Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Googballz

IRS "loses" 2 years of Lois Lerner emails. How convenient.

Recommended Posts

I didn't bring up Sonasoft, that would have been Goog's herring. I'll assume you got everything else wrong too. ;)

Yep, there's only one thing Jerry does well...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

being wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dayum is Googballz kicking some ass in this thread. It's almost embarrassing to watch.

 

ShoNuff asking for proof... gee I dunno, that would be in the emails that unfortunately went poof. It's kinda the thread topic.

 

OldMaid saying there were just too many Tea Party groups... yeah and they all got delayed through the election. Which is kinda how this whole investigation got started.

 

Honcho has done a yeoman's job with his Sonasoft red herring, so I guess he has that going for him. :thumbsup:

 

It's pretty embarrassing. This is basically the only place you will find people actually running to the defense of the IRS or this administration on this subject..

 

At least our hacks are consistent.

 

:doh:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

151 posts now for Recliner Pilot in this thread. That is not a typo. 151.

 

Holy. Focking. sh1t. This asswipe's going to need a straight jacket soon. :doh:

 

Its reached GFIAFP level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dayum is Googballz kicking some ass in this thread. It's almost embarrassing to watch.

 

ShoNuff asking for proof... gee I dunno, that would be in the emails that unfortunately went poof. It's kinda the thread topic.

 

OldMaid saying there were just too many Tea Party groups... yeah and they all got delayed through the election. Which is kinda how this whole investigation got started.

 

Honcho has done a yeoman's job with his Sonasoft red herring, so I guess he has that going for him. :thumbsup:

 

Googz has gotten his ass beat down.

The point about proof was drobs acting as if it were a proven fact of white house involvement when there has been absolutely nothing linking the WH to this.

Honcho just answered questions from your boy who ran and hid from everything as usual (at least from those posts of his that were quoted)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It's pretty embarrassing. This is basically the only place you will find people actually running to the defense of the IRS or this administration on this subject..

 

At least our hacks are consistent.

 

:doh:

 

Nobody ran to their defense.

 

Hacks here are consistent...the righty ones constantly claim people are doing or saying something that they aren't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, there's only one thing Jerry does well...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

being wrong.

I think you are an awesome poster and an even better person. :wave:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:wave:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jerry's a swell guy. :wub:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It's pretty embarrassing. This is basically the only place you will find people actually running to the defense of the IRS or this administration on this subject..

 

At least our hacks are consistent.

 

:doh:

 

There is a world of difference between defending something and responding to dubious facts and out and out lies with corrections.

 

I agree that the hacks are consistent...facts are presented, that challenge the right-wing tripe they've been fed, and they respond by putting fingers in ears and going "NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!!".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dayum is Googballz kicking some ass in this thread. It's almost embarrassing to watch.

 

ShoNuff asking for proof... gee I dunno, that would be in the emails that unfortunately went poof. It's kinda the thread topic.

 

OldMaid saying there were just too many Tea Party groups... yeah and they all got delayed through the election. Which is kinda how this whole investigation got started.

 

Honcho has done a yeoman's job with his Sonasoft red herring, so I guess he has that going for him. :thumbsup:

And you wonder why nobody takes your crybaby whining about trolls seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And you wonder why nobody takes your crybaby whining about trolls seriously.

Jerry's been defending Recliner Pilot and phurfur to the hilt in recent days. If you need to know what his mindset is. ROFL. He's blind to rightie hacks and trolling. Because he's a fox news parrot himself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And you wonder why nobody takes your crybaby whining about trolls seriously.

Well, I admit that I typed it knowing I would get such reactions. In all seriousness, I thought Googs handled himself pretty well going solo against all of those folks.

 

OldMaid was stuck on the 15X difference in number of applications, which hurts her case since every single one was delayed. She topped it off by asking if they had since been approved -- holy "shut the barn door after the horses got out" batman, the whole point was that they were delayed up to the election.

