Delta variant more transmissible than chickenpox?

[IGotWorms 4,059]

1 minute ago, TimmySmith said:

Fauci himself debunked the bolded part.  The last part could be true about the variants, according to what they are saying. 

Link? 

[Casual Observer 597]

Can anyone tell me:

1.  Why or how does CNN have access to an internal CDC document?

and

2.  Where I can find a specific test for the Delta variant?

[TimmySmith 2,782]

19 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Link? 

Coronavirus - Doomsday - The Geek Club - FFToday Forums

[TimmySmith 2,782]

6 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

Can anyone tell me:

2.  Where I can find a specific test for the Delta variant?

Same place you can find the data for those who have covid. Nowhere. 

[OldMaid 2,130]

7 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

Can anyone tell me:

1.  Why or how does CNN have access to an internal CDC document?

and

2.  Where I can find a specific test for the Delta variant?

1. It was leaked to the Washington Post and was later confirmed by the CDC.

 

2. I don’t think there is a specific test just for Delta-if I’m understanding your question right.

[porkbutt 893]

2 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

Same place you can find the data for those who have covid. Nowhere. 

same place you can find why you need vax if you had covid. nowhere.

basically the experts say "probably should just to be safe"

[Strike 5,594]

1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

The fock do I have to do with releasing data?

I'm not asking you to release data.  I'm asking you to explain why they don't, and, if you can't why you are willing to follow them blindly.  And why you take issue with those of us who are skeptical of them when they won't release that data. 

[Mike Honcho 5,297]

8 minutes ago, Strike said:

I'm not asking you to release data.  I'm asking you to explain why they don't, and, if you can't why you are willing to follow them blindly.  And why you take issue with those of us who are skeptical of them when they won't release that data. 

Literally the very next sentence in the article, after the stuff worms posted is...

Quote

The CDC is scheduled to publish data Friday that will back Walensky’s controversial decision to change guidance for fully vaccinated people. She said Tuesday the CDC was recommending that even fully vaccinated people wear masks indoors in places where transmission of the virus is sustained or high.

 

[edjr 6,608]

4 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Literally the very next sentence in the article, after the stuff worms posted is...

 

BECAUSE OF A BUNCH OF GAYS IN PTOWN!!!!!

[Strike 5,594]

9 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Literally the very next sentence in the article, after the stuff worms posted is...

 

So they  haven't published the data.  Thanks for confirming my point. 

[edjr 6,608]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

So they  haven't published the data.  Thanks for confirming my point. 

https://www.wcvb.com/article/cdc-analysis-shows-74-of-provincetown-cases-occurred-in-vaccinated-individuals/37182364

[Strike 5,594]

1 minute ago, edjr said:

https://www.wcvb.com/article/cdc-analysis-shows-74-of-provincetown-cases-occurred-in-vaccinated-individuals/37182364

It's like you people don't know what the word "data" means. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,554]

4 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

Good strategy.

Both caught covid but one vaccinated.

For one Mississippi couple who caught Covid-19, their outcomes provide a growing contrast. The wife, who is vaccinated, recovered after 10 days. But her unvaccinated husband has been in the hospital for 22 days and counting.

So the vaccinations are the only differences in their medical histories?  I noticed in the article they mentioned the wife having asthma.  Also noticed that they didn't mention one word about her husband.  Kind of weird, no?  Wonder why that is?  Couldn't be because he had other ailments, could it?  Other extenuating circumstances?  No, just the vaccine, right?

[edjr 6,608]

3 minutes ago, Strike said:

It's like you people don't know what the word "data" means. 

that IS the data you squid. That is what she used. It's a farce

[Mike Honcho 5,297]

6 minutes ago, Strike said:

So they  haven't published the data.  Thanks for confirming my point. 

Quote

Individuals who are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus but become infected could harbor just as much virus as infected, unvaccinated people, according to a study published Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

2 hours ago.

What did you tell me once...oh yeah... 'not my fault you can't stay atop current events.'

[Strike 5,594]

God some of you guys are pathetic.  

[IGotWorms 4,059]

48 minutes ago, Strike said:

I'm not asking you to release data.  I'm asking you to explain why they don't, and, if you can't why you are willing to follow them blindly.  And why you take issue with those of us who are skeptical of them when they won't release that data. 

I’m not willing to follow anyone blindly  I highly doubt they’re making it up, but you’re right that others should be able to analyze and review the data and I’m sure that will happen soon

[IGotWorms 4,059]

31 minutes ago, Strike said:

So they  haven't published the data.  Thanks for confirming my point. 

Your “point” is focking dumb you belligerent dipsh1t

[Strike 5,594]

5 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Your “point” is focking dumb you belligerent dipsh1t

And yet here you are, being the good lemming, simply because you "doubt" they would make it up. 

[GobbleDog 997]

The "online Coronavirus calculator"  https://covid19risktools.com:8443/riskcalculator

My absolute mortality rate is 4.1 per 1,000,000 or 0.00041%.  I haven't been vaccinated and I can snort lines of coronavirus.

[Casual Observer 597]

1 hour ago, OldMaid said:

1. It was leaked to the Washington Post and was later confirmed by the CDC.

 

2. I don’t think there is a specific test just for Delta-if I’m understanding your question right.

1.  Yeah, sure they did, Swoosie.

2.  Correct.  Which means all reports you hear of "Delta variant" this and "Delta variant" that are misinformation.

[titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745]

5 hours ago, Strike said:

Can't way one way or another.  But there's no reason they can't release the data that I can imagine.  So, why aren't they?  Saying I don't trust them, with the amount of flip flopping and changing guidance over the last year, would be an understatement.  Fauci is a liar, and the CDC is incompetent.  Why would I trust them?  Release the data and let other scientists who don't have a political agenda evaluate it. 

Be nice, one of of our own works at cdc.

Peenie never had anything to say in the covid topics. I assume she's prohibited.   

[porkbutt 893]

i had it and beat it. almost want it again. it'll become like a lil b;tch cold to me. im never wearing a mask again and my immune system will be superior. meanwhile cucks will be on their 10th vaccine shot with 3 masks on, a tumor growing out of their head and then probably croak from the next time they get a common cold.

[Strike 5,594]

2 minutes ago, titans&bucs&bearsohmy! said:

Be nice, one of of our own works at cdc.

Peenie never had anything to say in the covid topics. I assume she's prohibited.   

Do we know she works there?  I knew she was a lab person but didn't know where.  But I don't care.  The CDC has been incompetent since day one on this virus.  That doesn't mean Peenie.  She's a lab rat.  She's not the one making the decisions and setting policy.   If she were she wouldn't be constantly complaining about money. 

[titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745]

Just now, Strike said:

Do we know she works there?  I knew she was a lab person but didn't know where.  But I don't care.  The CDC has been incompetent since day one on this virus.  That doesn't mean Peenie.  She's a lab rat.  She's not the one making the decisions and setting policy.   If she were she wouldn't be constantly complaining about money. 

I'm pretty sure she's said she has before. 

[OldMaid 2,130]

22 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

1.  Yeah, sure they did, Swoosie.

2.  Correct.  Which means all reports you hear of "Delta variant" this and "Delta variant" that are misinformation.

Since you asked a question that gave me pause… I went off on a google search to see how they detect the delta variant and more info. I’m going to post a link from the American Lung Association (which hopefully you don’t consider a "liberal rag" for your purview:

https://www.lung.org/blog/covid-19-delta-variant

 

But by all means, feel free to follow someone on Twitter that "knows better" if that helps you sleep at night.

[IGotWorms 4,059]

12 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Since you asked a question that gave me pause… I went off on a google search to see how they detect the delta variant and more info. I’m going to post a link from the American Lung Association (which hopefully you don’t consider a "liberal rag" for your purview:

https://www.lung.org/blog/covid-19-delta-variant

 

But by all means, feel free to follow someone on Twitter that "knows better" if that helps you sleep at night.

CO got d1ck slapped!

[Utilit99 4,099]

20 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

CO got d1ck slapped!

Yeah, one more doctor's opinion. Oh boy, what a "dlck slap" that was. Whatever that phag term means.

[titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745]

25 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

CO got d1ck slapped!

Om is a lady. He got meat curtain slapped. 

[TimHauck 2,922]

11 hours ago, 5-Points said:

Exactly. 

I've said it before and I'll say it again, it's better to get it and let your immune system do it's thing. Natural immunity > vaccine, for low/no risk individuals and society as a whole. 

 

Please explain.  The reported (and likely inflated) "vaccine death rate" is far lower than the death rate from the virus.    One could argue "well it's not guaranteed you'll get the virus" but you're throwing that out the window with this claim.   And don't give me the "don't know the long-term effects" excuse, you don't know the long-term effects of covid either.

[Cdub100 3,934]

Fear fear fear!!!

[TimHauck 2,922]

3 hours ago, TimmySmith said:

They also think that maybe the vaccine has little effect at best. 

No "they" don't.  Unless by they you mean lod001.

 

3 hours ago, TimmySmith said:

Fauci himself debunked the bolded part.  The last part could be true about the variants, according to what they are saying. 

No he didn't.  No they didn't say that, unless by they you mean lod001.

 

 

 

[TimHauck 2,922]

7 hours ago, Strike said:

Can't way one way or another.  But there's no reason they can't release the data that I can imagine.  So, why aren't they?  Saying I don't trust them, with the amount of flip flopping and changing guidance over the last year, would be an understatement.  Fauci is a liar, and the CDC is incompetent.  Why would I trust them?  Release the data and let other scientists who don't have a political agenda evaluate it. 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/cdc-breakthrough-infections/94390e3a-5e45-44a5-ac40-2744e4e25f2e/

 

[Strike 5,594]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/cdc-breakthrough-infections/94390e3a-5e45-44a5-ac40-2744e4e25f2e/

 

That's not data.  That's analysis.  And as I said earlier I don't trust the CDC to do that analysis.  Put the data out there and let third parties confirm the conclusions, before we lock down the country again.  FFS.

[TimHauck 2,922]

3 hours ago, edjr said:

it's from p-town orgies, that is why it is more transmissible. 

seems like the case huh

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm?s_cid=mm7031e2_w

"demographics of cases likely reflect those of attendees at the public gatherings, as events were marketed to adult male participants; further study is underway to identify other population characteristics among cases, such as additional demographic characteristics and underlying health conditions including immunocompromising conditions"

[TimHauck 2,922]

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

That's not data.  That's analysis.  And as I said earlier I don't trust the CDC to do that analysis.  Put the data out there and let third parties confirm the conclusions, before we lock down the country again.  FFS.

I think "the data" they're talking about is the Provincetown thing (link to report above)

[titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745]

2 minutes ago, Strike said:

before we lock down the country again.  FFS.

Personally, I'd see it burn first. 

[Strike 5,594]

Just now, TimHauck said:

Those were the slides.   I think "the data" they're talking about is the Provincetown thing

I don't care.  I keep asking for data and you idiots keep posting links to stories about analysis/conclusions. 

[Strike 5,594]

Just now, titans&bucs&bearsohmy! said:

Personally, I'd see it burn first. 

Right, and given the messaging and idiocy coming from our government, there's gonna be a lot of pushback to new restrictions.  Most people are ignoring the new mask mandates already.

[TimHauck 2,922]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

I don't care.  I keep asking for data and you idiots keep posting links to stories about analysis/conclusions. 

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm?s_cid=mm7031e2_w

Maybe more specifically: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm?s_cid=mm7031e2_w#F1_down

It also links to Massachusetts data at the bottom