal, but we shouldn't go against our word, when none of the money has been spent and won't be spent on weapons.

Dude, reread that last sentence.  You live in a fairy tale world.  Did the terrorists “pinky promise”?  Or would they spend that money on their own people under the guise of “good” meanwhile it frees up capital to fund terrorism.  

[KSB2424 3,148]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

The Iranians are behind this attack.   Limiting their ability to fund terrorist attacks is absolutely something we should do.

Amazing this had to be typed out.  

[HellToupee 1,783]

21 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

 

Charlottesville 

[Strike 5,555]

4 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

So we made a deal, and no you want to back out of the deal?  That's not how things work.

You can argue that it's a dumb deal, but we shouldn't go against our word, when none of the money has been spent and won't be spent on weapons.

1)  So you don't think we should limit their access to the money at all because "we made a deal."   Fock that.  I'm not longer going to call you pedoboy, pedopoosey.

2)  Saying the money won't be spent on weapons is idiotic.  Money is fungible.  They can simply spend other money on weapons, or financing terror, and use this money on what the other money was going to be spent on, and legitimately say they ddin't spend THIS money on terrorism.  What an idiotic stance. 

[Strike 5,555]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I do not disagree.  This attack is clearly Irainian in design and implementation. So not giving them that money makes perfect sense. But.....there could be another shoe to drop, we should not presume this is the main effort....I have heard a few things that suggest there is something else afoot.

So what?   How does re-freezing these funds change any of that?  Give me a good reason we SHOULDN'T re-freeze them? 

[Strike 5,555]

2 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

Amazing this had to be typed out.  

Well, as we've noted a lot on this bored Mike for the most part doesn't moderate it so we have retards like gutterpoosey who don't understand things.

[RogerDodger 798]

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

1)  So you don't think we should limit their access to the money at all because "we made a deal."   Fock that.  I'm not longer going to call you pedoboy, pedopoosey.

2)  Saying the money won't be spent on weapons is idiotic.  Money is fungible.  They can simply spend other money on weapons, or financing terror, and use this money on what the other money was going to be spent on, and legitimately say they ddin't spend THIS money on terrorism.  What an idiotic stance. 

3) They are lying terrorists.

Gutterboy has a minor in finance.  

[GutterBoy 2,899]

1 hour ago, Patented Phil said:

I posted three tweets about a young lady who was raped, tortured, all her limbs snapped, then paraded through the streets half naked while people spit on her.

So this was a lie?

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

21 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

I can stomach it, it just doesn't need to be seen by everyone like some sick fetish you have.