Bobbyn2022 53 Posted September 3, 2014 Team A. Rashad Jennings and Jordan Reed for Team B. Chris Johnson, Eric Decker and Jordan Mathews. (Team A has Vernon Davis.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted September 3, 2014 I say no Veto (has to be really obvious to veto it) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tanatastic 2,061 Posted September 3, 2014 No, this trade looks fine to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
laxdad57 2 Posted September 3, 2014 No Veto........ unless there is obvious collusion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
72dolfan 5 Posted September 3, 2014 If this trade made you ask the question, then I expect we'll see you often this season, unfortunately. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BufordT 372 Posted September 3, 2014 The season has officially began. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Showboat 146 Posted September 3, 2014 If your league allows vetos, then all trades should be vetoed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,091 Posted September 3, 2014 Definitely veto. One team got 3 players and the other only got two. Way too lopsided. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flgatorguy87 160 Posted September 3, 2014 I'm trying to figure out who won... but once I do I'm vetoing that sh!t. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bobbyn2022 53 Posted September 3, 2014 Lol I'm writing this so people in my league realize it's pretty close to fair and def not a trade u veto. I obviously know it's fair enough. I'm just hoping when they see a bunch of fantasy guys agreeing with me they will realize vetoing a trade Like this would be stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted September 3, 2014 If your league allows vetos, then all trades should be vetoed. You stole my line, thief. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PackYourNut 47 Posted September 3, 2014 Lol I'm writing this so people in my league realize it's pretty close to fair and def not a trade u veto. I obviously know it's fair enough. I'm just hoping when they see a bunch of fantasy guys agreeing with me they will realize vetoing a trade Like this would be stupid. Â You should leave that league immediately. Cause they are a bunch of focktards! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chronic Iguana 0 Posted September 3, 2014 And we have a winner! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jeffkomlo 19 Posted September 4, 2014 Go to team A's house and punch him in'the face in front of his wife and kids Issue resolved Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drizzay 648 Posted September 4, 2014 A RB on a sh!tty team and a TE on a sh!tty team  Vs.  A RB and WR on the same sh!tty team and a rookie WR   I don't see a problem. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GridironGuzzlers 3 Posted September 4, 2014 O Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â M Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â g Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,652 Posted September 4, 2014 Yes. Veto any trade that doesnt help your team. Then offer one of those owners a really lopsided deal hoping they accept. Once they do come back here to cry about your trade being vetoed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Giants Fan 85 Posted September 4, 2014 You are ghey if this goes through. Â Like officially. You hafta post pics where you are doing some really ghey stuff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,652 Posted September 4, 2014 You are ghey if this goes through. Â Like officially. You hafta post pics where you are doing some really ghey stuff. This made me laugh. I really shouldnt be encouraging you... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,406 Posted September 4, 2014 Oh good, love these threads Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dehaven123 31 Posted September 4, 2014 Lol I'm writing this so people in my league realize it's pretty close to fair and def not a trade u veto. I obviously know it's fair enough. I'm just hoping when they see a bunch of fantasy guys agreeing with me they will realize vetoing a trade Like this would be stupid. Â crassic backpeddlin here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tanatastic 2,061 Posted September 4, 2014 Top reasons anyone ever objects to a trade. Â 1. They feel like it. regardless of players or teams being traded. Â 2. they are jealous that other people are having fun and making moves. Â 3. They are nitpicking who got the better end and to them, its a crime if someone ever gets the better end of a deal they are not involved in. Â Trading objections is a cancer in FF. Commish decides if it goes through, period. If you cant trust the commish to do that, you need a new commish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steelers2101 7 Posted September 4, 2014 My thought exactly! Â Silly question. Never veto outside of collusion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,993 Posted September 4, 2014 I vetoed this thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kelvarr 13 Posted September 4, 2014 No trade should be vetoed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray_T 601 Posted September 4, 2014 Team A. Rashad Jennings and Jordan Reed for Team B. Chris Johnson, Eric Decker and Jordan Mathews. (Team A has Vernon Davis.) this is not a trade that is veto worthy. Â In my mind, a veto worthy trade is obvious from the moment you see it. You shouldnt even need to look at stats or anything of the like. Â there are exceptions to that rule, but not very many. Â If you find yourself looking at stats to see if the trade was fair, you are probably going way to far to justify a veto. Â Bottom line: none of these players is a 'stud' and because some of these players may have high ceilings and low floors, each person could theoretically place a wide difference in value on each of the players here. Â based on this, there is nothing to veto. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil Simms 11 127 Posted September 5, 2014 I was going to say no veto until I saw that team A has Davis. Obvious collusion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
