Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 14, 2019 8 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: Pretty sure you’re wrong on that. If I understand correctly I believe this suit began a while ago and doesn’t directly involve Jordan but rather centers around Ohio state’s wrestling team, for which he was an assistant coach at the time. And there you go; you just admitted he's only named NOW because he's effective at destroying Dem's narratives. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted November 14, 2019 27 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: And there you go; you just admitted he's only named NOW because he's effective at destroying Dem's narratives. No I didn’t, and I’m pretty sure that’s wrong. But you go on believing that, you’ve never let contrary facts get in your before Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 14, 2019 5 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: No I didn’t, and I’m pretty sure that’s wrong. But you go on believing that, you’ve never let contrary facts get in your before Your words "and doesn’t directly involve Jordan" You should reread the stuff you post. Just like the allegations against Kavanaugh and Trump, the left has millions set aside and will pay for people to just make accusations. Blasey Ford was just one of many idiots they'll use and discard to spread their narrative. And you do it for free. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,585 Posted November 14, 2019 3 hours ago, IGotWorms said: If Taylor’s staffer testifies as to what he heard Trump say, that ain’t hearsay. For a number of reasons. First it’d be a statement of a party-opponent which is not hearsay. Second it probably wouldn’t be offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted—the point of relevancy is that Trump said it, not whether what Trump said is ultimately true. Third even if it was hearsay there are probably exceptions like statements against interest and maybe present sense impression. Legally, it ain’t hearsay. I’m not really sure any of it is since most of this stuff isn’t for the truth of the matter asserted. It’s all about who knew and intended what, when. Yes I know this is all complicated to a non-fake lawyer and you won’t understand most of it and will act like I’m crazy. Whatever. I'll leave the fake lawyerin' to others. I was just going by the definition of hearsay that I posted. I'll take your explanation at face value and accept that it isn't hearsay. Nevertheless, whatever he says should be taken with a grain of salt. Unless the conversation was recorded there's no way to prove he actually heard what he says he heard. So far there's no there, there. I doubt there ever will be. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,614 Posted November 14, 2019 AOC admits this whole sham is about the election next year: Quote "I think many of those considerations will be taken up by the Judiciary Committee when all of this evidence is brought forth," Ocasio-Cortez stated. "We’ll see. I personally do believe that the president has engaged in flagrant violations of the emoluments clause. I'm concerned that we would allow this corruption to continue. But at the end of the day, we have to be able to come together as a caucus, and if it is this Ukrainian allegation that is what brings the caucus together, then I think we have to run with however we unify the House." Ocasio-Cortez has called for the president's impeachment since before her inauguration. "While I believe personally that we should be pursuing and investigating quite flagrant abuses of the emoluments clause, even reporting as recently as the suspicious stops at Trump properties even in congressional delegations or rather in foreign trips, I think all of this is game for investigation," she added. "We also need to move quite quickly because we’re talking about the potential compromise of the 2020 elections. This is not just about something that has occurred, this is about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome from occurring next year," she concluded. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,256 Posted November 14, 2019 I did get a little chuckle out of how utterly churdlish the Dems looked during the session yesterday, its hard to believe that they do not understand how bad th Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,614 Posted November 14, 2019 This is a good article: https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/12/alex-vindman-is-living-breathing-proof-that-the-deep-state-exists-and-it-is-corrupt/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 14, 2019 The neo fascists like the swamp. The media supports and promotes everything they do, the schools ram the agenda down the throats of kids and idiot pawn lefties really think it's organic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,518 Posted November 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Your words "and doesn’t directly involve Jordan" You should reread the stuff you post. Just like the allegations against Kavanaugh and Trump, the left has millions set aside and will pay for people to just make accusations. Blasey Ford was just one of many idiots they'll use and discard to spread their narrative. And you do it for free. That crazy, lying biotch got paid. Quite well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 14, 2019 Now the Ukraine has bribed Trump into releasing the funds. Nothing like throwing sh1t at the wall and seeing what might stick. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/11/02/impeachable-offense-trump-may-have-committed-democrats-arent-really-talking-about/ They danced around Biden doing what Trump did, but there is no doubt now Biden was obviously bribed. Or he wasn't and Trump wasn't. Might be curtains for simple Joe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,518 Posted November 14, 2019 National Enquirer > Washington Post Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,598 Posted November 14, 2019 Driving into work this morning (I’m a Republican) I heard on the radio something about a 2nd phone call with Ukraine. Is this because the hearings went so bad yesterday that they’ve already moved on to plan B... I mean plan J? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,256 Posted November 14, 2019 26 minutes ago, TimmySmith said: Now the Ukraine has bribed Trump into releasing the funds. Nothing like throwing sh1t at the wall and seeing what might stick. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/11/02/impeachable-offense-trump-may-have-committed-democrats-arent-really-talking-about/ They danced around Biden doing what Trump did, but there is no doubt now Biden was obviously bribed. Or he wasn't and Trump wasn't. Might be curtains for simple Joe. I wonder what else is in the toolbox when THAT fails.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 14, 2019 9 minutes ago, RLLD said: I wonder what else is in the toolbox when THAT fails.... Pelosi announced this personally. Her trying to show a hands off approach isn't working. Schiff is a dud. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,614 Posted November 14, 2019 21 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said: Driving into work this morning (I’m a Republican) I heard on the radio something about a 2nd phone call with Ukraine. Is this because the hearings went so bad yesterday that they’ve already moved on to plan B... I mean plan J? Are you sure it was a 2nd phone call? There are reports of a 2nd person hearing the same phone call as the aide to so and so who testified yesterday. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted November 14, 2019 10 minutes ago, Strike said: Are you sure it was a 2nd phone call? There are reports of a 2nd person hearing the same phone call as the aide to so and so who testified yesterday. There was an earlier phone call in April between trump and the Ukrainian President. White House was supposedly going to release a “transcript” of that call as well but so far as I know it hasn’t happened yet Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted November 14, 2019 5 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: There was an earlier phone call in April between trump and the Ukrainian President. White House was supposedly going to release a “transcript” of that call as well but so far as I know it hasn’t happened yet I bet he makes/takes a lot of calls. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted November 14, 2019 9 minutes ago, drobeski said: I bet he makes/takes a lot of calls. I’m sure he does Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 14, 2019 15 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: There was an earlier phone call in April between trump and the Ukrainian President. White House was supposedly going to release a “transcript” of that call as well but so far as I know it hasn’t happened yet There was a different President in April. For what it's worth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted November 14, 2019 7 minutes ago, TimmySmith said: There was a different President in April. For what it's worth. It was right after Zelensky’s election, I believe the supposed purpose of the call was to congratulate him on that. Like the supposed “purpose” of the July 25 call was to congratulate him on winning the parliamentary elections Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,939 Posted November 14, 2019 I've been off the net for a few days. Just checking in and I was wondering if the Democrats have anything yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 14, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1194974810411065345 The plan to hold up loans was hatched in the State Dept per Kent's closed door testimony. Nuland and Pyatt got some splainin to do..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,704 Posted November 15, 2019 The Schiff Has Hit the Fan! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,942 Posted November 15, 2019 The impeachment sham is a large scale version of Nancy Pelosi's Wrap-up Smear. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,871 Posted November 15, 2019 1 hour ago, lickin_starfish said: The impeachment sham is a large scale version of Nancy Pelosi's Wrap-up Smear. Her press conference was hilarious. She knows she focked up pandering to her base with this shitshow . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,518 Posted November 15, 2019 If the democrats had any leadership outside of the squad and Hillary, who's still pulling strings, they would abandon ship and hope everyone forgets this garbage over the holidays. Just go back to racism and white privilege. It almost worked last time. They ain't got nothin else. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Intense Observer 344 Posted November 15, 2019 How fast do Schittforbrains and the lawfare mafia run for the hills? This was their hail Mary before the IG report is released and it failed miserably. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Intense Observer 344 Posted November 15, 2019 Speaking of lawfare, they be shìtting their pants already over the IG report. Upset that they can't take notes with them to leak to the press. Lawfare deserves prison along with the rest of the traitors who have been trying to overthrow our government for 3 years. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 15, 2019 11 hours ago, lickin_starfish said: The impeachment sham is a large scale version of Nancy Pelosi's Wrap-up MDC's Pap-Smear. Fixed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted November 15, 2019 9 hours ago, Intense Observer said: Speaking of lawfare, they be shìtting their pants already over the IG report. Upset that they can't take notes with them to leak to the press. Lawfare deserves prison along with the rest of the traitors who have been trying to overthrow our government for 3 years. I for one am shocked the left wing hacks are already working to discredit the report. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,256 Posted November 15, 2019 1 hour ago, drobeski said: I for one am shocked the left wing hacks are already working to discredit the report. And then, if the report comes out with information that supports their propaganda...."this is an insightful and well-conceived report completed with absolute integrity:.....LMFAO Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,518 Posted November 15, 2019 Bombshells! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted November 15, 2019 15 minutes ago, RLLD said: And then, if the report comes out with information that supports their propaganda...."this is an insightful and well-conceived report completed with absolute integrity:.....LMFAO I think they know its gonna be bad for them, hence the effort to discredit before its released. The media and its complicity in the coup attempt will be exposed. Looking forward to the hacks around here take on it. Good times ahead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 15, 2019 10 hours ago, Intense Observer said: Speaking of lawfare, they be shìtting their pants already over the IG report. Upset that they can't take notes with them to leak to the press. Lawfare deserves prison along with the rest of the traitors who have been trying to overthrow our government for 3 years. Not prison; the gallows. Guarantee they won't try it again. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 15, 2019 8 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Not prison; the gallows. Guarantee they won't try it again. "Growing signs that there are serious problems". I am sure no one will ask what those signs are or how they would know anything about a confidential report. More horse manure from the lib media machine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, TimmySmith said: "Growing signs that there are serious problems". I am sure no one will ask what those signs are or how they would know anything about a confidential report. More horse manure from the lib media machine. "Growing signs there are serious problems" indicates to me the report IS confidential i.e. no leaks. They already know they acted criminally so they must question it's legitimacy before the American public gets it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted November 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Filthy Fernadez said: "Growing signs there are serious problems" indicates to me the report IS confidential i.e. no leaks. They already know they acted criminally so they must question it's legitimacy before the American public gets it. They are concerned about lack of leaks, you say. Maybe it's because all their leakers have been exposed by the Mueller investigation and this hail mary of an inquiry. A blessing in disguise? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 15, 2019 1 minute ago, TimmySmith said: They are concerned about lack of leaks, you say. Maybe it's because all their leakers have been exposed by the Mueller investigation and this hail mary of an inquiry. A blessing in disguise? There have been a sh!t ton of leakers exposed. 'The leaks are real; the news is fake'. It's possible that these phone calls were bait as well. The Dems took the bait, then gather speed towards impeachment inquiry thinking they've got him. Once the Dems committed to it, only then do we begin to see all the dirt about the State Dept in Ukraine and the river of dirty money starts coming out. Trump knows the Dems have one shot at impeachment and he made them use their shot on a Snipe hunt. Brilliant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted November 15, 2019 Dems' witness today is Marie Yovanovitch. Some of her accomplishments include but not limited to: 1. Gave Ukraine's Prosecutor General a list of 'Do Not Prosecute' people. Soros was one of those people. https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/434875-top-ukrainian-justice-official-says-us-ambassador-gave-him-a-do-not-prosecute 2. Spied on conservative journalists who were investigating corruption in Ukraine and State Dept. https://www.wnd.com/2019/10/u-s-state-department-monitored-conservative-journalists/ 3. Told Ukrainian officials to disregard Trump because he would be impeached soon (that was PRIOR to any calls between Trump/Ukraine) i.e. Impeachment in search of an offense. https://www.dailywire.com/news/calls-grow-remove-obamas-us-ambassador-ukraine-ryan-saavedra Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,518 Posted November 15, 2019 What's the poontang situation in Ukraine? Are they hot? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites