Jump to content
seafoam1

***Official Trump beat up the kamel again thread****

Recommended Posts

Just now, TimHauck said:

Well if you google Project 2025, you’ll see him claim that’s not his plan

WTF does this have to with whether KamalaToe is trying to associate Trump with that plan?  From the quote I posted above, she clearly is, which (as usual) shows you are incorrect asserting otherwise.  You're not having a good day dude.  Stay down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Strike said:

WTF does this have to with whether KamalaToe is trying to associate Trump with that plan?  From the quote I posted above, she clearly is, which (as usual) shows you are incorrect asserting otherwise.  You're not having a good day dude.  Stay down.

Here is what I said

7 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Also I interpreted her project 2025 comments as a prediction, not necessarily saying that was his stated plan.

She said it’s his plan, but she didn’t say he said it was his STATED plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimHauck said:

Here is what I said

She said it’s his plan, but she didn’t say he said it was his plan.

Wat????   🤣

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to know who got humiliated in the debate?   It’s the candidate that won’t agree to a 2nd debate: Trump.    That’s right, your alpha is running away from a woman.  Not a good look, MAGAts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, gas said:

Want to know who got humiliated in the debate?   

Well, you liberals did cry the whole time. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Well, you liberals did cry the whole time. :dunno:

Yeah, no, I was laughing at Trump the whole way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

ANOTHER TDS THREAD 😂 🌈 

Wrong again, MAGAt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, TimHauck said:

On “taking everyone’s guns,” the closest I’ve seen from Kamala is a 2019 statement saying she supported “mandatory buybacks.”   Seems she has changed her position since then.  But fyi posting clips of her saying she wants universal background checks, red flag laws, and an assault weapons ban is not proof she wants to take everyone’s guns.

Does it "seem" like she has changed her position on that?  Why is that?  Good thing the moderators pushed her on her changes from the last time she ran, and her entire history beforehand.  Errrrr...

8 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Also I interpreted her project 2025 comments as a prediction, not necessarily saying that was his stated plan.

There were some lies in there though, so thanks for the link.

Can’t remember, were the same people saying Trump’s “bloodbath” comment was a figure of speech any of the same ones complaining about Biden saying “put him in the bullseye”?

 His comment was in the context of an economic bloodbath, specifically for the auto industry. Good thing the objective moderators called her out on the lie.  Errrr...

59 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Well if you google Project 2025, you’ll see him claim that’s not his plan

Good thing that the objective moderators... forget it, hopefully you get the point.

Just take your ball and go home on this. 

Honestly, you are an interesting person -- you claim to be voting for Trump, but you seem completely oblivious to the obvious hack job that the MSM, and these moderators in particular, did to him.  :dunno:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just released by Mark Penn, former Clinton advisor:

Quote

“I will be releasing an affidavit from an ABC whistleblower regarding the debate. I have just signed a non-disclosure agreement with the attorney of the whistleblower. The affidavit states how the Harris campaign was given sample question which were essentially the same questions that were given during the debate and separate assurances of fact checking Donald Trump and that she would NOT be fact checked. Accordingly, the affidavit states several other factors that were built into the debate to give Kamala a significant advantage. I have seen and read the affidavit and after the attorney blacks out the name of the whistleblower and other information that could dox the whistleblower, I will release the full affidavit. I will be releasing the affidavit before the weekend is out.”

Not that it wasn't painfully obvious.  

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Just released by Mark Penn, former Clinton advisor:

Not that it wasn't painfully obvious.  

I’ll believe it when it’s released. RIP Mark Penn

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh snap!  Goldman Sachs says no we didn't say that.

 

 

 "It was conducted by an independent analyst.”

“The reason I say a bigger deal’s been made of it is what it showed is the difference between the sets of policies that they put forward was about two-tenths of 1%.”

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

I’ll believe it when it’s released. RIP Mark Penn

I hear he is suicidal.  May double tap himself in the back of his head.  :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Does it "seem" like she has changed her position on that?  Why is that?  Good thing the moderators pushed her on her changes from the last time she ran, and her entire history beforehand.  Errrrr...

 His comment was in the context of an economic bloodbath, specifically for the auto industry. Good thing the objective moderators called her out on the lie.  Errrr...

Good thing that the objective moderators... forget it, hopefully you get the point.

Just take your ball and go home on this. 

Honestly, you are an interesting person -- you claim to be voting for Trump, but you seem completely oblivious to the obvious hack job that the MSM, and these moderators in particular, did to him.  :dunno:

 

Because the last time she said she was in favor of mandatory buybacks was 2019, and she focuses on banning assault weapons and red flag laws whenever she comments on it that I’ve seen.

