Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
IGotWorms

No Stormy Daniels thread?

Recommended Posts

I did watch the Weekend Update. Not very good at all. The jokes are there and well written I think, but the delivery is so poor that they dont land....but I did half laugh while also shaking my head at the line:

 

What a thrill it is to follow politics at a time when the headline PORNSTAR BLACKMAILS PRESIDENT is only like the 4th biggest political story of the week.

 

Were the first three biggest ones dealing with FISA corruption, FBI/DOJ facing possible indictments, Hillary and aides looking at serious jail time? No...............wonder what the left considered the 3 biggest then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Were the first three biggest ones dealing with FISA corruption, FBI/DOJ facing possible indictments, Hillary and aides looking at serious jail time? No...............wonder what the left considered the 3 biggest then.

Im not sure. I think they were more interested in the joke so they didnt list off 3 bigger stories for some reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did watch the Weekend Update. Not very good at all. The jokes are there and well written I think, but the delivery is so poor that they dont land....but I did half laugh while also shaking my head at the line:

 

What a thrill it is to follow politics at a time when the headline PORNSTAR BLACKMAILS PRESIDENT is only like the 4th biggest political story of the week.

wellllll it is fake news so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So apparently Foxnews had this story before the election and buried it.

 

I dont personally care at this point, but assuming it was wel sourced and deemed legit, is burying it ethical?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So apparently Foxnews had this story before the election and buried it.

 

I dont personally care at this point, but assuming it was wel sourced and deemed legit, is burying it ethical?

yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She put out a letter saying its not true, the end. Pics, video or it didnt happen. When the woman says it didnt happen, doesnt matter if it did or not, its done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She put out a letter saying its not true, the end. Pics, video or it didnt happen. When the woman says it didnt happen, doesnt matter if it did or not, its done.

Paid off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, Howard Stern was contacted by her back in 2011 about the affair with Trump. Stern passed because he said he is not about talking about affairs and Trump was a good guest at that time.

 

He also said (and I agree) that Trump has never lied about who he is. If you voted for him as part of some family values play, then you are a chump. He is who he is and banging some porn star doesn't change that. If you don't like it, then get out and vote next election. Until then, this is nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, Howard Stern was contacted by her back in 2011 about the affair with Trump. Stern passed because he said he is not about talking about affairs and Trump was a good guest at that time.

 

He also said (and I agree) that Trump has never lied about who he is. If you voted for him as part of some family values play, then you are a chump. He is who he is and banging some porn star doesn't change that. If you don't like it, then get out and vote next election. Until then, this is nothing.

I would agree Trump is notbsome family values guy. Which makes the evangelical support of his interesting. They are basically selling out their own morals for two issues...abortion (which isnt changing anytime soon anyway) and gay rights. And the latter Trump plays lip service (beyond the trans stuff).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree Trump is notbsome family values guy. Which makes the evangelical support of his interesting. They are basically selling out their own morals for two issues...abortion (which isnt changing anytime soon anyway) and gay rights. And the latter Trump plays lip service (beyond the trans stuff).

 

Right, because they wouldn't be selling out their morals if they voted for Clinton. :doh:

 

Trump was the lesser of two evils.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Right, because they wouldn't be selling out their morals if the voted for Clinton. :doh:

 

Trump was the lesser of two evils.

A. This has zero to do with Hillary (always the crutch of the ignorant). She is gone yet evangelicals still support him.

B. He wasnt the only choice in the primaries...so it wasnt either him or Hillary. Thats a weak cop out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, Howard Stern was contacted by her back in 2011 about the affair with Trump. Stern passed because he said he is not about talking about affairs and Trump was a good guest at that time.

 

He also said (and I agree) that Trump has never lied about who he is. If you voted for him as part of some family values play, then you are a chump. He is who he is and banging some porn star doesn't change that. If you don't like it, then get out and vote next election. Until then, this is nothing.

I agree with basic judgement you personally make in regards to Trump. His paying off a porn star doesnt move the needle at all, and I assume there are several other identical stories about him out there. No big deal here.

 

But doesnt a major news orginization have a duty to report a story like this and let the voters decide on their own if a given story matters?

 

For the sake of this discussion, Im more concerned about the precedent set. With Trump it wouldnt have moved the needle for me, but do we want our most major news sources picking and choosing when to bury stories of this size with future candidates?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with basic judgement you personally make in regards to Trump. His paying off a porn star doesnt move the needle at all, and I assume there are several other identical stories about him out there. No big deal here.

 

But doesnt a major news orginization have a duty to report a story like this and let the voters decide on their own if a given story matters?

 

For the sake of this discussion, Im more concerned about the precedent set. With Trump it wouldnt have moved the needle for me, but do we want our most major news sources picking and choosing when to bury stories of this size with future candidates?

From what Stern said, she was about to go to the tabloids and her people approached his show. He passed, but it was not a secret. Anyone had the story and she was paid to keep her mouth shut. So, where is the story, is it credible and does it matter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you imagine being able to bang the young hot Jenna Jameson? I would have been all over that.

Same here...for a good 45 to 60 seconds, give or take. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So cb have you moved from blaming the russians to blaming fox news for Hillarys drubbing ? Or is it both?

I actually dont really care about Hillarys drubbing one way or another. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually dont really care about Hillarys drubbing one way or another. :dunno:

you seemed to be hinting at another fake blame the loss on something stupid theory. Like when you blamed the russians, facebook and pokeman. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Disagree that shes hot.

 

Sure as hell not $130k hot

 

hmm well. what's he worth? lets play pretend and say 100 million. no way he's a billionaire.

 

I would happily pay 0.0013 of my worth to be with her

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you seemed to be hinting at another fake blame the loss on something stupid theory. Like when you blamed the russians, facebook and pokeman. :dunno:

 

If I worded my posts in such a way that you believe I credited Trump's victory to Fox burying this story, then I apologize. I don't even think the Trump vs Clinton election result is even topical at this point.

 

My thoughts are on top media outlets having a major story that could (assuming it was sourced and believed to have happened), but deciding to bury it. I've come to accept that there will be spin and slants and bias, but hiding a potential controversy seems different and unsettling from a precedent setting perspective. It's not a right or left issue I'm discussing, although I know it'll be hard for anyone to discuss it as anything other than that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Straying from the media responsibility topic for a moment.....of course Trump was imagining his own daughter when he nailed the porn star.

 

We had really good banter. He told me once that I was someone to be reckoned with, beautiful and smart just like his daughter.

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And apparently he liked watching a shark Week and having her spank him with Forbes magazine. Not just any issue either.

:lol:

 

And they have the receipts where she was paid off.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-lawyer-used-private-company-pseudonyms-to-pay-porn-star-stormy-daniels-1516315731

Yes!

 

Does this story actually matter or affect anything? No.

But we need solid evidence like receipts, and hopefully a few embarrassing tidbits a week. Why? Comedy. :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes!

 

Does this story actually matter or affect anything? No.

But we need solid evidence like receipts, and hopefully a few embarrassing tidbits a week. Why? Comedy. :banana:

Its fun to watch the GOPers have to defend this..and the evangelicals. Would love to hear someone questioning n Pence in this one too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WSJ has discovered the name of the shamco Trump's lawyer used to remit payment to the stripper - includes the Lawyer's own name in the articles of organization.

 

Can you imagine the board mean girlz if even a fraction of this story broke on Obummer? :cry:

Jeesus, they're still butt-hurt over a Beejer from 20 years ago.

 

Like I've said before, the 'evangelicals' have proven themselves to be total hypocrites.

 

Gotta give Trump credit - the dude's such a sleeze, that a story that would have brought down (and has) any other candidate is like "meh" for a moral dotard like Trump.

 

Gary Hart's gotta be PIssed.

 

I mean, it's the WSJ for Chrissake. Not exactly a libruhl bastion.

 

I wonder if Melanoma BotoxFace ever has any actual reactions - or is just so happy to be out of ShiitCanIstan, she'd put up with anything.

 

Frankly, I think Americans are retarded on these issues - the Europeans are much more grown up. But, if you're going to freak out over Hart, Lewinsky, Edwards, etc., then you need to be eually morally outraged about a sleazebag like Newt and Trump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

By coming down, you mean impeachment, right?

Seriously, wtf could this tard be babbling about? Today's shut down whilst tubby mcalzheimer golfs?😃

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were really rich I would sex up many porn stars. As long as they go to the doctor first.

 

This.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×