drobeski 3,061 Posted December 14, 2019 Shonuff Checked out FBG They believe the howeritz report vindicated them and Barr and Durham are dirty cops. They are sickos 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,969 Posted December 14, 2019 5 minutes ago, drobeski said: Shonuff Checked out FBG They believe the howeritz report vindicated them and Barr and Durham are dirty cops. They are sickos Fanboys Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,894 Posted December 14, 2019 Those turds will often find themselves on the wrong side of history, since the facts aren't on their side. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,107 Posted December 15, 2019 21 hours ago, drobeski said: List of completely wrong spinelss losers in the thread. Newbie, wiff, cb, honcho, shonuff, saints, titans .. Did I miss any ? The good guys in this thread were right all along. You won't hear another word from those folks. Spineless hacks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,894 Posted December 16, 2019 They found who helped the Russians... https://magaimg.net/img/a2lz.jpg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted December 16, 2019 31 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said: They found who helped the Russians... https://magaimg.net/img/a2lz.jpg Saw that the other day. Who the fock thought that'd be a good idea? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,969 Posted December 16, 2019 I predict chaos at the democratic national convention. Hillary will ride in on her broomstick to save the day and unify the party. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,057 Posted December 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said: I predict chaos at the democratic national convention. Hillary will ride in on her broomstick to save the day and unify the party. It could certainly be chaotic. No focking way Hillary comes in but beyond that it’s anybody’s guess. Clearly Bloomberg is relying on being a compromise candidate. Buttigieg and Klobuchar trying to play that role as well. Interestingly Biden would have been an obvious choice but if he can’t wrap it up as early front runner he’d sure have a difficult time playing party savior Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,894 Posted December 16, 2019 Every one of those fukkers has vowed to steal my money and give it to illegals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted December 16, 2019 Gotta love the Nunes letter to Schiff.... nailed it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,969 Posted December 16, 2019 6 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said: Every one of those fukkers has vowed to steal my money and give it to illegals. Yes they have. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,238 Posted December 16, 2019 2 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said: I predict chaos at the democratic national convention. Hillary will ride in on her broomstick to save the day and unify the party. This would not surprise me. A poll shows her as the leading choice of democrats https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/dec/9/hillary-clinton-emerges-top-choice-democratic-vote/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted December 16, 2019 26 minutes ago, Strike said: This would not surprise me. A poll shows her as the leading choice of democrats https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/dec/9/hillary-clinton-emerges-top-choice-democratic-vote/ She's bringing a fresh face to the Dem field. https://magaimg.net/img/a2lz.jpg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,691 Posted January 14, 2020 Mueller probe witness George Nader pleads guilty to child pornography and sex trafficking https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mueller-probe-witness-george-nader-pleads-guilty-to-child-pornography-and-sex-trafficking-2020-1-13/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Intense Observer 344 Posted January 14, 2020 I like how they introduce him as Mueller witness rather than illegal donor of $3.5 million to Hillary campaign. Certainly no agenda. Be interesting to see if he flips on anyone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,691 Posted January 24, 2020 Carter Page FISA warrant lacked probable cause, DOJ admits in declassified assessment At least two of the FBI’s surveillance applications to secretly monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page lacked probable cause, according to a newly declassified summary of a Justice Department assessment released Thursday by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). The DOJ’s admission essentially means that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant authorizations to surveil Page, when stripped of the FBI’s misinformation, did not meet the necessary legal threshold and should never have been issued. https://3daysurvivalpack.com/index.php/2020/01/24/carter-page-fisa-warrant-lacked-probable-cause-doj-admits-in-declassified-assessment/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,894 Posted January 24, 2020 But Orange Man bad, so it's okay. -Liberals Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,969 Posted January 24, 2020 15 minutes ago, Baker Boy said: Carter Page FISA warrant lacked probable cause, DOJ admits in declassified assessment At least two of the FBI’s surveillance applications to secretly monitor former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page lacked probable cause, according to a newly declassified summary of a Justice Department assessment released Thursday by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC). The DOJ’s admission essentially means that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant authorizations to surveil Page, when stripped of the FBI’s misinformation, did not meet the necessary legal threshold and should never have been issued. https://3daysurvivalpack.com/index.php/2020/01/24/carter-page-fisa-warrant-lacked-probable-cause-doj-admits-in-declassified-assessment/ So they were indeed just spying on Trump. Illegally. These are the times I wish shonuff and newbie were still here and not in their safe space. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted January 24, 2020 11 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: So they were indeed just spying on Trump. Illegally. These are the times I wish shonuff and newbie were still here and not in their safe space. So does this get majorly highlighted in the Trump defense? More than before? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,969 Posted January 24, 2020 18 minutes ago, sderk said: So does this get majorly highlighted in the Trump defense? More than before? Has to. That’s what you have to get them talking about on the Sunday morning shows. Make the left defend it. Which is impossible, but they have to. I’m sure the cucks at fbg cane up with a defense. If they even bothered to acknowledge it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted January 24, 2020 Just now, Hardcore troubadour said: Has to. That’s what you have to get them talking about on the Sunday morning shows. Make the left defend it. Which is impossible, but they have to. I’m sure the cucks at fbg cane up with a defense. If they even bothered to acknowledge it. My bet is the defense will say, "meh, it's old news and we can't dismiss all the evil wrong doing that Trump has done". 'Painfully wrong', is nothing the left is afraid of being. Hell, they put it on parade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Intense Observer 344 Posted January 24, 2020 This also means any charges/convictions that stemmed from those 2 warrants will be dismissed. The first 2 FISA warrants are still under review. It is possible that Manafort, Gates, Stone, Flynn, Papadaplous all walk, have the records cleared, and are paid millions of dollars in settlement. Comey, McCabe, Schiff, and every person in the media who pushed this Russian propaganda deserve a good old fashioned prison love making session. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,497 Posted January 24, 2020 Why is it so hard to bring up a treason charge in the US? Some people need to be hanging after all of this. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted January 24, 2020 On 3/30/2017 at 7:12 PM, Sho Nuff said: https://www.wsj.com/articles/mike-flynn-offers-to-testify-in-exchange-for-immunity-1490912959 Flynn ready to sing... Update? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,969 Posted January 24, 2020 1 minute ago, drobeski said: Update? Ha! That dumbass will live in infamy. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,969 Posted January 24, 2020 4 minutes ago, Intense Observer said: This also means any charges/convictions that stemmed from those 2 warrants will be dismissed. The first 2 FISA warrants are still under review. It is possible that Manafort, Gates, Stone, Flynn, Papadaplous all walk, have the records cleared, and are paid millions of dollars in settlement. Comey, McCabe, Schiff, and every person in the media who pushed this Russian propaganda deserve a good old fashioned prison love making session. Besides suing the Government, they should sue the members of that cabal personally as well. We aren’t on the hook for their defense anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted January 24, 2020 2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Ha! That dumbass will live in infamy. We could probably run about 100 bumps for him and wiffle of them being wrong. No wonder they hide, must be so ashamed. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted February 10, 2020 4 hours ago, drobeski said: He’s pure scum. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OldMaid 2,129 Posted February 20, 2020 Not sure what to make of this, and I’m a little surprised it hasn’t been posted... Julian Assange is alleging Trump offered him a pardon via Dana Rohrabacher, for Russia e-mail hack denial. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51566470 What does he gain from this? Edit: Found another article that touches on his motivation. This could get interesting... https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-offered-assange-pardon-if-he-covered-up-russian-hack-court-hears Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted February 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, OldMaid said: Not sure what to make of this, and I’m a little surprised it hasn’t been posted... Julian Assange is alleging Trump offered him a pardon via Dana Rohrabacher, for Russia e-mail hack denial. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51566470 What does he gain from this? Edit: Found another article that touches on his motivation. This could get interesting... https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-offered-assange-pardon-if-he-covered-up-russian-hack-court-hears Just another day in a presidency full of corruption and cover ups. Who can stop him now? He's untouchable. The Senate told us so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,872 Posted February 20, 2020 7 minutes ago, OldMaid said: Not sure what to make of this, and I’m a little surprised it hasn’t been posted... Julian Assange is alleging Trump offered him a pardon via Dana Rohrabacher, for Russia e-mail hack denial. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51566470 What does he gain from this? Edit: Found another article that touches on his motivation. This could get interesting... https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-offered-assange-pardon-if-he-covered-up-russian-hack-court-hears Fake News. Already debunked: https://mobile.twitter.com/DanaRohrabacher/status/1230251235527286784 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,107 Posted February 20, 2020 Every. Single. Time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OldMaid 2,129 Posted February 20, 2020 1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Fake News. Already debunked: https://mobile.twitter.com/DanaRohrabacher/status/1230251235527286784 I’m not sure I would call a denial from Rohrabacher, dubunked. From what I read, he’s only denying Trump’s involvement. But if they’re going to use this as a defense, I would think they would need to submit proof... If none is offered up, then I would assume it’s all a ploy to keep him from being extradited to the US. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,872 Posted February 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, Reality said: Every. Single. Time. Assange laid the bait and the Fake Media fell for it once again. They want Trump soooooo badly they'll willing to believe anything at this point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 20, 2020 10 minutes ago, OldMaid said: Not sure what to make of this, and I’m a little surprised it hasn’t been posted... Julian Assange is alleging Trump offered him a pardon via Dana Rohrabacher, for Russia e-mail hack denial. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51566470 What does he gain from Assange lawyer, not Assange. Why lie .. also, this congresswoman made this request in 2017. But here's assange himself in 2016. My god the deep state sucks at framing the guy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OldMaid 2,129 Posted February 20, 2020 Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Assange laid the bait and the Fake Media fell for it once again. They want Trump soooooo badly they'll willing to believe anything at this point. This came came from a pre trial hearing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,872 Posted February 20, 2020 Just now, OldMaid said: This came came from a pre trial hearing. From Assange's lawyer, right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OldMaid 2,129 Posted February 20, 2020 Drobs... of course it’s coming from his lawyer. This info is from a hearing that was held today. He’s trying to claim he shouldn’t be extradited to the United States because it’s a politically motivated case. As I stated before, I’d like to see the evidence he’s going to submit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, OldMaid said: Drobs... of course it’s coming from his lawyer. This info is from a hearing that was held today. He’s trying to claim he shouldn’t be extradited to the United States because it’s a politically motivated case. As I stated before, I’d like to see the evidence he’s going to submit. Did you watch the video ? I was recorded pre-election! He doesnt need to be bribed to claim russia didnt give him the emails. He was already making the claim long before then. Because they didn't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
