Hilary Clinton calls for clamp down on social media

[Frozenbeernuts 2,114]

You are hearing this more and more. Liberals can wave it away all they want. There is a reason why liberal thought leaders are increasing their message that social media is dangerous and speech needs to be clamped down on. If Trump was saying this, you would be losing your shlt. I would too. Anyone who wants to clamp down on speech is trying to remove our ability to speak out.

They already did this with covid. They literally banned people from Twitter for speaking out against the vaccine, and those people were proven right. They banned the guy who invented the mRNA vaccine. How is his opinion less valid just because he had concerns about its use? Don't make the mistake of being pro censorship just because it's your party. Eventually you will find yourself on the wrong end of crackdown on speech.

 

https://thehill.com/policy/4917812-clinton-social-media-safety-regulations/

[avoiding injuries 1,505]

Good luck, b!tch. It’s too late. The train is coming. CHOO CHOO!!!

[seafoam1 2,799]

All liberals have the need to be led around on leashes. As long as you let them out to loot, riot and murder from time to time

[Frozenbeernuts 2,114]

52 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

Good luck, b!tch. It’s too late. The train is coming. CHOO CHOO!!!

It really is.

[Tree of Knowledge 1,698]

They know Trump is coming after pedophiles and child traffickers. There aren’t enough pizza parlor basements to hide anymore and they know it.  
 

MAGA is for the children

[Frozenbeernuts 2,114]

17 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

They know Trump is coming after pedophiles and child traffickers. There aren’t enough pizza parlor basements to hide anymore and they know it.  
 

MAGA is for the children

I think this is most likely the case. If I was a democrat, I would want the pedos brought to justice. We already know the liberals aren't going to do anything about it. I wonder why.

[weepaws 3,152]

To hide the truth of whats really the worlds government agenda.  

[Mike Honcho 5,093]

1 hour ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

You are hearing this more and more. Liberals can wave it away all they want. There is a reason why liberal thought leaders are increasing their message that social media is dangerous and speech needs to be clamped down on. If Trump was saying this, you would be losing your shlt. I would too. Anyone who wants to clamp down on speech is trying to remove our ability to speak out.

They already did this with covid. They literally banned people from Twitter for speaking out against the vaccine, and those people were proven right. They banned the guy who invented the mRNA vaccine. How is his opinion less valid just because he had concerns about its use? Don't make the mistake of being pro censorship just because it's your party. Eventually you will find yourself on the wrong end of crackdown on speech.

 

https://thehill.com/policy/4917812-clinton-social-media-safety-regulations/

You guys need to give me a break, a couple of years ago conservatives(including Trump) were calling for a repeal of section 230. 

Quote

 

Trump Vows To Veto Defense Bill Unless Shield For Big Tech Is Scrapped

President Trump is threatening to veto a critical defense spending bill unless Congress agrees to repeal a liability shield for social media companies.

The president tweeted late Tuesday that Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act is "a serious threat to our National Security & Election Integrity."

 

 

[edjr 6,578]

Social Media is the worst thing to happen to mankind in a very very long time. It all should be banned. 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,698]

3 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

You guys need to give me a break, a couple of years ago conservatives(including Trump) were calling for a repeal of section 230. 

 

Musk taking over Twitter was a GameChanger 

[Mike Honcho 5,093]

 

[seafoam1 2,799]

1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

And now it's you liberals whining. Good on you for taking the credit. 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,698]

1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

And the left did not care until Twitter embraced free speech.  

[Thornton Melon 603]

1 hour ago, edjr said:

Social Media is the worst thing to happen to mankind in a very very long time. It all should be banned. 

What would you do all day? 

[edjr 6,578]

1 minute ago, Thornton Melon said:

What would you do all day? 

Not to worry. Tell your mom I will still be over for lunch

[Patented Phil 1,469]

1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

You guys need to give me a break, a couple of years ago conservatives(including Trump) were calling for a repeal of section 230. 

 

As usual, you swallowed it hook line and sinker.  What Trump objected to back then was Twitter selectively fact checking his tweets.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,114]

1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

You guys need to give me a break, a couple of years ago conservatives(including Trump) were calling for a repeal of section 230. 

 

Good reference. I agree it is dangerous to withdrawl protection for platforms on what their users publish. That should not happen. Why Trump pushed for it though was because the election had been tampered with, and the social media platforms who were favoring one side over the other were going to get away with that favoritism.

Freedom of speech is vital. So is election integrity. Was it the right way to go about making sure information related to election tampering was allowed to be equally presented from both sides? Probably not. At that point he was desperate to prove his case. It was the fastest way to get results as he saw it.

I already know you will call BS on election fraud. Everyone with a brain's favorite democrat until he endorsed Trump, Kennedy, agrees that the CIA helped to fake the results.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,114]

Section 230 ultimately was never revealed. Speech was censored on social media at the direction of the FBI and the government. That is a fact. Now you can point to section 230 saying it's their right. It is, but it doesn't change the fact that speech was censored that ultimately harmed Americans.

[The Real timschochet 6,404]

I’m not for censorship. But maybe social media could stop with the racism, the Nazism, the outright lies about Covid and all the other extreme white supremacy bullcrap? I’m against forcing them to stop but I wish they would. It’s not making the world a better place. 

[Alias Detective 1,389]

4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I’m not for censorship. But maybe social media could stop with the racism, the Nazism, the outright lies about Covid and all the other extreme white supremacy bullcrap? I’m against forcing them to stop but I wish they would. It’s not making the world a better place. 

A++ troll job. 

[Thornton Melon 603]

1 hour ago, edjr said:

Not to worry. Tell your mom I will still be over for lunch

Is that your way of saying I should visit her grave more often?

[The Real timschochet 6,404]

18 minutes ago, Alias Detective said:

A++ troll job. 

Not trolling I’m 100% serious

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

2 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

section 230 from my understanding, has nothing to do with limiting free speech, regardless of what Trump or anyone else says.

 

long before it become a political issue, I knew about it

 

what 230 has to do is whether social media companies are responsible for the information posted as a provider, much like AT@T is not responsible for comments on their service

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

29 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I’m not for censorship. But maybe social media could stop with the racism, the Nazism, the outright lies about Covid and all the other extreme white supremacy bullcrap? I’m against forcing them to stop but I wish they would. It’s not making the world a better place. 

 

I am all for allowing racism, nazism, say whatever you want about covid, white supremacy, black supremacy, speak up against the govt, organize rallies, you know all those 1st amendment freedoms

 

but I get it, liberals are all about covert racism instead

[Frozenbeernuts 2,114]

11 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

 

I am all for allowing racism, nazism, say whatever you want about covid, white supremacy, black supremacy, speak up against the govt, organize rallies, you know all those 1st amendment freedoms

 

but I get it, liberals are all about covert racism instead

Yes the only racism that is acceptable is their form of it.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

1 minute ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Yes the only racism that is acceptable is their form of it.

 

its funny cause the lack of free speech is what leads to jews being massacred, but Tim is ok with that as long as the Germans don't say anything before hand

 

[weepaws 3,152]

27 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

section 230 from my understanding, has nothing to do with limiting free speech, regardless of what Trump or anyone else says.

 

long before it become a political issue, I knew about it

 

what 230 has to do is whether social media companies are responsible for the information posted as a provider, much like AT@T is not responsible for comments on their service

Anytime you what to censer speech, that’s limiting free speech.  

[The Real timschochet 6,404]

28 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

 

I am all for allowing racism, nazism, say whatever you want about covid, white supremacy, black supremacy, speak up against the govt, organize rallies, you know all those 1st amendment freedoms

 

but I get it, liberals are all about covert racism instead

Im all for allowing it too. I just wish they wouldn’t do so much of it. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

2 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Anytime you what to censer speech, that’s limiting free speech.  

 

again 230 has nothing to that 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

Im all for allowing it too. I just wish they wouldn’t do so much of it. 

 

when you see racism in everything, its all you see, its how you continually view things, looking for victimhood

 

i am not saying this to attack or insult you, I just see that as how you are

[edjr 6,578]

20 minutes ago, weepaws said:

Anytime you what to censer speech, that’s limiting free speech.  

What if we know English and want to censor it?

[weepaws 3,152]

18 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

 

again 230 has nothing to that 

Doesn’t mean it won’t.  

[weepaws 3,152]

1 minute ago, edjr said:

What if we know English and want to censor it?

What if you go walk your dog.  And let the adults have a conversation.  

[TheNewGirl 1,342]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

I’m not for censorship. But maybe social media could stop with the racism, the Nazism, the outright lies about Covid and all the other extreme white supremacy bullcrap? I’m against forcing them to stop but I wish they would. It’s not making the world a better place. 

TIM: I am not for censorship. 

Also TIM: Lists out everything he thinks needs to be censored. 

 

[MDC 7,122]

1 hour ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

section 230 from my understanding, has nothing to do with limiting free speech, regardless of what Trump or anyone else says.

 

long before it become a political issue, I knew about it

 

what 230 has to do is whether social media companies are responsible for the information posted as a provider, much like AT@T is not responsible for comments on their service

You’re right, but repealing 230 would encourage websites / social media to start censoring platforms. It’s a terrible idea.

[Drizzay 698]

its amazing how she manages to stay relevant.

[Gepetto 1,288]

2 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

I’m not for censorship. But maybe social media could stop with the racism, the Nazism, the outright lies about Covid and all the other extreme white supremacy bullcrap? I’m against forcing them to stop but I wish they would. It’s not making the world a better place. 

This is made up by the Main Stream Media and you fall for it, or you know it's made up and just push it anyway. Also, Cowboys beat the Steelers in Pittsburgh, so haha!

[The Real timschochet 6,404]

6 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

Also, Cowboys beat the Steelers in Pittsburgh, so haha!

Really? Did that happen? I’ve already forgotten it. 

[Voltaire 5,182]

8 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

I’m not for censorship. But maybe social media could stop with the racism, the Nazism, the outright lies about Covid and all the other extreme white supremacy bullcrap? I’m against forcing them to stop but I wish they would. It’s not making the world a better place. 

That was the first stuff kicked off social media about eight onion rings ago. Thet were incrementally banning everybody more and more mainstream conservative until Elon Musk came along. Meanwhile Communists and terrorists were always free to spout anything they wanted. Unless you outright advocated for violence, it was/is impossible to be so extreme left to ever get banned.

[The Real timschochet 6,404]

49 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

That was the first stuff kicked off social media about eight onion rings ago. Thet were incrementally banning everybody more and more mainstream conservative until Elon Musk came along. Meanwhile Communists and terrorists were always free to spout anything they wanted. Unless you outright advocated for violence, it was/is impossible to be so extreme left to ever get banned.

I would prefer the major sites to self censor ALL extremism, from left or right. I just don’t want the government involved- UNLESS- there are rare instances in which the public safety could be threatened.