Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted May 14, 2016 Well I'm glad you agree it is an interpretation of the 14th Amendment and so not completely made up and based on nothing, as was your original bullsh1t assertion. Now is it a reasonable interpretation of the 14th Amendment? We'll find out. But that wasn't the target so now you're shifting it since I handed your ass to you Yiu have to go a long way to say this is an interpretation of the 14th A. I wonder if you even know why it was necessary to have the 14th? I do, and I know it wasn't for this childish, foolish, overreach. And you yell and stomp around here every day crying that Trump has support. You and the j-offs that have hijacked the Democratic Party better snap out of it and grow up. It's not that long ago a sitting moron won re-election, after sending us to an unnecessary war, over gay marriage. Wake up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted May 14, 2016 Agree the courts will decide, and so far it doesn't look good. Quite a few schools have lost lawsuits already for not lettng transgender 'boys' into the girls restroom. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted May 14, 2016 Agree the courts will decide, and so far it doesn't look good. Quite a few schools have lost lawsuits already for not lettng transgender 'boys' into the girls restroom. Sad but true. School vouchers are a big part of whether I will vote for or contribute money to a candidate now. I never thought I would care about that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted May 14, 2016 Sad but true. School vouchers are a big part of whether I will vote for or contribute money to a candidate now. I never thought I would care about that. Sad part is, there's an easy solution. 1 boys only, 1 girls only, 1 anyone. That's the same solution the schools keep losing lawsuits with, though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted May 14, 2016 Sad part is, there's an easy solution. 1 boys only, 1 girls only, 1 anyone. That's the same solution the schools keep losing lawsuits with, though. It's the modern Democrat. No debate, no compromise, only demands. I have been a registered democrat for a long time. I went along with a lot of the social issues, some of them made sense, even though I wasn't passionate about them. Im getting off the crazy bus now. They can continue without me. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,421 Posted May 14, 2016 hes not serious with this transgender liberal poosay overreach is he? thats why he'll always be a disgrace. what focking joke. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted May 14, 2016 You said there was no law and that jerk face Obummer is just making it up!!! Actually there is a law and it's a g0ddamn constitutional amendment. Now does it say what that poopyface Obummer!! says it says? Well the courts will figure that and, yes, possibly including the US Supreme Court. But to say he has no basis at all is ignorant and/or disingenuous. I'm leaning towards disingenuous since you continue to push a disingenuous "history" of how this NC state law came about. HTH dude, take some Ritalin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,543 Posted May 14, 2016 so can my son now play women's basketball? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted May 14, 2016 so can my son now play women's basketball? How does he feeeeeeeel about it ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frank M 181 Posted May 14, 2016 hes not serious with this transgender liberal poosay overreach is he? thats why he'll always be a disgrace. what focking joke. You sound a little outraged. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted May 14, 2016 hes not serious with this transgender liberal poosay overreach is he? thats why he'll always be a disgrace. what focking joke. 10-12 years from now, he's going to be considered a good or even great President. 8yrs of Trump or Hillary, then the next clown, will lower the bar enough to make that happen. Watch and see. Bin Laden- dead 4th longest period of economic growth in U.S. history, with a recession likely right around the corner. The growth hasn't added up to much, but they'll blame the upcoming recession if or when it happens. Expanded healthcare coverage- good or bad, being at the head of the line is what's remembered. There might be more, but that's likely enough. The downhill slide will make this guy remembered fondly by most non-Republican diehards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FeelingMN 273 Posted May 14, 2016 When a normal Y chromosome with a fully functional SRY locus is found in a patient with dysfunctional androgen receptors, as is the case in androgen insensitivity syndrome, which has an incidence rate of 1 per 20,000 population, virilization of the fetus does not fully take place. Although testosterone is produced in utero, it cannot change cells that lack normal receptors. In complete androgen insensitivity, the fetus has a total absence of functional androgen receptors. Therefore, progression in the default path toward female genital structure continues uninterrupted. It is growing more common, and such individuals are referred to as XY females. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/917990-overview#a3 God's handiwork. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted May 14, 2016 10-12 years from now, he's going to be considered a good or even great President. 8yrs of Trump or Hillary, then the next clown, will lower the bar enough to make that happen. Watch and see. Bin Laden- dead 4th longest period of economic growth in U.S. history, with a recession likely right around the corner. The growth hasn't added up to much, but they'll blame the upcoming recession if or when it happens. Expanded healthcare coverage- good or bad, being at the head of the line is what's remembered. There might be more, but that's likely enough. The downhill slide will make this guy remembered fondly by most non-Republican diehards. He would be considered a pretty good president regardless of who followed him. People need a few years to appreciate his accomplishments although it is already starting to happen Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted May 14, 2016 10-12 years from now, he's going to be considered a good or even great President. 8yrs of Trump or Hillary, then the next clown, will lower the bar enough to make that happen. Watch and see. Bin Laden- dead 4th longest period of economic growth in U.S. history, with a recession likely right around the corner. The growth hasn't added up to much, but they'll blame the upcoming recession if or when it happens. Expanded healthcare coverage- good or bad, being at the head of the line is what's remembered. There might be more, but that's likely enough. The downhill slide will make this guy remembered fondly by most non-Republican diehards. I dont think so. When this smoke and mirrors economy led by a Wall Street that has been propped up by low interest rates, and corporate buy back of stocks bursts, and it will, he's getting the blame. He's done absolutely nothing for this countries economy but let the banks and Wall Street go nuts again. Jobs walking out the door left and right and he does zilch. But he made sure Pamela Manderson can pee where it wants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,882 Posted May 14, 2016 The celebrity potus Can Republicans still use this line? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted May 14, 2016 Can Republicans still use this line? For a few more months, then the Democrats will have it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted May 14, 2016 I dont think so. When this smoke and mirrors economy led by a Wall Street that has been propped up by low interest rates, and corporate buy back of stocks bursts, and it will, he's getting the blame. He's done absolutely nothing for this countries economy but let the banks and Wall Street go nuts again. Jobs walking out the door left and right and he does zilch. But he made sure Pamela Manderson can pee where it wants. He'll get the blame at first, true. Remember how many times we heard "Bush!" in Obama's first term. Not too much now, though. Same thing will happen with Obama. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted May 14, 2016 Can Republicans still use this line?jayzee, Beyonce and the front loop lady in the bathtub say yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,882 Posted May 14, 2016 jayzee, Beyonce and the front loop lady in the bathtub say yes. Weren't they all contestants on Celebrity Apprentice? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,084 Posted May 14, 2016 http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/917990-overview#a3 God's handiwork. That would suck. Seriously though, what's your point? Is it that some folks truly are transgender? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,783 Posted May 14, 2016 The libbies have decided that every issue that has an effect on people (every issue) is a civil rights issue. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted May 14, 2016 The libbies have decided that every issue that has an effect on people (every issue) is a civil rights issue. the drag Queens of fake outrage Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,173 Posted May 14, 2016 I voted in my state for ghey marraige. Transgender people should have the same rights as anyone else to live their life. Shouldn't be discriminated against for employment, getting a loan from a bank, entering a restaurant, etc. However I find it fascinating that reasonable people can't agree that Transgender people who have not fully transitioned bring about an issue when it comes to things like public showers, restrooms, and athletic competition due to their very unique situation. Especially when it comes to minors (public schools). It's not about 'hate'. I'm sorry but when we're talking about minors and showers and bathrooms....clear lines have to be drawn. Surly folks can understand this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted May 14, 2016 I voted in my state for ghey marraige. Transgender people should have the same rights as anyone else to live their life. Shouldn't be discriminated against for employment, getting a loan from a bank, entering a restaurant, etc. However I find it fascinating that reasonable people can't agree that Transgender people who have not fully transitioned bring about an issue when it comes to things like public showers, restrooms, and athletic competition due to their very unique situation. Especially when it comes to minors (public schools). It's not about 'hate'. I'm sorry but when we're talking about minors and showers and bathrooms....clear lines have to be drawn. Surly folks can understand this. Quite simply, the left is no longer reasonable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted May 14, 2016 I voted in my state for ghey marraige. Transgender people should have the same rights as anyone else to live their life. Shouldn't be discriminated against for employment, getting a loan from a bank, entering a restaurant, etc. However I find it fascinating that reasonable people can't agree that Transgender people who have not fully transitioned bring about an issue when it comes to things like public showers, restrooms, and athletic competition due to their very unique situation. Especially when it comes to minors (public schools). It's not about 'hate'. I'm sorry but when we're talking about minors and showers and bathrooms....clear lines have to be drawn. Surly folks can understand this. Probably not, that's why they're surly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donkeyjotes 54 Posted May 14, 2016 They didn't even have separate bathrooms when the 14th amendment was written. They went doodoo in outhouses. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted May 14, 2016 It's the left that brought this up, no matter how they want to spin it. Nobody said they couldnt use the bathroom, locker room ect. They went to the bathroom for years just fine, and we never heard a word about it. Now it's going to clog up the courts for a few years. Good job Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
donkeyjotes 54 Posted May 14, 2016 Agree 100%. Equal is equal. Making special arrangements for one gender, race, etc. or another is persecution not equality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLS 314 Posted May 14, 2016 He would be considered a pretty good president regardless of who followed him. People need a few years to appreciate his accomplishments although it is already starting to happen I can't decide between and . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,339 Posted May 14, 2016 Obama sucks. Most of the military hate him. Same goes for me. Can't wait til his ass is out Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naomi 360 Posted May 14, 2016 Again. Its .2% of the pooulation. Who cares? At the high school I work at a lot of the student body leans liberal (it's CA and a big program at the school has a progressive philosophy) and it seems a seed has been planted for many youth. One could argue that they are transgender or identify androgenously (a burgeoning group) at their core, and higher social consciousness is now allowing these people to understand who they are and be recognized. But I can't help but strongly guess that a lot of these kids are starting to believe this is what the deal is with them out of power of suggestion, and for reasons that in the longer scheme of things, should not be catered to. They wouldn't all 'grow out' of it, but many would. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,543 Posted May 14, 2016 I just don't understand how parents in their right mind, would allow a 5 year old boy to identify as a girl, that kid needs to get psychological help. Putting him in school and letting him pretend to be a girl, is not the solution Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naomi 360 Posted May 14, 2016 I just don't understand how parents in their right mind, would allow a 5 year old boy to identify as a girl, that kid needs to get psychological help. Putting him in school and letting him pretend to be a girl, is not the solution What about a 5 year old girl identifying as a boy? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted May 14, 2016 Well, it seems we have exhausted the Bill of Rights, now we have to institute a Bill of Feeeeelings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,084 Posted May 14, 2016 At the high school I work a lot of the student body leans liberal (it's CA and a big program at the school has a progressive philosophy) and it seems a seed has been planted for many youth. One could argue that they are transgender or identify androgenously (a burgeoning group) at their core, and higher social consciousness is now allowing these people to understand who they are and be recognized. But I can't help but strongly guess that a lot of these kids are starting to believe this is what the deal is with them out of power of suggestion, and for reasons that in the longer scheme of things, should not be catered to. They wouldn't all grow out of it, but many would. Agreed. My daughter's HS theater company has one boy who identifies as a girl (Dani; wouldn't you come up with a clearly feminine name?), one girl who identifies as a boy (Neil; you can't make this up), and a third boy Bennie who, if I understand, isn't transgender but cross dresses and is ghey, I think. The common thread is that these kids all have pretty messed up home lives. Heck, most of the kids in theater never fit in anywhere else -- it is like the Island of Misfit Toys. Our house is the hangout house for the theater kids so I've spent plenty of time with them all. I'm not a psychologist but I'm a good judge of people, and I'm pretty sure there is no physiological basis for the two transgenders. Bennie is pretty out there though. It is unfortunate because a lot of these kids need counseling, but we can't propose that now because in doing so we would be implying that there is something wrong with the snowflakes$#@! So these poor kids will likely go through life confused, hopefully not cutting off body parts only to find out that that wasn't the underlying problem. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,543 Posted May 14, 2016 What about a 5 year old girl identifying as a boy? same thing, both are wrong, if someone wants to do that when they are 15-16 then so be it, but encouraging it at such a young age, is just bad Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FeelingMN 273 Posted May 14, 2016 That would suck. Seriously though, what's your point? Is it that some folks truly are transgender? Yeah. Look at the responses in this thread. Blame the parents. Blame the liberals. Blame somebody, anybody....when the simple fact is biology explains why they are the way they are. Fact is many parents reject their transgender kids for who they are, which helps explain the high suicide rate amongst that group. So I think discussion about this topic needs to focus more on the biology of transgender than on critiquing the home environment. Why would someone choose to be transgender....given the high suicide rate? Why not choose a different lifestyle rather than offing yourself? Do you think it would be truly hellish if your core identity was seen as wrong by virtually everyone you knew? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted May 14, 2016 Yeah. Look at the responses in this thread. Blame the parents. Blame the liberals. Blame somebody, anybody....when the simple fact is biology explains why they are the way they are. Fact is many parents reject their transgender kids for who they are, which helps explain the high suicide rate amongst that group. So I think discussion about this topic needs to focus more on the biology of transgender than on critiquing the home environment. Why would someone choose to be transgender....given the high suicide rate? Why not choose a different lifestyle rather than offing yourself? Do you think it would be truly hellish if your core identity was seen as wrong by virtually everyone you knew? Sounds like commie libtard BS to me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frank M 181 Posted May 14, 2016 Sounds like commie libtard BS to me It's worse than that. It's commie libtard B.S. meant to help men to show their dongs to little girls because that's what liberals want. They want to make it easier to molest children. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites