Voltaire 4,559 Posted September 26, 2018 So Ford is refusing to answer questions under penalty of perjury. Ramirez is refusing to answer questions under penalty of perjury. Avenatti was trolled by 4chan into thinking Kav was gang raping chicks. Vote scheduled for Friday morning if nobody shows up Thursday to testify. I guess the left is now hanging their hopes on a porn star's lawyer to save the day. Jeebus fock, I'm always twelve hours behind. So the present state of the will she/won't she yo-yo ride is at 'won't' again? She;s changed her mind like five or six times in a week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,646 Posted September 26, 2018 I'm going to go ahead and put this in the corner with the pee-pee story. You're doing a heck of a job Shonuff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted September 26, 2018 Jeebus fock, I'm always twelve hours behind. So the present state of the will she/won't she yo-yo ride is at 'won't' again? She;s changed her mind like five or six times in a week. Again...if you believe anything Rock posts, you should probably smack yourself in the head with a hammer Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 2,729 Posted September 26, 2018 Jeebus fock, I'm always twelve hours behind. So the present state of the will she/won't she yo-yo ride is at 'won't' again? She;s changed her mind like five or six times in a week. I'm going to go out on a limb and say she hasn't changed her mind once. She's said and done what she's been told to say and do. Which was what she'd planned to do all along. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted September 26, 2018 Didnt the porn lawyer hide is Twitter? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 3,975 Posted September 26, 2018 Thank goodness there are mechanisms to determine when claims have validity Waterboarding? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,559 Posted September 26, 2018 Thank goodness there are mechanisms to determine when claims have validity There are? I thought we were just going to believe whoever it is that makes us feel better to believe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 5,206 Posted September 26, 2018 Thank goodness there are mechanisms to determine when claims have validity What do you have in mind? She went to a senator not the authorities, and now it appears she won't speak. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted September 26, 2018 What do you have in mind? She went to a senator not the authorities, and now it appears she won't speak. I think she needs a special counsel Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,710 Posted September 26, 2018 Focking sh!tshow... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,380 Posted September 26, 2018 Didnt the porn lawyer hide is Twitter? Sure did. Hancho thinks that's totally normal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,941 Posted September 26, 2018 Thank goodness there are mechanisms to determine when claims have validity Exactly what mechanisms are in place to determine if this womans claims are valid? Decades ago drunken HS party. No witnesses. He said, she said. The problem here is that an accusation in todays world does lots of damage. There doesnt have to be any proof or due process to convict in the court of public opinion. So even if this he gets confirmed, theres a segment of the population that will always and forever think of him as an attempted rapist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,737 Posted September 26, 2018 If you believe everything rock says you should smack yourself in the head with a hammer. Puzzy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted September 26, 2018 So even if this he gets confirmed, theres a segment of the population that will always and forever think of him as an attempted rapist. Should get him season tickets to Duke lacrosse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,584 Posted September 26, 2018 all women are to be believed 100% except Juanita Broderick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,584 Posted September 26, 2018 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKIK5bYN-BQ&t=1455s 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted September 26, 2018 all women are to be believed 100% except Juanita Broderick And Crystal Mangum. After they caught her lying? They did absolutely nothing to her. And months later? She stabbed her boyfriend to death. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
penultimatestraw 473 Posted September 26, 2018 What do you have in mind? She went to a senator not the authorities, and now it appears she won't speak. I'm not up-to-the-second on the status of her testimony, but that is her opportunity. If she chooses not to testify, the confirmation should proceed as scheduled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,125 Posted September 26, 2018 If none of these women even come in and speak to address their allegations Kav shouldnt have to speak about it either and it shouldnt be considered whatsoever in the voting process. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
penultimatestraw 473 Posted September 26, 2018 If none of these women even come in and speak to address their allegations Kav shouldnt have to speak about it either and it shouldnt be considered whatsoever in the voting process.Sure, but no way in he!! hell get off the hook that easy. I assume you believe the converse should also be true? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted September 26, 2018 Sure, but no way in he!! hell get off the hook that easy. I assume you believe the converse should also be true? he is not on a hook, she is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
penultimatestraw 473 Posted September 26, 2018 he is not on a hook, she is.I think both their lives will be permanently changed by the accusations. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted September 26, 2018 I think both their lives will be permanently changed by the accusations. sure, doesnt change the fact that he is not on the hook. If she doesnt show he gets confirmed and leftists weirdos do what they do. Cry, destroy things, act like temper tantrum throwing 5 year olds and continue to make baseless accusations against conservatives who threaten their agenda to destroy our nation. I'll take the win for our country and ignore the noise from the toddlers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
penultimatestraw 473 Posted September 26, 2018 sure, doesnt change the fact that he is not on the hook. If she doesnt show he gets confirmed and leftists weirdos do what they do. Cry, destroy things, act like temper tantrum throwing 5 year olds and continue to make baseless accusations against conservatives who threaten their agenda to destroy our nation. I'll take the win for our country and ignore the noise from the toddlers. What if she does testify? What were conservatives doing when they stalled voting on Obama’s S.C. appointee? How is partisan gamesmanship a win for the country? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted September 26, 2018 What if she does testify? What were conservatives doing when they stalled voting on Obamas S.C. appointee? How is partisan gamesmanship a win for the country? They are voting for him no matter what. They will say the accusations are troubling and thats about it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted September 26, 2018 The right finally took control of an out of control situation. Now she can bail without remorse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 2,729 Posted September 26, 2018 What if she does testify? What were conservatives doing when they stalled voting on Obamas S.C. appointee? How is partisan gamesmanship a win for the country?It WAS partisan gamesmanship when the GOP did it to Garland. But you'll notice that they didn't needlessly or falsley accuse Garland of sexual assault or any other alleged crime that would besmirch his reputation. That seems to be the Dem's go to move in such cases and its disgusting. Remember Harry Reid saying about Romney that "the word is out. He hasn't paid his taxes in 10 years..."? Yeah Harry, you just put the word out, dickbag. Baseless accusations are perfectly acceptable to them if it furthers their agenda and they don't care if lives or careers get ruined as a result. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,646 Posted September 26, 2018 What if she does testify? What were conservatives doing when they stalled voting on Obamas S.C. appointee? How is partisan gamesmanship a win for the country? They were invoking the Biden rule, and they could do it because Harry Reid changed the rules to benefit the democrats when they were the majority. We all know Obama quickly blew that. Democrats have themselves to blame about Garland. Plus Obama didn't really put up much of a fight, confident Hillary would win. Why wouldn't he? The FBI told him it was in the bag. Lol. You really need to start reading and watching some news programs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,559 Posted September 26, 2018 What if she does testify? What were conservatives doing when they stalled voting on Obama’s S.C. appointee? How is partisan gamesmanship a win for the country? At this point, it's not how you play the game, it's if you win or lose. Both McConnell with Garland and Feinstein with Kavenaugh did/are doing it. We're not supposed to care about right and wrong or just and unjust anymore. We're supposed to just cheer for our side to fock over the other side by any means necessary, ethics be damned. It's OK when we do it to them because they do it to us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,517 Posted September 26, 2018 Ford now has 4 witnesses who she claims corroborate her story. Except, of course, these are witnesses that she simply told her story to in The last 5 Years. These weren't witnesses to the alleged attack. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/09/25/brett-kavanaugh-ford-has-4-people-corroborate-sexual-assault-claims/1429270002/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted September 26, 2018 Ford now has 4 witnesses who she claims corroborate her story. Except, of course, these are witnesses that she simply told her story to in The last 5 Years. These weren't witnesses to the alleged attack. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/09/25/brett-kavanaugh-ford-has-4-people-corroborate-sexual-assault-claims/1429270002/ At least its something, anything, to prove she wasn't prodded into doing this by Dem operatives. It helps, if only a little.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,559 Posted September 26, 2018 Ford now has 4 witnesses who she claims corroborate her story. Except, of course, these are witnesses that she simply told her story to in The last 5 Years. These weren't witnesses to the alleged attack. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2018/09/25/brett-kavanaugh-ford-has-4-people-corroborate-sexual-assault-claims/1429270002/ She also had four witnesses from 35 years ago, that she says were there that day .... uh .... nevermind. Forget them. These four are much better. The four that were there are all lying. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,646 Posted September 26, 2018 At this point, it's not how you play the game, it's if you win or lose. Both McConnell with Garland and Feinstein with Kavenaugh did/are doing it. We're not supposed to care about right and wrong or just and unjust anymore. We're supposed to just cheer for our side to fock over the other side by any means necessary, ethics be damned. It's OK when we do it to them because they do it to us. I think there is a big difference between republicans invoking a process technicality and democrats alleging a sexual assault and holding the info for months. I'd say it's not even close. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,517 Posted September 26, 2018 At least its something, anything, to prove she wasn't prodded into doing this by Dem operatives. It helps, if only a little.... So we're supposed to believe 4 people that she simply told her story to and not people that she named as being at the actual party who all have denied her claims? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted September 26, 2018 So we're supposed to believe 4 people that she simply told her story to and not people that she named as being at the actual party who all have denied her claims? Nope, but if she at least told the story before this guy was nominated to someone, that at the very least proves she is not a liberal plant. There is still not nearly enough evidence to prove the guy is unfit for placement, let alone guilty of this purported action from high school. Frankly, I don't much care what he did when he was a teenager, i do care what he has done while a judge, and what his positions are. The rest of it is just political gamesmanship that wastes our tax dollars, which is the one thing we can say the Dem's are exceedingly good at. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,559 Posted September 26, 2018 I think there is a big difference between republicans invoking a process technicality and democrats alleging a sexual assault and holding the info for months. I'd say it's not even close. Yeah, well outcomes too. In the end, Republicans get a SCOTUS seat while the Dems only got an AFDC purchased box of Kleenex. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,646 Posted September 26, 2018 Yeah, well outcomes too. In the end, Republicans get a SCOTUS seat while the Dems only got an AFDC purchased box of Kleenex. Yup and it's driving them nuts. But they never point a finger at their own leadership for letting it happen. Like I said, Obama didn't even try. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,517 Posted September 26, 2018 She also had four witnesses from 35 years ago, that she says were there that day .... uh .... nevermind. Forget them. These four are much better. The four that were there are all lying. Right. #believeallwomen Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted September 26, 2018 It is funny watching them move from hysteria to hysteria. In the last 48 hours: -2nd accuser story released by the New Yorker after NYT and WaPo said it was too fake for them to publish -Creepy Porn Lawyer says he has witnesses and evidence of drug fueled gang rapes - Second accuser says she will not tell her story to any other reporters or anyone under oath - Female attorney is picked to ask the questions so Ford does not feel intimidates by mean white men - Media attacks female attorney because she is from the same state as Joe Arpaio The gift that keeps on giving. I still predict no women speak on the record. The next stall tactic will be protests > violence > minority gets roughed up by a cop. This let's them play the race card for a week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted September 26, 2018 Yup and it's driving them nuts. But they never point a finger at their own leadership for letting it happen. Like I said, Obama didn't even try. Harry Reid approves....doesn't he.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites