Jump to content
Alias Detective

Official President Trump Impeachment Inquiry Thread

Recommended Posts

I'm at work, have not seen one minute or heard one word.  I do have a question though....

Have we heard from anyone that has first hand knowledge of an impeachable offense as of yet?

Or

Is the "testimony" so far from people who heard stuff through a grapevine of something or guess as to things because they don't like Trump?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Okay but just humor me, hypothetically if there were corroboration say from the aide or Sondland himself, then would you change your opinion? It’s a simple question. 

It would totally change my opinion.  I might start thinking the sky is green.  Luckily this is a bridge I won't have to cross. 

Taylor tried to entrap Sondland many times, and failed because of nothing being there, then he uses the attempted entrapment as testimony.  He cites a fake "aide" that we will never know.  He's a liar and he's a liar for a reason.  Sad that supposedly intelligent people don't clamor for their own side to show them facts.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

I'm at work, have not seen one minute or heard one word.  I do have a question though....

Have we heard from anyone that has first hand knowledge of an impeachable offense as of yet?

Or

Is the "testimony" so far from people who heard stuff through a grapevine of something or guess as to things because they don't like Trump?

I am at work also, and haven't seen any of the charade, but I would say:

If the guesses and suppositions corroborate from the third-hand witnesses, we need to peach the Orange man, according to our resident legal scholar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at Twitter on my lunch break.  Is this pretty much what we are hearing?

"I am here today to tell you what people have told me"  So..... "office gossip"?   :unsure: :dunno:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Disgraceful. And yet "men of the people" like Worms side with the globalists that sell us out and are now desperately clinging to their positions and wealth in the face of the peasants revolting. I would love to see the houses and bank accounts of these lifetime government employees. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

Looking at Twitter on my lunch break.  Is this pretty much what we are hearing?

"I am here today to tell you what people have told me"  So..... "office gossip"?   :unsure: :dunno:

 

 

Twitter is usually the best place to get the unvarnished news.   :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Twitter is usually the best place to get the unvarnished news.   :thumbsup:

It's a video snippet of "testimony".  :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

Looking at Twitter on my lunch break.  Is this pretty much what we are hearing?

"I am here today to tell you what people have told me"  So..... "office gossip"?   :unsure: :dunno:

 

 

I’m surprised you aren’t maintaining an open mind toward something you aren’t even bothering to follow :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, KSB2424 said:

It's a video.  :unsure:

Yes, an entire 11 seconds of the proceedings, so clearly that's enough to reach the conclusion that this is 'office gossip'   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Gonna hold you to that :thumbsup:

Sure why not.  And to Taylor's credit, he definitely stayed away from any mention of Biden.  It was all Burisma.  So even that testimony would require much dot connecting. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Yes, an entire 11 seconds of the proceedings, so clearly that's enough to reach the conclusion that this is 'office gossip'   

Well, onnthe other side, hours of testimony and yet no proof. We're waiting. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Twitter is usually the best place to get the unvarnished news.   :thumbsup:

Snopes is even better :doublethumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

I’m surprised you aren’t maintaining an open mind toward something you aren’t even bothering to follow :rolleyes:

Irony

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jim Jordan went to town on that lightweight Taylor. What a farce. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Jim Jordan went to town on that lightweight Taylor. What a farce. 

I'll have to find/listen to this.  Jim Jordan is focking awesome.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

I'll have to find/listen to this.  Jim Jordan is focking awesome.

There are a few extreme partisans that don't realize it yet but, this thing is over.  What a sht show..

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ONLY thing of substance today by Taylor can be found in the transcript.  Am I wrong about that?   Everything else is made up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

The ONLY thing of substance today by Taylor can be found in the transcript.  Am I wrong about that?   Everything else is made up. 

We'll have to wait and see.

Worms and MCD will be along with CNN's version shortly, then we'll see if we can make the bad man go away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jim Jordan: You didn’t listen in on President Trump & Zelensky’s call?

Taylor: I did not.

Jordan: You’ve never talked with Chief of Staff Mulvaney?

Taylor: I never did.

Jordan: You’ve never met the President?

Taylor: That’s correct.

Jordan: And you’re their star witness.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, so there was 55 days between the time of this so called "call" and when the Ukraine Aid was given?   And this guy has no direct knowledge of any sort of quid pro quo or bribery or whatever?  Why is he a witness then?  I don't get why this guy is a witness.....its either that he read something in Politico or somebody told him something that they heard.  :unsure:

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, KSB2424 said:

ait, so there was 55 days between the time of this so called "call" and when the Ukraine Aid was given?   And this guy has no direct knowledge of any sort of quid pro quo or bribery or whatever?  Why is he a witness then?  I don't get why this guy is a witness.....its either that he read something in Politico or somebody told him something that they heard. 

He is a witness because he interacted with Sondland.  He tried several times to entrap Sondland and failed.  So he read his notes to make it look like Sondland was hiding something.  poor shill,  I feel bad for the guy, the left has promised him something, but it won't pan out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

Jim Jordan: You didn’t listen in on President Trump & Zelensky’s call?

Taylor: I did not.

Jordan: You’ve never talked with Chief of Staff Mulvaney?

Taylor: I never did.

Jordan: You’ve never met the President?

Taylor: That’s correct.

Jordan: And you’re their star witness.

lol

literally

lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

Do you guys have any idea how this stuff works? There’s more than one witness :doh:

You mean they have someone who actually witnessed something? Great strategy keeping them on ice. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys are so willfully dumb that in a murder trial you’d be clamoring for acquittal because the first witness only saw the defendant buy a gun, never mind that several other witnesses then saw him shoot someone with it :lol: :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

You mean they have someone who actually witnessed something? Great strategy keeping them on ice. 

You mean the call? Speaking directly to the president about the extortion? Because yeah, they have all of that :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

You guys are so willfully dumb that in a murder trial you’d be clamoring for acquittal because the first witness only saw the defendant buy a gun, never mind that several other witnesses then saw him shoot someone with it :lol: :doh:

Usually in a murder case someone got murdered. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone see the testimony of this guy George Kent?  He's basically making the case for Trump that Biden and his son should be investigated.  You can't make this sh*t up.  The idiots pushing for impeachment are making Trump's case for him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Herbivore said:

how about the ones he brought in after the fact..like Taylor

He was one of the two sitting there.  He didn't have anything to say, either.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

You mean the call? Speaking directly to the president about the extortion? Because yeah, they have all of that :doh:

One of the participants on the call said he wasn't pressured.  When does he testify?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Do you guys have any idea how this stuff works? There’s more than one witness :doh:

Have you ever even conducted a trial, let alone a deposition?  All I saw this morning was a partisan lawyer asking leading questions on rehearsed testimony and they couldn't even make that damaging.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

You guys are so willfully dumb that in a murder trial you’d be clamoring for acquittal because the first witness only saw the defendant buy a gun, never mind that several other witnesses then saw him shoot someone with it :lol: :doh:

There's a lot of stupid in this post, lets save it for posterity's sake, it's Slownutts worthy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Do you guys have any idea how this stuff works? There’s more than one witness :doh:

Well sure, this thing is supposed to all week right?  
 

My question though was Why was this Taylor guy called as a witness at all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Do you guys have any idea how this stuff works? There’s more than one witness :doh:

:lol:  A few pages back this guy had bombshells for you.  At least you are sensible enough to listen to us and know what a failure he was.  Better luck with the next one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

I am so willfully dumb that if CNN told me Trump was a Ugandan spy attempting to deport actual aliens from space I would cry :lol: :doh:

Funny how it works both ways

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×