Jump to content
JustinCharge

Fears of a second civil war grow among democrat & republican pundits

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

So then you agree with this same logic for terrorists, right?  Not all Muslims are terrorists but all terrorists are Muslim?

According to the FBI most terrorists here in the US are white supremicists and other right wing groups. :dunno:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MDC said:

According to the FBI most terrorists here in the US are white supremicists and other right wing groups. :dunno:

Does not answer the question.   using your logic,  Not all Muslims are terrorists but all terrorists are Muslim......?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎7‎/‎31‎/‎2019 at 12:28 AM, Herbivore said:

This post is hilarious.  Remember when Kaep made his protest about police brutality.  You had a group of people that felt disenfranchised, to the point they felt people were being killed or targeted, etc.. Instead of addressing the issues, you all just said shut up.  This isn't an agreement with Kaeps stance.  It just should have been easy enough for people who disagreed to address.  You chose not to and went with shut up.  But now from you its boo hoo white republicans need to feel more included.   stfu.  

To note..it's the righties on this site that keep talking about civil war.

"Police brutality." "It's not about disrespecting the flag." 

I knew it was bullsh*t excuse all along.

Fast forward two years and you realize through his complaints about the "Betsy Ross shoe" that it really was about disrespecting the flag all along. And actually, I agree with Kaepernick. Nike chose Anti-American wokeness. FOCK OFF FOCK OFF FOCK OFF. Don't be selling us American shoe flags. FOCK OFF. You aren't weaseling your way back into my good graces. FOCK OFF.

I focking despise the company. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Does not answer the question.   using your logic,  Not all Muslims are terrorists but all terrorists are Muslim......?

Statistically that doesn’t seem to be true.

Ready to admit that violence isn’t just a left thing yet? :overhead:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MDC said:

Statistically that doesn’t seem to be true.

Ready to admit that violence isn’t just a left thing yet? :overhead:

And yet, statistically it is....Link

So now, you are asserting that "According to the FBI most terrorists here in the US are white supremicists and other right wing groups."

But are unwilling to use that same logic on Muslims, if it sounds hypocritical that is only because it is.....

Now, I associate politically-motivated violence with leftists/liberals/Democrats more so than conservatives at the present time, allowing that the balance has ebbed and flowed over the decades.....RIGHT NOW, political violence can be found more so in the left.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No such thing as right and left wing in the US anymore.  Everything is a lot of both.  Most anyone who uses the term generally uses it in a social context, which by it's nature is nearly always left wing.  The KKK certainly is not capitalist, nor in support of the upper classes. If anything they are social anarchists which is left wing.  Yes they are racist, which is neither wing.  Or both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

17 minutes ago, RLLD said:

And yet, statistically it is....Link

So now, you are asserting that "According to the FBI most terrorists here in the US are white supremicists and other right wing groups."

But are unwilling to use that same logic on Muslims, if it sounds hypocritical that is only because it is.....

Now, I associate politically-motivated violence with leftists/liberals/Democrats more so than conservatives at the present time, allowing that the balance has ebbed and flowed over the decades.....RIGHT NOW, political violence can be found more so in the left.

 

According to the FBI white supremicist groups are responsible for half or more of all terrorism in the US, so obviously not all terrorists are Muslim. 

You seem to be walking your initial statement about political violence only being a left thing back. I am glad that I was able to educate you even if you’re too emotional to admit it. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RLLD said:

But we know that is not true, the statistics bear that out.  Feeling that way because politicians and the media manipulate you still does not make it true, and in fact it makes it worse.  This is why cities such as Baltimore, Detoit and others only get worse....the move to ignore reality means the problem continues, it never gets fixed.

By supporting idiotic dogma about cops preying on black people, they are sold a problem that is not real, while the real problems are ignored.....its sick

You believe it's true, take those stats, sit down, show Kaep, explain and discuss, hopefully get to accepted position.  As I said, all you had to do was win this one person.  Instead you went with shut up. That is how a problem doesn't get fixed.  Whether the problem is inequality or a portion of the public being misled about it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDC said:

 

 

According to the FBI white supremicist groups are responsible for half or more of all terrorism in the US, so obviously not all terrorists are Muslim. 

You seem to be walking your initial statement about political violence only being a left thing back. I am glad that I was able to educate you even if you’re too emotional to admit it. :thumbsup:

Where can I find this info.  The RLLD report lists the Klan, Texas Militia and Michigan Militia, but no violent acts for the latter two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

You believe it's true, take those stats, sit down, show Kaep, explain and discuss, hopefully get to accepted position.  As I said, all you had to do was win this one person.  Instead you went with shut up. That is how a problem doesn't get fixed.  Whether the problem is inequality or a portion of the public being misled about it.

Actually, that's not true at all.  What happened is exactly what you said should have happened.  There were numerous reports saying that he's wrong and showing him where, how, and why.  Yet, he doubled down.  THAT's when people told him to shut up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Actually, that's not true at all.  What happened is exactly what you said should have happened.  There were numerous reports saying that he's wrong and showing him where, how, and why.  Yet, he doubled down.  THAT's when people told him to shut up.

I remember Boyer talked to him, but it was mostly Tomi Lahren type of response.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Casual Observer said:

Where can I find this info.  The RLLD report lists the Klan, Texas Militia and Michigan Militia, but no violent acts for the latter two.

Crickets. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Casual Observer said:

Where can I find this info.  The RLLD report lists the Klan, Texas Militia and Michigan Militia, but no violent acts for the latter two.

Yeah, I think if anything like this actually happened involving white supremacists, it would generate publicity worthy of Jussie Smolett, Covington Catholic, or Erica Thomas.

I got Timothy McVeigh and he's well past 150. Then the one dead at Charlottesville.

Then you've got the ranchers at the Wilderness Reserve but they didn't kill anyone. Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer didn't kill anyone. There was some militia in Michigan that got busted but I don't recall the hurting anyone....

I think it's just Timothy McVeigh plus one at Charlottsville. Am I wrong? What am I forgetting?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Yeah, I think if anything like this actually happened involving white supremacists, it would generate publicity worthy of Jussie Smolett, Covington Catholic, or Erica Thomas.

I got Timothy McVeigh and he's well past 150. Then the one dead at Charlottesville.

Then you've got the ranchers at the Wilderness Reserve but they didn't kill anyone. Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer didn't kill anyone. There was some militia in Michigan that got busted but I don't recall the hurting anyone....

I think it's just Timothy McVeigh plus one at Charlottsville. Am I wrong? What am I forgetting?

Abortion guys. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Yeah, I think if anything like this actually happened involving white supremacists, it would generate publicity worthy of Jussie Smolett, Covington Catholic, or Erica Thomas.

I got Timothy McVeigh and he's well past 150. Then the one dead at Charlottesville.

Then you've got the ranchers at the Wilderness Reserve but they didn't kill anyone. Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer didn't kill anyone. There was some militia in Michigan that got busted but I don't recall the hurting anyone....

I think it's just Timothy McVeigh plus one at Charlottsville. Am I wrong? What am I forgetting?

Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, Colorado Planned Parenthood shooting, Charleston church shooting off the top of my head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MDC said:

Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, Colorado Planned Parenthood shooting, Charleston church shooting off the top of my head.

Yeah, thanks.

There was also a Kentucky church shooting too not more than two years ago. The Charleston one jogged my memory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Voltaire said:

Yeah, thanks.

There was also a Kentucky church shooting too not more than two years ago. The Charleston one jogged my memory.

You’ve also got those red pill / incel types who shoot up yoga studios and other places where hot women who won’t fock them congregate. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MDC said:

You’ve also got those red pill / incel types who shoot up yoga studios and other places where hot women who won’t fock them congregate. 

Are incels right wing or left wing? Seems they would be primarily left wing while MGTOWs would be right wing but fock all if I know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Are incels right wing or left wing? Seems they would be primarily left wing while MGTOWs would be right wing but fock all if I know.

The incel, MGTOW, red pill etc. people all seem to love Trump, hate feminism, call people stuff like cuck and soyboy etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MDC said:

The incel, MGTOW, red pill etc. people all seem to love Trump, hate feminism, call people stuff like cuck and soyboy etc. 

Well, I thought incels might have a large overlap with cucks.

These are all new vocabulary words since I've been overseas, I've not met any and am not sure I use them correctly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Yeah, I think if anything like this actually happened involving white supremacists, it would generate publicity worthy of Jussie Smolett, Covington Catholic, or Erica Thomas.

I got Timothy McVeigh and he's well past 150. Then the one dead at Charlottesville.

Then you've got the ranchers at the Wilderness Reserve but they didn't kill anyone. Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer didn't kill anyone. There was some militia in Michigan that got busted but I don't recall the hurting anyone....

I think it's just Timothy McVeigh plus one at Charlottsville. Am I wrong? What am I forgetting?

Tim McVeigh was an atheist anti-gov.  The Charlottsville guy I don't understand, because while he may be a white supremacist, he was trying to get away from a leftist crowd and hit some fat chick that had  a heart attack.  Hardly white supremacist violence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Well, I thought incels might have a large overlap with cucks.

These aer all nw vocabulary words since I've been overseas, I'm not sure I use them correctly.

Cucks are largely left-wing dweebs like MDC.  Incels cut across strata like Elliott Rodger.  The difference is that left-wing cucks justify incel or cuckold status on the basis of feminism or some similar self-mutilating ideology.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Well, I thought incels might have a large overlap with cucks.

These are all new vocabulary words since I've been overseas, I've not met any and am not sure I use them correctly.

They share the same lingo, hatred for women and minorities, and fake machismo covering up massive insecurities. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

6 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

Cucks are largely left-wing dweebs like MDC.  Incels cut across strata like Elliott Rodger.  The difference is that left-wing cucks justify incel or cuckold status on the basis of feminism or some similar self-mutilating ideology.

Yeah, like incels can graduate to cuck status if they meet a chick that will give them the time of dayand let them hang around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MDC said:

They share the same lingo, hatred for women and minorities, and fake machismo covering up massive insecurities. :thumbsup:

Cucks and incels also speculate as to the motivations of others, projecting their fears and their own inadequacies onto others as a way to cover for those inadequacies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

 

Yeah, like incels can graduate to cuck status if they meet a chick that will give them the time of day.

Incels are pissed that they can't get laid; cucks justify getting cucked on the basis of some focked up left wing propaganda.  There is hope that an incel can break out of his funk.  There is no hope for cucks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MDC is wrong. Incel (a word invented on reddit) is typically left leaning men (if you can call them that) same with cucks. The left has tried their best to steal the word as they do with all of ours jokes, but typically incels are skinny little leftist with a testosterone imbalance.

The rights version of an Incel is “neck beard”.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

Incels are pissed that they can't get laid; cucks justify getting cucked on the basis of some focked up left wing propaganda.  There is hope that an incel can break out of his funk.  There is no hope for cucks.

That makes sense. I was thinking cucks at least get seconds which is a step up from zero. But as you point out, it's also a trap that maybe a patient enough incel can avoid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

MDC is wrong. Incel (a word invented on reddit) is typically left leaning men (if you can call them that) same with cucks. The left has tried their best to steal the word as they do with all of ours jokes, but typically incels are skinny little leftist with a testosterone imbalance.

The rights version of an Incel is “neck beard”.

Just going on what I’ve seen. “Cuck” and “soyboy” are almost exclusively used by Trumpers and red pill / MGTOW / incel types. They all hate feminists, Muslims and SJWs. There’s a lot of overlap between men’s rights activist groups that support Trump and these red pill affiliated groups. An actual leftist or SJW type would get ridiculed on any one of these sites. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, MDC said:

Just going on what I’ve seen. “Cuck” and “soyboy” are almost exclusively used by Trumpers and red pill / MGTOW / incel types. They all hate feminists, Muslims and SJWs. There’s a lot of overlap between men’s rights activist groups that support Trump and these red pill affiliated groups. An actual leftist or SJW type would get ridiculed on any one of these sites. 

So men's right groups are far right and women's rights groups are far left?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, MDC said:

Just going on what I’ve seen. “Cuck” and “soyboy” are almost exclusively used by Trumpers and red pill / MGTOW / incel types. They all hate feminists, Muslims and SJWs. There’s a lot of overlap between men’s rights activist groups that support Trump and these red pill affiliated groups. An actual leftist or SJW type would get ridiculed on any one of these sites. 

SJW? Sarah Jessica Whorseface? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

So men's right groups are far right and women's rights groups are far left?

I’d say women’s rights groups tend to be left and men’s rights tend to be far right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/9/2019 at 6:17 PM, Frozenbeernuts said:

A civil war of Dems vs Repubs? Yeah, ok. Any idiot who participates in a civil war to kill someone based on their political views should be executed on the spot. It can be a three way civil war!

The left would get obliterated.  They don't want this at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, remote controller said:

The left would get obliterated.  They don't want this at all.

This how I picture it. A millennial breaks into your house. He doesn't believe in the right to carry arms so he tries to attack you with a cucumber. You place one hand on his head to keep him away from you as you drink your beer with your other hand. The cucumber slips and spills some of your beer. You give him a dirty look and he runs into your closet and cries. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, remote controller said:

The left would get obliterated.  They don't want this at all.

Democrats don't want a civil war? How about no one really wants this. Anyone who does is a ######

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Voltaire said:

Yeah, I think if anything like this actually happened involving white supremacists, it would generate publicity worthy of Jussie Smolett, Covington Catholic, or Erica Thomas.

I got Timothy McVeigh and he's well past 150. Then the one dead at Charlottesville.

Then you've got the ranchers at the Wilderness Reserve but they didn't kill anyone. Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer didn't kill anyone. There was some militia in Michigan that got busted but I don't recall the hurting anyone....

I think it's just Timothy McVeigh plus one at Charlottsville. Am I wrong? What am I forgetting?

Proud Boys aren't white supremacists so even if they had killed anyone it wouldn't count. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

Proud Boys aren't white supremacists so even if they had killed anyone it wouldn't count. 

If you support white people at all in anyway whatsoever you’re a white supremacist, didn’t you know?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

If you support white people at all in anyway whatsoever you’re a white supremacist, didn’t you know?

MDC knows this to be true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, sderk said:

MDC knows this to be true.

Speak for yourself Peefoam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×