cmh6476 1,024 Posted December 12, 2024 interesting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 1,855 Posted December 12, 2024 I am a sucker for these types of movies. In. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,903 Posted December 13, 2024 I remember watching the first one in theaters and loved it. The second one was very good too. Can't wait for this one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MLCKAA 573 Posted December 13, 2024 17 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said: I am a sucker for these types of movies. In. I love post-apocalypse and global catastrophe movies. I’m in. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,269 Posted December 13, 2024 But it's only been 23 years? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,399 Posted December 13, 2024 18 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said: I am a sucker for these types of movies. In. Same here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 1,855 Posted December 13, 2024 I do think I prefer the slow walking hordes of zombies over the spastic infested zombie genre. Regardless, this will be good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,696 Posted June 18 Coming out this Friday... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,017 Posted June 18 That has to be the most annoying trailer I have ever wasted time on watching. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheNewGirl 1,489 Posted June 18 Looking forward to seeing this one. I love horror. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,696 Posted June 18 7 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said: Looking forward to seeing this one. I love horror. Me too... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
patweisers44 845 Posted June 18 "Coming Out June 20th" ??? I thought this would be about NewbieJr. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,257 Posted June 18 Nothing will ever top the greatest zombie movie of all time, Resident Evil. I don't do much horror any more, but I can make an exception for a good zombie movie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,696 Posted June 20 Sony’s 28 Years Later gobbled up $5.8M in previews Thursday night. That’s an excellent preview number for a horror movie, especially in these times, besting the Thursday nights of Final Destination Bloodlines ($5.5M), Sinners ($4.7M), pre-Covid’s A Quiet Place ($4.3M) and even post-Covid’s Scream VI ($5.7M). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,093 Posted June 22 I'm going to see this tonight. Getting excellent reviews. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 2,197 Posted June 22 Young Fathers - Lowly (2025) From 28 Years Later Original Motion Picture Soundtrack. All that is missing here are some hand claps. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,734 Posted June 22 On 12/13/2024 at 10:02 AM, Cdub100 said: I remember watching the first one in theaters and loved it. The second one was very good too. Can't wait for this one. The first one is one of the best zombie movies ever made. I did not see it in theaters but part of what makes it so great is the lower budget feel. Cillian Murphy was great. The second was a let down. I guess to be expected and overall it wasn’t terrible but it was severely lacking depth compared to the original. Idris Elba was in it for like 5 minutes. Jeremy Renner was okay too bad they didn’t do a 28 months later before 28 years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
easilyscan 924 Posted June 23 4 hours ago, WhiteWonder said: The first one is one of the best zombie movies ever made. I did not see it in theaters but part of what makes it so great is the lower budget feel. Cillian Murphy was great. Agree. Liked it so much I bought the DVD. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,610 Posted June 23 I'm so sick of zombie and superhero movies. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 1,367 Posted June 23 I don't watch this type of movie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 1,855 Posted June 23 Anyone see it this weekend and have a review? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,399 Posted June 23 1 minute ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Anyone see it this weekend and have a review? I was just going to ask the same thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,696 Posted June 23 2 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Anyone see it this weekend and have a review? 2 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said: I was just going to ask the same thing. Review from Bloody Disgusting writer... https://bloody-disgusting.com/reviews/3873444/28-years-later-review-danny-boyle-alex-garland-launch-new-trilogy-with-epic-journey/ Since escaping the lab in 28 Days Later, the rage virus decimated the British mainland and forced survivors to fend for themselves for nearly three decades in 28 Years Later. That presents fertile ground to mine scares and social commentary, and director Danny Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland haven’t lost a step since collaborating on their highly influential early aughts horror movie. The pair build on 28 Days Later with groundbreaking new techniques, rich worldbuilding, and dense themes – this trilogy starter has a lot on its mind – anchored by a tremendous cast to guide viewers on an epic, emotional coming-of-age journey. 28 Years Later introduces a quarantined UK largely forgotten by the outside world, with its survivors having forged new communities and simplified ways of life post-outbreak. That includes Holy Island, a small island community protected by a causeway to the mainland that only emerges during low tide. We’re introduced to this village right as young Spike (newcomer Alfie Williams) is preparing to embark on a rite of passage with gregarious dad Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), heading to the mainland proper to kill his first infected. Venturing away from his sheltered existence would be enough to induce anxiety, but Spike and Jamie are also contending with the mysterious illness of family matriarch Isla (Jodie Comer). Both will irrevocably alter Spike’s trajectory as he leaves the safety of Holy Island’s gates for the first time. Spike’s fresh eyes make for the perfect audience proxy for reacclimating to the virus-ravaged setting as his doting dad shows him the ropes. Williams’ doe-eyed curiosity, relatable skittishness, and inherent kindness earn instant rooting interest as a child being forced to grow up too early, all while Dad provides a crash course navigating some of this world’s harsher edges. That includes the infected, who have evolved in surprising ways. Boyle kicks this planned trilogy off with a sensory assault. Rapid cuts, a punishing soundscape, and immersive camerawork that employs a variety of techniques, including strapping cameras and iPhones to actors, ensure that even those desensitized to the fast-moving infected will find themselves on edge from the director’s skillful means of evoking nail-biting danger. It’s even in the way that Boyle frames his shots, utilizing negative space to leave his characters vulnerable and open for attack. Boyle’s direction may largely be responsible for keeping audiences on their toes, but it’s also in the mutations that have altered the infected themselves. Boyle and Garland push the gore and violence further, leading to fascinating developments. However, the infected are merely part of the equation in Spike’s coming-of-age story that touches on everything from Brexit to the inevitability of death. As with 28 Days Later, it’s complex characters that deftly usher us through visceral chases, harrowing escapes, and explosive set pieces. Williams makes for a remarkable young lead, portraying a teen grappling with the realization that his dad isn’t an infallible hero but a flawed human. It exposes the film’s true beating heart, Spike’s bond with mom Isla, taking his journey on unexpected detours that eventually slow the frenetic horror to a soulful rumination on death itself. Boyle and Garland once again disregard rules with a third act that’s more healing and triumphant than action-heavy. And Ralph Fiennes‘ brief supporting role, at least so far, injects an affecting level of empathy and pathos that not only brings Spike’s thematic arc to its fitting end but lays the groundwork for what’s yet to come. Boyle and Garland seamlessly integrate intimate, nuanced storytelling with epic-sized scale, one with deeply personal yet perilously high stakes. In a post-Covid world, 28 Years Later has a lot on its mind about human connection, generational divides, and even the concept of rage itself as it manifests from survivor trauma. It’s made all the more complicated by a complex family unit struggling to get by in a world that’s largely abandoned them. Spike’s bravery in venturing into the harrowing wilds in a world where death is certain makes for a powerful new entry, one with bravura filmmaking and savage horror. 28 Years Later covers quite a bit of ground, not all of it neatly, but it does so with breathless style and impeccable craftsmanship. That 28 Years Later begins a new trilogy means that while Spike’s story is largely self-contained, not everything receives tidy resolution by film’s end. That’s okay, because Boyle & Garland once again introduce characters we want to spend more time with, even when they break our hearts. This riveting blend of horror and heart also reminds that death, horror’s favorite equalizer, can be as beautiful as it can be cruel. 4 out 5 skulls 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteWonder 2,734 Posted June 23 33 minutes ago, posty said: Review from Bloody Disgusting writer... Hide contents https://bloody-disgusting.com/reviews/3873444/28-years-later-review-danny-boyle-alex-garland-launch-new-trilogy-with-epic-journey/ Since escaping the lab in 28 Days Later, the rage virus decimated the British mainland and forced survivors to fend for themselves for nearly three decades in 28 Years Later. That presents fertile ground to mine scares and social commentary, and director Danny Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland haven’t lost a step since collaborating on their highly influential early aughts horror movie. The pair build on 28 Days Later with groundbreaking new techniques, rich worldbuilding, and dense themes – this trilogy starter has a lot on its mind – anchored by a tremendous cast to guide viewers on an epic, emotional coming-of-age journey. 28 Years Later introduces a quarantined UK largely forgotten by the outside world, with its survivors having forged new communities and simplified ways of life post-outbreak. That includes Holy Island, a small island community protected by a causeway to the mainland that only emerges during low tide. We’re introduced to this village right as young Spike (newcomer Alfie Williams) is preparing to embark on a rite of passage with gregarious dad Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), heading to the mainland proper to kill his first infected. Venturing away from his sheltered existence would be enough to induce anxiety, but Spike and Jamie are also contending with the mysterious illness of family matriarch Isla (Jodie Comer). Both will irrevocably alter Spike’s trajectory as he leaves the safety of Holy Island’s gates for the first time. Spike’s fresh eyes make for the perfect audience proxy for reacclimating to the virus-ravaged setting as his doting dad shows him the ropes. Williams’ doe-eyed curiosity, relatable skittishness, and inherent kindness earn instant rooting interest as a child being forced to grow up too early, all while Dad provides a crash course navigating some of this world’s harsher edges. That includes the infected, who have evolved in surprising ways. Boyle kicks this planned trilogy off with a sensory assault. Rapid cuts, a punishing soundscape, and immersive camerawork that employs a variety of techniques, including strapping cameras and iPhones to actors, ensure that even those desensitized to the fast-moving infected will find themselves on edge from the director’s skillful means of evoking nail-biting danger. It’s even in the way that Boyle frames his shots, utilizing negative space to leave his characters vulnerable and open for attack. Boyle’s direction may largely be responsible for keeping audiences on their toes, but it’s also in the mutations that have altered the infected themselves. Boyle and Garland push the gore and violence further, leading to fascinating developments. However, the infected are merely part of the equation in Spike’s coming-of-age story that touches on everything from Brexit to the inevitability of death. As with 28 Days Later, it’s complex characters that deftly usher us through visceral chases, harrowing escapes, and explosive set pieces. Williams makes for a remarkable young lead, portraying a teen grappling with the realization that his dad isn’t an infallible hero but a flawed human. It exposes the film’s true beating heart, Spike’s bond with mom Isla, taking his journey on unexpected detours that eventually slow the frenetic horror to a soulful rumination on death itself. Boyle and Garland once again disregard rules with a third act that’s more healing and triumphant than action-heavy. And Ralph Fiennes‘ brief supporting role, at least so far, injects an affecting level of empathy and pathos that not only brings Spike’s thematic arc to its fitting end but lays the groundwork for what’s yet to come. Boyle and Garland seamlessly integrate intimate, nuanced storytelling with epic-sized scale, one with deeply personal yet perilously high stakes. In a post-Covid world, 28 Years Later has a lot on its mind about human connection, generational divides, and even the concept of rage itself as it manifests from survivor trauma. It’s made all the more complicated by a complex family unit struggling to get by in a world that’s largely abandoned them. Spike’s bravery in venturing into the harrowing wilds in a world where death is certain makes for a powerful new entry, one with bravura filmmaking and savage horror. 28 Years Later covers quite a bit of ground, not all of it neatly, but it does so with breathless style and impeccable craftsmanship. That 28 Years Later begins a new trilogy means that while Spike’s story is largely self-contained, not everything receives tidy resolution by film’s end. That’s okay, because Boyle & Garland once again introduce characters we want to spend more time with, even when they break our hearts. This riveting blend of horror and heart also reminds that death, horror’s favorite equalizer, can be as beautiful as it can be cruel. 4 out 5 skulls I really have not read much about it although I plan to see it sometime this week. So it's a start of a new trilogy rather than wrapping up the first two movies? Interesting. That makes me feel like 28 weeks later will just be a throw away, but I can't say that for certain until I see this. I thought there would be some interesting ways they could go with the genetic immunity from the second movie (and maybe that is part of the "evolution" of the infected) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 3,208 Posted July 2 Saw it tonight. Was very disjointed. Had some cool scenes and moments. Very odd ending and…..spoilers….. Was a cliff hanger which I wasn’t aware of there wis a part 2 coming out. I’d give it a B- Share this post Link to post Share on other sites