Sho Nuff 720 Posted August 26, 2014 You know you look like a fagg0t when you do this, right? Just when he does that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Googballz 39 Posted August 26, 2014 Just when he does that? RMFF! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peenie 1,915 Posted August 26, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97PH8B2PEls that doesn't appear to be a robbery to me. i don't know why he later grabbed the store clerk and pushed him (not in this video), but it didn't look like they came in the store intending to steal. i mean, why did either guy give back items if they were trying to steal?? i've seen people steal and they usually grab and run. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,516 Posted August 26, 2014 that kid should of just watched this video and everything would of been fine. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=575727099190133 I've never seen that before... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GobbleDog 997 Posted August 26, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97PH8B2PEls that doesn't appear to be a robbery to me. i don't know why he later grabbed the store clerk and pushed him (not in this video), but it didn't look like they came in the store intending to steal. i mean, why did either guy give back items if they were trying to steal?? i've seen people steal and they usually grab and run. Agreed, I don't see anything out of the ordinary in that video. He didn't look too nice in the other video pushing the store clerk though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,516 Posted August 26, 2014 I heard earlier they sent 3 to the thug's funeral, zero to the General's. If true, that is pathetic. Even better (or worse) The White House sent three officials to attend Monday's funeral for Michael Brown in St. Louis -- three more than it sent for former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's funeral last year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,087 Posted August 26, 2014 whats the good reason? a business i built and operated for 25 years...my livelihood...anyone can just come in and take anything they want and b;tich slap me in the process...and i just sit there and take it? hahahaa You didn't build it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted August 26, 2014 I don't see what the big deal is with the looting anyway. It's just a bunch of people dressed up in frilly, poofy shirts and pantyhouse, prancing about, strumming and plinking on a fancy Renaissances ukelele. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
porkbutt 893 Posted August 26, 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97PH8B2PEls that doesn't appear to be a robbery to me. i don't know why he later grabbed the store clerk and pushed him (not in this video), but it didn't look like they came in the store intending to steal. i mean, why did either guy give back items if they were trying to steal?? i've seen people steal and they usually grab and run. :lol: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted August 26, 2014 why are you guys saying he stole cigars? i thought it was reported that he paid for them but got in an argument with the shop owner about showing ID. ...and i'm not even following this story. why are you guys arguing over false facts?? You may have a point. The only people I've heard that reported the robbery were the police, the media, the dead kid's parents, Al Sharpton, Robin William's suicide note, and the dead kid's buddy who helped rob the store. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bandrus1 413 Posted August 26, 2014 why does the "robbery" matter? Hasnt it been proven the shooting officer did not know he was involved in that at the time? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Googballz 39 Posted August 26, 2014 why does the "robbery" matter? Hasnt it been proven the shooting officer did not know he was involved in that at the time? 1. It dispels the "Gentle Giant" BS the media is pushing. 2. The thug didn't know the officer was unaware of his robbery and would naturally think the cop was going to arrest him, which would explain his reaction to the cop. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,254 Posted August 26, 2014 You mean white-hispanic, which I didn't even know existed until George Zimmerman. White hispanic is defined as a half hispanic who got a white name. He can't even follow a black guy. Barack Obama was raised whiter than George Zimmerman, but he is completely black, due to his name. He can bust a cap in anyone he wants. If a hispanic commits a crime he is identified as "white", if he is a victim of a crime he is hispanic,,,, HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted August 26, 2014 why does the "robbery" matter? Hasnt it been proven the shooting officer did not know he was involved in that at the time? Kid's state of mind at the time of the incident. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,087 Posted August 26, 2014 1. It dispels the "Gentle Giant" BS the media is pushing. 2. The thug didn't know the officer was unaware of his robbery and would naturally think the cop was going to arrest him, which would explain his reaction to the cop. Kid's state of mind at the time of the incident. The two of you acree on something? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
porkbutt 893 Posted August 26, 2014 why does the "robbery" matter? Hasnt it been proven the shooting officer did not know he was involved in that at the time? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Googballz 39 Posted August 26, 2014 The two of you acree on something? If so, I seriously have to reevaluate my life. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted August 26, 2014 If so, I seriously have to reevaluate my life. That was pretty funny when I posted it yesterday in response to posty Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vikings4ever 556 Posted August 26, 2014 why does the "robbery" matter? Hasnt it been proven the shooting officer did not know he was involved in that at the time? It doesn't really matter, it doesn't change the facts about what happened. It does, however, change the narrative of the story. Brown's family immediately started the narrative that he was an angel, that he would never, ever do ANYTHING that could justify a cop shooting him. Race baiters like Sharpton grabbed onto, and propagated this narrative because it gains them attention, money, and power. With the release of the video, reasonable people have to doubt that narrative, and wonder if Brown did do something to justify the shooting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted August 26, 2014 That was pretty funny when I posted it yesterday in response to posty No, it wasn't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Googballz 39 Posted August 26, 2014 No, it wasn't. Beat me to it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,254 Posted August 26, 2014 It doesn't really matter, it doesn't change the facts about what happened. It does, however, change the narrative of the story. Brown's family immediately started the narrative that he was an angel, that he would never, ever do ANYTHING that could justify a cop shooting him. Race baiters like Sharpton grabbed onto, and propagated this narrative because it gains them attention, money, and power. With the release of the video, reasonable people have to doubt that narrative, and wonder if Brown did do something to justify the shooting. Of course we can agree that being a bad person who does bad things is not justification for shooting someone ,and while no one is making that assertion I continue to hear this brought up as if people are actually saying so, which again...no one has yet said that, though there are plenty of people prentding so, and using it. Hell, if this factor were true we would run out of black people in a couple of weeks. It is rather typical to hear the family and friends state how "he was such a good boy!" and such, yeah I get it, it correlates to the cognitive dissonance practiced in the African American community. THey know their kids are thugs, ignore this fact, and want to pretend they are victims. When their kids are held accountable for their actions its racism.....right ,we get it, accountability is not the "thing" in the African American culture. When kids act up uin school its time to lower the standards since they cant behave or keep up with their fellow students. Whatever, keep degrading yourselves, it creates a cutlure of non-competitiveness. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BiPolarBear 485 Posted August 26, 2014 Yesterday I saw a video of Dorian Johnson completely flipping on his account of the shooting. He said the officer was attacked by Brown and there was a struggle for the gun. Now I can't find the video. Was the video a spoof? Was it removed for legal reasons? This is the source of the story: http://therightscoop.com/report-key-witness-dorian-johnson-now-admits-that-michael-brown-attacked-officer-wilson/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted August 26, 2014 Have they dismissed the fake doctors autopsy results yet ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,254 Posted August 26, 2014 Have they dismissed the fake doctors autopsy results yet ? Not sure they can. At this point justice has to give way to the mob. If they dont crucify the cop, regardless of his level of actual culpability, they run the risk of the retards burning stuff again. Sorry, the cop simply has to go down at this time, to save dozens of other people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,494 Posted August 26, 2014 why does the "robbery" matter? Hasnt it been proven the shooting officer did not know he was involved in that at the time? Because if you think Mike Brown was a criminal you're less likely to care about the details as to why he got shot? Dunno. This is the same crowd that suggested Trayvon Martin's soda and candy were part of a drug cocktail. You're not dealing with a bunch of geniuses here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,254 Posted August 26, 2014 why does the "robbery" matter? Hasnt it been proven the shooting officer did not know he was involved in that at the time? What the perp had actually done that day speaks to his frame of mind during his assault on the officer. Similarly, what the cop had done that date also needs to be taking into consideration, along with any previous instances where perhaps the officer may have used excessive force etc. It does not convict either person, but lets not pretend either one was an angel, like some prefer to do. Regardless of why the perp assualted the officer, that there are over a dozen witnesses to this event then allows one to begin to create a narrative for what transpired. I think the big question is whether or not the cop was jsutified in firing his weapon. I think attempting to justify the killing of the thug is just dumb, regardless of his many shortcomings, none would justify killing him. However, that being said, assault is a suitable reason to draw ones weapon and defend oneself. I suspect there is a current of people who might oppose the notion of a firearm being suitable for defending against assault.....until they get assaulted of course. I found it telling that someone recently came up with the 10 things to not do when encountering police. All of which was simple common sense that most people already understand, or were taught by their parents. Yet, for some reason, African American kids need a cheat sheet to know how to behave. Very telling. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted August 26, 2014 Wow, racist much RLLD? An entire race of persons doesn't "know how to behave"?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
porkbutt 893 Posted August 26, 2014 Because if you think Mike Brown was a criminal you're less likely to care about the details as to why he got shot? Dunno. This is the same crowd that suggested Trayvon Martin's soda and candy were part of a drug cocktail. You're not dealing with a bunch of geniuses here. :lol: liberals are silly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,494 Posted August 26, 2014 :lol: liberals are silly Is there another reason for the focus on whether Brown stole a cigar? The length of this thread and tone of the posts is evidence to me that some folks are highly invested in this case for suspect reasons. For the record I think the political left has gone full retard over this and I doubt we will ever know what exactly happened. But the Geek Club has been the same thing in reverse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
porkbutt 893 Posted August 26, 2014 Is there another reason for the focus on whether Brown stole a cigar? The length of this thread and tone of the posts is evidence to me that some folks are highly invested in this case for suspect reasons. For the record I think the political left has gone full retard over this and I doubt we will ever know what exactly happened. But the Geek Club has been the same thing in reverse. tone of the posts? suspect reasons? wtf are you talking about? it's national news. your savior sent 3 reps to the gentle giant's funeral. is there some other looting and rioting scene we should be talking about? should we just dismiss the fact that he robbed a store and assaulted the clerk right before the whole incident? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 191 Posted August 26, 2014 Officer Wilson has not yet given his statement of what occurred. I represented many cops on many shootings as a union rep, and my first action was to always tell the shooter to make no statements except amount of rounds fired and the general direction which they were fired. We would then sit tight until the lawyer arrived. Nothing has been "proven" about whether he knew about the robbery. Just speculation by that incompetent chief of police. Any statements made before Miranda don't count, absent a spontaneous utterance, which I'm sure would have surfaced at this point. Officer Wilson is the only one who knows exactly what happened, and we have yet to hear from him. It's how the system works, like it or not. The accused has rights. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,494 Posted August 26, 2014 tone of the posts? suspect reasons? wtf are you talking about? I'm talking about how the expected usual right wing bigots on this site have been referring to Brown and the protestors in the expected racial language like calling then animals etc., in between crying about Obummer and the librul media. Fake outrage. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted August 26, 2014 Officer Wilson has not yet given his statement of what occurred. I represented many cops on many shootings as a union rep, and my first action was to always tell the shooter to make no statements except amount of rounds fired and the general direction which they were fired. We would then sit tight until the lawyer arrived. Nothing has been "proven" about whether he knew about the robbery. Just speculation by that incompetent chief of police. Any statements made before Miranda don't count, absent a spontaneous utterance, which I'm sure would have surfaced at this point. Officer Wilson is the only one who knows exactly what happened, and we have yet to hear from him. It's how the system works, like it or not. The accused has rights. I highly doubt that's true. Miranda applies only in the case of custodial interrogations. I doubt they immediately handcuffed the cop and locked him in a police interrogation room. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeshushu 51 Posted August 26, 2014 Not sure they can. At this point justice has to give way to the mob. If they dont crucify the cop, regardless of his level of actual culpability, they run the risk of the retards burning stuff again. Sorry, the cop simply has to go down at this time, to save dozens of other people. Did not Spock say the many are more important than the one or few? Something like that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,494 Posted August 26, 2014 Did not Spock say the many are more important than the one or few? Something like that? Yep. He backed that up in the Wrath of Khan too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 191 Posted August 26, 2014 "absent a spontaneous utterance". Reading is fundamental. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted August 26, 2014 "absent a spontaneous utterance". Reading is fundamental. No that's wrong, actually. A spontaneous utterance made during an unmirandized custodial interrogation may be admissible. But if it isn't a custodial interrogation then it's all admissible whether the person had been mirandized or not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
porkbutt 893 Posted August 26, 2014 I'm talking about how the expected usual right wing bigots on this site have been referring to Brown and the protestors in the expected racial language like calling then animals etc., in between crying about Obummer and the librul media. Fake outrage. so like i said you lefties are hilarious. as opposed to the real outrage of stealing xboxes and nikes or crying about big bad whitey racist cops and their using too much force? maybe we should just give them whistles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 191 Posted August 26, 2014 You're thick as a brick man. I should have said except spontaneous utterances instead of absent. My bad, but I would think you would have gotten the gist of it. I'll be sure and dumb it down for you from now on Share this post Link to post Share on other sites