wiffleball 4,793 Posted October 12, 2016 I figured it was cause you called him a Shiite and he's actually Sunni. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted October 12, 2016 It's gonna get wild as the GOP stab each other for the next month. Can't wait. This party just gave itself the kill shot from the wounds palin and Romney gave them. Maybe a real party will rise from the ashes. I doubt it though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,962 Posted October 12, 2016 It's gonna get wild as the GOP stab each other for the next month. Can't wait. This party just gave itself the kill shot from the wounds palin and Romney gave them. Maybe a real party will rise from the ashes. I doubt it though. God I hope so. I'm ready for the end of this party. We need a new party, a center-right party. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,060 Posted October 12, 2016 It's gonna get wild as the GOP stab each other for the next month. Can't wait. This party just gave itself the kill shot from the wounds palin and Romney gave them. Maybe a real party will rise from the ashes. I doubt it though. I'm not sure it's fair to blame Romney. Wasn't his fault the Tea Party loons were running the show Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted October 12, 2016 I'm not sure it's fair to blame Romney. Wasn't his fault the Tea Party loons were running the show I don't really. He seems like a decent enough guy. God knows he seems like a statesman now! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,439 Posted October 12, 2016 Romney would get 75% of the vote right about now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted October 12, 2016 Romney would get 75% of the vote right about now He'd likely get mine. And I hated him last time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,439 Posted October 12, 2016 He'd likely get mine. And I hated him last time. Romney seems like a really good guy at least, and he does have those Kennedy type looks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,962 Posted October 12, 2016 He'd likely get mine. And I hated him last time. Hated him why, because of his true statement that 47% of people don't pay taxes and would never vote for him because they are second-handers? Or because he governed Mass. successfully despite a strong Democrat congress? Or his ability to rescue the Salt Lake olympics? Or his numerous examples of helping regular folks? Let's be honest, the MSM would be blasting the 47% thing, and folks here would continue to post objections to his magic underwear (I'm thinking of mobb_deep, sorry if that is wrong). The left would continue to drink the koolaid they are being fed. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,439 Posted October 12, 2016 Hated him why, because of his true statement that 47% of people don't pay taxes and would never vote for him because they are second-handers? Or because he governed Mass. successfully despite a strong Democrat congress? Or his ability to rescue the Salt Lake olympics? Or his numerous examples of helping regular folks? Let's be honest, the MSM would be blasting the 47% thing, and folks here would continue to post objections to his magic underwear (I'm thinking of mobb_deep, sorry if that is wrong). The left would continue to drink the koolaid they are being fed. all this, I was a huge Romney guy, liked everything about him, knew about medical plans, worked as a great bipartisan leader. I wish he was on the ticket, hell everyone does, it would be the biggest landslide in history. but you are right, we would be focusing on the true statement about the 47%, thats all they had last time Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted October 12, 2016 Hated him why, because of his true statement that 47% of people don't pay taxes and would never vote for him because they are second-handers? Or because he governed Mass. successfully despite a strong Democrat congress? Or his ability to rescue the Salt Lake olympics? Or his numerous examples of helping regular folks? Let's be honest, the MSM would be blasting the 47% thing, and folks here would continue to post objections to his magic underwear (I'm thinking of mobb_deep, sorry if that is wrong). The left would continue to drink the koolaid they are being fed. Mainly because I'm a liberal. He is a trickle down salesman. I've seen that show. I'll pass. And he was hailed as a business guru. He is a slash and burn raider. He is to business what the nazis were to diversity mediators. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,060 Posted October 12, 2016 Hated him why, because of his true statement that 47% of people don't pay taxes and would never vote for him because they are second-handers? Or because he governed Mass. successfully despite a strong Democrat congress? Or his ability to rescue the Salt Lake olympics? Or his numerous examples of helping regular folks? Let's be honest, the MSM would be blasting the 47% thing, and folks here would continue to post objections to his magic underwear (I'm thinking of mobb_deep, sorry if that is wrong). The left would continue to drink the koolaid they are being fed. Yeah that's a pretty good reason. Shows why you're an ahole since you say it's true. And before you say it, I did not like the basket of deplorables comment either and if she wasn't running against a madman she would've lost my vote (if she ever had it) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,060 Posted October 12, 2016 all this, I was a huge Romney guy, liked everything about him, knew about medical plans, worked as a great bipartisan leader. I wish he was on the ticket, hell everyone does, it would be the biggest landslide in history. but you are right, we would be focusing on the true statement about the 47%, thats all they had last time His healthcare plan was terrible too. Just take an ambulance to the ER if you don't have healthcare. Yeesh. For the record I don't think he actually believed that, but his stated position was atrocious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted October 12, 2016 Hated him why, because of his true statement that 47% of people don't pay taxes and would never vote for him because they are second-handers? Or because he governed Mass. successfully despite a strong Democrat congress? Or his ability to rescue the Salt Lake olympics? Or his numerous examples of helping regular folks? Let's be honest, the MSM would be blasting the 47% thing, and folks here would continue to post objections to his magic underwear (I'm thinking of mobb_deep, sorry if that is wrong). The left would continue to drink the koolaid they are being fed. Great post; lead out with a big-ole glass of koolaid then close criticizing others for drinking koolaid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,793 Posted October 12, 2016 Romney lost mostly because of those whack-job fundamentalist Christians. They would rather vote for Satan Then God forbid a Mormon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,692 Posted October 12, 2016 Romney lost mostly because of those whack-job fundamentalist Christians. They would rather vote for Satan Then God forbid a Mormon. how is trump doing with those folks? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,060 Posted October 12, 2016 how is trump doing with those folks? That's what Pence is for Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted October 12, 2016 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/10/12/former-miss-arizona-trump-just-came-strolling-right-in-on-naked-contestants/?postshare=241476271495317&tid=ss_tw No worries about teen girls naked...he just walks right in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mighty_thor 115 Posted October 12, 2016 A woman named Jill Harth did file a lawsuit against Trump in 1997 for among other things "groping her". She dropped the lawsuit after Trump agreed to pay a settlement to her husband for some business dispute. So, he may have groped women in the past. I'm more disturbed by his aggressive style, his lies, his boastfulness and bipolar tendencies than about his lack of respect for women. He lies about things that are easily checked. He seems to take everything personally and he will try to destroy anyone who says anything negative about him. I think he would be a disaster as president with his disposition. He has no diplomatic skills. All he knows how to do is attack and destroy anyone who gets in his way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,781 Posted October 12, 2016 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/10/12/former-miss-arizona-trump-just-came-strolling-right-in-on-naked-contestants/?postshare=241476271495317&tid=ss_tw No worries about teen girls naked...he just walks right in. You have 0 free articles left this month You obviously love great journalism. With special savings on our Sunday Paper + Digital offer, you'll never miss a single story again. LOL @ great journalism... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted October 12, 2016 LOL @ great journalism... LOL @ that being the takeaway. The guy went into dressing rooms thinking he owned the place not caring that 15 year old girls were naked. There are plenty of stories like this from women...yet you all keep whining about Bill who isn't even running. Again...over and over, Trump seems to attack people the most, for things he has done himself (or similar). Liar, corrupt, sexual misconduct...and so on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,692 Posted October 12, 2016 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/10/12/former-miss-arizona-trump-just-came-strolling-right-in-on-naked-contestants/?postshare=241476271495317&tid=ss_tw No worries about teen girls naked...he just walks right in. He was ahead of his time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rholio 339 Posted October 12, 2016 He was ahead of his time. Ahead of their time, too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,793 Posted October 12, 2016 I'm more disturbed by his aggressive style, his lies, his boastfulness and bipolar tendencies than about his lack of respect for women. He lies about things that are easily checked. He seems to take everything personally and he will try to destroy anyone who says anything negative about him. I think he would be a disaster as president with his disposition. He has no diplomatic skills. All he knows how to do is attack and destroy anyone who gets in his way. I think you missed the biggest part. Just like noted Conservative Columnist Kathleen Parker pointed out with Sarah Palin, Trump is a "Bullshiit Artist". He can't deliver specifics and, when pressed, throws out tag lines like "make america great" and "I know more than the generals!" I mean, he must honestly think most Americans are just that incredibly stupid. And apparently, he's not too far off the mark. I mean, for Pete's sake, even Fox nailed his budget plan during the primaries - and he had no answer. And that's him in a nutshell - no answer, no plan, no specifics, just catch phrases. "Trust me, It'll be SO great, SO awesome, believe me!". I could probably put up with her personality foibles if the guy wasn't such a focking idiot, but he's just too damn dumb to understnad a basic civics class -much less nuanced foreign policy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,153 Posted October 13, 2016 The Catch 22 is that even when a respected Republican candidate is on the ticket they are made out to be the anti-Christ by the Democrats and Yes, the media. John McCain, Mitt Romney were both solid candidates, moderate Republicans with experience and decency, who were raked over the coals for rather benign stuff. The 47% stuff was nothing. McCain was to old even before Palin was on the ticket. Stupid, political posturing BS. Half you moes would portray Mother Theresa into a lying whoore if she had an R by her name. Yes the Republican Party is divided and imploding. But at least half of them have the balls to put conviction and personal ideals over towing the party line and selling out. I'd be nice if some Democrats would come out the same sometimes......so both parties could clean house. I mean, can you imagine if a Republican candidate who was Sec of State did what HRC did. It'd be a hissy fit to end all hissy fits. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,781 Posted October 13, 2016 LOL @ that being the takeaway. The guy went into dressing rooms thinking he owned the place not caring that 15 year old girls were naked. There are plenty of stories like this from women...yet you all keep whining about Bill who isn't even running. Again...over and over, Trump seems to attack people the most, for things he has done himself (or similar). Liar, corrupt, sexual misconduct...and so on. Guess you missed that part that said I had "0 free articles" left for viewing? Doesn't surprise me, you only see what you want to see... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted October 13, 2016 Guess you missed that part that said I had "0 free articles" left for viewing? Doesn't surprise me, you only see what you want to see... There are plenty more out there showing him thinking its fine to ogle young naked women. But keeep living with your head in the sand. Your responses are as weak as expected. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,793 Posted October 13, 2016 The Catch 22 is that even when a respected Republican candidate is on the ticket they are made out to be the anti-Christ by the Democrats and Yes, the media. John McCain, Mitt Romney were both solid candidates, moderate Republicans with experience and decency, who were raked over the coals for rather benign stuff. The 47% stuff was nothing. McCain was to old even before Palin was on the ticket. Stupid, political posturing BS. Half you moes would portray Mother Theresa into a lying whoore if she had an R by her name. . I don't want to disappoint your revisionist history, but it was Limblob and his Fox ilk that spent the majority of the primaries bashing McCain - for being too moderate. By the time he was up against Obummer, they were all like "oh shiit...." Unlike you, I have the facts behind me. 7 Million Registered Republicans who voted for Bush at least once skipped the voting process entirely - rather than have to vote for McCain. 4 years later, the Fundie Repubs chose to skip voting rather than vote for a "GASP" MORMON - "They're a cult you know!" These are all facts easily determined with even a modicum of research. The GOP for now THREE terms has focked itself over due to the prevalance of blowhoard demagogues and nutjobs. Just like in this election, the Dems pretty much just have to sit back and wait for the 'other guys' to shoot each other in a circular firing squad - until it's too late (hint: that's now) . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted October 13, 2016 More women coming out. Other conversations with Trump commenting about a group of 10 year old girls...that he will date some of them in 10 years. Just a sick fock and idiots will still support him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,060 Posted October 13, 2016 More women coming out. Other conversations with Trump commenting about a group of 10 year old girls...that he will date some of them in 10 years. Just a sick fock and idiots will still support him. Ten year old girls? That is... not good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 476 Posted October 13, 2016 Ten year old girls? That is... not good. And this stuff was held on ice until now? How did any of the Republican nominees not dig up this stuff and use it in the primaries? That in itself it's frightening. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,793 Posted October 13, 2016 And this stuff was held on ice until now? How did any of the Republican nominees not dig up this stuff and use it in the primaries? That in itself it's frightening. Sort of amazes me that Billy Bush didn't at least help his Cousin out a bit. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted October 13, 2016 Sort of amazes me that Billy Bush didn't at least help his Cousin out a bit. He probably doesn't like Jeb either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,060 Posted October 13, 2016 And this stuff was held on ice until now? How did any of the Republican nominees not dig up this stuff and use it in the primaries? That in itself it's frightening. It makes no sense. Obviously this stuff was out there. Everyone should've known things like this could be found. Maybe not quite "ten year old girls" bad, but still. And no, Jerry, before you chime in: can't pin it all on some supposed MSM conspiracy. Republican primary candidates had every reason to dig this stuff up and make an issue of it, ESPECIALLY after he viciously attacked all of them. And yet no one did. It's bizarre, really. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 13, 2016 And this stuff was held on ice until now? How did any of the Republican nominees not dig up this stuff and use it in the primaries? That in itself it's frightening. maybe because it's bullsh1t from a desperate media/clinton team? Maybe they know the big stuff (her 33k emails, videos, bribery, threats, all the way up to the white house) is coming out next and this is prevent defense ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted October 13, 2016 And this stuff was held on ice until now? How did any of the Republican nominees not dig up this stuff and use it in the primaries? That in itself it's frightening. The left is just better at this sort of stuff, plus having willing accomplices in the media like the NYT. They don't even fake it any longer. Just read the wikileaks emails, this is what they do. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted October 13, 2016 maybe because it's bullsh1t from a desperate media/clinton team? Maybe they know the big stuff (her 33k emails, videos, bribery, threats, all the way up to the white house) is coming out next and this is prevent defense ? You just keep clinging to that hope. I mean sure, half the focking government has been trying to bring her down for twenty five years and found d!ck, but I'm sure it's coming. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,714 Posted October 13, 2016 You just keep clinging to that hope. I mean sure, half the focking government has been trying to bring her down for twenty five years and found d!ck, but I'm sure it's coming. What do you mean found dik? They found plenty of incompetence and I guess it's lost on people that she destroyed all the evidence. A compliant DOJ and FBI don't bring charges and you think they found dik? Eyes wide shut. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,714 Posted October 13, 2016 And the broad they trotted out that said Trump grabbed her poonanny on a plane is FOS. How come the NYT left out that she had a property dispute with him in 2007? Both could be true, but why leave out that fact? Only reason I could come up with is that she's FOS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,345 Posted October 13, 2016 maybe because it's bullsh1t from a desperate media/clinton team? Maybe they know the big stuff (her 33k emails, videos, bribery, threats, all the way up to the white house) is coming out next and this is prevent defense ? What do you mean found dik? They found plenty of incompetence and I guess it's lost on people that she destroyed all the evidence. A compliant DOJ and FBI don't bring charges and you think they found dik? Eyes wide shut. VOX The decision to delete Clinton’s personal emails came before the congressional subpoena The key to understanding what’s going on here is to first go back to why Clinton’s emails were deleted in the first place. All of the emails Clinton sent or received while secretary of state were once being stored on one private server. When a congressional investigation into Benghazi began asking for records from her time as secretary of state, Clinton ordered her lawyers to give the State Department all of her "work-related" emails. This is how we get to two separate batches of Clinton emails — the first “work-related” emails turned over to the state department, and the second “non-work related” emails that stayed on the private server. That first batch of around 30,000 emails has been released piecemeal by the State Department. The second batch of “non-work related” emails, around 32,000 of them, were eventually deleted. It’s for the deletion of this second group of emails that Trump thinks Clinton should be jailed. The idea, popular among some conservatives, is that Clinton ducked congressional investigators by deleting these private emails — which they think may have contained damaging Clinton secrets — while under subpoena. This accusation is very difficult to maintain under the facts produced by the FBI for a few key reasons. For one, Clinton’s staff told the contractor managing the private sever to delete the second batch of emails in December 2014, according to the FBI. The House Republicans’ Benghazi committee didn’t order that all emails on the private server be preserved until March 2015. (There’s a complicated counter-narrative that these emails weren’t actually deleted until a conference call with Bill Clinton’s attorneys after the subpoena was issued, but that story doesn’t make much sense for reasons I explained here.) It’s also not really possible to think that Clinton herself is responsible for hiding and deleting the “non-work related” emails that Trump is referencing. That’s because Clinton delegated those decisions to her attorneys — nobody has claimed that Clinton herself determined which emails were work-related and which ones were not. But, for the sake of argument, forget the timeline and forget the fact that Clinton herself wasn’t actually involved in the determination of which emails should be turned over. Most tellingly of all, Clinton had the legal authority to classify as private and delete whichever emails she felt was appropriate. Truly, the really scary clowns aren't the ones walking around neighborhoods... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites