Nikki Haley with 100% of the vote in New Hampshire primary!

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

Just now, Reality said:

From the dipshlts who don't think minorities are capable of acquiring government issued ID's.

We'll take ya'lls input with a massive grain of salt.

 

Nobody has ever made that argument. 
 

 

[Reality 3,121]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

Nobody has ever made that argument. 
 

 

Ever? LoL.

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

New York Times has called it for Trump, says Trump “easily” defeats Haley. 
 

So now we know where we are. 

[weepaws 3,191]

56 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Serious question: you’re probably the most outspoken religious person in this forum. Many times you have stated that all events are the will of God. If you truly believe that all of our elections are rigged and corrupt, is that also what God desires? 

God knows what going to happen, God knows the outcome, nothing that will or has happen has ever been s surprise to God, God wants this world to be Holy as God is Holy.  But God didn’t make us robots , God gave us freewill.  So God knows what the outcome is going to be, but God doesn’t influence the out come.  He lets people do that.  Romans 1:28.  Reprobate mind   Which is why we don’t worry about the outcome of elections, we know in the end we will in up in Heaven. You can have that same comfort, peace, joy. 

I do believe that the outcome of elections have already been been chosen by those that are in control, and it’s not the president.  

 

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

Just now, Reality said:

Ever? LoL.

No. Not ever. 
 

The argument that is made is that because many poor minorities, particularly in rural areas, don’t already have such IDs, requiring them will discourage voting, Not that they can’t figure out how to get them but that it’s an added step that will serve to reduce their numbers. And since there are no significant examples of voter fraud in this country involving these folks, one can only deduce that the purpose of these ID laws is to discourage and reduce those numbers. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,348]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

No. Not ever. 
 

The argument that is made is that because many poor minorities, particularly in rural areas, don’t already have such IDs, requiring them will discourage voting, Not that they can’t figure out how to get them but that it’s an added step that will serve to reduce their numbers. And since there are no significant examples of voter fraud in this country involving these folks, one can only deduce that the purpose of these ID laws is to discourage and reduce those numbers. 

I’m waiting for someone anywhere to say they couldnt vote cause theys too stupid to get an id. 
 

yet they need one to cash their welfare checks. Besides you continue to say the republicans are the party of the ignorant so wouldn’t that help you?

[iam90sbaby 2,611]

18 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Not my job to educate you. Not that there’s any chance of that happening, anyway. 

Alrighty 

[lod001 1,344]

She couldn't win even with 1/2 her votes being democrats. 

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

She’s delusional. 

[The Psychic Observer 498]

19 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Assuming she loses tonight, even if it’s close, I don’t understand her rationale for continuing. If she can’t win in New Hampshire then where can she win? 

South Carolina, next primary.

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

Just now, The Psychic Observer said:

South Carolina, next primary.

Yeah? She’s going to get crushed there. It’s one of the Trumpiest states in the Union and Dems can’t vote for her. It won’t be nearly this close. 

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

Ugly dress too. Not that it matters. 
 

ETA- early 70s Carol Burnett dress. 

[5-Points 3,528]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

If there is an upset tonight- and while it’s unlikely anything’s possible I suppose- does anyone have any doubt that Trump will announce himself the winner no matter what? Has he ever been able to accept a defeat? 

Of course. You bozos like to point out all the times he's declared bankruptcy. What is that if not admitting defeat? He tried, he failed, he admitted it.  

[HellToupee 1,775]

Sununu’s are chumps

[Cdub100 3,907]

Trump keeping another brown woman down.

[jonmx 2,429]

39 minutes ago, The Psychic Observer said:

Why does party history matter?  One party today supports a Muslim ban, wants to round up Hispanics and deport them, wants to restrict women's reproductive and marital rights and a slew of other policies that disproportionately harm minorities.  And they are proud of it all.

You must get all your 'news' from Rachel Maddow.   Congrats on being a moron. 

[seafoam1 3,023]

41 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Not my job to educate you. 

You don't have the talent to educate anyone in life. Good for you admitting it. Drunktard.

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

15 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

Of course. You bozos like to point out all the times he's declared bankruptcy. What is that if not admitting defeat? He tried, he failed, he admitted it.  

No. Each time he declared bankruptcy he blamed the system and claimed his finances were stronger than ever. 

[seafoam1 3,023]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

No. Each time he declared bankruptcy he blamed the system and claimed his finances were stronger than ever. 

He's doing better than you. 

[shorepatrol 1,870]

1 hour ago, OldMaid said:

You might want to look up the Southern Strategy and the Dixiecrats.

You may want to get them panties off and shuffle off to the kitchen 

[seafoam1 3,023]

3 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

You may want to get them panties off and shuffle off to the kitchen 

It's how she made a living in the ghetto parts of the south. She's gotta be worth at least $2500 by now. 

[Gepetto 1,368]

WE LANDED ON THE MOON!

 

[Horseman 2,458]

41 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

New York Times has called it for Trump, says Trump “easily” defeats Haley. 
 

So now we know where we are. 

We? You're just figuring this out.

[MLCKAA 574]

35 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

No. Not ever. 
 

The argument that is made is that because many poor minorities, particularly in rural areas, don’t already have such IDs, requiring them will discourage voting, Not that they can’t figure out how to get them but that it’s an added step that will serve to reduce their numbers. And since there are no significant examples of voter fraud in this country involving these folks, one can only deduce that the purpose of these ID laws is to discourage and reduce those numbers. 

I consider ID a reasonable requirement for voting.  If rural minorities are capable of getting ID, then I think they’re capable of recognizing the need to obtain it in advance of whatever election is looming.

It’s the same requirements for all voters, so it’s inaccurate to describe it as an added step.  Technically, it’s not an added step at all.  It’s the requirement for all voters.

[Horseman 2,458]

29 minutes ago, The Psychic Observer said:

South Carolina, next primary.

 

28 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Yeah? She’s going to get crushed there. It’s one of the Trumpiest states in the Union and Dems can’t vote for her. It won’t be nearly this close. 

Losing to Trump in her home state might just be political suicide.  

 

[peenie 1,915]

I’m glad people are acting thoughtfully. There is hope for humanity. Remember when you used to be like them? 

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C1VOieUJBBb/?igsh=b3VwY2h1bWV1dDhy

[iam90sbaby 2,611]

W for Trump 

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

14 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

He's doing better than you. 

I doubt that. He’s certainly financially better off than me, but I suspect I’m a much happier person. I love my life and my family. I don’t have his insecurities. Trump strikes me as a very unhappy man, filled with anger and resentment, in addition he’s a really awful human being, uneducated, irrational, an abuser of women, a bigot, anti-intellectual. I wouldn’t want to be him for all the money in the world. 

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

11 minutes ago, MLCKAA said:

I consider ID a reasonable requirement for voting.  If rural minorities are capable of getting ID, then I think they’re capable of recognizing the need to obtain it in advance of whatever election is looming.

It’s the same requirements for all voters, so it’s inaccurate to describe it as an added step.  Technically, it’s not an added step at all.  It’s the requirement for all voters.

It’s unnecessary. If there was real, significant voter fraud I might be open to it. But without that it’s simply a restriction deliberately designed to reduce minority voting. 

[Mike Honcho 5,270]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

New York Times has called it for Trump, says Trump “easily” defeats Haley. 
 

So now we know where we are. 

Wait, more than 6 people voted? I guess I called it too early. 

[seafoam1 3,023]

15 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I doubt that. 

Of course you doubt it. You are stupid. 

[Gepetto 1,368]

Trump speaking now live right here https://www.wmur.com/article/new-hampshire-primary-election-results-2024/46439473#

[MLCKAA 574]

10 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

It’s unnecessary. If there was real, significant voter fraud I might be open to it. But without that it’s simply a restriction deliberately designed to reduce minority voting. 

But it isn’t deliberately designed to reduce minority voting.  All voters have the same requirement and you’ve already stated that minorities are capable of obtaining ID.

You may think ID is unnecessary, but I doubt you genuinely believe it is an unreasonable requirement.  It’s just an ID.

[shorepatrol 1,870]

18 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

but I suspect I’m a much happier person. I love my life and my family. I don’t have his insecurities. 

You live on a low rent fantasy football board slap fighting politics . You are non of the above 

[The Psychic Observer 498]

Where's Melania?

[seafoam1 3,023]

Just now, The Psychic Observer said:

Where's Melania?

 

[5-Points 3,528]

44 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

No. Each time he declared bankruptcy he blamed the system and claimed his finances were stronger than ever. 

You spelled "played the system" wrong. 

He didn't make the rules, he just exploited them. Like hiring illegals so you don't have to pay them minimum wage. 

 

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

Just claimed that he won New Hampshire in the general election in 2016 and 2020. He didn’t either time. 
 

Something seriously wrong with this guy. It’s one thing to lie but you get the feeling he’s lying to himself. 

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

14 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

You live on a low rent fantasy football board slap fighting politics . You are non of the above 

Dude this is playtime. I “live” a few hours a day at most. Trust me, you’re more obsessed with me than I am with this board. 

[The Real timschochet 6,763]

8 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

You spelled "played the system" wrong. 

He didn't make the rules, he just exploited them. Like hiring illegals so you don't have to pay them minimum wage. 

 

Oh I agree with you.