Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Fireballer

I find it hard to not see trans as mental illness...

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

It's BECAUSE they are being enabled that more and more carnage follows them.

I seriously can't understand why the liberals see mental  illness as a strength. But they do indeed crave having power over weak people. So I guess that's why they push it. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

I seriously can't understand why the liberals see mental  illness as a strength. But they do indeed crave having power over weak people. So I guess that's why they push it. :dunno:

Oppressed vs Oppressor.  Classic Marxist nonsense.  It's how they'll gain power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/14/2024 at 5:41 PM, seafoam1 said:

The real question is, what the fock is wrong with the idiots who support and enable and even encourage them? :mellow:

Who better to use to pilot drones strikes, computer attacks, and misinformation campaigns against patriots than psychopathic, shut ins that have done nothing with their lives but be keyboard warriors and play video games?  
 

It’s no accident The Regime ™️ has manipulated, legitimized and sought out their loyalty.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Set at 2:19 for an interesting discussion with Dennis Prager regarding Trans back in 2019.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/18/2024 at 7:54 AM, Tree of Knowledge said:

Who better to use to pilot drones strikes, computer attacks, and misinformation campaigns against patriots than psychopathic, shut ins that have done nothing with their lives but be keyboard warriors and play video games?  
 

It’s no accident The Regime ™️ has manipulated, legitimized and sought out their loyalty.  

Gutterboy is a shut in and plays video games. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Admiral" Rachel Levine convinced WPATH to remove age restrictions on gender care, including medical/surgical procedures.

Quote

→ A Biden official pressured WPATH to remove age restrictions on gender care: The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) has outsize influence on the medical care offered to children distressed about their gender. It shouldn’t. It’s not a medical or scientific organization, it’s an advocacy group. And in 2022, when it released its long-awaited revision of its treatment guidelines, including those for minors, the recommendations came as a shock. At the last minute, the group eliminated virtually all minimum age restrictions for receiving these life-altering medical and surgical interventions—interventions that, for example, could render patients sterile. How and why did such a thing happen? 

Now we know. 

A high-ranking Biden administration official, Assistant Secretary for Health Dr. Rachel Levine, directly interfered with these supposedly evidence-based WPATH recommendations.

Levine, we learned this week from internal WPATH documents that are part of a civil suit, lobbied WPATH to eliminate age minimums for treatments—including surgeries. The documents, from a report by expert witness Dr. James Cantor, show that Levine’s chief of staff met with WPATH representatives, who reported that Levine was very concerned that “specific minimum ages for treatment” “based on the rhetoric she is hearing in D.C.” “will result in devastating legislation for trans care. She wonders if the specific ages can be taken out. . . ” (Cantor’s report also shows the American Academy of Pediatrics similarly pressured WPATH to remove minimum age recommendations.)

The documents, as reported by Jesse Singal, show WPATH officials acknowledged Levine’s request and said they would act accordingly. Levine, a transgender woman who transitioned in middle age, was also worried about bans and backlash that were coming regarding transitioning young people. So, as the documents show, she pressured WPATH to hurry and release the new standards of care, to get them out soon for the administration’s political advantage: “I have just spoken to Admiral Levine today, who—as always is extremely supportive of the [Standards of Care 8], but also very eager for its release—so to ensure integration in the US health policies of the Biden government. So, let’s crack on with the job!!!”

Levine frequently describes gender transition of young people as “lifesaving” and “medically necessary.” Now we see how she used her political influence to interfere in what was supposed to be an evidence-based undertaking. But she also hasn’t been consistent. Levine said that she’s grateful that transition was not available when she was a teenager. “If I had transitioned when I was young, then I wouldn’t have my children,” Levine said at a 2019 meeting of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. “I can’t imagine a life without my children.” —Lisa Selin Davis

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we get some confirmation on the actual content of this bill and why activists are against it?  Are they actually crying about an anti-sex trafficking bill because LGBTQ people commit more sex crimes?  This has to be embellished, right?  
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/1/2024 at 3:53 PM, jerryskids said:

"Admiral" Rachel Levine convinced WPATH to remove age restrictions on gender care, including medical/surgical procedures.

 

It’s not happening. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

It’s not happening. 

I didn't think trans people could compete in olympic track and field.  :dunno: 

I guess it happens but it's rare.

I couldn't imagine how disappointed/upset I'd be if my daughter came in "4th" place in the qualifier.  :( 

Quote

Paris Olympics 2024: Transgender middle-distance runner Nikki Hiltz qualifies with record-breaking 1500m time
Hiltz broke the record Sunday, the final day of Pride Month, and will be heading to Paris with the previous record-holder
By Jordan Pagkalinawan 
Jul 2, 2024 at 9:34 pm ET

1 min read

Nikki Hiltz, an American transgender middle-distance runner, qualified for the 2024 Paris Olympics in the women's 1500m final, running a record-breaking time of 3:55.53. The record was previously held by Elle St. Pierre, who ran a 3:58.03 at the 2021 track and field trials.

Hiltz reflected on the achievement in an Instagram post, writing in part: "Yesterday afternoon in Eugene Oregon a childhood dream of mine came true. I'm not sure when this will fully sink in… All I know is today I'm waking up just so grateful for my people, overwhelmed by all the love and support, and filled with joy that I get to race people I deeply love and respect around a track for a living."

Hiltz previously won a silver medal in the 1500m at the Indoor World Championships in March, and they will now be heading to their first Olympic Games. They will be joined by Emily Mackay, who came in second at 3:55.90, and St. Pierre, who finished third with a time of 3:55.99.

"This is bigger than just me," Hiltz told NBC. "It's the last day of Pride Month, and I wanted to run this one for my community. All the LGBTQ folks, you guys brought me home that last 100. I could just feel the love and support.

"To be going with these two, I mean, Elle St. Pierre has elevated women's distance running. I saw the time, and I didn't think that was possible. We all had to rise because of her. [This is an] awesome, awesome team we're sending to Paris."

https://www.cbssports.com/olympics/news/paris-olympics-2024-transgender-middle-distance-runner-nikki-hiltz-qualifies-with-record-breaking-1500m-time/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Fireballer said:

Can we get some confirmation on the actual content of this bill and why activists are against it?  Are they actually crying about an anti-sex trafficking bill because LGBTQ people commit more sex crimes?  This has to be embellished, right?  
 

 

I am not finding WHY LGBTQ folks are saying it harms them more. 

All I can see is: 

Quote

Under the amended versions of SB 1414, solicitation of a minor would sometimes be a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in county jail and sometimes be a felony punishable by up to three years in county jail. The stronger punishment would be available only when the defendant was 18 or older and "knew or should have known that the person who was solicited was a minor at the time of the offense." And it would only apply when "the solicited minor was under 16 years of age at the time of the offense, or if the person solicited was under 18 years of age at the time of the offense and the person solicited was a victim of human trafficking." A second or subsequent offense would always be a felony, and an offender more than 10 years older than the solicited minor would have to register as a sex offender for 10 years.

I am failing to see how punishing for sex trafficking with minors whether you knew it or not would harm those particular groups, UNLESS they are doing that. In which case, if they ARE then they deserve to be punished. Maybe you have minor LGBTQ's trying to solicit with other minor LGBTQs and that's what they are worried about? I am filling to see where these groups are "more impacted." We're talking about the sexual exploitation of children. ANYONE should be punished for it, IDGAF what group you belong to. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am wondering why the LGBTQ crowd always speaks up when kids are involved? I mean you hear bout like drag queen story hour, but you don't see them going around to old folks homes, homeless camps, veterans or anything like that trying to get those people more involved. 

It's always kids. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TheNewGirl said:

 

It's always kids. 

Give me just one generation of youth, and I'll transform the whole world.
Vladimir Lenin
 
The LGBTQ issue isn’t really THE issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TheNewGirl said:

I am wondering why the LGBTQ crowd always speaks up when kids are involved? I mean you hear bout like drag queen story hour, but you don't see them going around to old folks homes, homeless camps, veterans or anything like that trying to get those people more involved. 

It's always kids. 

Not true, but the Anti-LGBTQ crowd never talks about that. In another thread I posted links to where some Drag Queen Story Hours have been held at nursing homes, assisted living and other senior facilities. And of course most Drag Queen Story Hours are held at public libraries where senior and veterans are free to attend if they want to hear a story read to them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, squistion said:

Not true, but the Anti-LGBTQ crowd never talks about that. In another thread I posted links to where some Drag Queen Story Hours have been held at nursing homes, assisted living and other senior facilities. And of course most Drag Queen Story Hours are held at public libraries where senior and veterans are free to attend if they want to hear a story read to them. 

Ahh...no they haven't.  Unless it's an old folks for the Rainbow Mob.

There's are a reason the rainbow mobs targets children - easier to groom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Maximum Overkill said:

 

 

He's sick of being humanized, but is also sick of being dehumanized? Oh no. We should drop everything and cater to insanity. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find this very interesting

Under President Joe Biden’s administration, transgender women who are born male must register for the Selective Service, which provides the Defense Department with troops in the event of a military draft. Transgender men who are born female do not have to register for the Selective Service.

 

it goes against what the left has been telling us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/19/2024 at 10:42 AM, Baker Boy said:

I find this very interesting

Under President Joe Biden’s administration, transgender women who are born male must register for the Selective Service, which provides the Defense Department with troops in the event of a military draft. Transgender men who are born female do not have to register for the Selective Service.

 

it goes against what the left has been telling us.

What has the left been telling us that this goes against?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Audrey Hale's full manifesto released.  No wonder they were trying to suppress it.  WOW!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Strike said:

Audrey Hale's full manifesto released.  No wonder they were trying to suppress it.  WOW!

Link?  Or at least Cliffs Notes version? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe one day in the foreseeable future, trans ideology will be viewed for what it is, a dangerous social experiment.  Hopefully the road won’t be littered with too many more mutilated and confused kids/adults.  Also, great to see WPATH members resisting this, although they must just be trying to avoid lawsuits. They are the sick fuks responsible for most of this garbage.

https://x.com/amayadeakins/status/1885455027629666574?s=46&t=DFWeVowvyy-F23jlecK3zw

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Real timschochet said:

At this point I’m having trouble not seeing anti-trans rants as a mental illness. The obsession you guys have with this is truly disturbing. 

It's been a big problem that has been growing year over year. 

Your side says we are obsessed. That it isn't happening yet every day there seems to be multiple examples. And that is what we do see.

I welcome this return science and what is right 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

At this point I’m having trouble not seeing anti-trans rants as a mental illness. The obsession you guys have with this is truly disturbing. 

Well Tim, to rationally thinking adults, it’s obvious that this huge push of trans ideology is harmful.  That’s why it gets called out.  The “obsessed” take is just a continual gun throw by several of you on this site. It’s pretty laughable really.

 Also, did you even read her tweet thread?  She is one of those that you would have considered a “trusted medical expert” that you obtain your opinion from. She’s a card carrying WPATH member and everything.  Do you discount her now that she’s drawing attention to things that counter your opinion?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fireballer said:

Maybe one day in the foreseeable future, trans ideology will be viewed for what it is, a dangerous social experiment.  Hopefully the road won’t be littered with too many more mutilated and confused kids/adults.  Also, great to see WPATH members resisting this, although they must just be trying to avoid lawsuits. They are the sick fuks responsible for most of this garbage.

https://x.com/amayadeakins/status/1885455027629666574?s=46&t=DFWeVowvyy-F23jlecK3zw

 

 

“ 75% of those with gender dysphoria desist, and 30% of transitioners detrans, then 83% of those with gender dysphoria detrans or desist.”

Imagine how many people could be saved from irreversible harm if we gave them proper psychological support instead.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fireballer said:

Well Tim, to rationally thinking adults, it’s obvious that this huge push of trans ideology is harmful.  That’s why it gets called out.  The “obsessed” take is just a continual gun throw by several of you on this site. It’s pretty laughable really.

 Also, did you even read her tweet thread?  She is one of those that you would have considered a “trusted medical expert” that you obtain your opinion from. She’s a card carrying WPATH member and everything.  Do you discount her now that she’s drawing attention to things that counter your opinion?

It’s not my opinion. It’s the vast majority of health experts. Just as with climate change there’s always a few that disagree; my usual assumption is that it’s for publicity. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

It’s not my opinion. It’s the vast majority of health experts. Just as with climate change there’s always a few that disagree; my usual assumption is that it’s for publicity. 

15% of "women" in US prisons are transgender, whereas about 1% of the population are.  

Quote
AI Overview
 
As of January 2025, 15% of women in federal prisons were transgender. This is a disproportionate number, given that transgender people make up less than 1% of the adult population in the United States. 

15%?  Could there be men "self" identifying as women, for some combination of getting into softer facilities, with less risk of bodily harm, as well as continuing their history of assaulting women?  :dunno: 

Or maybe it's random that 15X of the prison population is trans women.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×