 

And ShoNuff... still responding that we have no PROOF that the WH was involved. I don't even know where to start; maybe 16 pages ago in this thread which is about whether or not emails were intentionally destroyed?

 

Honcho did a good job backing him into a corner with the Sonasoft stuff. I actually appreciate the info he brought on the HD crashes, although something about it seems like "lying with statistics." He seems like a good chess player, a worthy adversary if you will. Don't tell him I said that though.

 

Back to the topic of trolling... to me what I did isn't "trolling," it is having a little good-natured bored fun. Nothing rankles feathers like claiming a little bored victory. :D

 

To me, trolling is Newbie posting 20 times about Googs posting 150 times. Completely devoid of any content, and somewhat ironic at the same time.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me, trolling is Newbie posting 20 times about Googs posting 150 times. Completely devoid of any content, and somewhat ironic at the same time.

I just don't understand that... He complains when Googballz, Phurfur, drobeski, Recliner Pilot and others post negative things about Obama (or any Democrat) and yet if he would just stop trolling and let the thread go, things would be better...

 

He talks about how they bring down the board with their constant posts about politics, but IMO he brings down the board as well with his trolling at just trying to piss them off...

 

I don't know, just thinking that things would be better if the trolling in the political threads stopped, things could improve overall...

 

Yeah I know I troll on things as well, but Newbie (and some others) are taking to a higher level...

 

Just my one cent, since my opinions only matter to me...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I admit that I typed it knowing I would get such reactions. In all seriousness, I thought Googs handled himself pretty well going solo against all of those folks.

 

OldMaid was stuck on the 15X difference in number of applications, which hurts her case since every single one was delayed. She topped it off by asking if they had since been approved -- holy "shut the barn door after the horses got out" batman, the whole point was that they were delayed up to the election.

 

And ShoNuff... still responding that we have no PROOF that the WH was involved. I don't even know where to start; maybe 16 pages ago in this thread which is about whether or not emails were intentionally destroyed?

 

Honcho did a good job backing him into a corner with the Sonasoft stuff. I actually appreciate the info he brought on the HD crashes, although something about it seems like "lying with statistics." He seems like a good chess player, a worthy adversary if you will. Don't tell him I said that though.

 

Back to the topic of trolling... to me what I did isn't "trolling," it is having a little good-natured bored fun. Nothing rankles feathers like claiming a little bored victory. :D

 

To me, trolling is Newbie posting 20 times about Googs posting 150 times. Completely devoid of any content, and somewhat ironic at the same time.

 

I view it more as 'can what happened be explained because it falls within a reasonable range of probability?' Without being there, viewing tapes to see if someone took a hard drive out of there computer and bashed it with a hammer, or some other smoking gun, that's all one can do in these situations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In all seriousness, I thought Googs handled himself pretty well going solo against all of those folks.

 

 

:lol:

 

In all seriousness, you think every conservative handles himself well. The first sign of a polit5ical hack. hope this helps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just don't understand that... He complains when Googballz, Phurfur, drobeski, Recliner Pilot and others post negative things about Obama (or any Democrat) and yet if he would just stop trolling and let the thread go, things would be better...

 

Oops. You listed RP twice. :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like Lerner didn't get rid of all her emails exposing her as a political hack.

 

 

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Congressional investigators say they uncovered emails Wednesday showing that a former Internal Revenue Service official at the heart of the tea party investigation sought an audit involving a Republican senator in 2012.

 

The emails show former IRS official Lois Lerner mistakenly received an invitation to an event that was meant to go to Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa.

 

The event organizer apparently offered to pay for Grassley's wife to attend the event. In an email to another IRS official, Lerner suggests referring the matter for an audit, saying it might be inappropriate for the group to pay for his wife.

 

"Perhaps we should refer to exam?" Lerner wrote.

 

It was unclear from the emails whether Lerner was suggesting that Grassley or the group be audited — or both.

 

The other IRS official, Matthew Giuliano, waved her off, saying an audit would be premature because Grassley hadn't even accepted the invitation.

 

"It would be Grassley who would need to report the income," Giuliano said.

 

The name of the event organizer was blacked out on copies of the emails released by the House Ways and Means Committee because they were considered confidential taxpayer information. Grassley and his wife signed waivers allowing their names to be released.

 

In a statement, Grassley's office said the senator did not attend the event, and did not receive any invitation intended for Lerner.

 

"This kind of thing fuels the deep concerns many people have about political targeting by the IRS and by officials at the highest levels," Grassley said. "It's very troubling that a simple clerical mix-up could get a taxpayer immediately referred for an IRS exam without any due diligence from agency officials."

 

How does this expose her as a hack. She accidentally received an email and asked a colleague if the invitation warranted an exam? Should, upon seeing what might be a questionable legal offer to pay for the wife to go to event also, she should ignore it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

In all seriousness, you think every conservative handles himself well. The first sign of a polit5ical hack. hope this helps

Except, I went on to explain why, troll. :wave:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops. You listed RP twice. :doh:

Did Googballz publicly admit that he was in fact Recliner Pilot?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How does this expose her as a hack. She accidentally received an email and asked a colleague if the invitation warranted an exam? Should, upon seeing what might be a questionable legal offer to pay for the wife to go to event also, she should ignore it?

 

It's not her area in the IRS. And for it to be illegal they would have had to pay for her, issue Grassley a 1099, and then him not report it as income. Hack jumped the gun a little, don't ya think?

 

Also, saying she wouldn't be seen on the same stage as Grassley, and donating to Dems adds to her hack iness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did Googballz publicly admit that he was in fact Recliner Pilot?

Is that what it takes for you? Holy fock you're slow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I admit that I typed it knowing I would get such reactions. In all seriousness, I thought Googs handled himself pretty well going solo against all of those folks.

 

OldMaid was stuck on the 15X difference in number of applications, which hurts her case since every single one was delayed. She topped it off by asking if they had since been approved -- holy "shut the barn door after the horses got out" batman, the whole point was that they were delayed up to the election.

 

And ShoNuff... still responding that we have no PROOF that the WH was involved. I don't even know where to start; maybe 16 pages ago in this thread which is about whether or not emails were intentionally destroyed?

 

Honcho did a good job backing him into a corner with the Sonasoft stuff. I actually appreciate the info he brought on the HD crashes, although something about it seems like "lying with statistics." He seems like a good chess player, a worthy adversary if you will. Don't tell him I said that though.

 

Back to the topic of trolling... to me what I did isn't "trolling," it is having a little good-natured bored fun. Nothing rankles feathers like claiming a little bored victory. :D

 

To me, trolling is Newbie posting 20 times about Googs posting 150 times. Completely devoid of any content, and somewhat ironic at the same time.

 

It isn't "trolling" or "slap fighting" when you or the people who's politics you mostly align with are doing it. That's about the only difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that what it takes for you? Holy fock you're slow.

Yes they sound similar, but anyone can make an online persona to sound like someone else... Just would like absolute proof...

 

Plus I don't care about "aliases" like a lot of people do...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not her area in the IRS. And for it to be illegal they would have had to pay for her, issue Grassley a 1099, and then him not report it as income. Hack jumped the gun a little, don't ya think?

 

Also, saying she wouldn't be seen on the same stage as Grassley, and donating to Dems adds to her hack iness.

 

She had a question about a possible tax issue and asks someone else(who's area it is in) about it <>Hack. :rolleyes:

 

It's amazing how easy it is to get you blinder wearing partisans to froth at the mouth, like with Sonasoft. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It isn't "trolling" or "slap fighting" when you or the people who's politics you mostly align with are doing it. That's about the only difference.

Somebody is a whiny biotch... I initially gave my reasons of why I thought those folks were wrong, expanded upon them in the post you quoted (while giving Honcho some kudos, albeit a backhanded compliment the first time), and you respond with :cry: ? Any actual defense of what I said about the OldMaid or ShoNuff exchanges? Or just more :cry: ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somebody is a whiny biotch... I initially gave my reasons of why I thought those folks were wrong, expanded upon them in the post you quoted (while giving Honcho some kudos, albeit a backhanded compliment the first time), and you respond with :cry: ? Any actual defense of what I said about the OldMaid or ShoNuff exchanges? Or just more :cry: ?

 

Nope, just pointing out the hypocrisy of chiding other people for trolling when you act like a passive aggressive little preteen girl all the time. :wave:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MDC brings less substance than Newbie......if that's possible.

 

Rut roh, looks RP just changed personalities from the world's biggest trolling creep into Vicky Victim again. :overhead:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rut roh, looks RP just changed personalities from the world's biggest trolling creep into Vicky Victim again. :overhead:

Not sure how you constantly making an ass of yourself makes me a victim, but whatever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Holy fock Jerry, you can't see why it's important to know when and if these conservative groups were approved? If the IRS was legitimately trying to determine if campaign fraud was being committed by these groups, then they probably didn't magically get approved, right after the campaign.

 

And as for your "but all the conservative groups were held up" line... I've addressed that. Of course RP chose not to respond to any of it. But since you missed it:

 

And regarding some of the stuff you posted earlier... If you read the entire link, you would have seen, that the flags for the progressive groups didn't contain any notes on how to proceed, while the conservative flags, did. Now you can speculate that is unfair... or it could be because of the sheer number of conservative groups vs progressive. Hell, we could even speculate that it was an oversight on the person who set the system up. But it would still just be speculation. That's straight from one of my responses.

 

And yes, the totals of 292 vs 20 is telling. If one group has that much of a higher rate, it makes sense they would get scrutinized more.

 

 

Whatever... I know you're just trying to rile everyone up. Not sure why you enjoy doing so, but I guess if it floats your boat, have at it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how you constantly making an ass of yourself makes me a victim, but whatever.

 

Is this the part where you :cry: about Newbie rooning your awesome threads while Jerry pats your schlong? :wub:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And yes, the totals of 292 vs 20 is telling. If one group has that much of a higher rate, it makes sense they would get scrutinized more.

 

 

292 vs 20 is not a "rate". Those are total number of applicants.

 

6 out of 20 vs 292 out of 292 is the rate.

 

33% vs 100%.

 

Math isn't your strong suit, is it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

292 vs 20 is not a "rate". Those are total number of applicants.

 

6 out of 20 vs 292 out of 292 is the rate.

 

33% vs 100%.

 

Math isn't your strong suit, is it.

 

We know it's not yours. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I figured I should post in this thread.

 

I didn't read it, but it is probably liberal posters trolling the conservative posters while at the same time saying that they are not trolling.

 

The conservatives are probably also trolling, but I they do not deny their trolling near as much.

 

 

What a waste.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

292 vs 20 is not a "rate". Those are total number of applicants.

6 out of 20 vs 292 out of 292 is the rate.

33% vs 100%.

Math isn't your strong suit, is it.

Really?

 

I wasn't talking about the number being scrutinized, but the number of applications. One side was applying at a much higher rate. But thanks for trying to deflect some more.

 

If you had a stack of 20 applications on one side and a stack of 292 applications on the other, which one do you think it would be more important to set a protocol for?

 

I'm still not saying that there isn't something wrong here... but I can also see some other explanations that might fit what happened besides a conspiracy. Never underestimate the power of Government ineptitude...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike is buying the entire IRS story.....hook.....line.....sinker.

 

Funny stuff.

 

 

Whatever you say IRSer. Got anymore conspiracy theories to peddle today...another Sonasoft, cause that was funny watching you swallow that load of tripe. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Old maid and mikey sure are good lil soldiers :lol:

The wonder twins, blam in the form of a sheep and a parrot. POW!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Los Lerner could tell you the moon was made of cheese and you would spend the next hour trying to convince us it was chedder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×