Ron_Artest 2,688 Posted yesterday at 02:15 PM 17 minutes ago, Reality said: It's hilarious, these idiots think you can attempt run over a LEO and just go on about your business. These dipshlts live in fantasy land. A LEO doesn't have the legal authority to shoot at a fleeing vehicle after they feel like they were hit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,178 Posted yesterday at 02:15 PM Is she even from Minneapolis? According to geek club standards she shouldn’t have been there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,688 Posted yesterday at 02:16 PM Just now, Horseman said: "Get out of the car" "Put down the gun" Same result if you don't comply. You don't actually have to try and shoot someone to be perceived as a legitimate threat. No, there is no authority to shoot someone if they don't get out of the car. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,688 Posted yesterday at 02:16 PM Just now, Hardcore troubadour said: Is she even from Minneapolis? According to geek club standards she shouldn’t have been there. She lived in that neighborhood. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 8,214 Posted yesterday at 02:17 PM I can’t tell whether the Ice agent gets clipped or narrowly avoids it. I doubt that has much bearing on whether he was justified in shooting. Law enforcement gets the overwhelming benefit of the doubt in these cases. I am assuming he won’t face any charges. Which makes it even weirder that this admin felt the need to comment in such a reckless and inflammatory way. It’s almost like they’re trying to goad people into unrest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,688 Posted yesterday at 02:17 PM 2 minutes ago, Reality said: Bud, that's exactly what it means. No it's not. The law is pretty clear on this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,297 Posted yesterday at 02:17 PM Very interesting explanation of how these nuts are organized Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,822 Posted yesterday at 02:17 PM 3 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: It that grainy video it does appear he gets hit. In the video from the NY times they sync that video up with the other clear video and it doesn't appear he gets. Either way, if he gets hit or not, he doesn't have the right to then murder her. Whether he gets shot or not , he doesn't have the right to return fire. That's the tiny brain logic you're going to reach for? Figures. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,178 Posted yesterday at 02:17 PM Just now, Ron_Artest said: She lived in that neighborhood. Sounds like bullshitt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,688 Posted yesterday at 02:18 PM Just now, MDC said: It’s almost like they’re trying to goad people into unrest. Ya think? Look at the big brain on MDC. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drizzay 766 Posted yesterday at 02:18 PM Is it true that there have been over 100 incidents of people hitting or ramming Ice agents with their cars? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 2,297 Posted yesterday at 02:18 PM 2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Is she even from Minneapolis? According to geek club standards she shouldn’t have been there. Sounds like her parents thought she was a kook. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,974 Posted yesterday at 02:18 PM 7 minutes ago, Gladiators said: Yep. Pretty obvious unluss you're an idiot. Looks like there's one idiot on this board who thinks when an officer is trying to open your door and there's another officer standing in front of your car, that's an indication to hit the gas pedal. lol Very very obvious. They want to Rittenhouse the guy so bad. Rittenhouse was so so clearly self defense and they put on a show trial for no reason just to appease wokies. This is extremely clear from the videos. How anyone claims she didn't hit him is weird, but that doesn't even matter since she put him in danger. Precedent has been for years and years and years, you put a cop in danger with your vehicle, he can fire. Not sure why the wokies want to turn him into a millionaire on top of getting one of their wokie clan killed. Clean shoot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,178 Posted yesterday at 02:19 PM So they canceled school so the teachers union can participate in the planning of tomorrow’s riots. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,688 Posted yesterday at 02:19 PM Just now, Horseman said: Whether he gets shot or not , he doesn't have the right to return fire. That's the tiny brain logic you're going to reach for? Figures. Yes that's the law. He's not returning fire because he wasn't fired upon. Jesus now you're saying she shot him? You're brain dead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,684 Posted yesterday at 02:20 PM Imagine this was your wife or daughter and she didn’t get shot (we are pretending here)… What would you say to her for being involved in trying to prevent federal agents from doing their jobs? Then finding out she was the ringleader for stopping them with her car? Then learning she endangered their’s and her life by hitting, or nearly hitting the officers exactly in this situation but was able to drive away safely? Id say you’re lucky you didn’t get your stupid ass shot and killed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,822 Posted yesterday at 02:20 PM 2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: No, there is no authority to shoot someone if they don't get out of the car. Work from home nobody by day......super secret midget law attorney by night. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,164 Posted yesterday at 02:21 PM 1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said: Yes that's the law. He's not returning fire because he wasn't fired upon. Jesus now you're saying she shot him? You're brain dead. This is dumb, even for you. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,822 Posted yesterday at 02:21 PM 1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said: Yes that's the law. He's not returning fire because he wasn't fired upon. Jesus now you're saying she shot him? You're brain dead. Sorry. My bad. Why are you so poor if you're literally an expert on everything? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,363 Posted yesterday at 02:21 PM 13 minutes ago, Horseman said: She hit him, but, she wasn't trying to!!!!! JFC To be fair she’s a female driver Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,178 Posted yesterday at 02:22 PM Just now, Horseman said: Sorry. My bad. Why are you so poor if you're literally an expert on everything? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,688 Posted yesterday at 02:22 PM 1 minute ago, Horseman said: Work from home nobody by day......super secret midget law attorney by night. Point me to the legal standing that says a LEO is allowed to shoot a driver when they disobey your order to get out of the car. Now please be quiet the adults are posting. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,086 Posted yesterday at 02:23 PM 2 minutes ago, cyclone24 said: Lol… this is absurd. There’s a clean bullet hole through the front windshield and you can clearly see the guy shoot at the front windshield when he’s right in front of it. This isn’t even disingenuous for political dumb reasons which you liberals are really grasping at. It's absurd you MAGA mooks can watch a video that clearly shows these things and then ignore it because you want to protect the team. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IrfmRdDKjnIgNVYckzyMpx6Z82ZMmoXU/view?usp=drive_link In the photo here- the yellow line is the barrel of the gun. The blue line is where the front of the car is and the orange lines are where the legs are of the cop. Again- facts are facts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,684 Posted yesterday at 02:24 PM 3 minutes ago, Horseman said: Work from home nobody by day......super secret midget law attorney by night. I’m gonna need to see the statute and regulations of that one. HFS 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,363 Posted yesterday at 02:24 PM 5 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said: Sounds like her parents thought she was a kook. Sounded like she didn’t make good life choices right up until her demise Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 6,115 Posted yesterday at 02:25 PM I think my favorite rhetoric from the mayor/governor is when they say ICE is performing operations without local cooperation, as if that's ICE's fault. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,860 Posted yesterday at 02:25 PM 2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: A LEO doesn't have the legal authority to shoot at a fleeing vehicle after they feel like they were hit. Uh, yeah, they do. If a person attempts, or is perceived to have attempted, to run over a LEO, they have the right to fire in self defense. It's sad that she's dead, but she focked up. Put it in park. Live to see your day in court. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,363 Posted yesterday at 02:25 PM 2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Point me to the legal standing that says a LEO is allowed to shoot a driver when they disobey your order to get out of the car. Now please be quiet the adults are posting. That’s not why she was shot. Good lord do you eat paint chips growing up? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 2,688 Posted yesterday at 02:26 PM 9 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Is she even from Minneapolis? According to geek club standards she shouldn’t have been there. You don't like facts or the truth, it gets in your way of believing all the BS that Trump tells you, and you like being lied to. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,684 Posted yesterday at 02:26 PM I’m usually not around posting in real time when one of our liberal members goes full retard. This is awesome. 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,164 Posted yesterday at 02:26 PM 4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said: Point me to the legal standing that says a LEO is allowed to shoot a driver when they disobey your order to get out of the car. Now please be quiet the adults are posting. Really stupid response, not what happened. She got shot for attempting to drive over a LEO. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,109 Posted yesterday at 02:29 PM 2 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said: I’m usually not around posting in real time when one of our liberal members goes full retard. This is awesome. Right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,974 Posted yesterday at 02:29 PM Just now, HellToupee said: That’s not why she was shot. Good lord do you eat paint chips growing up? It's Captain Semantics you're talking to. It was convenient for him to pretend the analogy presented was intended to be a description of what actually happened so he jumped at it. With gutter, you have to be extremely precise with your words. He doesn't have to be precise, but you do. Been that way for a decade with him. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 2,086 Posted yesterday at 02:30 PM 25 minutes ago, nobody said: I was encouraged that a wokie actually saw the same things the rest of the world did up through item 5. Acknowledged she was blocking traffic. Acknowledged there was an order to get out of the car. Acknowledged she was trying to flee instead of the absurd notion that she was complying with the order to move the car. Acknowledged she hit the dude inst and of the rest of the wokies claiming she didn't. Went off the rails again on the timing of the gun pull, but it was the best effort by a wokie to be realistic yet. Of course you liked the things that agreed with your point of view and ignored the things that didn't. You also ignored the first order to move the car. But that's because it doesn't match up with what you want it to be. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,822 Posted yesterday at 02:32 PM 4 minutes ago, 5-Points said: Uh, yeah, they do. If a person attempts, or is perceived to have attempted, to run over a LEO, they have the right to fire in self defense. It's sad that she's dead, but she focked up. Put it in park. Live to see your day in court. You mean exactly like if someone is holding a gun and is perceived to be a threat? That's what I said earlier but the midget attourney superhero said I was wrong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,822 Posted yesterday at 02:32 PM 5 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said: I’m usually not around posting in real time when one of our liberal members goes full retard. This is awesome. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fireballer 2,696 Posted yesterday at 02:33 PM 6 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said: I’m usually not around posting in real time when one of our liberal members goes full retard. This is awesome. This. There’s some special mental gymnastics going on here today Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 866 Posted yesterday at 02:34 PM 33 minutes ago, Reality said: Sure it is. Feel free to apologize. There will be a trial on this and a jury will decide. An Ice - That’s (1) Immigration & (2) Customs Enforcement - agent nowhere near any border with zero reasonable suspicion of any crime being perpetrated was trying to stop an American white woman who is a mother of 3 children, who had just waved 2 other LE vehicles ahead of her, from following that line of cars as she slowly pulled away, wheels turned from his position. He broke DHS guidelines on dealing with people in vehicles. The agent was filming at the time & that video will become evidence if he doesn’t destroy it. Lets put it before a jury. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,822 Posted yesterday at 02:35 PM 7 minutes ago, nobody said: It's Captain Semantics you're talking to. It was convenient for him to pretend the analogy presented was intended to be a description of what actually happened so he jumped at it. With gutter, you have to be extremely precise with your words. He doesn't have to be precise, but you do. Been that way for a decade with him. 100% It's got to be some sort of on the spectrum trait. Its nonsensical. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 2,174 Posted yesterday at 02:35 PM 7 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said: I’m usually not around posting in real time when one of our liberal members goes full retard. This is awesome. You can absolutely see why many so libs are dangerous. There is some seriously scary unhinged posting going on here. And this is how they react. Their emotions completely take them over, and they lead to bad reactions. It's not good, at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites