Minnesota

[TimHauck 3,521]

15 hours ago, jerryskids said:

 

I never saw your response to why your "they could just let her sit there riding her horn and impeding traffic" solution didn't work.

She was stopped for the purpose of riding her horn, impeding traffic, and goading ICE agents while they were performing their duties.  Is this a trick question?

They could have just told her to leave, which apparently one guy did just before a different one told her to get out.   I’m sure people here will say, “no, she needs to be prosecuted for being un-American!!!” but from what I’m seeing DHS has been dropping a lot of these charges when they’re trying to prosecute people for minor stuff

[Sean Mooney 2,104]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

They could have just told her to leave, which apparently one guy did just before a different one told her to get out.   I’m sure people here will say, “no, she needs to be prosecuted for being un-American!!!” but from what I’m seeing DHS has been dropping a lot of these charges when they’re trying to prosecute people for minor stuff

I said from the start- all reports and the initial video have her getting told by one office to "get out of here" and by the other to "get out of her car."

Again- she handled things badly. The ICE agents did as well. It ended in her death. 

[MDC 8,276]

21 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Why the bold part?  Minneapolis has major issues.

Minneapolis isn’t a hotbed of illegal migrants. Trump deployed ICE there to sow chaos. Noem announced the were going. Someone told ICE they’re entitled to demand people show their papers or detain them without cause. The admin claims ICE has blanket immunity.

Everything they’ve done has made conflict there and elsewhere more likely, because that’s their goal. 

[jerryskids 7,280]

1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

They could have just told her to leave, which apparently one guy did just before a different one told her to get out.   I’m sure people here will say, “no, she needs to be prosecuted for being un-American!!!” but from what I’m seeing DHS has been dropping a lot of these charges when they’re trying to prosecute people for minor stuff

We don't know if there was any contact prior to the videos we see.  We can determine that she didn't start to leave when the first officer told her to get out, and her wife yelled to drive only when the officer reached for the door handle.  We'll never know if more words would have worked; my guess is not so much, your guess is that she would have agreed to move I guess?

My question is more in the hypothetical; let's say beyond all belief she chooses not to move despite a request to move.  What do the officers do then?

I'm fine with prosecuting her, not because she was Un-American, but because she was violating the law.

[dogcows 1,446]

8 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

We don't know if there was any contact prior to the videos we see.  We can determine that she didn't start to leave when the first officer told her to get out, and her wife yelled to drive only when the officer reached for the door handle.  We'll never know if more words would have worked; my guess is not so much, your guess is that she would have agreed to move I guess?

My question is more in the hypothetical; let's say beyond all belief she chooses not to move despite a request to move.  What do the officers do then?

I'm fine with prosecuting her, not because she was Un-American, but because she was violating the law.

Prosecution is what competent officers would have done if they couldn’t de-escalate. I don’t think most people would have had a problem with that. And you mention “if they couldn’t get her to move” - well… moving is what inspired them to kill her.

I posted a video analysis above showing that Ross was not actually in front of the car. His legs were well outside its path, and he was leaning on it with his arms. Another point, the video from his phone led some people to believe he was hit. But they show frame by frame synced with other video that he was just fumbling his phone.

[Hawkeye21 2,472]

30 minutes ago, dogcows said:

moving is what inspired them to kill her.

I don't think he was inspired to kill her.  I can't imagine that was his intent.  If his goal the entire time was to kill her, then he deserves to be tried for murder.  I honestly don't think that's what happened though.

[dogcows 1,446]

1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I don't think he was inspired to kill her.  I can't imagine that was his intent.  If his goal the entire time was to kill her, then he deserves to be tried for murder.  I honestly don't think that's what happened though.

Inspired was the wrong word, my bad…

They wanted her to move, but when she did so she ended up dead.

As for murder, it need not be premeditated… that’s 1st degree. If she angered him and that’s why he fired (crime of passion), that could be motive for a 3rd degree charge.

If he just panicked when the car started to move and he was slipping a bit on the ice, one could argue negligence as the reason for the killing, which could also qualify as 3rd degree murder. (Negligence due to not following his training and having his gun un-holstered in the first place)

[Hawkeye21 2,472]

1 minute ago, dogcows said:

Inspired was the wrong word, my bad…

They wanted her to move, but when she did so she ended up dead.

As for murder, it need not be premeditated… that’s 1st degree. If she angered him and that’s why he fired (crime of passion), that could be motive for a 3rd degree charge.

If he just panicked when the car started to move and he was slipping a bit on the ice, one could argue negligence as the reason for the killing, which could also qualify as 3rd degree murder. (Negligence due to not following his training and having his gun un-holstered in the first place)

I would agree with negligence. 

[seafoam1 3,597]

6 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Inspired was the wrong word, my bad…

They wanted her to move, but when she did so she ended up dead.

As for murder, it need not be premeditated… that’s 1st degree. If she angered him and that’s why he fired (crime of passion), that could be motive for a 3rd degree charge.

If he just panicked when the car started to move and he was slipping a bit on the ice, one could argue negligence as the reason for the killing, which could also qualify as 3rd degree murder. (Negligence due to not following his training and having his gun un-holstered in the first place)

Yeah, if she lived through the gunshot, she should have been charged with attempted murder. 

Thank God the officer neutralized her threat before she killed someone.  

[Hardcore troubadour 16,251]

I fired to explain to MDC and Gutterboy that you need pre mediation for a murder charge. They chose to remain ignorant. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,691]

This is all so simple... dbags (Gov, mayor, etc) in Minnesota, told their citizens to interfere with law enforcement.  Idiots listened to them.  This particular one died because of it.  The blame falls on the woman for being stupid and the elected officials who told her to do it.  Not that hard.

[Strike 6,153]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I fired to explain to MDC and Gutterboy that you need pre mediation for a murder charge. They chose to remain ignorant. 

You only need pre meditation for murder 1.

[League Champion 1,938]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

I fired to explain to MDC and Gutterboy that you need pre mediation for a murder charge. They chose to remain ignorant. 

@MDC thinks he knows all about murder just because he lives in Fishtown, PA. Granted most residents there fear for their lives and know someone who's been murdered, BUT THAT DOES NOT MAKE HIM AN EXPERT. 

[jerryskids 7,280]

AI answer but I don't feel like chasing the links.  At most you could try to make a case for Man 2:

Quote

AI Overview

 

 

 

In Minnesota, the key difference between murder and manslaughter is 

intent and malice: murder involves intent to kill (or extreme recklessness in third-degree), while manslaughter is an unintentional killing resulting from heat of passion (voluntary) or extreme negligence/recklessness (involuntary), with murder carrying much harsher penalties like life imprisonment compared to manslaughter's shorter sentences. 

 

Murder (Involves Intent/Malice)

• First-Degree Murder: Premeditated killing with intent to kill (not detailed in snippets, but generally the most severe).
• Second-Degree Murder: Intentional killing, but not premeditated, or causing death with intent to cause fear/harm (up to 40 years).
• Third-Degree Murder: Unintentional killing showing depraved mind, indifference to human life, without intent to kill (up to 25 years). 

 

Manslaughter (No Intent to Kill/Malice)

• First-Degree Manslaughter: Intentionally causing death in the heat of passion (provoked) or causing death by administering certain controlled substances (up to 15 years).
• Second-Degree Manslaughter: Culpable negligence, creating unreasonable risk, or during dangerous activities (e.g., reckless hunting) (up to 10 years). 

 

[MDC 8,276]

15 minutes ago, Strike said:

You only need pre meditation for murder 1.

Thank you. You’d think a cop would know this.  

[seafoam1 3,597]

17 minutes ago, League Champion said:

@MDC thinks he knows all about murder just because he lives in Fishtown, PA. Granted most residents there fear for their lives and know someone who's been murdered, BUT THAT DOES NOT MAKE HIM AN EXPERT. 

He's an expert at hiding in his basement. 

[League Champion 1,938]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

He's an expert at hiding in his basement. 

His Moms basement 

[Hawkeye21 2,472]

20 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

This is all so simple... dbags (Gov, mayor, etc) in Minnesota, told their citizens to interfere with law enforcement.  Idiots listened to them.  This particular one died because of it.  The blame falls on the woman for being stupid and the elected officials who told her to do it.  Not that hard.

Sounds exactly like Jan 6th.

[seafoam1 3,597]

Just now, League Champion said:

His Moms basement 

"MOM!! You need to knock before you come down here!!! I'm a grown man now!" 

[seafoam1 3,597]

1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Sounds exactly like Jan 6th.

No it doesn't. 

It looks like 2020.

[League Champion 1,938]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

"MOM!! You need to knock before you come down here!!! I'm a grown man now!" 

 

 

[Hawkeye21 2,472]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

No it doesn't. 

This is all so simple... Trump in DC, told the citizens to interfere with our government.  Idiots listened to them.  One woman died because of it.  The blame falls on the woman for being stupid and the Trump who told her to do it.  Not that hard.

[TBayXXXVII 2,691]

9 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Sounds exactly like Jan 6th.

Already responded to that earlier.

[Fnord 2,716]

30 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

This is all so simple... dbags (Gov, mayor, etc) in Minnesota, told their citizens to interfere with law enforcement.  Idiots listened to them.  This particular one died because of it.  The blame falls on the woman for being stupid and the elected officials who told her to do it.  Not that hard.

Link to all the dbags in MN telling their citizens to directly interfere? I'll wait. I certainly never got that memo, and I live here, unlike you.

[dogcows 1,446]

14 minutes ago, MDC said:

Thank you. You’d think a cop would know this.  

More like a Mall Cop School Dropout.

Hmm that sounds like a potential title for a series of pornos now that I look at it… 

[seafoam1 3,597]

11 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

This is all so simple... Trump in DC, told the citizens to interfere with our government.  Idiots listened to them.  One woman died because of it.  The blame falls on the woman for being stupid and the Trump who told her to do it.  Not that hard.

You obviously didn't watch him telling them to be peaceful. And a group of dumbasses got rowdy then went homw when they were told to.

Liberals burn down buildings, smash up cars, beat up police, take over zones of public lands, topple landmarks, loot stores, vandalize anything they can, and do it all in multiple states for many months and had the future vice president and the liberal media both funding their release from prisons, and saying to the public that they should continue to riot. Also, killary not heeding Trumps warning of upping security and the liberal mayors telling police to stand down when it comes to the rioters. 

There is a dinstinct difference. 

[seafoam1 3,597]

11 minutes ago, League Champion said:

 

 

 

[Fireballer 2,714]

I’d like to know the breakdown of the people here who think both ICE shooter and Rittenhouse committed murder.

[Hardcore troubadour 16,251]

You need intent for Murder 2. No intent here either 

[seafoam1 3,597]

30 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

I’d like to know the breakdown of the people here who think both ICE shooter and Rittenhouse committed murder.

Both heroes in their own way.  

[MDC 8,276]

HT = Premeditated Moron  

[dogcows 1,446]

27 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

I’d like to know the breakdown of the people here who think both ICE shooter and Rittenhouse committed murder.

Rittenhouse was acquitted. I don’t agree with it, but that’s our jury trial system. So i accept it.

I am concerned about this case because DHS, the Prez, and the VP declared the shooter innocent before any investigation happened. This doesn’t instill trust that the DoJ will be actually following the evidence.

[Engorgeous George 2,375]

18 hours ago, dogcows said:

Don’t see 3 bullets to the head mentioned here.  

And it wasn’t done in a way that kept agents safe. So… pretty much an epic fail by these agents.

Curious.  I have not seen confirmation that he hit her three times, more less in the head each time.  It may be that he did though given the time, recoil of the weapon, movement of the car and the Officer I would be surprised if what you say is so.  Do you have a link for the claim?

 

Now none of this really matters.  She clearly was shot and by no one but the Oficer.  Hitting her only once mitigates nothing that happened, if he only hit her once, just as hitting her three times is really now worse than hitting her once if the shot was to the head.  I am just interested if police reports or autopsy information has made it into the public realm

[dogcows 1,446]

5 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

Curious.  I have not seen confirmation that he hit her three times, more less in the head each time.  It may be that he did though given the time, recoil of the weapon, movement of the car and the Officer I would be surprised if what you say is so.  Do you have a link for the claim?

 

Now none of this really matters.  She clearly was shot and by no one but the Oficer.  Hitting her only once mitigates nothing that happened, if he only hit her once, just as hitting her three times is really now worse than hitting her once if the shot was to the head.  I am just interested if police reports or autopsy information has made it into the public realm

From the CNN report (saw the same in NY Times). Looks like at least 3 wounds. But only one to the head.

Quote

The 37-year-old had two apparent gunshot wounds to her right chest, one apparent gunshot wound to her left forearm and a possible gunshot wound on the left side of her head, according to the report, which also says Good was found with no pulse and given chest compressions and other measures to try to resuscitate her.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/16/us/renee-good-shooting-incident-report?cid=ios_app

[Engorgeous George 2,375]

2 minutes ago, dogcows said:

From the CNN report (saw the same in NY Times)

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/16/us/renee-good-shooting-incident-report?cid=ios_app

I thank you for the link.

 

The forearm shot to me implies she saw at least one of the shots coming and that maybe she raised her hand/arm in a defense reaction and got shot through that arm into her chest or head.  I don't see any official corroboration there in that story, but it is more information than i have previously heard on the matter. 

[dogcows 1,446]

1 minute ago, Engorgeous George said:

I thank you for the link.

 

The forearm shot to me implies she saw at least one of the shots coming and that maybe she raised her hand/arm in a defense reaction and got shot through that arm into her chest or head.  I don't see any official corroboration there in that story, but it is more information than i have previously heard on the matter. 

I hope the autopsy will be made public at some point…

[dogcows 1,446]

Deploying tear gas on babies. Delightful.

https://www.fox9.com/news/children-hospitalized-flash-bang-hits-van-jan-15

Quote

The father, Shawn Jackson, told a FOX 9 reporter at the scene his children were hurt when a flash bang detonated nearby. He says the blasts were strong enough to set off his vehicle's air bags. 

"Officers threw flash bangs and tear gas in my car. I got six kids in the car […] My 6-month-old can't even breathe. This was flipped over," Shawn said, holding up his child’s car seat. "My car filled with tear gas, I'm trying to pull my kids from the car." 

His wife, Destiny Jackson, told FOX 9 their 6-month-old infant stopped breathing and lost consciousness. She then performed CPR on her baby while others poured milk on her other children in an effort to neutralize the tear gas. 

Three of children, including the baby, were then taken to the hospital by ambulance for treatment. All of the children are between 6 months old and 11 years old.

They weren’t part of any protest, just happened to be on the street where ICE decided to make a scene. 

[League Champion 1,938]

46 minutes ago, dogcows said:

Rittenhouse was acquitted. I don’t agree with it,

He was acquitted because he did nothing wrong. He was attacked by violent libs and defended himself. 

 

[seafoam1 3,597]

1 hour ago, League Champion said:

He was acquitted because he did nothing wrong. He was attacked by violent libs and defended himself. 

 

Liberals are just dumb. 

[League Champion 1,938]

Just now, seafoam1 said:

Liberals are just dumb. 

And violent