nuclear war - doomsday⌛

[craftsman 1,045]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I’m curious what the guy’s plan is to deal with the impending apocalypse.  I might need to take some pointers, otherwise I might only have a few months left on this earth.

Sounds like you are being sarcastic and just making fun of him. What's the point of that? 

[TimHauck 2,909]

4 minutes ago, craftsman said:

Sounds like you are being sarcastic and just making fun of him. What's the point of that? 

He’s clearly serious, so hopefully he has a plan for the nuclear fallout 

[GutterBoy 2,899]

11 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Go get your steppy stool, which you will need to find out how my ass tastes. 

At this point you're arguing with yourself.

1) Welcher boy made a claim about Trump and war

2) You called him stupid and wrong, while at the same time supporting his statement

3) Now you're providing links that contradict your first link, and then asking me to taste your ass

Are you drunk?

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

37 minutes ago, craftsman said:

What's your obsession with the guy?

What's your obsession with your perceived obsession with the guy?

He puts himself way out there with predictions he claims aren't predictions and says he's certain these things will happen.

Expecting posters to not flock to that is like expecting flies to not swarm over a fresh pile of dog doo.

[craftsman 1,045]

4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He’s clearly serious, so hopefully he has a plan for the nuclear fallout 

I was referring about your comment. Not his. 

[craftsman 1,045]

2 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

What's your obsession with your perceived obsession with the guy?

He puts himself way out there with predictions he claims aren't predictions and says he's certain these things will happen.

Expecting posters to not flock to that is like expecting flies to not swarm over a fresh pile of dog doo.

Well, if I say the Rams will win the Super Bowl again in 2022-23, and you disagree, that's what it is. 

We have a very weak president and government right now and it's not crazy for us to be severely tested in the coming couple years. 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

2 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

At this point you're arguing with yourself.

1) Welcher boy made a claim about Trump and war

2) You called him stupid and wrong, while at the same time supporting his statement

3) Now you're providing links that contradict your first link, and then asking me to taste your ass

Are you drunk?

1.) He didn't make the claim about Trump and war. He parroted a claim about Trump and war, and the Donald Trump Jr. tweet said "modern war." If we're talking about strikes and not full-scale war, you can't exclude Obama and not include Trump, and I posted factual information about his strike record.

2.) I didn't call him "stupid and wrong." You're making up content, as you're prone to do. I used the word "baloney" to address the claim. 

3.) The first link was to a fact check of the claim, and the rest were to support the fact that Trump did his share of military strikes. You walked right into it when you ruled out full-scale war and focused on the strikes. If you had rolled with presidents who didn't get us into full-scale war in the past 40 years, you have to lump in Obama. If you roll with modern times, you have to lump in Ford in Carter. If you are going with military strikes, you have to include Trump.

You boxed yourself into a corner, where my ass awaits your teeny tiny snake tongue. 

I hereby declare victory!

[GutterBoy 2,899]

2 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

1.) He didn't make the claim about Trump and war. He parroted a claim about Trump and war, and the Donald Trump Jr. tweet said "modern war." If we're talking about strikes and not full-scale war, you can't exclude Obama and not include Trump, and I posted factual information about his strike record.

2.) I didn't call him "stupid and wrong." You're making up content, as you're prone to do. I used the word "baloney" to address the claim. 

3.) The first link was to a fact check of the claim, and the rest were to support the fact that Trump did his share of military strikes. You walked right into it when you ruled out full-scale war and focused on the strikes. If you had rolled with presidents who didn't get us into full-scale war in the past 40 years, you have to lump in Obama. If you roll with modern times, you have to lump in Ford in Carter. If you are going with military strikes, you have to include Trump.

You boxed yourself into a corner, where my ass awaits your teeny tiny snake tongue. 

I hereby declare victory!

You're a weird guy.

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

5 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

You're a weird guy.

Too bad inflation doesn't work on people.

[GutterBoy 2,899]

Just now, Pimpadeaux said:

Too bad inflation doesn't work on people.

It does on some people, fatty.

[nobody 2,691]

4 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

we spent enormous amounts of time and money fretting over Iran and North Korea getting nuclear weapons for DECADES.  The clearly stated reason for this has been that if they got the bomb, they'd start blowing up the world.  Everyone is now screaming that Putin is a power mad dictator, another Hitler, and is threatening to blow up the world like 50 times, and yet once in a while I hear this "magical thinking" where people draw the line at him actually nuking us without explaining why.

Why is that?  

1. North Korea has nukes
2. The stated reason is not "if they got the bomb, they'd start blowing up the world."  The reason is if they get the bomb there is a greater than 0 chance they'll use them.
3. Russia won't nuke anyone because of mutually assured destruction.  This is a basic tenet that has been around for decades
4. People who would be screaming that Putin is a power mad dictator don't matter.  Putin is a world leader and understands brinkmanship.

[TimHauck 2,909]

40 minutes ago, craftsman said:

I was referring about your comment. Not his. 

That one you just quoted of mine was serious

[Hardcore troubadour 15,508]

5 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Should I retire now then?  No sense in working if it's all going to end in the next 6 months.  Might as well enjoy the rest of our time here.

? I thought you already did? 

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

? I thought you already did? 

I have at least another 20 years.

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

2 hours ago, craftsman said:

Well, if I say the Rams will win the Super Bowl again in 2022-23, and you disagree, that's what it is. 

We have a very weak president and government right now and it's not crazy for us to be severely tested in the coming couple years. 

Predicting a Super Bowl winner will repeat isn't anywhere close to the crazy bin one is in if they predict a Russian takeover of the planet and guaranteeing a nuclear war by year's end.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

9 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Predicting a Super Bowl winner will repeat isn't anywhere close to the crazy bin one is in if they predict a Russian takeover of the planet and guaranteeing a nuclear war by year's end.

that is the game we are playing tho.  this situation is like a construction company building a skyscraper.  theyve secured rights to all the property they need, except for one tiny shack owned by some guy who refuses to sell except for millions.  The guy with the shack controls the entire game board because he has nothing to lose.  Putin is the guy with the shack.  He gets to demand the world and it is usually paid.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

Keep in mind that whatever actually happens, we will probably never know the truth.  Russia will hit the US with a massive cyberattack disabling communications and follow it up with nukes.  Maybe we fire back.  Maybe we don't.  Media sources will go dark.  Maybe they change over to some new group that we cannot verify.  Your region may be without power for months.  Years.  Information will come via rumor.  And thats all if you actually live.

And this shiit is coming FAST.

Proving me right or wrong on the internet forum should be the least of your worries.  Make plans to protect yourself and your loved ones.

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

Just now, JustinCharge said:

And this shiit is coming FAST.

When you say fast do you mean this year?

[craftsman 1,045]

16 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Predicting a Super Bowl winner will repeat isn't anywhere close to the crazy bin one is in if they predict a Russian takeover of the planet and guaranteeing a nuclear war by year's end.

I see it as since our sitting president claims no control over all the terrible things that are happening to this country over the past 1.5 years and he blames it all on Putin, then that means Putin is in charge of what happens to us. So why shouldn't we not be weary of a nuclear strike? He's obviously the man in charge of this country according to Biden. 

[frank 2,307]

7 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

Russia is willing to blow up the world

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,508]

2 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Predicting a Super Bowl winner will repeat isn't anywhere close to the crazy bin one is in if they predict a Russian takeover of the planet and guaranteeing a nuclear war by year's end.

Oh look, another hot take. Pimpadoosh thinks Justin is crazy. It never gets old. 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

3 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Predicting a Super Bowl winner will repeat isn't anywhere close to the crazy bin one is in if they predict a Russian takeover of the planet and guaranteeing a nuclear war by year's end.

010101010100000 personal attack liberal bot.  woop woop woo woo beep beep boop.

I mean really.  we know what you do.  shoo.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

3 hours ago, craftsman said:

I see it as since our sitting president claims no control over all the terrible things that are happening to this country over the past 1.5 years and he blames it all on Putin, then that means Putin is in charge of what happens to us. So why shouldn't we not be weary of a nuclear strike? He's obviously the man in charge of this country according to Biden. 

plus, the news report i linked to today in this thread is about a freaking NATO report where they see it likely Russia is going to attack NATO.

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

3 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

that is the game we are playing tho.  this situation is like a construction company building a skyscraper.  theyve secured rights to all the property they need, except for one tiny shack owned by some guy who refuses to sell except for millions.  The guy with the shack controls the entire game board because he has nothing to lose.  Putin is the guy with the shack.  He gets to demand the world and it is usually paid.

Russia attacked what was supposed to be a vastly weaker and smaller opponent and not only has failed to take much of the country but has been beaten back in counteroffensives. To lose roughly half your soldiers and have so much equipment destroyed ranks among history's worst military ass whippings, particularly at the hands of a supposed underdog.

The Russian military command is crap. Generals have been taken out. Their lumbering tactics, crap strategy, terrible morale, elderly equipment with nothing to replace or even repair it,  terrible training, faulty logistics and an obliterated economy back home has exposed Russia for military weakling that it is. It couldn't beat France. It couldn't beat Great Britain. It couldn't beat Germany. It most certainly could not beat the United States. Hell, it probably couldn't beat Poland.

And you think Russia has a crack military strong enough to defeat all the NATO countries combined?

No one is going to kowtow to Putin's saber rattling and nuclear threats. He's as bad or worse than Biden in the doddering department.

You really should find something else to be mentally deranged over, because this one isn't going to work out like you hope.

How about climate change?

[Gepetto 1,372]

3 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Predicting a Super Bowl winner will repeat isn't anywhere close to the crazy bin one is in if they predict a Russian takeover of the planet and guaranteeing a nuclear war by year's end.

How about predicting a Detroit Lions Super Bowl win this coming February?

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

1 minute ago, Gepetto said:

How about predicting a Detroit Lions Super Bowl win this coming February?

I'll take the nuclear war prediction.

[TimHauck 2,909]

3 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

Make plans to protect yourself and your loved ones.

Are you?

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

5 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

Keep in mind that whatever actually happens, we will probably never know the truth.  Russia will hit the US with a massive cyberattack disabling communications and follow it up with nukes.  Maybe we fire back.  Maybe we don't.  Media sources will go dark.  Maybe they change over to some new group that we cannot verify.  Your region may be without power for months.  Years.  Information will come via rumor.  And thats all if you actually live.

And this shiit is coming FAST.

Proving me right or wrong on the internet forum should be the least of your worries.  Make plans to protect yourself and your loved ones.

If only they did this to the country they attacked and lost half their invasion force trying to conquer. 

[nobody 2,691]

14 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

If only they did this to the country they attacked and lost half their invasion force trying to conquer. 

Preach, how are they going to knock out our communication when they can't even knock out Ukraine's?  Dudes are posting tik-tok videos of post-battle aftermath everyday.

This is why I think he actually works for Russia.  No one can have that distorted of an opinion on something unless they're being compensated for it some how.  He's probably getting 15 rubles a day or something to go online and spread the greatness of Russia.

[craftsman 1,045]

15 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

If only they did this to the country they attacked and lost half their invasion force trying to conquer. 

They attacked Ukraine for their resources and have secured most of them. Why would they nuke them? 

[Cdub100 3,930]

 

[craftsman 1,045]

11 minutes ago, Cdub100 said:

 

Joe Biden says, "Wait, what?"

[JustinCharge 2,397]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/un-chief-warns-world-just-210354912.html

UN chief warns the world is just 'one misunderstanding' away from 'nuclear annihilation' as tensions rise across the globe

John Haltiwanger

Mon, August 1, 2022, 2:03 PM

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Monday urged countries to reduce their nuclear stockpiles, warning that "humanity is just one misunderstanding, one miscalculation away from nuclear annihilation."

"Almost 13,000 nuclear weapons are now being held in arsenals around the world. All this at a time when the risks of proliferation are growing and guardrails to prevent escalation are weakening," Guterres said at a conference in New York of countries that are party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).

"The clouds that parted following the end of the Cold War are gathering once more," the UN chief said, pointing to "festering" crises occurring around the world — including the "invasion of Ukraine by Russia."

Guterres said "eliminating nuclear weapons is the only guarantee they will never be used," calling on countries to work "relentlessly towards this goal."

The UN chief's comments came amid concerns over rising tensions, with issues like the war in Ukraine, China and Taiwan, and Iran's nuclear program causing friction.

Throughout Russia's large-scale invasion of Ukraine, some Western officials have expressed concerns that Russian President Vladimir Putin could get desperate enough to use nuclear weapons to achieve his goals in the war.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

Russia continues its strategy of open negotiations when it comes to nuclear war by saying peaceful things one day and then talking like a mad man the next.

8/1 no we wont use nukes
8/2 yes we will use nukes

when deciphering open negotiations, the FIRST declared intent is the correct one.  We see this a lot in sports.  For example, the Colts might open by saying early in the offseason they are selecting Peyton Manning in the draft.  then as the weeks and months roll by, they start leaking that they might instead select Ryan iv, or they might trade down and get a boat load of great players.  But that all smoke to gain leverage.  Then you reach draft day and the Colts go "yah, were selecting Manning you idiot!"

Same Principle here.  Putin invaded Ukraine and opened with threats of nuking the world.  Ever since, Russia tap dances on the issue in an attempt to gain leverage.  But make no mistake, they are going to nuke the world when the time comes. Putin is softening Biden up as he sees Biden as a weak leader that may kneel when the time comes. And if Biden fails to kneel, fock it, Putin blows up the planet.

 

 

 

 

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-vladimir-putin-statements-nuclear-war-weapons-1729779

What Russia Said About Using Nuclear Weapons as Putin Warns No One Wins

BY ANDREW STANTON ON 8/1/22 AT 3:20 PM EDT

"We proceed from the fact that there can be no winners in a nuclear war and it should never be unleashed, and we stand for equal and indivisible security for all members of the world community," Putin wrote.

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/west-could-trigger-nuclear-war-over-ukraine-russia-says-un-2022-08-02/

West could trigger nuclear war over Ukraine, Russia says at U.N.

By Michelle Nichols

August 2, 2022 4:21 PM PDT Last Updated 12 hours ago

UNITED NATIONS, Aug 2 (Reuters) - The conflict in Ukraine does not warrant Russia's use of nuclear weapons, but Moscow could decide to use its nuclear arsenal in response to "direct aggression" by NATO countries over the invasion, Russia said on Tuesday at the United Nations.

 

[TimHauck 2,909]

What’s your preparation plan Justin?

[JustinCharge 2,397]

Just now, TimHauck said:

What’s your preparation plan Justin?

read the OP for preparation plans.

[TimHauck 2,909]

47 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

read the OP for preparation plans.

Thanks for answering.  So you have all that?

 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

in the scenario where Russia successfully does us like the US did the Empire of Japan in WW2 (Russia nukes 2-5 US cities, demands Biden surrender, and Biden surrenders), I think you can expect a lot of republican civilians to be open targets, especially Trumpers.  Remember, when the Nazis were losing the war at the end, they accelerated the process of killing the jews.  It would be like that I think, except the target will be white people.  the liberals will try to kill as many whites as they can before Russia takes over.

the twist is a lot of liberals are whites.  so its possible that a lot of liberals would commit mass suicide rather than be hauled before a Russian court.  Hitler killed himself in ww2, the leader of Greece killed himself.  We might see some of that too.

But ww3 is very short.  were talking hours probably.

[TheNewGirl 1,498]

But liberals aren't the white supremacist nazis...conservatives are. At least that's what I've been hearing. 

 

 

[nobody 2,691]

So, liberals are going to want to kill whites, but since many liberals are white, they'll just commit suicide.

And this is after Biden decides to surrender to Russia.

What the fūck?   How can anyone tell me this dude isn't employed by Russia.