Hardcore troubadour 12,961 Posted March 5, 2017 Trump wins again. Remember everyone was talking about Russians and Sessions? Now it's suspicious activity of Obama. He owns the media once again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,459 Posted March 5, 2017 Step 1: Ask judge for a wire tapping warrant, get denied. Step 2: Ask judge for a wire tapping warrant, get denied. Step 3: Ask judge for a wire tapping warrant, get denied. Step 4: Lie when you ask a judge for a wire tapping warrant, get approved. Step 5: Not worried about getting caught cause Hillary has a 98% chance to win. Step 6: Listen to Trumps phone calls and expose him for the Russian loving, woman hating, minority crushing, Hitler he his. Step 7: Oh sh!t There's nothing there. Nothing to release FML Step 8: Lose election Step 9: Piss Trump off enough for him to expose your illegal wire tap Step 10: Go to jail 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 5, 2017 Step 1: Ask judge for a wire tapping warrant, get denied. Step 2: Ask judge for a wire tapping warrant, get denied. Step 3: Ask judge for a wire tapping warrant, get denied. Step 4: Lie when you ask a judge for a wire tapping warrant, get approved. Step 5: Not worried about getting caught cause Hillary has a 98% chance to win. Step 6: Listen to Trumps phone calls and expose him for the Russian loving, woman hating, minority crushing, Hitler he his. Step 7: Oh sh!t There's nothing there. Nothing to release FML Step 8: Lose election Step 9: Piss Trump off enough for him to expose your illegal wire tap Step 10: Go to jail Step 11: Make crap up because Trump has been shown to be a dirty lying jagoff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,159 Posted March 5, 2017 Step 1: Ask judge for a wire tapping warrant, get denied. Step 2: Ask judge for a wire tapping warrant, get denied. Step 3: Ask judge for a wire tapping warrant, get denied. Step 4: Lie when you ask a judge for a wire tapping warrant, get approved. Step 5: Not worried about getting caught cause Hillary has a 98% chance to win. Step 6: Listen to Trumps phone calls and expose him for the Russian loving, woman hating, minority crushing, Hitler he his. Step 7: Oh sh!t There's nothing there. Nothing to release FML Step 8: Lose election Step 9: Piss Trump off enough for him to expose your illegal wire tap Step 10: Go to jail Yeah, probably not. Word of advice, don't take at face value who imagines 3 Million dead people voting, or any of the other crazy azz sh!t he says. FBI director James Comey asked Justice Department to refute Trump's wiretapping claims, sources say WASHINGTON — The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, asked the Justice Department this weekend to publicly reject President Trump’s assertion that President Barack Obama ordered the tapping of Mr. Trump’s phones, senior American officials said on Sunday. Mr. Comey has argued that the highly charged claim is false and must be corrected, they said, but the department has not released any such statement. Mr. Comey, who made the request on Saturday after Mr. Trump leveled his allegation on Twitter, has been working to get the Justice Department to knock down the claim because it falsely insinuates that the F.B.I. broke the law, the officials said. A spokesman for the F.B.I. declined to comment. Sarah Isgur Flores, the spokeswoman for the Justice Department, also declined to comment. Mr. Comey’s request is a remarkable rebuke of a sitting president, putting the nation’s top law enforcement official in the position of questioning Mr. Trump’s truthfulness. The confrontation between the two is the most serious consequence of Mr. Trump’s weekend Twitter outburst, and it underscores the dangers of what the president and his aides have unleashed by accusing the former president of a conspiracy to undermine Mr. Trump’s young administration. It is not clear why Mr. Comey did not issue the statement himself. He is the most senior law enforcement official who was kept on the job as the Obama administration gave way to the Trump administration. And while the Justice Department applies for intelligence-gathering warrants, the F.B.I. keeps its own set of records and is in position to know whether Mr. Trump’s claims are true. While intelligence officials do not normally discuss the existence or nonexistence of surveillance warrants, no law prevents Mr. Comey from issuing the statement. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,686 Posted March 5, 2017 Been too gorgeous to mess with this shiit all day, and, I'm just bored with it already, but: General feeling I"m seeing from Congress (even Repubs) and Intel community is: "Sigh, great, now we have to waste time trying to disprove a negative". (virtually impossible) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,159 Posted March 5, 2017 Been too gorgeous to mess with this shiit all day, and, I'm just bored with it already, but: General feeling I"m seeing from Congress (even Repubs) and Intel community is: "Sigh, great, now we have to waste time trying to disprove a negative". (virtually impossible) But all of this will finally lead to the leader the country truly needs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,686 Posted March 5, 2017 Gotta love Spicer's comment - "We will have no more comment on this further". Really? You throw a hand grenade in the fire - with absolutely no discernible proof - and you're too chickenshiit to at least take questions on the matter? I mean, honest to Gawd, what's to keep Trump's lunatic brain from requesting ANOTHER investigation as to whether Michelle Obama is a man, or vince Foster is still actually alive, etc? I mean, we've all put the dots together - he got this from Levin/Breitbart. - And even HE is backing off. IF I'm lead investigator, First up is Levin, 2nd - POTUS. If you make an allegation with no basis, it's usually up to you to substantiate it. Not just throw shiit out there and demand millions of dollars get wasted chasing down random bullshiit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,686 Posted March 6, 2017 Just saw Little Marco Rubio on the telescreen during a replay of MTP. I"m not even paying much attention and this is the second Republican on the Senate Intel Committee (who would have HAD to have seen a FISA request) to say basically "I dunno WTF he's talking about." I mean, it's one thing if it's Schumer, but these are two long standing Intel comm Republicans saying it. Rubio (in a political, professional way) basically threw the administration under the bus. He didn't call anybody a liar, he just said something like "We're not going to do a wiitchhunt on either side, we're looking for the facts - and if this becomes political in ANY way, I'm not signing off." I mean, if you a dog in this race and you hear from a couple different guys who are in a position to know, then you couple it with Levin backing off the basis for Trump's claim - and the Intel Community saying "WTF?" Imean, at a certain point, dontcha just say WTF? And now, while everybody is doing/saying THAT, TrumpCo runs and hides behind "no comment"? If this ends up being BS, I really hope the GOP leadership in Congress just smacks the shiit out of the guy. And if it's true? Well now, let's get Barry back up on The Hill. But the only one saying so - is Trump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,159 Posted March 6, 2017 Barry should slap him with a slander lawsuit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 824 Posted March 6, 2017 Read the Obama/Clapper/Comey denials and the wording. They are consistent with the thinking that the IC never bugged or tapped Trump or his campaign. But they may have tapped the lines of some Roosky Spies.....and if that resulted in Trump/his team on tape, well then... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,459 Posted March 6, 2017 Been too gorgeous to mess with this shiit all day, and, I'm just bored with it already, but: General feeling I"m seeing from Congress (even Repubs) and Intel community is: "Sigh, great, now we have to waste time trying to disprove a negative". (virtually impossible) Did that feeling come to you while cleaning your cats kitty litter? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 6, 2017 Barry should slap him with a slander lawsuit. I'd rather just see him slap him in the side of the face. Just pound the sh1t out of the guy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 6, 2017 I'd rather just see him slap him in the side of the face. Just pound the sh1t out of the guyBarry? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 6, 2017 Barry? You do realize that Trump is 75 lbs overweight, right? He'd last about 8 seconds of physical assertion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bandrus1 413 Posted March 6, 2017 https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,159 Posted March 6, 2017 You do realize that Trump is 75 lbs overweight, right? He'd last about 8 seconds of physical assertion To drobe that's fit and trim. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,686 Posted March 6, 2017 Read the Obama/Clapper/Comey denials and the wording. They are consistent with the thinking that the IC never bugged or tapped Trump or his campaign. But they may have tapped the lines of some Roosky Spies.....and if that resulted in Trump/his team on tape, well then... ...Which honestly, is what we went through with Flynn. 'Hey, if you're going to talk to a known Russian Operative electronically, you should probably KNOW you're going to end up on tape.' - Especially if you're taking a National Security job. Really, I'm thinking of pulling a Sessions - and recusing myself. Seems like not much can be done or said that hasn't already been - until the investigation is over. But by then, I'm guessing there will be half a dozen other ones. I mean, we still have the voter fraud investigation, The Ruskie vote swaying investigation, the Manfort investigation, ..... And, BTW? The North Koreans just apparently launched a missile or a shell or something. Fock, why not? We're so busy throwing poop at each other... The Europeans are a mess, maybe the Japs or the Canadians can act like the adult in the room for a while. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,961 Posted March 6, 2017 Maybe if Europe didn't open the floodgates to violent hordes of Muslims they wouldnt be such a mess. Take a look at Sweden and a few others. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,686 Posted March 6, 2017 Did that feeling come to you while cleaning your cats kitty litter? Guys like you seriously need to get some sort of a life. Do you keep like a bulletin board in your Mom's basement tracking the most minute shiit about other posters? Focking Creepy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 2,711 Posted March 6, 2017 Guys like you seriously need to get some sort of a life. Do you keep like a bulletin board in your Mom's basement tracking the most minute shiit about other posters? Focking Creepy. Irony. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,836 Posted March 6, 2017 Irony. Was thinking the same thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,593 Posted March 6, 2017 Obummer should have tapped his tax records, not his phone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,686 Posted March 6, 2017 Funny the timing of when reality shows up in various threads. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bandrus1 413 Posted March 6, 2017 Funny the timing of when reality shows up in various threads. That's the point Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 6, 2017 So the FBI is demanding the DOJ to refute Trump's lie. Time for Trump to put up or shut up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,979 Posted March 6, 2017 Trump is the erratic shoot-from-the-hip POTUS we've always needed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 6, 2017 MSM portrays this as 'evidence free' yet doesn't label the Russians hacking the election as such. What physical evidence has anyone produced Russia hacked other than Obama and his loyal folks claiming this? Was this possible illegal wiretapping the reason for the Russian claim? For the previous admin to have an out? Was it so assumed Hillary would win that this would never be found out? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 6, 2017 Speaking of peeling the onion layers back....we need another DNC staffer to take one for the team and leak emails about this. RIP Sean Rich Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bandrus1 413 Posted March 6, 2017 MSM portrays this as 'evidence free' yet doesn't label the Russians hacking the election as such. What physical evidence has anyone produced Russia hacked other than Obama and his loyal folks claiming this? Was this possible illegal wiretapping the reason for the Russian claim? For the previous admin to have an out? Was it so assumed Hillary would win that this would never be found out? Did you read my post above? The Russian issue is not evidence free Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 6, 2017 MSM portrays this as 'evidence free' yet doesn't label the Russians hacking the election as such. What physical evidence has anyone produced Russia hacked other than Obama and his loyal folks claiming this? Was this possible illegal wiretapping the reason for the Russian claim? For the previous admin to have an out? Was it so assumed Hillary would win that this would never be found out? There have now been six different Trump staffers who have met with Russian officials during the election. Coupled with Trump's absolute refusal to ever say anything negative about the mass murderer, Vladimir Putin. This is more than enough to warrant an investigation. Notice I said investigation and not charges filed? Trump stated as fact that Obama had Trump Tower wiretapped. With zero evidence. Nada. The FBI is simply telling the White House to produce something or refute the statement. This wasn't your typical Trump lie. This wasn't a birther accusation. This wasn't claiming 3 million fraudulent voters without a shred of proof. This wasn't claiming he had more electoral votes than anyone since Reagan. The country has learned to simply laugh at Trump for that kind of lie. This was a serious accusation and Trump needs to learn that he's not in third grade and making up tall tales just to get a reaction isn't going to cut it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,159 Posted March 6, 2017 Did you read my post above? The Russian issue is not evidence free Filthy read the POTUS tweets on the subject, he's as informed as he ever will be. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 6, 2017 MSM portrays this as 'evidence free' yet doesn't label the Russians hacking the election as such. What physical evidence has anyone produced Russia hacked other than Obama and his loyal folks claiming this? Was this possible illegal wiretapping the reason for the Russian claim? For the previous admin to have an out? Was it so assumed Hillary would win that this would never be found out? You are reaching bad here and still trying to deny Russian involvement. There is a ton of metadata...some of it has been shown already. But the OC isn't going to present info on an ongoing investigation. There was no illegal wiretapping...yet you assume so because Trump and Breitbart say so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 6, 2017 Still waiting on evidence of Russian hacking THE ELECTION and not just an assertion from some intelligence agency that just got busted wiretapping a Presidential candidate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 6, 2017 Still waiting on evidence of Russian hacking THE ELECTION and not just an assertion from some intelligence agency that just got busted wiretapping a Presidential candidate. Doubling down on the dumb. How do you manage day to day functions? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 6, 2017 You are reaching bad here and still trying to deny Russian involvement. There is a ton of metadata...some of it has been shown already. But the OC isn't going to present info on an ongoing investigation. There was no illegal wiretapping...yet you assume so because Trump and Breitbart say so. So you say ongoing investigation needs no proof......followed by a claim that Trump has no proof on an illegal wiretap. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted March 6, 2017 Doubling down on the dumb. How do you manage day to day functions? Where's the evidence meathead? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,734 Posted March 6, 2017 You people were here on a weekend arguing about this sh1t? Sad Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 6, 2017 So you say ongoing investigation needs no proof......followed by a claim that Trump has no proof on an illegal wiretap. Please tell me you're just pretending not to understand. I've always considered Flahawker to be the dumbest person I've ever interacted with, but unless you're purposely being obtuse, you might wrestle that title away from him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted March 6, 2017 Still waiting on evidence of Russian hacking THE ELECTION and not just an assertion from some intelligence agency that just got busted wiretapping a Presidential candidate. You are really struggling with facts yet again Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 6, 2017 You are really struggling with facts yet again I'm now convinced that he's just playing around. No one is that thick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites