Obama illegally tapped DJT phone in Trump Tower in October

[FeelingMN 273]

Trump did tweet that he saw an FBI Surveillance Van parked out front of Trump Tower. But those tweets have been deleted.

[Mike Honcho 4,041]

so Trump was right again

 

When do you think the charges are coming?

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Says the guy still try's ngbto claim they all just too crowd strikes info and did nothing else.

 

ENGLISH MOTHER FOCKER.............DO YOU SPEAK IT?!!!!

 

No...his wires weren't tapped and Obama didn't do it.

 

As usual...you are wrong.

 

As usual, you're wrong. There was a FISA warrant(s) issued. But hey, don't let facts get in the way of your point.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,687]

So, in the end, this is what JQ Public knows: Trump didn't collude with the Russians, that was made up, and The Obama administration did, indeed, have President Trumps organization under surveillance during the campaign, like he tweeted. Well played libtards. Looking good so far.

[NewbieJr 540]

So, in the end, this is what JQ Public knows: Trump didn't collude with the Russians, that was made up, and The Obama administration did, indeed, have President Trumps organization under surveillance during the campaign, like he tweeted. Well played libtards. Looking good so far.

ROFL Life must be wonderful viewed through the eyes of a gullible moron.

[edjr 5,579]

sad

 

 

 

 

 

Who posted in:

Obama illegally tapped DJT phone in Trump Tower in October

 

Sho Nuff 68

NewbieJr 50

Filthy Fernadez 48

Hardcore troubadour 41

wiffleball 34

drobeski 27

Cdub100 27

Mike Honcho 23

cyclone24 20

bandrus1 16

Cruzer 14

MDC 13

[MDC 5,901]

 

sad

 

 

 

 

 

Who posted in: Obama illegally tapped DJT phone in Trump Tower in October

 

 

Sho Nuff 68

NewbieJr 50

Filthy Fernadez 48

Hardcore troubadour 41

wiffleball 34

drobeski 27

Cdub100 27

Mike Honcho 23

cyclone24 20

bandrus1 16

Cruzer 14

MDC 13

That looks about right.

[Cruzer 1,992]

Was Trump being surveilled by the U.S. Government?

I don't know - was he? Aren't we still waiting to find out - or did Levin text you and confirm it?

[Sho Nuff 719]

well have to wait until the investigation plays out to determine that.

What investigation? The one about bogus claims by cheeto boy?

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

ENGLISH MOTHER FOCKER.............DO YOU SPEAK IT?!!!!

 

 

As usual, you're wrong. There was a FISA warrant(s) issued. But hey, don't let facts get in the way of your point.

To follow Russian banks...none targeting Trump.

 

Once again facts are not your friend.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

To follow Russian banks...none targeting Trump.

 

Once again facts are not your friend.

Really? So I assume there were wiretaps EVERYWHERE a Russian bank conducted bysiness in October.

 

Sho Flake trying to fight a battle of wits going in unarmed.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,687]

Really? So I assume there were wiretaps EVERYWHERE a Russian bank conducted bysiness in October.

 

Sho Flake trying to fight a battle of wits going in unarmed.

For the win.

[Sho Nuff 719]

Really? So I assume there were wiretaps EVERYWHERE a Russian bank conducted bysiness in October.

 

Sho Flake trying to fight a battle of wits going in unarmed.

You claimed there was an FISA warrant issued.

There were none issued targeting Trump. That much has been said already.

If you have a link to anything refuting that...post it.

 

Fact is...you are talking out your ass again and getting your ass kicked.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,687]

Didn't Hillary tweet a week before the election that there was surveillance on Trump? How did she know? Uh oh.

[giraldi02 470]

Didn't Hillary tweet a week before the election that there was surveillance on Trump? How did she know? Uh oh.

mmhmm

 

https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/793250312119263233?lang=en

[Sho Nuff 719]

mmhmm

 

https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/793250312119263233?lang=en

The bank was what was being tapped...as has been said

[Hardcore troubadour 12,687]

mmhmm

 

https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/793250312119263233?lang=en

"Computer scientists discovered". Lol. Guess who gets to sit down with the FBI? Again. And who would have thunk it was a tweet by Hillary, and not President Trump, that blew the lid off this whole affair?

[Hardcore troubadour 12,687]

The bank was what was being tapped...as has been said

But how did HRC know?

[giraldi02 470]

"Computer scientists discovered". Lol. Guess who gets to sit down with the FBI? Again. And who would have thunk it was a tweet by Hillary, and not President Trump, that blew the lid off this whole affair?

It all stemmed from a Slate article that no one else (NYT, WaPo, Reuters, etc) wanted to touch either.

 

Here's the Slate article: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/10/was_a_server_registered_to_the_trump_organization_communicating_with_russia.html#return

 

Here's the Intercept's immediate follow-up: https://theintercept.com/2016/11/01/heres-the-problem-with-the-story-connecting-russia-to-donald-trumps-email-server/

 

Hmmm...

[frank 2,150]

Desperado........why don't you come to your senses......

I like witchy woman.

[Sho Nuff 719]

It all stemmed from a Slate article that no one else (NYT, WaPo, Reuters, etc) wanted to touch either.

 

Here's the Slate article: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/10/was_a_server_registered_to_the_trump_organization_communicating_with_russia.html#return

 

Here's the Intercept's immediate follow-up: https://theintercept.com/2016/11/01/heres-the-problem-with-the-story-connecting-russia-to-donald-trumps-email-server/

 

Hmmm...

FBI still checking it out too

 

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/09/politics/fbi-investigation-continues-into-odd-computer-link-between-russian-bank-and-trump-organization/index.html

[kutulu 1,552]

CNN = fake news

 

 

"I have nothing to with Russia. I have nothing to do with Russia for anything."

[mmmmm...beer 691]

Tapping that ass 》Tapping kegs > tapping phones

Fixed bro..

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

So I guess we'll have throw common sense out the window when communicating here with ShoFlake...........He is reliving the Clinton years debating what the meaning of the word "Is" is.

 

The FISA warrant was issued trying to catch Trump and/or anyone in his campaign doing something nefarious. PERIOD.

[Reality 2,710]

So I guess we'll have throw common sense out the window when communicating here with ShoFlake...........

 

 

You new?

[FeelingMN 273]

It all stemmed from a Slate article that no one else (NYT, WaPo, Reuters, etc) wanted to touch either.

Here's the Slate article: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/cover_story/2016/10/was_a_server_registered_to_the_trump_organization_communicating_with_russia.html#return

 

 

Here's the Intercept's immediate follow-up: https://theintercept.com/2016/11/01/heres-the-problem-with-the-story-connecting-russia-to-donald-trumps-email-server/

 

 

Hmmm...

Interesting stuff.

 

Why would you set up two servers for marketing purposes for basically two companies (Spectrum and Alfa)? Ultimately there's no smoking gun here....no evidence of any communications between Trump and Alfa....but it seems weird.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

 

You new?

 

I assumed after nearly 50,000 posts that noggin of his would absorb something.

[Reality 2,710]

 

I assumed after nearly 50,000 posts that noggin of his would absorb something.

 

No, he is the least self aware person on the planet. Nothing is ever being absorbed.

[Sho Nuff 719]

So I guess we'll have throw common sense out the window when communicating here with ShoFlake...........He is reliving the Clinton years debating what the meaning of the word "Is" is.

 

The FISA warrant was issued trying to catch Trump and/or anyone in his campaign doing something nefarious. PERIOD.

Bullshit...I'm dealing with what the warrant was actually for rather than making bogus claims like Trump and his followers keep doing.

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

I assumed after nearly 50,000 posts that noggin of his would absorb something.

Ive absorbed that you are the absolute most clueless person on the board...and you found a little buddy in Reality.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Ive absorbed that you are the absolute most clueless person on the board...and you found a little buddy in Reality.

 

Whereas you and Reality will never meet.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,687]

 

Whereas you and Reality will never meet.

Ha!

[drobeski 3,061]

 

Whereas you and Reality will never meet.

lol

[Gepetto 989]

Now that the media-Democrat complex has been caught in its own web, there is some serious skullduggery underway. It’s revisionist history, Soviet style. You know, the kind where the bad stuff gets “disappeared.” The New York Times is disappearing its claim that Obama investigated Trump. For four months, the mainstream press was very content to have Americans believe — indeed, they encouraged Americans to believe — that a vigorous national-security investigation of the Trump presidential campaign was ongoing. “A counterintelligence investigation,” the New York Times called it. As I contended in a column this weekend, it was essential for the media and Democrats to promote the perception of an investigation because the scandalous narrative they were peddling — namely, that Trump-campaign operatives conspired with the Putin regime to “hack the election” — required it. Russia obviously did not hack the election. Russian intelligence services may have hacked e-mail accounts of prominent Democrats, although even that has not been proved. And there is even less evidence of collusion by the Trump campaign in that effort — as one would expect, in light of the intelligence agencies’ conclusion that the Russians sought to hack accounts of both major parties. So, for this fatally flawed storyline to pass the laugh test, the Left needed the FBI. Even if the election-hacking conspiracy story sounded far-fetched, the public might be induced to believe there must be something to it if the Bureau was investigating it. But when the election-hacking narrative went on too long without proof, the risk the Democrats were running became clear. If the FBI had been investigating whether the Trump campaign colluded in purported “Russian hacking of the election,” that meant the incumbent Obama administration must have been investigating the campaign of the opposition party’s presidential candidate. Moreover, if such an investigation had involved national-security wiretaps under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), that would suggest that the Obama Justice Department had alleged, in court, that Trump associates had acted as “agents of a foreign power” — in this case, Russia. Get it? If there is no hacking conspiracy — and there manifestly is not — the big scandal here is not possible Trump-campaign collusion with Russia. It is that the Obama Justice Department may have used its legal authorities to investigate the Democrats’ top political adversary. And not to be overlooked: This would have been done at the very same time the same Obama Justice Department was bending over backwards to whitewash the extremely serious criminal case against the Democrats’ nominee, Hillary Clinton. It would have meant Obama had his thumb on the election scale. I began pointing this out in early January, but matters did not come to a head until last Saturday morning. In a tweet-burst, President Trump made the controversial allegation that President Obama had ordered that Trump be subjected to wiretapping at Trump Tower, where his campaign had been headquartered. To say the least, it is unfortunate that this was the angle Trump chose to pursue. There is plenty of support for the overarching proposition that the Obama administration used its law-enforcement and intelligence powers to investigate Trump associates during the campaign. There is, to my knowledge, no evidence that Trump personally was wiretapped. So instead of highlighting the alarming things that may be true, President Trump’s tweets obsessed over something that probably is not true. Nevertheless, even if Trump’s allegation was false, the tweets demanded attention to the real scandal: Was the Obama administration investigating the Trump campaign? That was the uh-oh moment for the media-Democrat complex. That was when it dawned on them not only that the election-hacking conspiracy narrative wasn’t working, but that the investigation of the Trump campaign could be a much bigger scandal.

 

So, after insisting for four months that the Trump campaign was under investigation for conspiring with Putin to steal the election from Hillary Clinton, the media decided that it better adopt a different strategy: “Investigation? What investigation?” Thus the claim, suddenly, is that Obama was never investigating Trump. How could we possibly believe such a thing . . . even if it’s the thing the media have wanted us to believe for four months. That brings us back to the New York Times. On January 20, when the paper was trying to promote the “government investigating Trump–Russia conspiracy to steal the election” narrative, here’s the headline that appeared on the big story: “Wiretapped Data Used in Inquiry of Trump Aides.” See? They wanted you to assume the “inquiry” was focused on Trump aides who had connections to the Trump campaign. The report elaborated that investigators were poring over “intercepted communications” of three associates of Donald Trump. Among them was Paul Manafort, who had been Trump’s campaign chairman until August. The intimation was clear: The FBI was conducting a FISA investigation targeting Trump associates to determine whether the campaign had colluded with the Putin regime to steal the election from Hillary Clinton. Only in the fine print did the Times acknowledge that whatever the government might be investigating may have nothing to do with Trump, the Trump campaign, or Russian hacking. But now that the media have been called on this, now that the Obama administration has been called on investigating the Trump campaign, what happens? Have you checked the Times’s January 20 story lately? Turns out the story has suddenly, quietly been given a new headline. No longer is it “Wiretapped Data Used in Inquiry of Trump Aides.” Instead, readers are now told, “Intercepted Russian Communications Part of Inquiry into Trump Associates.” Why would the Times change its headline in this manner, weeks after the fact? Because, during the four months when the media-Democrat complex wanted you to believe there was a Trump–Putin conspiracy to hack the election, they needed you to believe that the Justice Department was targeting Trump associates for surveillance because they were Russian agents. Now that they don’t want you to believe there was an investigation — because that would be an Obama abuse of power — they want to convince you that Trump associates were never targeted for surveillance. “If the conversations of these Trump guys were intercepted,” they want you to conclude, “it’s not because we were targeting them. No, no, no: It’s because we were monitoring Russian agents whom they just happened to call.” Nothing to see here . . . move along. We shouldn’t move along. Let’s see the FISA applications and warrants. If there was no targeting of the Trump campaign, as the media and Democrats now say, let’s hear an explanation of why they’ve pretended otherwise for four months. If the Trump campaign was targeted for an investigation, let’s hear why. — Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior policy fellow at the National Review Institute and a contributing editor of National Review.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/445628/barack-obama-donald-trump-fbi-wiretap-russia

 

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/445628/barack-obama-donald-trump-fbi-wiretap-russia

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

Whereas you and Reality will never meet.

Again...coming from pizzagate guy and guy who has to make things up over and over to argue...this is funny.

You Trump guys have proven over and over again you live in a fantasy world.

See the post above me for more proof.

 

 

The following piece is based on an error. The Times did not in fact change the headline of a January 19 article after its publication as was alleged. Andrew C. McCarthy acknowledges and explains the error in this post. The text of his column as originally published remains below for reference. We regret the error and apologize to our readers.

 

 

 

Did you even read the note at the top Gepetto? Or his apology?

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/445649/mccarthy-error-apologize-nyt-headline-not-changed

[Gepetto 989]

http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/timeline-of-obama-probe-of-alleged-trump-russia-ties/

Editor’s note: The following is an overview of events that led up to President Trump’s controversial claim that the Obama administration was surveilling his campaign and its headquarters during the 2016 election campaign.

2016

June: The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court denies a FISA request by the Obama administration to monitor the communications of presidential candidate Donald Trump and some of his campaign advisers, according to BBC News and Heat Street.

July 25: The FBI announces it is investigating the hack of the Democratic National Committee, revealing the party’s effort to ensure Hillary Clinton wins. The Daily Beast reports the FBI suspects Russian government hackers are responsible.

July 27: Trump is accused of inviting Russia to intervene in the election when he jokes about Hillary Clinton’s missing emails and the WikiLeaks release of DNC emails, telling reporters: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing.”

October: Hillary Clinton’s campaign accuses Trump and the Russians of being the source of John Podesta’s hacked emails, which are released by WikiLeaks.

Oct. 15: The FISA court grants an Obama administration request, focusing this time on surveilling a computer server in Trump Tower that allegedly would document Trump campaign links to Russian banks, according to Heat Street. The administration finds no evidence but continues the wiretaps, citing national security.

2017

Jan. 6: The director of national intelligence releases a declassified report that concludes Russian President Vladimir Putin had ordered an influence campaign to “undermine faith in the U.S. democratic process,” damage Hillary Clinton’s election prospects and bolster Trump’s, McClatchy reports. The campaign included the hacking of top Democrats’ emails and fake news distributed by Russian sources, the DNI report claims.

Jan. 10: Buzzfeed and CNN report a purported intelligence “dossier” claiming the Russians had regular contact with the Trump administration, but the document is quickly debunked as fraudulent.

Jan. 12: The New York Times reports the Obama administration has expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.

Jan. 20: The New York Times reports the FBI, CIA, NSA and the Treasury Department are monitoring several associates of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian ties.

February: Reports surface that the FBI, in its probe of Russia-Trump campaign ties, intercepted a conversation in 2016 between Michael Flynn, when he was a private citizen, and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Appointed by Trump as national security adviser, Flynn resigns for misleading Vice President Pence about the conversation, apparently denying he had discussed Obama’s new sanctions on Russia amid a contrary claim by acting Attorney General Sally Yates, an Obama holdover, who cited an FBI transcript of the intercepted call.

Feb. 14: The New York Times reports members of Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and other Trump associates had repeated contacts with senior Russian intelligence officials in the year before the election, citing four current and former American officials. The Trump campaign insists there is no evidence of any such coordination.

March 2: Attorney General Jeff Sessions recuses himself from any investigation into alleged Trump campaign collusion with Russia after the Washington Post reports he had contact twice with the Russian ambassador during the campaign in his role as a U.S. senator. Democrats contend the revelation contradicts his testimony at his confirmation hearings, but Sessions argues he was responding to a specific question about a breaking CNN article and understood it pertained only to his capacity as a campaign surrogate.

March 1: The New York Times reports the Obama White House “rushed to preserve” intelligence related to alleged Russian links with the Trump campaign.

March 4: Trump tweets: “How low has President Obama gone to tapp [sic] my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!”

March 5: White House press secretary Sean Spicer says in a statement, “Reports concerning potentially politically motivated investigations ahead of the 2016 election are very troubling.”

March 5: Former director of national intelligence James Clapper, who served President Obama from 2010 to 2017, denies Trump’s wiretap claim on NBC’s “Meet The Press” but also says that, to his knowledge, there was “no evidence” of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/03/timeline-of-obama-probe-of-alleged-trump-russia-ties/#v15FmKUbdvBfBGoB.99

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Again...coming from pizzagate guy and guy who has to make things up over and over to argue...this is funny.

You Trump guys have proven over and over again you live in a fantasy world.

 

I just b!tch slapped you and now you bring up pizzagate? Why? To defend the Podestas again? Why do you hate children so much? Spend too much time with them at the house? How about this sunshine; you put down the box of tampons and bon bons, get off your fat a$$ and go earn a living? When you're done proving you're worth something and can actually debate something, come back and we'll discuss things.

 

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmkay? Bring me back a sammich too.

[Sho Nuff 719]

WND...even better.

Your first statement in that for June...has not been shown anywhere credible to show where anything was requested to monitor Trump. Its not in the BBC article (only the FISA issue with the russian Banks again) Mensch continues to be the only one claiming as much as well.

[Sho Nuff 719]

 

I just b!tch slapped you and now you bring up pizzagate? Why? To defend the Podestas again? Why do you hate children so much? Spend too much time with them at the house? How about this sunshine; you put down the box of tampons and bon bons, get off your fat a$$ and go earn a living? When you're done proving you're worth something and can actually debate something, come back and we'll discuss things.

 

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmkay? Bring me back a sammich too.

 

slapped me? You swung and missed (like you do every single time).

I bring up Pizzagate to show you how gullible of a person you are...that you believe wild conspiracies with zero proof when it fits your agenda. While denying facts that destroy your opinions.

And you never fail in making crap up (like you are about children and what you claim I have defended).

 

The rest of your rant is your usual childish ignorance shining through again.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

 

###### slapped me? You swung and missed (like you do every single time).

 

 

I got two laughs out of that You and Reality will never meet. Last time you got a laugh was when you dropped your pants.