Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
vuduchile

Kavanaugh sexual misconduct in High School

Recommended Posts

I thought I read the investigators were made up of former ICE and ATF? If true, I would guess they're more then capable investigators.

Shonuff just says stuff. Clueless. He actually thinks Senators are flying all over the place and conducting interviews.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a guy who despises Trump, I gotta say, as of right now there just isnt enough there. Its a bunch of hearsay and 'he said she said'. In my opinion, that shouldn't even be enough to warrant a discussion in the Senate.

 

I think with the evidence provided, anyone who comes down hard on either side is just pathetic. If you're calling Kavanaugh a rapist based on the information provided, you're a partisan troll. If you're calling these women 'whores' and 'sluts', you're a partisan troll.

 

This. Totally this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone really believe there were 10 or more gang rape parties at a high school and nobody knew about until today?

 

Just sit back and think. Really?

 

:lol:

... And women kept going back to them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not seeing this anywhere, even foxnews.

Any links besides twitter?

It took a while.

 

USA Today https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/26/brett-kavanaugh-two-men-say-they-had-disputed-sexual-encounter-christine-ford/1439569002/

 

Buzzfeed https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/two-men-told-senate-staffers-they-had-the-encounter-with

 

National Review https://www.nationalreview.com/news/kavanaugh-hearings-senate-judiciary-committee-christine-blasey-ford/

 

Fox News http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/27/ahead-pivotal-senate-hearing-witnesses-surface-to-say-christine-ford-may-have-mistaken-them-for-kavanaugh.html

 

 

Apparently one guy came forward stating he thinks he is the Kavanaugh character, claiming he tried to get to second base with her. Provided testimony on Monday and Wednesday, also written reports detailing what happened. A second guy also came forward stating he is the Judge character, he witnessed the other guy trying to dry hump Ford and putting his hand on her mouth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It took a while.

 

USA Today https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/26/brett-kavanaugh-two-men-say-they-had-disputed-sexual-encounter-christine-ford/1439569002/

 

Buzzfeed https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/two-men-told-senate-staffers-they-had-the-encounter-with

 

National Review https://www.nationalreview.com/news/kavanaugh-hearings-senate-judiciary-committee-christine-blasey-ford/

 

Fox News http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/27/ahead-pivotal-senate-hearing-witnesses-surface-to-say-christine-ford-may-have-mistaken-them-for-kavanaugh.html

 

 

Apparently one guy came forward stating he thinks he is the Kavanaugh character, claiming he tried to get to second base with her. Provided testimony on Monday and Wednesday, also written reports detailing what happened. A second guy also came forward stating he is the Judge character, he witnessed the other guy trying to dry hump Ford and putting his hand on her mouth.

 

I did it, I was 8 and lived in San Diego but #metoo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Game. Set. Match. The democrats certainly aren't living up to their "go high" mantra. As low as it gets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure it was me who stuck his ###### in Deborah Ramirez's face. I don't remember ever going to Massachusetts though, so she must be mistaken on that part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone seen this? I tried posting this earlier t don't think the link worked.

 

 

 

WHAT A COLOSSAL DOUCHE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

won't be repealed. but i could see a set time limit of 20 weeks like most civilized countries. a lot of feminazi focking freak sicko lefties want nothing less than abortion on demand at any time.

Late term abortions are just a talking point, as they are rarely performed. When they occur, it usually for medical indications. From the CDC:

 

The majority of abortions in 2014 took place early in gestation: 91.5% of abortions were performed at ≤13 weeks’ gestation; a smaller number of abortions (7.2%) were performed at 14–20 weeks’ gestation, and even fewer (1.3%) were performed at ≥21 weeks’ gestation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You want to hang your hat on this:

 

 

Wow.

 

How much credence do you give to the FACT that every person the first two accusers have specifically named as having been there don't even remember the incidents in question? That seems pretty damning IMO. If I say, "these people can attest to this" and they say "uh, I don't remember that ever happening", it should reflect on my credibility, don't you think?

Why does their denial hold so much weight? If they weren't involved, it's easy to imagine forgetting about the experience, especially if drunk. Alternatively, are you surprised Judge won't comment, given that he may have been complicit with Kavanaugh's actions?

 

The only denial that is a little damning is the chick who said she wasn't even at the party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It took a while.

 

USA Today https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/09/26/brett-kavanaugh-two-men-say-they-had-disputed-sexual-encounter-christine-ford/1439569002/

 

Buzzfeed https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/two-men-told-senate-staffers-they-had-the-encounter-with

 

National Review https://www.nationalreview.com/news/kavanaugh-hearings-senate-judiciary-committee-christine-blasey-ford/

 

Fox News http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/27/ahead-pivotal-senate-hearing-witnesses-surface-to-say-christine-ford-may-have-mistaken-them-for-kavanaugh.html

 

 

Apparently one guy came forward stating he thinks he is the Kavanaugh character, claiming he tried to get to second base with her. Provided testimony on Monday and Wednesday, also written reports detailing what happened. A second guy also came forward stating he is the Judge character, he witnessed the other guy trying to dry hump Ford and putting his hand on her mouth.

Wait, why are these guys coming forward at the last minute? I thought that meant your were paid off and lying?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, why are these guys coming forward at the last minute? I thought that meant your were paid off and lying?

Is that the best you got?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't this be a hoot?

 

https://voat.co/v/QRV/2747691

The problem is, the left is pulling in the youth through gross emotional tactics, like 3rd world and terrorist countries do to try to take communistic type control over the people. Call it socialism if you like. For now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Late term abortions are just a talking point, as they are rarely performed. When they occur, it usually for medical indications. From the CDC:

Exactly. To hear the fundies talk we're dragging 6 month old children out to the wood chipper on a regular basis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, there's dirty on all sides. But the Press is just fully surrendered to gossip. They are so God damn interested in being first that they've completely surrendered the concept of being right.

 

, last night we had people reading emails verbatim right off the printer without any attempt to vet or verify or refute or confirm anything.

 

I'm not confident, but I'm hopeful that the pendulum has swung so far on this kind of thing that the media Enzo checking itself. There's so much low-hanging fruit coming from Washington these days that nobody wants to miss a single piece of it. They're like Augustus drinking from the chocolate River.

 

Honestly, I'd like one news organization and maybe NPR is as close as we get, but one organization to come right out and say look, we're not going to be the fastest. If that's what you want, there's plenty of others. But we're not going to play in the Speed game. We're going to play the news game. We're going to play the accuracy game as well as we possibly can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Late term abortions are just a talking point, as they are rarely performed. When they occur, it usually for medical indications. From the CDC:

So is the rape\incest angle. Tiny % of abortion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Can you synopsize?

Quoted from the link...

 

"It relates to a claim that this very same Dr Fauxd also sent a letter claiming to have been assaulted by the prior Trump SC nominee Neil Gorsuch when his confirmation was in front of the judicial committee - obviously not used at that time"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quoted from the link...

 

"It relates to a claim that this very same Dr Fauxd also sent a letter claiming to have been assaulted by the prior Trump SC nominee Neil Gorsuch when his confirmation was in front of the judicial committee - obviously not used at that time"

 

Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Those that can make you believe in absurdities can make you commit atrocities " - Voltaire

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quoted from the link...

 

"It relates to a claim that this very same Dr Fauxd also sent a letter claiming to have been assaulted by the prior Trump SC nominee Neil Gorsuch when his confirmation was in front of the judicial committee - obviously not used at that time"

 

 

I did some really surface research on this, and the notion of it appears to come from a sole source, who is spurious in nature....not buying into this one at all...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that the best you got?

Nah, I'm just trying to understand the difference between lying whoras and upstanding friends of Cav. It appears the former can't possibly be credible, and time their attacks based on political nonsense. Meanwhile, the good guys' version of the story is apolitical, free from bias and should be followed as gospel. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that the best you got?

The best you got is two guys coming forward now on their own to admit to a crime in state with no statute of limitations.

 

All these women are lying...but this is what you all believe?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hearing should be soon. Do we know can size yet?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quoted from the link...

 

"It relates to a claim that this very same Dr Fauxd also sent a letter claiming to have been assaulted by the prior Trump SC nominee Neil Gorsuch when his confirmation was in front of the judicial committee - obviously not used at that time"

And this is what drobeski wouldnt linknto after being asked multiple times.

Because look at at that link...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote from polygrapher expert Jerry Hanafin about Dr. Ford's lie detector test.

 

"I had it independently reviewed by four other polygraph examiners, two are retired from the FBI, two from local law enforcement with over 20 years of polygraph experience, and all four of them stated from the analysis from the charts that she passed the test"

 

And what exactly does lying judge Kav have to back up his story? A repetitive string of denials and a sloppily written calendar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And this is what drobeski wouldnt linknto after being asked multiple times.

Because look at at that link...

This is what I speculated she might be up to earlier in this thread but I never heard this, i was just pulling it out of my ass. If they really do have a letter, Ill LMAO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote from polygrapher expert Jerry Hanafin about Dr. Ford's lie detector test.

 

"I had it independently reviewed by four other polygraph examiners, two are retired from the FBI, two from local law enforcement with over 20 years of polygraph experience, and all four of them stated from the analysis from the charts that she passed the test"

 

And what exactly does lying judge Kav have to back up his story? A repetitive string of denials and a sloppily written calendar.

 

The evidence is certainly building up for the accuser(s) at this stage. Evidence is better than simple accusation of course, and better than simple denials. I would assess that the tilt against the Judge is starting to build.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote from polygrapher expert Jerry Hanafin about Dr. Ford's lie detector test.

 

"I had it independently reviewed by four other polygraph examiners, two are retired from the FBI, two from local law enforcement with over 20 years of polygraph experience, and all four of them stated from the analysis from the charts that she passed the test"

 

And what exactly does lying judge Kav have to back up his story? A repetitive string of denials and a sloppily written calendar.

Questions.

 

  1. Is any part of your statement false?
  2. Did you make up any part of your statement?

 

Seriously? 2 questions? And neither mentions Kavanaugh? You side gets loonier and loonier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What time does the show start?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know how you find fire out more about these accusers? You have a group of experts actually investigate the matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I speculated she might be up to earlier in this thread but I never heard this, i was just pulling it out of my ass. If they really do have a letter, Ill LMAO.

If theyve really had a letter it would have been all over the place and this hearing would never be happening today.

There is a reason its only reported on a site sketchier than even Q.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The evidence is certainly building up for the accuser(s) at this stage. Evidence is better than simple accusation of course, and better than simple denials. I would assess that the tilt against the Judge is starting to build.

What "evidence"?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×