Comey to Congress: President Trump told him 'I need loyalty'

[drobeski 3,061]

you keep trying drobs

trying what, simple question. Why are you unwilling to answer ?

[wiffleball 4,797]

Damn, Hardcore FriendACore sure has a lot of "friends". LOL

[Sho Nuff 720]

trying what, simple question. Why are you unwilling to answer ?

Because your spin is laughable.

You understand this as well as you do the5th amendment

[drobeski 3,061]

Because your spin is laughable.

You understand this as well as you do the5th amendment

no spin at all, him stepping way out of his duties is a sure sign of loyalty to the previous administration. That cannot be argued...he did it.

[Cruzer 1,996]

Damn, Hardcore FriendACore sure has a lot of "friends". LOL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5yW8TvzpvI

[cbfalcon 827]

Not to pile on or anything but here are some more Hardcore friends:

 

5-10-16

My friend owns a bar, family business for 35 years. He has had to basically turn it into a restaurant at this point because the younger generation stays at home and drinks cheap beer and smoke pot and show up at 11 pm all focked up and nurse beers while they go out and get high every hour. And barely tip.

 

7-19-16

Had a friend lose a bar because of a fatal DWI. He just folded up shop and walked away. He was incorporated, so the claimants got nothing, or very little I think.

 

10-20-16

Right, but then he admits abusing her? She didn't tell the cops that one time during their times at her house? There is something off here, but his statements did him in. I will say, that if he made them during counseling, kinda wrong that was reported. I had a friend who lost his job because he thought what he said in counseling was confidential.

 

2-19-17

I found it weird how a major nuclear disaster like that faded from the news as fast as it did. A friend of mine got offered to go work there with the cleanup. I had watched a documentary, maybe on VICE? and I told him I wouldn't go near that place for a million bucks.

 

Hardcore's good friends could be it's own thread.

[edjr 6,898]

 

Hardcore's good friends could be it's own thread.

 

hilarious how often he called out other people for lying

[Mike Honcho 5,432]

 

President Donald Trump told him, "I need loyalty. I expect loyalty"

 

 

Maybe "Loyalty" is a the name of stripper they both know...

[Sho Nuff 720]

no spin at all, him stepping way out of his duties is a sure sign of loyalty to the previous administration. That cannot be argued...he did it.

 

He didn't step away from his duties. That is the spin.

Also...Hillary wasn't the previous administration. HTH

[bandrus1 413]

loyalty is trigger word for "piss on me"

[wiffleball 4,797]

Also...Hillary wasn't the previous administration. HTH

Unless it works in Sho and Co's favor, in which case, she is, by all means. Hell, even BILL is fair game too!

[Sho Nuff 720]

Unless it works in Sho and Co's favor, in which case, she is, by all means. Hell, even BILL is fair game too!

 

Huh?

[Big Guy 1,421]

Sounds like he wanted him to put his biased past behind him.

 

 

Yes, highly reasonable to expect that while draining the swamp!

[vuduchile 1,947]

 

digbysr

Bunnyjr

[Cdub100 3,995]

President Trump gets TWO SCOOPS of ice cream!

[MDC 7,882]

Damn, Hardcore FriendACore sure has a lot of "friends". LOL

They only hang out with HT for his in ground pool with the deck around it.

[NewbieJr 541]

Rofl. What a brutal beat down. Poor hardcore. Even though he may be the biggest ass hole here, I felt sorry for him. That was hard to watch. LOL

[edjr 6,898]

Rofl. What a brutal beat down. Poor hardcore. Even though he may be the biggest ass hole here, I felt sorry for him. That was hard to watch. LOL

No it wasn't

 

Was one of the most enjoyable things seen on FFT in some time.

 

[5-Points 3,766]

So a guy who campaigned on draining the swamp, thereby alienating himself from both sides, was concerned with loyalty?

 

I'm uhh... shocked, I guess.

[NewbieJr 541]

No it wasn't

 

Was one of the most enjoyable things seen on FFT in some time.

 

 

yes it was. And me too.

[cbfalcon 827]

Rofl. What a brutal beat down. Poor hardcore. Even though he may be the biggest ass hole here, I felt sorry for him. That was hard to watch. LOL

 

 

No it wasn't

 

Was one of the most enjoyable things seen on FFT in some time.

 

 

He will have a story about how he was going on vacation or something and wouldn't have been able to post for a few days anyway...then he'll say something about "rent free" and claim a victory.....Not too difficult to see coming.

[Sho Nuff 720]

So a guy who campaigned on draining the swamp, thereby alienating himself from both sides, was concerned with loyalty?

 

I'm uhh... shocked, I guess.

How is that draining the swamp?

[edjr 6,898]

 

 

 

He will have a story about how he was going on vacation or something and wouldn't have been able to post for a few days anyway...then he'll say something about "rent free" and claim a victory.....Not too difficult to see coming.

 

Thank you Sir, for making my day even more enjoyable

[cbfalcon 827]

 

Thank you Sir, for making my day even more enjoyable

You're quite welcome. It is my humble hope to accomplish said feat once every 60 days or so. At that rate, I'm doing my job.

[paulinstl 296]

It sure looked like Comey was in Hillary's pocket when he reopened the email investigation a week before the election.

[5-Points 3,766]

How is that draining the swamp?

In and of itself, it isn't.

 

My point is that a guy who made enemies on both sides of the aisle during his campaign being concerned with loyalty seems appropriate.

[Sho Nuff 720]

In and of itself, it isn't.

 

My point is that a guy who made enemies on both sides of the aisle during his campaign being concerned with loyalty seems appropriate.

Nothing appropriate about blurring lines of independence.

[paulinstl 296]

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/os-jcomey-060817.pdf

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

It sure looked like Comey was in Hillary's pocket when he reopened the email investigation a week before the election.

Just to turn around and say there's evidence she destroyed evidence but I'm not going to charge her.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Letting them release this is getting out ahead of the Trump tweeting.

And gives committee members now access and ability to formulate questions.

[5-Points 3,766]

Nothing appropriate about blurring lines of independence.

If he was soliciting Comey's loyalty in cleaning up the corruption in D.C., I have absolutely no problem with it.

 

If he was soliciting Comey's loyalty to Donald J. Trump, it's a problem.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

If he was soliciting Comey's loyalty to Donald J. Trump, it's a problem.

Why? With all the leaks going on it's understandable he'd want to know where this guy's loyalty lies.

[paulinstl 296]

Just to turn around and say there's evidence she destroyed evidence but I'm not going to charge her.

The single irrefutable fact is that no Hillary shill in his position would have done that. Common sense can leak through your partisan blinders can't it?

[cyclone24 1,935]

If he was soliciting Comey's loyalty in cleaning up the corruption in D.C., I have absolutely no problem with it.

If he was soliciting Comey's loyalty to Donald J. Trump, it's a problem.

It's grey...I mean if he's asking for loyalty in that the FBI director gives him a fair shake and that comey doesn't purposely jam him up....that's ok IMO. If he's asking for loyalty as in "cover this up for me"....that's a problem.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

The single irrefutable fact is that no Hillary shill in his position would have done that. Common sense can leak through your partisan blinders can't it?

This theory of yours have an explaination of why he didn't just charge her then?

 

He jumped out there because it was getting bigger with Huma/Weiner revalations so he opens it just so he can make a statement not to charge her. That enabled it to fizzle out despite outcries on both sides.

[5-Points 3,766]

Why? With all the leaks going on it's understandable he'd want to know where this guy's loyalty lies.

Agreed.

 

My point is, Trump trying to find out if the guy is going to be loyal to his oath of office is a good thing.

 

Trump trying to pressure the guy into being loyal to him personally is not.

 

It's more of the same corruption I'd like to see eliminated.

[paulinstl 296]

This theory of yours have an explaination of why he didn't just charge her then?

 

He jumped out there because it was getting bigger with Huma/Weiner revalations so he opens it just so he can make a statement not to charge her. That enabled it to fizzle out despite outcries on both sides.

That is laughable. All he had to do was sit tight for 10 days. Give me a break. This is a complete waste of time. Holy Christ, you right wingers here are out of your minds with partisan garbage.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

That is laughable. All he had to do was sit tight for 10 days. Give me a break. This is a complete waste of time. Holy Christ, you right wingers here are out of your minds with partisan garbage.

You left wingers still blaming Comey FFS.

 

If he was out to ruin her, charge her and she was done.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Veteran FBI agents say FBI Director James Comey has permanently damaged the bureaus reputation for uncompromising investigations with his cowardly whitewash of former Secretary of State Hillary Clintons mishandling of classified information using an unauthorized private email server. . . .

 

But agents say Comey tied investigators hands by agreeing to unheard-of ground rules and other demands by the lawyers for Clinton and her aides that limited their investigation.

 

In my 25 years with the bureau, I never had any ground rules in my interviews, said retired agent Dennis V. Hughes, the first chief of the FBIs computer investigations unit. . . .

 

Comenys immunity deal for several key witnesses rankled investigators, among other things.

 

The immunity agreements came with outrageous side deals, including preventing agents from searching for any documents on a Dell laptop owned by former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills generated after Jan. 31, 2015, when she communicated with the server administrator who destroyed subpoenaed emails.

 

Comey also agreed to have Mills laptop destroyed after the restricted search, denying Congress the chance to look at it and making the FBI an accomplice to the destruction of evidence. . . .

 

The FBI has politicized itself, and its reputation will suffer for a long time, Hughes said. I hold Director Comey responsible.

 

Agreed retired FBI agent Michael M. Biasello: Comey has singlehandedly ruined the reputation of the organization.

 

Another retired FBI agent has penned a damning open letter to Director Comey condemning his unilateral decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for violations of federal law:

 

[Y]ou eloquently laid out enough of the evidence deduced from the investigation to strongly indicate there was abundant evidence uncovered during the investigation and interview of her to not only indict but to convict her in Federal Court.­­­­­­­ ­­­­­­However, you personally re-worded and soft-pedaled the actions she took as Secretary of State describing her actions as extremely careless in using a personal email and un-secured server for her communications while Secretary of State. You rewrote the statute, which is not your job. . . .

 

Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of agents with one being the Case agent, or the lead investigator. When the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved. It would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution for that investigation NOT the FBI agent. But in the Clinton investigation, YOU (unilaterally) decided not to forward the investigation to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S., but instead personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even provide the information to a Federal Grand Jury. You were wrong to take this upon yourself. . . .

 

Furthermore, you stopped short of investigating the Clinton Foundation as a RICO case (Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization). This is a RICO case if there ever were one. Even an untrained person can tell from the communications which were recovered that Hillary Clinton spent more time working for the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State than on State Business. It may be argued that Hillary did not do any State business UNLESS the Clinton Foundation benefitted. You decided to just let this uncomfortable truth alone without addressing it.

 

http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LEVwoghThZWcoAlklx.9w4;_ylu=X3oDMTE0dWVpZWM2BGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMyBHZ0aWQDVUkyRkJUM18xBHNlYwNzcg--/RV=2/RE=1496905121/RO=10/RU=http%3a%2f%2fpolitichicks.com%2f2016%2f10%2fwhy-did-fbi-director-comey-reopen-clinton-email-investigation%2f/RK=1/RS=Eu.J803xFuR5MwLblZH5eaCKbJw-

[Sho Nuff 720]

If he was soliciting Comey's loyalty in cleaning up the corruption in D.C., I have absolutely no problem with it.

 

If he was soliciting Comey's loyalty to Donald J. Trump, it's a problem.

Seems clear it was the latter.