Yes I know you’ll say I’m quibbling over words but I still feel like she was not directly saying Trump said Project 2025 was his plan in the debate.  However, I looked at her website and it does seem more direct there which is not good - https://kamalaharris.com/issues/

But I acknowledged she had some lies in there, which would include the bloodbath comment.  Just want to make sure we’re all on the same page that Biden saying “put him in the bullseye” was taken out of context as well.

Yes, I’d agree the moderator was biased, but not to the extent that some are saying.  I do think Trump lied more.  But Harris’s lesser number of lies in my opinion were more driven by the fact that she mostly spoke in generalities and often didn’t get very specific.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, so this did not go the way liberals and the media think it did. 

Independents aren't happy, rightfully so...

Looks like there was some real shenanigans with ABC and the debate prep as well. Oh boy, this about to get ugly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Because the last time she said she was in favor of mandatory buybacks was 2019, and she focuses on banning assault weapons and red flag laws whenever she comments on it that I’ve seen.

Yes I know you’ll say I’m quibbling over words but I still feel like she was not directly saying Trump said Project 2025 was his plan in the debate.  However, I looked at her website and it does seem more direct there which is not good - https://kamalaharris.com/issues/

But I acknowledged she had some lies in there, which would include the bloodbath comment.  Just want to make sure we’re all on the same page that Biden saying “put him in the bullseye” was taken out of context as well.

Yes, I’d agree the moderator was biased, but not to the extent that some are saying.  I do think Trump lied more.  But Harris’s lesser number of lies in my opinion were more driven by the fact that she mostly spoke in generalities and often didn’t get very specific.

 

Mandatory buybacks:  she hasn't changed her position since, until now.  It's part of a pattern that her entire history is progressive positions like this, but now that she is running for POTUS, she is a chameleon, saying whatever she thinks she needs to say.  But she said very recently that her values haven't changed.  The intelligent conclusion is that she is lying now to get elected.

Project 2025:  she absolutely attributed it to Trump, please stop, this isn't helping your case of trying to seem objective.

Thanks for acknowledging the bloodbath lie.

It's hard to conclude from this post that the moderators weren't as biased as "some are saying."  They were very biased.  Zero fact checks on Harris.  Zero follow-up questions on her word salads that didn't answer their questions.  Instead, pushing Trump on things like his negotiation with the Taliban, instead of being an actual, I dunno, moderator, and giving him an open-ended opportunity to respond.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Goldman Sachs

Crime Rates 

Not listed in any media fact checks. 

NBC is the only outlet that has an article on Trumps announcement today of no taxes on overtime.  News reporting is dead in this country.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This must be really hard for you stupid MAGAts.   Your Alpha Cult God got eviscerated by a woman on national TV.   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, gas said:

This must be really hard for you stupid MAGAts.   Your Alpha Cult God got eviscerated by a woman on national TV.   

Black woman. :lol: 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, gas said:

This must be really hard for you stupid MAGAts.   Your Alpha Cult God got eviscerated by a woman on national TV.   

Says the guy with the rainbow flag wearing an I'm with her t-shirt.  🤣🤣🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Says the guy with the rainbow flag wearing an I'm with her t-shirt.  🤣🤣🤣

It's funny because the "her" is his boyfriend generalpimpledoosh. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, thegeneral said:

Trump’s number one ghoul had a meltdown after debate

That’s the problem with stacking lies on top of lies.  
 

‘MAGAts melting down everywhere.    Their Emperor has no clothes, and their tiny little minds don’t know what to do.    There’s a subreddit r/LeopardsAteMyFace that’s very delicious these days.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

We’re finally realizing how stupid we’ve been.

Hey, don’t be so hard on yourself.   Lots of people make stupid decisions.     Stupid people, sure, but people nevertheless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, gas said:

Hey, don’t be so hard, you are turning me on. 

I think your boyfriend is going to be upset with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Reality said:

As usual, Trump was right. 

 

Hopefully we get to the bottom of this during the next nationally televised debate. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Reality said:

 

these things bother me, putting this vid up and ending it the way they did..where are they?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/12/2024 at 5:42 PM, gas said:

Want to know who got humiliated in the debate?   It’s the candidate that won’t agree to a 2nd debate: Trump.    That’s right, your alpha is running away from a woman.  Not a good look, MAGAts.

DON'T CALL US MAGATS  B!TCH!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People are still getting suckered in by this story.

There are so many inaccuracies in that "affidavit" it isn't even fun to point them out. And people wouldn't listen anyway. Oh well- some people just like being lied to I suppose. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

People are still getting suckered in by this story.

There are so many inaccuracies in that "affidavit" it isn't even fun to point them out. And people wouldn't listen anyway. Oh well- some people just like being lied to I suppose. 

Jesus Christ your Lord and Savior, must people won't listen to the truth, most like you like being lied to.  You are in love with satan your Antichrist Father.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×