wiffleball 4,646 Posted November 15, 2018 You totally play grade school with a guy right? " All right everybody! Tony it up for everyone! No more press conferences!" Then watch the media turn on the guy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,220 Posted November 16, 2018 Throwback Thursday....... Notice how the press cheer Obama when he sticks up to a reporter acting rude. Much different than Peter Alexander sticking up for Accoster in this incident. Also, no wonder there is so much arrogance on the left. Its a big focking echo chamber in the biased media. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,080 Posted November 16, 2018 The Left believes our laws and rules do not apply to them. In a nut shell. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 16, 2018 Judge rules credentials must be returned to Acosta while lawsuit moves forward. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,564 Posted November 16, 2018 Judge rules credentials must be returned to Acosta while lawsuit moves forward. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted November 16, 2018 Time to put the toddler in the corner with a heavy dose of ignore Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 16, 2018 Time to put the toddler in the corner with a heavy dose of ignore Have you ever tried to shut a toddler up? He will now be emboldened to be as petulant as he wishes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,710 Posted November 16, 2018 Best case scenario. Give that focking turd his credentials back and ignore the fock out of him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,710 Posted November 16, 2018 :lol: What's so funny it took 3 faces? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted November 16, 2018 Time to put the toddler in the corner with a heavy dose of ignore That isn't very good for ratings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,400 Posted November 16, 2018 Judge rules credentials must be returned to Acosta while lawsuit moves forward. Hmmm......lemme guess, another Obama appointed judge. Acosta's such a fockface btw! Somebody needs to show up at his door and punch him in front of his male lover and cats. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,039 Posted November 16, 2018 Hmmm......lemme guess, another Obama appointed judge. Acosta's such a fockface btw! Somebody needs to show up at his door and punch him in front of his male lover and cats. Judge Timothy J. Kelly On June 7, 2017, President Trump nominated Kelly to serve as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, to the seat vacated by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer, who took senior status on May 18, 2016.[3] A hearing on his nomination before the Senate Judiciary Committee took place on June 28, 2017.[4] On July 13, 2017, his nomination was reported out of committee by voice vote.[5] On September 5, 2017, the United States Senate confirmed his nomination by a vote of 94–2.[6] He received his judicial commission on September 8, 2017. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,895 Posted November 16, 2018 Another agent of the deep state! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,125 Posted November 16, 2018 I dont get why this is the main story everyone is talking about? Who gives AF about Jim Acosta really? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,710 Posted November 16, 2018 I dont get why this is the main story everyone is talking about? Who gives AF about Jim Acosta really? Boredom. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,400 Posted November 16, 2018 Which makes this whole thing even crazier. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,039 Posted November 16, 2018 I dont get why this is the main story everyone is talking about? Who gives AF about Jim Acosta really? ---Probably because some people were saying Acosta assaulted an intern. Not sure how you could doctor it and her reaction, he absolutely hit her. Don't think that is up for debate. Yup, he hit her in both videos. Probably just a simple reflex but, it still happened. Nah, I don't think so. Silly to claim he didn't get physical with her, he did. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herbivore 905 Posted November 16, 2018 Absolutely, I can only hope that SJW-types cry foul, it really demonstrates the duality within.... the way you post cracks me up...the duality within. HA!! Good thread schmoes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,710 Posted November 16, 2018 ---Probably because some people were saying Acosta assaulted an intern. Not sure why you are quoting me, he obviously got physical with her. 90's was clearly talking about the media and public in general though. HTH If you need help with anything else, let me know. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,080 Posted November 16, 2018 If I was trump I'd call on Acosta and say no comment and have the biggest motherfucker in the Secret Service go the microphone and have him say...Wanna try that shiot with me boy? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,895 Posted November 16, 2018 The comments on Breitbart are gold. The Trump appointed judge is a RINO and possible deep state plant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,400 Posted November 16, 2018 The comments on Breitbart are gold. The Trump appointed judge is a RINO and possible deep state plant. Is this a possibility? YES Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bandrus1 413 Posted November 16, 2018 Is this a possibility? YES Tilt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,485 Posted November 16, 2018 This should be good, the judge just gave him a free pass to do what ever he wants at the Press Confrences. Trump on CNN’s Jim Acosta: ‘If he misbehaves, we’ll throw him out’ Get the popcorn! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,482 Posted November 16, 2018 Make him sit way in the back and never call on him to ask a question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,400 Posted November 16, 2018 Tilt Tilt Schmilt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted November 17, 2018 If I was trump I'd call on Acosta and say no comment and have the biggest motherfucker in the Secret Service go the microphone and have him say...Wanna try that shiot with me boy? I bet your peniis is huge. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted November 17, 2018 I bet your peniis is huge. You bet on things like that? Weird. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,080 Posted November 17, 2018 I bet your peniis is huge. Ask your wife. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,646 Posted November 17, 2018 The comments on Breitbart are gold. The Trump appointed judge is a RINO and possible deep state plant. Bigly conflicted and a loser. And his sister went to a Dixie Chicks concert in 1998. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,039 Posted November 19, 2018 CNN asks for emergency hearing after Trump threatens to revoke Acosta's press pass again The White House has issued a new warning to CNN's Jim Acosta, saying his press pass could be revoked again at the end of the month. In response, CNN is asking the U.S. District Court for another emergency hearing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,564 Posted November 19, 2018 Make him sit way in the back and never call on him to ask a question. And also have him sit next to Alex Jones. https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/give-alex-jones-press-credentials-and-sit-him-next-jim-acosta Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted November 19, 2018 I would love to see Trump try this on him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 19, 2018 The Atlantic The Legal Precedent That Could Protect Jim Acosta’s Credentials A 1977 court ruling said that administrations cannot bar correspondents from the briefing room without “due process.” Sherrill v. H Knight This is for a denial of press pass application by Secret Service, not the revocation of one by the WH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,039 Posted November 19, 2018 This is for a denial of press pass application by Secret Service, not the revocation of one by the WH. You need to read the case history, the denial was found to be not credible and the real reason he wasn't given a pass was because LBJ and Nixon just didn't want him there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 19, 2018 You need to read the case history, the denial was found to be not credible and the real reason he wasn't given a pass was because LBJ and Nixon just didn't want him there. Still, the case was a denial of his application by the SS, not an existing revoked pass. And it clearly stated it was because the SS did not determine he was a threat to the President. So the SC has never come close to ruling on revocation. How convenient you left off 23. 23 We have no occasion to consider what procedures must be employed in the revocation, for security reasons, of an already-issued White House press pass Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,039 Posted November 19, 2018 Still, the case was a denial of his application by the SS, not an existing revoked pass. And it clearly stated it was because the SS did not determine he was a threat to the President. So the SC has never come close to ruling on revocation. How convenient you left off 23. 23 We have no occasion to consider what procedures must be employed in the revocation, for security reasons, of an already-issued White House press pass In the Acosta case, when presented to the court the other day, they did not say it was for security reasons(they took that out of the argument presented to the court) his pass was being revoked, but that the decision just came from Trump/Sanders. Not a matter of convenience, but a matter of relevance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 19, 2018 In the Acosta case, when presented to the court the other day, they did not say it was for security reasons(they took that out of the argument presented to the court) his pass was being revoked, but that the decision just came from Trump/Sanders. Not a matter of convenience, but a matter of relevance. Still, regardless of the reason, it's precedent that the SC has not reviewed revocation and this court case would be irrelevant precedent. It does, however, briefly explore the idea that press passes can be revoked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted November 19, 2018 Wait, are you all actually trying to argue that you want a President to be able to legally ban press that he considers too critical? Or is this just a Trump thing where you like him and don't like CNN and want to stick it to the left so you will support something you don't actually agree with? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites