Kyle Rittenhouse trial

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

Real men protect children and don’t care when a monster that rapes them is killed, under any circumstances. 

[Mike Honcho 5,223]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

3 scumbags shot. One of them a convicted child rapist.  You’re more concerned with why Rittenhouse was there rather than why a POS who should be locked up for eternity was. If you libtards were real men I’d say your outrage is misplaced. But it’s right where you want it, not on where it belongs, because that’s on you and who you support/ vote for. 

I was more concerned that CDub's analogy was bad, and now I'm concerned about your inability to comprehend what you read.

[wiffleball 4,789]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Real men protect children and don’t care when a monster that rapes them is killed, under any circumstances. 

 pudgy kyke had no idea who is shooting at, right?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

2 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

 pudgy kyke had no idea who is shooting at, right?

Well, he knew they were scumbags. Good enough. 

[wiffleball 4,789]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Well, he knew they were scumbags. Good enough. 

Wow.

 

Got to wonder where his parents were in this whole situation. Why haven't they been interviewed?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

5 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

I was more concerned that CDub's analogy was bad, and now I'm concerned about your inability to comprehend what you read.

Again, you are more concerned with what Rittenhouse was doing there rather than why a child rapist was back on the street. It’s simple. What you are most outraged about is noted. We all know the reason why a child rapist was back on the street, and it wasn’t because of Trump, his voters, or Q. That belongs to your team. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

1 minute ago, wiffleball said:

Wow.

 

Got to wonder where his parents were in this whole situation. Why haven't they been interviewed?

His mother has been in court everyday. GFY if you won’t bother paying a little bit of attention before you flap your gums anymore. 

[wiffleball 4,789]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

His mother has been in court everyday. GFY if you won’t bother paying a little bit of attention before you flap your gums anymore. 

Where was she when he said hey Mom! I want to go to a riot with an illegally purchased firearm?

 

Dude, I remember what kind of restrictions I had at 17. Pretty sure that would have been shitcanned.

 

But now the worthless piece of shiit suddenly has all kinds of time to show up in court. Guess it takes litigation to make some people a parent.

[Mike Honcho 5,223]

6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Again, you are more concerned with what Rittenhouse was doing there rather than why a child rapist was back on the street. It’s simple. What you are most outraged about is noted. We all know the reason why a child rapist was back on the street, and it wasn’t because of Trump, his voters, or Q. That belongs to your team. 

What a child rapist being on the streets has no bearing on this case or my reply to RLLD & CDub, but it sure does sound like a wonderful deflection/outrage drum that you can bang all night long. 

[wiffleball 4,789]

Pretty sure I called this one:

 

Kyle Rittenhouse took the stand to testify at his murder trial on Wednesday, CRYING so hard at one point that the judge called a break to allow the defendant to collect himself.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

6 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

What a child rapist being on the streets has no bearing on this case or my reply to RLLD & CDub, but it sure does sound like a wonderful deflection/outrage drum that you can bang all night long. 

 No, it’s just about who you advocate for. I hear child rapist killed, I say good and then turn the page and am glad. You go another way. If Rittenhouse had killed an innocent even by accident I would say he should pay a price. But he didn’t and the world is better off. When  two a-holes find each other I don’t root for either one. Unless one of them is a child rapist. Then I root for the other a hole. 

[Masshole 642]

52 minutes ago, RLLD said:

This kid should not have been out there with a weapon, should not have been out there at all really.

I do not like that he was out there walking around armed.

I understand why he shot the people who attacked him, but he should not have really been out there like that.

Turning this into some bullsh!t racist thing has no place here either.

I think this is probably the correct take on this.    I get a bit of a queasy feeling when the cheerleading for Rittenhouse starts.    I don't think he should go to jail, but a 17 yr old walking around a riot with a rifle slung over his shoulder is something that doesn't feel right.    Of course, the flip side to that is that if the local officials had done what they should have - called out the nat'l guard, brought in cops from every town within 100 miles of Kenosha, i.e. slammed the door on any rioting then people wouldn't have felt the need to try to protect their stores/homes by having 17 yr olds with rifles wandering around.     Either way, it sucks.     

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

2 minutes ago, Masshole said:

I think this is probably the correct take on this.    I get a bit of a queasy feeling when the cheerleading for Rittenhouse starts.    I don't think he should go to jail, but a 17 yr old walking around a riot with a rifle slung over his shoulder is something that doesn't feel right.    Of course, the flip side to that is that if the local officials had done what they should have - called out the nat'l guard, brought in cops from every town within 100 miles of Kenosha, i.e. slammed the door on any rioting then people wouldn't have felt the need to try to protect their stores/homes by having 17 yr olds with rifles wandering around.     Either way, it sucks.     

But then 3 scumbags wouldn’t have been shot, 2 of them dead and one was a child rapist. It all worked out for the best. Like liberals say, it’s just property that was destroyed and burned. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,500]

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

This kid should not have been out there with a weapon, should not have been out there at all really.

I do not like that he was out there walking around armed.

I understand why he shot the people who attacked him, but he should not have really been out there like that.

Turning this into some bullsh!t racist thing has no place here either.

 

19 minutes ago, Masshole said:

I think this is probably the correct take on this.    I get a bit of a queasy feeling when the cheerleading for Rittenhouse starts.    I don't think he should go to jail, but a 17 yr old walking around a riot with a rifle slung over his shoulder is something that doesn't feel right.    Of course, the flip side to that is that if the local officials had done what they should have - called out the nat'l guard, brought in cops from every town within 100 miles of Kenosha, i.e. slammed the door on any rioting then people wouldn't have felt the need to try to protect their stores/homes by having 17 yr olds with rifles wandering around.     Either way, it sucks.     

He shouldn't have HAD to been out there with a weapon.  Because of the political environment, the police weren't doing the job they should've been doing and the politicians weren't doing the job that they should've been doing.  This falls squarely on the fault of the government, not the kid.  I have no problems with what the kid did.  That said, his parents shouldn't have allowed him to go.  His friend and/or store owners, shouldn't have asked him to be out there.  THAT's a totally different argument.  Again, one of which I'd blame the "adults" for asking/allowing this to happen and just pin "poor judgement" on Kyle.  He's the real victim in all of this, no one else.

[wiffleball 4,789]

43 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Again, you are more concerned with what Rittenhouse was doing there rather than why a child rapist was back on the street. It’s simple. What you are most outraged about is noted. We all know the reason why a child rapist was back on the street, and it wasn’t because of Trump, his voters, or Q. That belongs to your team. 

I'm sorry, when was he convicted and sentenced?

[wiffleball 4,789]

32 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Pretty sure I called this one:

 

Kyle Rittenhouse took the stand to testify at his murder trial on Wednesday, CRYING so hard at one point that the judge called a break to allow the defendant to collect himself.

I'm guessing Faux won't lead with this. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

3 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

I'm sorry, when was he convicted and sentenced?

You are sorry. No doubt. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

1 minute ago, wiffleball said:

I'm guessing Faux won't lead with this. 

Yeah, now you’re making fun of an 18 year old kid crying.  I bet you got misty eyed yourself when that puzzy Capitol Police “cop” was crying during the 1/6 dog and pony show hearing. 

[Mike Honcho 5,223]

41 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

 No, it’s just about who you advocate for. I hear child rapist killed, I say good and then turn the page and am glad. You go another way. If Rittenhouse had killed an innocent even by accident I would say he should pay a price. But he didn’t and the world is better off. When  two a-holes find each other I don’t root for either one. Unless one of them is a child rapist. Then I root for the other a hole. 

And this is why you are on the 'pay no mind' list, you can't have a discussion without making things up. I've never advocated for anyone in this thread. 

Please proceed with your imaginary argument, feel free to imagine replies to it.  

[Mike Honcho 5,223]

37 minutes ago, Masshole said:

I think this is probably the correct take on this.    I get a bit of a queasy feeling when the cheerleading for Rittenhouse starts.    I don't think he should go to jail, but a 17 yr old walking around a riot with a rifle slung over his shoulder is something that doesn't feel right.    Of course, the flip side to that is that if the local officials had done what they should have - called out the nat'l guard, brought in cops from every town within 100 miles of Kenosha, i.e. slammed the door on any rioting then people wouldn't have felt the need to try to protect their stores/homes by having 17 yr olds with rifles wandering around.     Either way, it sucks.     

As someone who grew up in Kenosha county and had many dealings with the local podunk cops, that would not have helped the situation. 

[wiffleball 4,789]

16 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You are sorry. No doubt. 

No answer?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

34 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

And this is why you are on the 'pay no mind' list, you can't have a discussion without making things up. I've never advocated for anyone in this thread. 

Please proceed with your imaginary argument, feel free to imagine replies to it.  

Gun thrown. Keep looking out for child rapists burning and looting because a different rapist was justifiably shot by the cops.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

32 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

No answer?

He as convicted of anally raping 5 kids age 9-11. What the Fock do I care when he was convicted and sentenced?  But it was 2002 if you need to know. Google down ? Again, I care that this monster was ever let out of prison. Period. What, you think he paid his debt for those crimes? Rehabilitated himself? Impossible . He’s out because of left wing retards. Your team.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

It makes me a little happy to think that maybe the victims of this POS Rosenbaum were able to crack a smile when they found out he got took out by a young kid.  Died in the street like a filthy animal. Fitting. 

[RLLD 4,177]

1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

 

He shouldn't have HAD to been out there with a weapon.  Because of the political environment, the police weren't doing the job they should've been doing and the politicians weren't doing the job that they should've been doing.  This falls squarely on the fault of the government, not the kid.  I have no problems with what the kid did.  That said, his parents shouldn't have allowed him to go.  His friend and/or store owners, shouldn't have asked him to be out there.  THAT's a totally different argument.  Again, one of which I'd blame the "adults" for asking/allowing this to happen and just pin "poor judgement" on Kyle.  He's the real victim in all of this, no one else.

Correct. If the politicians were not posturing with their virtue signaling the riots get controlled just like they are supposed to.

The politicians are as culpable as any of the other participants, and should go to jail.

[Cdub100 3,867]

2 hours ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

Kyle was not a trained EMT, legally couldn't open carry that weapon in Wisconsin and has no training in security, crowd control.  RLLD, who IIRC, has actually served in combat forward situations is 100% right and that this untrained KID shouldn't have been in that situation in the first place. Your analogy isn't the same at all.

They both got what was coming to them, eh with that logic. The point is whether he should have been there or not, is moot. He has every right to be there and not be assaulted just like the woman has every right to walk the streets without being raped.

If the Democrats continue with this defund the police BS and mayors keep the police stood down while these domestic terrorists Burn Loot and Murder cities across the nation. You better believe you're going to start seeing more and more people like Kyle standing up to mob rule. 

BL - Just because you don't like he was there doesn't mean he's not allowed to be there. 

[Mike Honcho 5,223]

3 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

They both got what was coming to them, eh with that logic. The point is whether he should have been there or not, is moot. He has every right to be there and not be assaulted just like the woman has every right to walk the streets without being raped.

If the Democrats continue with this defund the police BS and mayors keep the police stood down while these domestic terrorists Burn Loot and Murder cities across the nation. You better believe you're going to start seeing more and more people like Kyle standing up to mob rule. 

BL - Just because you don't like he was there doesn't mean he's not allowed to be there. 

He had a right to be there, but according to the law he didn't have a right to be there with a gun.  And a big reason there are laws like that, is because untrained minors are not generally equipped to deal with those situations.  So since he was there illegally brandishing a gun, it's not a moot point at all and it does mean he's not allowed to be there like he was.

 

[Cdub100 3,867]

1 minute ago, Mike Honcho said:

He had a right to be there, but according to the law he didn't have a right to be there with a gun.  And a big reason there are laws like that, is because untrained minors are not generally equipped to deal with those situations.  So since he was there illegally brandishing a gun, it's not a moot point at all and it does mean he's not allowed to be there like he was.

 

Doublethink.

I also find it interesting you're not concerned about the convicted felon who got his wife-beating arm blown off having a gun he shouldn't have had. If you want to argue the gun stuff that's fine. I really don't know Wisconsin law at all to know if it was legal or not. But stop with the "he shouldn't have been there BS" He has every right as an American to be there and secure in himself. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

19 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

They both got what was coming to them, eh with that logic. The point is whether he should have been there or not, is moot. He has every right to be there and not be assaulted just like the woman has every right to walk the streets without being raped.

If the Democrats continue with this defund the police BS and mayors keep the police stood down while these domestic terrorists Burn Loot and Murder cities across the nation. You better believe you're going to start seeing more and more people like Kyle standing up to mob rule. 

BL - Just because you don't like he was there doesn't mean he's not allowed to be there. 

So you advocate tossing laws and our legal system and advocate a vigilante approach to criminals?

That might fly among the inbred, glue-sniffing dopes up in Yooperville, but that's not how the system works. What you're advocating is the kind of thing carried out in Nazi Germany and China.

Rittenhouse at least committed weapons crimes and should be punished accordingly. He'll be a hero in prison and become a rich man once he gets out.

But if you want to put your money where your smelt-smelling piehole is, here is a list of the registered sex offenders within five miles of Detroit City Hall.

Get your gun and go shoot them!

https://mspsor.com/Home/MultiOffenderMap?RadiusStreetAddress=18100+Meyers+Rd&RadiusCity=Detroit&RadiusZip=48235&RadiusMiles=5&RadiusCounty=Wayne

[Mike Honcho 5,223]

9 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

Doublethink.

I also find it interesting you're not concerned about the convicted felon who got his wife-beating arm blown off having a gun he shouldn't have had. If you want to argue the gun stuff that's fine. I really don't know Wisconsin law at all to know if it was legal or not. But stop with the "he shouldn't have been there BS" He has every right as an American to be there and secure in himself. 

Doublethink???  Sorry no.   Last time, he had a right to be there, heck he probably had a right to be there as the EMT.  What he didn't have a right to do is open carry a rifle in the state of Wisconsin and be uner the age of 18.  Those two things are no the same thing so no doublethink or whatever you are trying to say.

I'm not concerned about the convicted wife-beating felon, because I was replying to RLLD's post about Kyle, and not the convicted felon.  You and HT need to stop with the 'whataboutism' arguments.

[shorepatrol 1,870]

3 hours ago, RLLD said:

 

I understand why he shot the people who attacked him, but he should not have really been out there like that.

 

So a girl in skimpy clothes, tittiiies and azz hanging out at midnight in anytown USA armed, shoots a guy who is attempting to rape her is guilty of murder too. Uh huh 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

1 minute ago, Mike Honcho said:

Doublethink???  Sorry no.   Last time, he had a right to be there, heck he probably had a right to be there as fake EMT.  What he didn't have a right to do is open carry a rifle in the state of Wisconsin and be uner the age of 18.  Those two things are no the same thing so no doublethink or whatever you are trying to say.

I'm not concerned about the convicted wife-beating felon, because I was replying to RLLD's post about Kyle, and not the convicted felon.  You and HT need to stop with the 'whataboutism' arguments.

Everyone on this board who believes Rittenhouse to be a hero and should not be punished for his crimes needs to load up their guns right now and go kill all the kid touchers they can find. Where they are is public record. Otherwise, they are hypocrites.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

12 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

So you advocate tossing laws and our legal system and advocate a vigilante approach to criminals?

That might fly among the inbred, glue-sniffing dopes up in Yooperville, but that's not how the system works. What you're advocating is the kind of thing carried out in Nazi Germany and China.

Rittenhouse at least committed weapons crimes and should be punished accordingly. He'll be a hero in prison and become a rich man once he gets out.

But if you want to put your money where your smelt-smelling piehole is, here is a list of the registered sex offenders within five miles of Detroit City Hall.

Get your gun and go shoot them!

https://mspsor.com/Home/MultiOffenderMap?RadiusStreetAddress=18100+Meyers+Rd&RadiusCity=Detroit&RadiusZip=48235&RadiusMiles=5&RadiusCounty=Wayne

Exactly.  You can only commit crimes like looting and burning and attacking cops and killing people if it’s sanctioned by the Democratic Party. Which it has been, and at  the highest levels. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,118]

4 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Everyone on this board who believes Rittenhouse to be a hero and should not be punished for his crimes needs to load up their guns right now and go kill all the kid touchers they can find. Where they are is public record. Otherwise, they are hypocrites.

Maybe your dumbest post. I know over the years you have most likely made numerous dumber ones, but I can only speak to this. Nice work. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Maybe your dumbest post. I know over the years you have most likely made numerous dumber ones, but I can only speak to this. Nice work. 

Here's a list of all the sex offenders in the Albany area:

https://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/SomsSUBDirectory/search_index.jsp?offenderSubmit=true&LastName=&County=1&Zip=&g-recaptcha-response=03AGdBq26_cU2SdujfMnI4s6ozqCdfZa1csTsHZXa0-rqREs0qWDb9Jm-CwSzJb0itC3DYquyT14n07jo9t4MBItmoVkJUeA0xaneNUqIE9GOXhicm7pbSl_KUrZuCFpE28q8Kq0ineOXMpoE9td6kLLTrDDhTSGppky__-TKPO-q99FHIYuZtaQyXFfTWbhYf_zvdzqx41vIa7KMJrTMsRsTeLuEH_QHuas-2dDmmEgZJeCJMEJzT_KbnwjKgPPh5Rm7qh3yPn0VeSZQGLATrbjRwAVhx8ksqyM5_BnjPv2mLMgJUcWrYKHiK6RqrzG713N8fZg-ud-s0f2O6zJFAw19TNvtzVq9FpH6duylp6VYc4uu0xR9w1WeY1Kjyl8LrCvjrP-h1kYday4z2OT9_l5ySNlLU29cQ_uK-vljMnCF-6_xY3sd-0batV7mGsaU68Wg_05lfm1laCxLfZddgwWrlYlcjCfUDcg&Submit=EN

If you think it's OK for Rittenhouse's law-breaking and that it's OK to go out and shoot sex offenders, then by all means get out there and kill 'em all!

Oh, but, wait ... that would be a CRIME!

 

 

[Cdub100 3,867]

17 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Everyone on this board who believes Rittenhouse to be a hero and should not be punished for his crimes needs to load up their guns right now and go kill all the kid touchers they can find. Where they are is public record. Otherwise, they are hypocrites.

If they attack me like they attacked Kyle it would be my pleasure.

ETA - I'd be okay with the government executing your friends who touch children. But nope they get to walk around and they don't even have to carry a passport because that would against their right to privacy...weird how that works.

[5-Points 3,434]

Unfortunately, I haven't been able to watch this trial but from what I've heard on the radio and seen posted here, I pretty much called it from day one. 

The Prosecution pretty much made the case for the Defense.

The focking defense felt so sure of their case that THEY PUT THE DEFENDENT ON THE STAND IN HIS OWN DEFENSE! 

And he killed it. 

 

[Pimpadeaux 2,404]

28 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Exactly.  You can only commit crimes like looting and burning and attacking cops and killing people if it’s sanctioned by the Democratic Party. Which it has been, and at  the highest levels. 

No party sanctions looting, burning, attacking cops and killing people ... unless it's Capt. Crazysauce firing up his deluded followers for a go at the Capitol and democracy itself.

[shorepatrol 1,870]

7 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

No party sanctions looting, burning, attacking cops and killing people ... unless it's Capt. Crazysauce firing up his deluded followers for a go at the Capitol and democracy itself.

Sigh

[Cdub100 3,867]

28 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

Unfortunately, I haven't been able to watch this trial but from what I've heard on the radio and seen posted here, I pretty much called it from day one. 

The Prosecution pretty much made the case for the Defense.

The focking defense felt so sure of their case that THEY PUT THE DEFENDENT ON THE STAND IN HIS OWN DEFENSE! 

And he killed it. 

 

I'm no lawyer. I don't even pretend to be one on a low-rent message board. But everything I know about courts is you never want to put the defendant on the stand guilty or innocent.