Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
BudBro

"A Treasonous Conspiracy" - DNI Gabbard Exposes Obama At Center Of Trump 'Russia Hoax'

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Tried to rig 2016 election and undermined the Trump Presidency using DOJ resources.  

They tried to rig the 2016 election by releasing a report after the election happened?  That’s a bold strategy 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

They can't explain it, because it simply doesn't exist.

It's probably a good time to remind the GC that a republican led bipartisan committee led by Marco Rubio concluded russia did actually interfere in the 2016 election.  And this all happened during Trump's first term.  His intelligence concluded it happened.  

How coincidental that at a time when Trump was outed as a child rapist that suddenly Obama should be charged with treason.  The same Obama trump is saying faked the Epstein list that he is on.

This so called evidence release by gabbard, a long suspected Russian asset is now praised by Trump after he completely disregarded her intelligence that Iran was not close a nuke.  She's wrong, trump said, but now she's right.

Trump is a cornered rat and "stories" like this are what he needs to bring his base together.

Just look at everyone in this thread falling for it.  I bunch of useful idiots being played by Trump so easily just like they have been for a decade.

Yeah lots of Obama talk recently.  Up until last week most of it was just talking about Michelle being a man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see how it goes.🍿

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

They had the number one source of the Steele dossier (Danchenko) pleading in federal court during a criminal investigation under oath that the Steele dossier was bullsh!t. “I was its main source and I told the FBI that in January 2017.”

The FBI offered Christopher Steele $1000,000 to verify his own dossier but the motherf’er refused. 

Obama ordered a new ICA based entirely off the Steele Dossier pushed by Brennan. In other words for the slow retards, the White House, FBI, CIA and several other treasonous seditious dirtbags participated in a criminal conspiracy with a foreign agent to setup and frame a Presidential candidate. Then, Susan Rice drafts a memo to herself that everything was done by the book. The fraudulent FISA warrants say otherwise. 

Two problems here.  You said Obama ordered a new ICA off the Steele dossier which is false.  And of course the obvious that Russia did interfere in 2016 election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seditious treason. Obama was the CIC. Military tribunal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Initial IC assessment “no election impact by Russia”. Obama, Brennan and Comey “hold my beer”. All off the fake Dossier they knew was fake. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Initial IC assessment “no election impact by Russia”. Obama, Brennan and Comey “hold my beer”. All off the fake Dossier they knew was fake. 

They actually said Russia was incapable of interference. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tulsi was the one they fought so hard against ……….she’s a Russian asset!”

 

This was insurrection.. Follow the new J6 standards

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, MDC said:

I see the deflection campaign has begun! 😂 

Can more than one thing be true at once?  Don’t be dumb - You are a Pennsylvanian. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They actually said Russia was incapable of interference. 

Where?

Here is the document.  I didn't read every page but a search for incapable returns nothing.

https://legacy.www.documentcloud.org/documents/26002914-250717-dig-declassified-evidence-obama-subvert-president-trump-2016-victory-election-july2025/#document/p81/a2664773

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Gabbard is so dumb.  She's conflating the reports about Russia rigging votes vs Russia hacking the emails and using social media to influence.

Of course the magas here just fall in line 

 

Yeah this definitely looks like what they’re doing.  The earlier documents are clearly talking about the potential threat of them hacking votes, which they didn’t think would happen.  The later documents are clearly talking about an “influence campaign.”  In fact on page 93 of what was released, within the document detailing the influence campaign, is a line saying “the types of systems we observed Russian actors targeting or compromising are not involved in vote tallying.  We have not detected the sorts of Russian government cyber accesses that would have allowed Moscow to alter vote tabulations.”

I mean I knew MAGA was dumb but this is taking it to a new level.  There are very few that seem to realize this is just an attempt to distract from Epstein.  Although to be fair to the idiots of MAGA, looks like even some people previously thought to be smart like Matt Taibbi also fell for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Yeah this definitely looks like what they’re doing.  The earlier documents are clearly talking about the potential threat of them hacking votes, which they didn’t think would happen.  The later documents are clearly talking about an “influence campaign.”  In fact on page 93 of what was released, within the document detailing the influence campaign, is a line saying “the types of systems we observed Russian actors targeting or compromising are not involved in vote tallying.  We have not detected the sorts of Russian government cyber accesses that would have allowed Moscow to alter vote tabulations.”

I mean I knew MAGA was dumb but this is taking it to a new level.  There are very few that seem to realize this is just an attempt to distract from Epstein.  Although to be fair to the idiots of MAGA, looks like even some people previously thought to be smart like Matt Taibbi also fell for it.

Two things can be true at the same time, we'll see how both stories play out.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Voltaire said:

Two things can be true at the same time, we'll see how both stories play out.

Well I’ll say Tulsi may have started looking into this before the Epstein speculation about Trump went crazy, she may have started done it after Trump said she was stupid to try to get back on his good side.

Pretty sure this one will go nowhere, but we’ll see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, BudBro said:

Link

Pres Trump had already noted this years ago, but now is documented.  Tall trees and short ropes?

Not surprising, politics are a dirty business.  The pursuit of keeping power will make people do crazy things.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mike Hunt said:

Not surprising, politics are a dirty business.  The pursuit of keeping power will make people do crazy things.    

Agree, it’s pretty dirty to release this now to distract from Epstein

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deep state knew this was coming. John Solomon was warning about it weeks ago. Best they could do was the WSJ garbage. Bought them a day at best. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I decided to flip on Fox News to see what they were saying and get their side. They are apoplectic about this all talking about how Obama tried to overthrow the government. Imagine being stupid enough to believe all this man. We are in a bad spot in this country

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

I decided to flip on Fox News to see what they were saying and get their side. They are apoplectic about this all talking about how Obama tried to overthrow the government. Imagine being stupid enough to believe all this man. We are in a bad spot in this country

⬆️  TRIGGERED LIBERAL ALERT 🚨

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

I decided to flip on Fox News to see what they were saying and get their side. They are apoplectic about this all talking about how Obama tried to overthrow the government. Imagine being stupid enough to believe all this man. We are in a bad spot in this country

Any Epstein talk?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Seditious treason. Obama was the CIC. Military tribunal. 

It wouldn't matter, remember the SC made a ruling that the President is King to get Trump out of his Jan 6th, applies to all presidents.  :wave:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Alias Detective said:

Can more than one thing be true at once?  Don’t be dumb - You are a Pennsylvanian. 

How many times do you need to get duped by Trump before you figure out he’s a conman and you’re a rube? :( 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Murdoch owns Fox. He did his work with the WSJ. He doesn’t want to lose anymore millions than he already will be. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Murdoch owns Fox. He did his work with the WSJ. He doesn’t want to lose anymore millions than he already will be. 

It's a sad state of affairs for Fox when it resorts to misinformation, bias and ignoring a major story in order to preserve and pander to viewers so as not to lose money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Sandy Loam said:

That they got him now, dead to rights!

IT'S A RUMAH OF A CONSPIRICAH OF A PLOT INVOLVING A SCHEME!

🤣

“Thinking ‘bout a plan to dream to try.”

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Yeah this definitely looks like what they’re doing.  The earlier documents are clearly talking about the potential threat of them hacking votes, which they didn’t think would happen.  The later documents are clearly talking about an “influence campaign.”  In fact on page 93 of what was released, within the document detailing the influence campaign, is a line saying “the types of systems we observed Russian actors targeting or compromising are not involved in vote tallying.  We have not detected the sorts of Russian government cyber accesses that would have allowed Moscow to alter vote tabulations.”

I mean I knew MAGA was dumb but this is taking it to a new level.  There are very few that seem to realize this is just an attempt to distract from Epstein.  Although to be fair to the idiots of MAGA, looks like even some people previously thought to be smart like Matt Taibbi also fell for it.

The Epstein thing isn’t going away. No one is just forgetting about it. Trump knew mentioning Epstein would bring more attention to it. You think he's oblivious to the fact that his words will bring more attention to the topic, which shows your own ignorance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

No one is just forgetting about it. 

Actually yes many are.  Wake up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I forget, was Epstein Jewish ?  I know those pizza place guys hooked up with the  Clintons are. Polanski and Weinstein too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sandy Loam said:

It's a sad state of affairs for Fox when it resorts to misinformation, bias and ignoring a major story in order to preserve and pander to viewers so as not to lose money.

Poor peeRusty.  :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Dizkneelande said:

They had the number one source of the Steele dossier (Danchenko) pleading in federal court during a criminal investigation under oath that the Steele dossier was bullsh!t. “I was its main source and I told the FBI that in January 2017.”

The FBI offered Christopher Steele $1000,000 to verify his own dossier but the motherf’er refused. 

Obama ordered a new ICA based entirely off the Steele Dossier pushed by Brennan. In other words for the slow retards, the White House, FBI, CIA and several other treasonous seditious dirtbags participated in a criminal conspiracy with a foreign agent to setup and frame a Presidential candidate. Then, Susan Rice drafts a memo to herself that everything was done by the book. The fraudulent FISA warrants say otherwise. 

Was there anything in the documents released that the Obama admin believed Trump was in on Russia’s attempt to influence the election?  If not, they weren’t trying to “frame” him for anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


“You don’t want to affect people’s lives if there’s phony stuff in there.” :wacko: 

Since when did that ever stop doofus from making an accusation. :doh: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, TimHauck said:

You gotta admit the timing is a bit curious, no?

I was out of the loop so I had to figure this out.  Looks like something about Trump and a birthday card for Epstein?  That's about all I know, so I can't really comment on the specifics, other than I'm having a hard time remembering a period where Trump was NOT under suspicion if not indictment for some sort of lawfare.  :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I was out of the loop so I had to figure this out.  Looks like something about Trump and a birthday card for Epstein?  That's about all I know, so I can't really comment on the specifics, other than I'm having a hard time remembering a period where Trump was NOT under suspicion if not indictment for some sort of lawfare.  :dunno: 

That was the latest development yes, to which Trump is now suing the WSJ for $10 billion (but I guess it’d be hard to remember a time when Trump wasn’t suing someone either).  

There has also been additional comments from Trump claiming he wants Bondi to release what’s “pertinent” and “credible.”

The difference here from past “lawfare” is that much of the backlash about Epstein is from his own supporters.  So he gave them Obama to be mad at instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I'm having a hard time remembering a period where Trump was NOT under suspicion if not indictment for some sort of lawfare.  :dunno: 

It’s almost like the guy with a 50-year history of business fraud and sexual assault is in fact a piece of chit. :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, MDC said:

It’s almost like the guy with a 50-year history of business fraud and sexual assault is in fact a piece of chit. :dunno: 

It’s almost like the mdpee guy with a 50-year history of uselessness and sexual tranny love is in fact a piece of chit. :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody cares about this stuff. The Russian collusion was real. Nothing is going to be discovered here. 
 

The public wants prices lowered and they want Trump to leave most undocumented immigrants alone. When are those things going to happen? Every poll shows this is the stuff the public wants. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×