Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
wiffleball

Goodbye Russel Brand

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, jonmx said:

I absolutely do.  Is YouTube banning every felon posting on their platform?  Corporations and government aligning to destroy people is a fascist tactic.   This has zero to do with Brands alledged activities 15 years.  This is 100 percent to shut up Brand's libertarian anti-establishment views.   Such attacks on free speech is an attack on everything that this country stands for.  Do not fall for these authoritarian bastards lies.  It is pure evil the agenda they push. 

Did you see where the poster said “if he’s guilty”?

So even then, you’d still support a rapist and see this as some Illuminati conspiracy?? :wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, IGotWorms said:

Did you see where the poster said “if he’s guilty”?

So even then, you’d still support a rapist and see this as some Illuminati conspiracy?? :wacko:

Do you see where I said I don't care.  Unless YouTube is banning every felon, then f-them.  They are not banning him for his actions.  They are banning him for his message, one thst violates none of their rules..YouTube is making up rules and applying them arbitrarily, even if he is guilty.   These corporations can't be political arms of the government or political party. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Did you see where the poster said “if he’s guilty”?

So even then, you’d still support a rapist and see this as some Illuminati conspiracy?? :wacko:

Ooof. 

Guilty until proven innocent it is, huh?  You communists haven't changed a bit!  :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Do you see where I said I don't care.  Unless YouTube is banning every felon, then f-them.  They are not banning him for his actions.  They are banning him for his message, one thst violates none of their rules..YouTube is making up rules and applying them arbitrarily, even if he is guilty.   These corporations can't be political arms of the government or political party. 

Wow, you’re nuts man.

If Russell Brand is convicted of rape and sent to prison, I’d be okay with YouTube blocking him. Call me crazy 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Ooof. 

Guilty until proven innocent it is, huh?  You communists haven't changed a bit!  :doh:

That was exactly the point you ‘tard 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Wow, you’re nuts man.

If Russell Brand is convicted of rape and sent to prison, I’d be okay with YouTube blocking him. Call me crazy 

If they were following their policies and implementing it fairly, I would be fine with it.   Currently it is making up rules and applying them arbitrarily.   So it is political and authoritarian directed at a specific message.   YouTube does not have a policy in place and are not enforcing it on anyone else.  So in the present, it is not ok....even if he were found guilty in the future.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Wow, you’re nuts man.

If Russell Brand is convicted of rape and sent to prison, I’d be okay with YouTube blocking him. Call me crazy 

Jon showing his true colors tonight.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BuckSwope said:

Jon showing his true colors tonight.  

You authoritarian bootlicking idiots are showing how ignorant you are by mistating my reasoning.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jonmx said:

You authoritarian bootlicking idiots are showing how ignorant you are by mistating my reasoning.  

They know exactly what they are doing. Trolling. This forum is hot garbage now 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

That was exactly the point you ‘tard 😂

R Kelly songs are still accessible on YouTube :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

They know exactly what they are doing. Trolling. This forum is hot garbage now 

But the authoritarian bastards are far more vocal than the freedom-loving 'deplorables'.   Too many on the right are afraid to stand up an stay quiet.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Jon showing his true colors tonight.  

Red White and Blue are great colors.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Strike said:

Red White and Blue are great colors.

Downplaying assualt on cops and sexual assualt?  U.S.A.! U.S.A.!     True patriot, that one.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Downplaying assualt on cops and sexual assualt?  U.S.A.! U.S.A.!     True patriot, that one.  

I an not downplaying anything.  I look at people in similar cases and see a grossly distorted treatment based on the politics and not on the action.  I believe in people getting treated equally is an essential pillar of our justice system.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, BuckSwope said:

OR people cared more because a "womanizer" and drug addict aren't the same as committing assault or rape.   

 

By nobody I mean the media and groups with the means and interest to proactively seek such victims out a decade later.  But I'm sure you are right, it's just a coincidence that he is anti establishment recently.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, jerryskids said:

By nobody I mean the media and groups with the means and interest to proactively seek such victims out a decade later.  But I'm sure you are right, it's just a coincidence that he is anti establishment recently.

Gotcha, so in your mind what exactly happens?  We can start posting examples of people who speak out against the war and big pharma who aren't kicked platforms and "silenced".  So it can't be JUST that he was doing that.   Please explain your theory - is there a magical threshold of talking too much about it or being too popular, and then they get you?  Or do "they" actively do this and seek out dirt on anybody who speaks out, but only find it with some.    In your mind are all these women lying?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Andrew Tate engaged in a bunch of illegal activities, then he told his followers that if he gets arrested, it's all because the govt is trying to silence him from speaking the truth, and people bought it.  He knew there was a good chance he was gonna get caught and set himself up to be the victim prior, and the fools bought it.

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, BuckSwope said:

Gotcha, so in your mind what exactly happens?  We can start posting examples of people who speak out against the war and big pharma who aren't kicked platforms and "silenced".  So it can't be JUST that he was doing that.   Please explain your theory - is there a magical threshold of talking too much about it or being too popular, and then they get you?  Or do "they" actively do this and seek out dirt on anybody who speaks out, but only find it with some.    In your mind are all these women lying?  

I'm on vacation and don't have time to respond to your snark today.  I already stated my theory, perhaps you can regale us with your theory on why the media decided this month to dig into the past of a person they celebrated as a womanizer a decade ago.  Slow news month?  Maybe it never occurred to anyone for 10 years that he may have crossed a line, until a recent message from God?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/26/2023 at 7:27 AM, BuckSwope said:

Gotcha, so in your mind what exactly happens?  We can start posting examples of people who speak out against the war and big pharma who aren't kicked platforms and "silenced".  So it can't be JUST that he was doing that.   Please explain your theory - is there a magical threshold of talking too much about it or being too popular, and then they get you?  Or do "they" actively do this and seek out dirt on anybody who speaks out, but only find it with some.    In your mind are all these women lying?  

Authoritarian bastards you bootlick for only need to make examples out of some to have a chilling effect on others.   There have been dozens of high-profile people who have been silenced by various means and there are thousands of posters who have been silenced on social media, many directed by federal agencies.   I have no idea how you nazi bastards can't see how dangerous this is.  Sieg Heil, MFer.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never cared for English Humor. I did like when Benny Hill would play that circus song and speed up the tape and chase some buxom gal around. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait. I thought he was getting canceled? How is he selling anything?

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Now pushing $240 amulets to protect you from WiFi signals.  Not joking.

 

It’s a bargain really. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So a year later and the story pimped by British intelligence to broadcast TV, there is still not a single charge coming from all this

  But yet it was enough for Parlimemt to send threatening letters to all social media platforms to ban him.  Really disgusting justice system, but leftist bastards love this unchecked authoritarianism.

 

   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, jonmx said:

So a year later and the story pimped by British intelligence to broadcast TV, there is still not a single charge coming from all this

  But yet it was enough for Parlimemt to send threatening letters to all social media platforms to ban him.  Really disgusting justice system, but leftist bastards love this unchecked authoritarianism.

 

   

I don’t think anyone expected criminal charges, was probably past statute of limitations.  An internal investigation at the company he worked at did find that “informal complaints were not properly addressed”

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/russell-brand-alleged-inappropriate-behavior-120229677.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAALd7xuSatVq_7kEWNTOK_2wh7vMByQkSupFTlThZvX8MnD3_vLuG1v4B5UT5A_brBdhWGyZ9KIgWUWE27t_sgXX24VZeK-C-yKK-2gWtRRfSKbou9qHj-5oacLJcF-kO8Y81FP0Bc-es7u-lkSyt6FFU_FM72Hu33tIDPTVv94VF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, purdygood said:

Get Him to the Greek was funny.  Oh wait.   P. Diddy was in that.  Yikes.

Meh. I still think the naked gun is funny.  Even with OJ in it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I don’t think anyone expected criminal charges, was probably past statute of limitations.  An internal investigation at the company he worked at did find that “informal complaints were not properly addressed”

 

What are you talking about.   They took it to the police who questioned Brand.  There were no statue of limitations.  You want to move the goal posts back to it was not properly addressed 20 plus years ago?  Why would some television station spend a year investigating just to come up with such a petty conclusion?   The answer is simple....the authoritarian state uses every available means to shut up dissenting voices.  You really wonder why I use the terms bootlicker?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

Meh. I still think the naked gun is funny.  Even with OJ in it

Haha same.  Get Him to the Greek still hilarious.  Pet that furry wall!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russell needs to switch back to liberal and then mark himself safe from the media 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jonmx said:

What are you talking about.   They took it to the police who questioned Brand.  There were no statute of limitations.  You want to move the goal posts back to it was not properly addressed 20 plus years ago?  Why would some television station spend a year investigating just to come up with such a petty conclusion?   The answer is simple....the authoritarian state uses every available means to shut up dissenting voices.  You really wonder why I use the terms bootlicker?

Who is “they”?  Police may have been investigating but I don’t see that the accusers were ever really interested in criminal charges 20 years later when they’re not going to be able to prove it in a criminal trial.  Keep in mind one of the accusers said the police were in fact contacted when it happened, they just did not press charges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Charged with rape. I saw @SaintsInDome2006 mentioned this in a different thread, but this one deserves a bump.  I’m sure there were some takes from righties here that are looking like they will age badly.  Although I’ll admit even I wasn’t expecting actual charges.   But I wasn’t defending him like @edjr and@jonmx

https://nypost.com/2025/04/04/entertainment/russell-brand-charged-with-rape-and-sexual-assault/

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×