Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
kilroy69

L.A. times editor throws a fit and resigns over Kamala non-endorsement.

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Editor at large Robert Kagan threw a fit and quit.  

Look up who his wife is.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Patented Phil said:

Celebrities and other butt-hurt Libtards are canceling their subscriptions to the Washington Post and the LA Times.  It’s like Christmas in October. 😆

Like the d0uchebag Keith Olbermann

https://www.outkick.com/analysis/keith-olberman-calls-followers-cancel-washington-post-his-call-backfires

Funny how he's performing his hissy fit on Twitter which ends up putting money in Elon Musk's pocket.  :lol:

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Horseman said:

Editor at large Robert Kagan threw a fit and quit.  

Kagan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have we found anyone yet waiting to see who their newspaper endorses to decide their vote?  I think this would be like trying to find the Japanese soldiers on the remote island still fighting WWII.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is so many people have no faith in either candidate.  The last couple of years of Biden was a disaster as he declined very fast but people believed in him when they voted.

 

This time around many people are picking their poison. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am amused at sudden concern evidence from those on the left with regard to media.   I can only say, welcome to the world folks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a world of difference between getting heat from one side because of accurately depicting the words and actions of a person versus getting heat from one side for refusing to stand behind your assertions about the words and actions of a person.

One is journalism, one is cowardly. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Oh no 

I didnt think they even had 200,000 subscribers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

I didnt think they even had 200,000 subscribers

Fun Fact:

  • As of 2023, The Washington Post has 2.5 million digital subscribers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, squistion said:

Fun Fact:

  • As of 2023, The Washington Post has 2.5 million digital subscribers.

How many are active? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jbycho said:

How many are active? 

If they are a current subscriber, then they are active.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, squistion said:

If they are a current subscriber, then they are active.

That's technically incorrect. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like it even matters anymore what candidate gets endorsed by a newspaper…. If someone is waiting to see who is getting endorsed by a paper to vote, that person shouldn’t be voting in the first place IMO…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jbycho said:

That's technically incorrect. 

Right?  I mean, squiz is a retard.  He'll say whatever he's required to say to push the propaganda and narrative.  Most of which are lies and disinformation.

I mean, he started a thread in the other forum insisting rainbow mob members could get fired simply for being ghey.  Didn't even know they had Civil rights protection and yet STILL insisted they could get fired.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Right?  I mean, squiz is a retard.  He'll say whatever he's required to say to push the propaganda and narrative.  Most of which are lies and disinformation.

I mean, he started a thread in the other forum insisting rainbow mob members could get fired simply for being ghey.  Didn't even know they had Civil rights protection and yet STILL insisted they could get fired.

Civil rights in the minds of liberals are still in the 1800s. They think fighting in 2024 is the same as the year 1845. 

It's amazing how they haven't caught up to current times. Or rather, maybe they just don't have anything else to complain about? 🤔

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jbycho said:

Civil rights in the minds of liberals are still in the 1800s. They think fighting in 2024 is the same as the year 1845. 

It's amazing how they haven't caught up to current times. Or rather, maybe they just don't have anything else to complain about? 🤔

Complaining about immigrants ruining the country is pretty old timey just saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, thegeneral said:

Complaining about immigrants ruining the country is pretty old timey just saying.

Complaining about the "cheap/slave labor" being taken away is pretty Democrat old timey, just saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jbycho said:

Civil rights in the minds of liberals are still in the 1800s. They think fighting in 2024 is the same as the year 1845. 

It's amazing how they haven't caught up to current times. Or rather, maybe they just don't have anything else to complain about? 🤔

No (see The Civil Rights Act of 1964 that Democrat Lyndon Johnson pushed through) plus it has been Democrats in the last two decades that have overwhelming been behind legislation to help minorites and LGBTQ folks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Complaining about immigrants ruining the country is pretty old timey just saying.

No. It's current day. When illegals are killing and raping people and staying for free in NYC hotels and sleeping in airports, it's real. 

Try another topic. You clearly don't have a grasp of this one. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, squistion said:

No (see The Civil Rights Act of 1964 that Democrat Lyndon Johnson pushed through) plus it has been Democrats in the last two decades that have overwhelming been behind legislation to help minorites and LGBTQ folks.

Like I said, in the mind of liberal democrats.

Every one has civil rights except for white males these days. 

LGBTQIA is nothing more than a lifestyle choice. And yet they all still enjoy their civil rights. 

You all are going off the rail on a crazy train. 🎶

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jbycho said:

No. It's current day. When illegals are killing and raping people and staying for free in NYC hotels and sleeping in airports, it's real. 

Try another topic. You clearly don't have a grasp of this one. 

This topic is very clear. 

Some people who write their opinions for newspapers didn’t like the direction their bosses were giving them so they said “fock off” and went public about it.

I say good for them and good luck. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jbycho said:

Like I said, in the mind of liberal democrats.

Every one has civil rights except for white males these days. 

LGBTQIA is nothing more than a lifestyle choice. And yet they all still enjoy their civil rights. 

You all are going off the rail on a crazy train. 🎶

Yet you say that I am going off the crazy train. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, thegeneral said:

This topic is very clear. 

Some people who write their opinions for newspapers didn’t like the direction their bosses were giving them so they said “fock off” and went public about it.

I say good for them and good luck. 

 

"Going public" about being triggered about something. This is what you bring to the table? 

In the past I quit jobs too. What's your point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, squistion said:

Yet you say that I am going off the crazy train. :lol:

Yeah. I made a joke. Although it a subtle one that would read better if you were intelligent. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jbycho said:

"Going public" about being triggered about something. This is what you bring to the table? 

In the past I quit jobs too. What's your point?

I guess you are frustrated that when you quit no one gave a shet.

Look I don’t particularly care what the LA Times writers did but I do appreciate people showing some integrity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jbycho said:

Yeah. I made a joke. Although it a subtle one that would read better if you were intelligent. 

If you continue to insult me like that I will put you on ignore. 

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, squistion said:

If you continue to insult me like that I will put you on ignore. 

Is that a threat or a promise? :wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jbycho said:

Is that a threat or a promise? :wacko:

It is a promise.

I don't have to listen to those who disrespect me, while at the same time expecting me to engage in a discussion with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, squistion said:

It is a promise.

I don't have to listen to those who disrespect me, while at the same time expecting me to engage in a discussion with them.

Try being respectable first. 

I have zero expectations on you responding anything. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×