Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Cdub100

Las Vegas Conspiracy Theory Thread

Recommended Posts

   And some idiots are desperate to call everything a hoax. You're trying too hard. Relax and let them investigate. You're going to die young with all your anger.

You just can't read can you? I've already said I NEVER call things a hoax. Moon landing faked? No it's real. Government covering up Area 51 and aliens? Nah. This? Yea the videos and story isn't adding up. You keep skipping over EVERYTHING that has been posted that would make a normal person go "well dam that's true. What's being covered up now?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You just can't read can you? I've already said I NEVER call things a hoax. Moon landing faked? No it's real. Government covering up Area 51 and aliens? Nah. This? Yea the videos and story isn't adding up. You keep skipping over EVERYTHING that has been posted that would make a normal person go "well dam that's true. What's being covered up now?"

  You've already concluded that there is no video of the guy. Why? Because they haven't shown it to YOU yet? The fourth floor 'flashes' have already proven to be nothing, since similar flashes appeared months before the shooting. You want so badly to believe there is something fishy going on that you've talked yourself into it. I don't really care what you believe. Nor do I care that people think we've never been on the moon. Or that fire can't melt steel. Or that Sandy Hook was a hoax. It makes zero difference to me and zero difference to reality. When a crime scene investigator steps up and claims the guy could not have acted alone or that he couldn't have possibly shot an automatic weapon for ten minutes off of a tripod, then I'll listen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

   You've already concluded that there is no video of the guy. Why? Because they haven't shown it to YOU yet? The fourth floor 'flashes' have already proven to be nothing, since similar flashes appeared months before the shooting. You want so badly to believe there is something fishy going on that you've talked yourself into it. I don't really care what you believe. Nor do I care that people think we've never been on the moon. Or that fire can't melt steel. Or that Sandy Hook was a hoax. It makes zero difference to me and zero difference to reality. When a crime scene investigator steps up and claims the guy could not have acted alone or that he couldn't have possibly shot an automatic weapon for ten minutes off of a tripod, then I'll listen.

Link to when I claimed any of that? I've said countless time I don't believe 9/11 was an inside job. I literally dispute EVERY conspiracy theory (well maybe except for Kennedys assassination). But there's too many holes in this one, too many eyewitness accounts, and too much inconsistency for it. When you've fired this type of weapon before you know a few things. Such as that place is going to be full of smoke. The gun with have probably jammed with as many times as he fired it for that length of time without stopping for the muzzle to cool down. YOU just want it to be true because you support the act of killing republicans (just like the president now am I right ;) )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey look, another little girl ripping off a full mag off-hand and miraculously living to tell about it!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQA8dwMl90I

:doh: that's an AR-15. Not a 240. Completely different gun.

 

This is what they reported him using

 

 

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4e/M240Bapril2004iraq.jpg/220px-M240Bapril2004iraq.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You just can't read can you? I've already said I NEVER call things a hoax. Moon landing faked? No it's real. Government covering up Area 51 and aliens? Nah. This? Yea the videos and story isn't adding up. You keep skipping over EVERYTHING that has been posted that would make a normal person go "well dam that's true. What's being covered up now?"

For real. People are acting like we are grasping at straws or desperately trying to find a story where there is none. I dont give a flying flip, I took the story at face value until blatant inconsistencies showed up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For real. People are acting like we are grasping at straws or desperately trying to find a story where there is none. I dont give a flying flip, I took the story at face value until blatant inconsistencies showed up.

Same here. Laughed when they said it was a conspiracy. Til multiple things came out and started adding up. Along with the way democrats were acting. Instead of offering condolences they immediately jumped into gun control. You got news network execs saying they don't care and brought them on themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Who is reporting that?

Ah hell I don't remember and don't have it right off hand but that's what I had read. I'm too lazy right now to go back and find it. But I wouldn't say it just to pull something out of my ass

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Ah hell I don't remember and don't have it right off hand but that's what I had read. I'm too lazy right now to go back and find it. But I wouldn't say it just to pull something out of my ass

I have seen speculation along those lines, but the stuff I saw from the ATF only mentioned up to 12 guns with bumpfire setups and nothing about a full auto.

 

Snyder revealed on Tuesday that Paddock rigged 12 semi-automatic rifles with bump-fire stocks, or "bump stocks," devices which allowed the guns to fire continuously -- much like a automatic weapon.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/las-vegas-shooting-why-stephen-paddock-gun-purchases-didnt-raise-red-flags/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I have seen speculation along those lines, but the stuff I saw from the ATF only mentioned up to 12 guns with bumpfire setups and nothing about a full auto.

 

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/las-vegas-shooting-why-stephen-paddock-gun-purchases-didnt-raise-red-flags/

I saw that and also saw an article where they said the main one being used was a 240 which would make more sense for its belt fed and automatic tendencies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly. 3600 rounds fired and only dozens of shells laying around. Pretty much game set match right here to anyone who knows anything about ballistics.

 

Its proven there were multiple shooters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I haven't checked all of this because I'm tired from work and working out so I'm about to pass out. I'll check it all out in the morning at work but here is something I found VERY interesting. Tell me what your thoughts on this are

 

 

 

https://www.facebook.com/alika.spahnnaihe.9/posts/2028086957414811

 

 

jeez that all sounds legit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

  

 

not a good add, chick was 25 feet away and didn't even hit the target once

 

fawking hot!!!! Look at her jiggle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Exactly. 3600 rounds fired and only dozens of shells laying around. Pretty much game set match right here to anyone who knows anything about ballistics.

 

Its proven there were multiple shooters.

 

LOL. How fawking stupid. You morons, you're not seeing the area of the suite where he fired at the concert area. You are seeing the area of the suite where he unloaded at the SWAT team that was coming in, hence his dead body next to those shells.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Where are these videos then? To be sure they would have shown them by now right? I haven't seen them. There's been no "we have video evidence of him in the casino carrying huge duffle bags". For a guy who "loved to gamble a lot" why was there no videos of him in a casino where he likes to gamble? He carried 800 pounds of ammo and guns up 30 stories (even in duffle bags it would be heavy and be a big duffle bag). He was able to remove an 800 pound hurricane proof window, set up a concealed sniper nest, disable fire alarms, set up cameras outside his room, then shoot almost continuously for 10 minutes with no training at all? Even trained professionals have a hard time firing for that long, that continuously WITH training. And with a 240 that is reported he used? I doubt that. Something is wrong with this picture.

 

 

It's an active investigation. There might very well be video of him but they're not releasing it to the public.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like the autopsies, as well as the Bulletholes that didnt hit anyone, would easily establish where they came from.

 

4th floor vs. 37th floor would be pretty easily noticeable angle difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This guy has got to be stick. I wrote Mandalay cuz that's the name of the f****** place. And we've covered this about a thousand times. I really think this guy is just pure stick. You don't just wander onto a board and become top poster the first day. Like I said, I guess he thinks it's clever. Personally I think hiding behind an alias it's just plain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like the autopsies, as well as the Bulletholes that didnt hit anyone, would easily establish where they came from.

 

4th floor vs. 37th floor would be pretty easily noticeable angle difference.

We wont hear about that because the story of multiple gunman cant be sold as well as the lone psycho. With the reported story, it happened, we got him, we won. In the real story theres questions, perps on the loose and a trail that people dont want followed. Thats a no no. Hence we will keep hearing what the news feeds us while weapons and ballistics experts laugh at how huge the holes in the story are.

 

He fired 3k rounds yet they only found dozens on the ground in the hotel room. Yea no red flags there, whats next on fox? Ooh family guy! Love that stewie!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This guy has got to be stick. I wrote Mandalay cuz that's the name of the f****** place. And we've covered this about a thousand times. I really think this guy is just pure stick. You don't just wander onto a board and become top poster the first day. Like I said, I guess he thinks it's clever. Personally I think hiding behind an alias it's just plain ######

 

 

Mensa's not an alias. He runs a successful business, has friends that are/were Green Bay Packer players, and has a high IQ. He used to post on the Geek bored all the time, left because got sick of the negativity, and posted on the main bored since until recently posted about topics important to him found here at the Geek club.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We wont hear about that because the story of multiple gunman cant be sold as well as the lone psycho. With the reported story, it happened, we got him, we won. In the real story theres questions, perps on the loose and a trail that people dont want followed. Thats a no no. Hence we will keep hearing what the news feeds us while weapons and ballistics experts laugh at how huge the holes in the story are.

 

He fired 3k rounds yet they only found dozens on the ground in the hotel room. Yea no red flags there, whats next on fox? Ooh family guy! Love that stewie!

Do you have a link to proof they only found dozens of shells in the hotel room?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

  

 

Mensa's not an alias. He runs a successful business, has friends that are/were Green Bay Packer players, and has a high IQ. He used to post on the Geek bored all the time, left because got sick of the negativity, and posted on the main bored since until recently posted about topics important to him found here at the Geek club.

 

 

...and the last thread you introduced 2 months ago was Breitbart clickbait praising that freakshow Miller from the Trump administration.

 

Yeah, seems legit. LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This guy has got to be stick. I wrote Mandalay cuz that's the name of the f****** place. And we've covered this about a thousand times. I really think this guy is just pure stick. You don't just wander onto a board and become top poster the first day. Like I said, I guess he thinks it's clever. Personally I think hiding behind an alias it's just plain ######

You thought you had figured it out. You said (Mandalay - 'nuff said).

 

What did you mean by that?

 

Also: Gepetto has a helluva memory. There were plenty of pics posted of me and my life, wiffleball. He's correct; you're not, and you're going to have to get over it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We wont hear about that because the story of multiple gunman cant be sold as well as the lone psycho. With the reported story, it happened, we got him, we won. In the real story theres questions, perps on the loose and a trail that people dont want followed. Thats a no no. Hence we will keep hearing what the news feeds us while weapons and ballistics experts laugh at how huge the holes in the story are.

 

He fired 3k rounds yet they only found dozens on the ground in the hotel room. Yea no red flags there, whats next on fox? Ooh family guy! Love that stewie!

Wow...you don't understand the media at ALL do you. Do you think, if there MIGHT be a second gunnan on the loose, or involved, the media wouldn't jump ALL OVER THAT MOTHER for ratings??? Every scared Mother in America would be tuning into CNN. It would be an absolute ratings bonanza. Remember the Boston Marathon bombing? Remember the absurd amount of coverage while they were looking for the second suspect?

 

Spout your conspiracy theories all you want, but your belief of how the media would react is absolutely false.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You thought you had figured it out. You said (Mandalay - 'nuff said).

 

What did you mean by that?

 

Also: Gepetto has a helluva memory. There were plenty of pics posted of me and my life, wiffleball. He's correct; you're not, and you're going to have to get over it.

That's the name of the place dumbass. Covered repeatedly.

 

Alia1 backs a2 backing of a1. Classic. 😂

 

 

Soon to be ignored. God you're worthless...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the name of the place dumbass. Covered repeatedly.

 

Alia1 backs a2 backing of a1. Classic.

 

 

Soon to be ignored. God you're worthless...

 

Now Gapetto and Mensa are aliases..

 

:clap: :clap:

 

You are such a focking tool.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly. 3600 rounds fired and only dozens of shells laying around. Pretty much game set match right here to anyone who knows anything about ballistics.

Its proven there were multiple shooters.

Proven is still too strong a word, but the points made there are more than reason enough to scratch the itch which was my suspicious nature about this incident right out of the gate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heard on the news this morning that they have not ruled out the possibilty that there was an accomplice.

To help him with the planning and getting the all the weapons/ammo to the room is what I heard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the name of the place dumbass. Covered repeatedly.

Alia1 backs a2 backing of a1. Classic.

Soon to be ignored. God you're worthless...

No one. I mean NO one finds that believable. You said you "thought (you) had it all figured out. Mandalay ('nuff said)" is what you said.

 

You didn't say that because it was simply the name of the place. You said it because of the reputation of the place.

 

And now you're hilariously denying that was the reason you wrote what you did? That's laughable.

 

What's even better about all of this is how you're launching your own deluded conspiracy about aliases while scoffing at the conspiracy which is the subject of this thread.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is all a psyop, this is a smooth transition to an 'accomplice', considering how easy it would be for agencies to monitor internet chatter and determine if their story is going over or not.

 

If it's not, this 'accomplice' angle provides a ton of cover. Of course, tangled webs ensue...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow...you don't understand the media at ALL do you. Do you think, if there MIGHT be a second gunnan on the loose, or involved, the media wouldn't jump ALL OVER THAT MOTHER for ratings??? Every scared Mother in America would be tuning into CNN. It would be an absolute ratings bonanza. Remember the Boston Marathon bombing? Remember the absurd amount of coverage while they were looking for the second suspect?

 

Spout your conspiracy theories all you want, but your belief of how the media would react is absolutely false.

 

I'll just chime in here. You assume that the media values ratings over narrative.

 

If that were true, they wouldn't be consistently slipping in the ratings.

 

If - again - if this really is a false flag event designed for totalitarian purposes, the 'second gunman' story will make it to mainstream news when and if the perpetrators decide that too much damage has been done to the credibility of their first story.

 

Right now, there is quite a bit of traction causing questions. Good questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not ruling out the Muslim angle.

Me either. Logic would dictate it's a strong consideration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heard on the news this morning that they have not ruled out the possibilty that there was an accomplice.

According to tantastic, thats unpossible. The media has already decided the case. Wrapped up, let's go home.

 

I believe you may have heard this, but CLEARLY not from the media.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not ruling out the Muslim angle.

Nor should you. ISIS took credit - they have an M.O. of doing that without actually being involved. But then the FBI said it was untrue? While admitting that they hadn't even checked Pollack's PCs or phone for associations?

 

The response by the FBI - the instant and assertive response the ISIS had nothing to do with this - was odd, considering that they, in their next sentence, said that "they will be analyzing any correspondences and data they find in Paddock's personal tech".

 

So I wondered immediately: how in hell - why in hell - would the FBI immediately deny ISIS involvement if in the next breath they admit that they would have no idea, as they hadn't perused Paddock's associations?

 

Suspicious. Particularly for one who already is cynical about this incident with which to begin.

 

What would fit into conspiracy theories? If the FBI is involved in this psyop - and I see no reason why they wouldn't have Deep State members within their structure if any of these musings are correct - they would already know what happened here, and a statement in advance of 'facts' would be a slip such people could possibly make. If the conspiracy has legs, of course ISIS wasn't involved: they did it. And they'd want to protect the narrative being broadcast, which is to further break down the resolve of Americans to possess weapons of enough power to be imposing to enemies.

 

This incident affords a chance at another phase in the very long effort to separate us from the purpose of the 2nd Amendment: attacking 'kits' and attacking 'semi-auto' weaponry. Having ISIS to blame for this attack wouldn't do at all, as it doesn't divide Americans against themselves.

 

Such a thing would unify, including our right to keep and bear arms of the type involved in this attack.

 

No, that wouldn't do at all. Hence: immediate denial, even if doing so is stupid, and raises questions of credibility with those paying close enough attention.

 

If we're being played, we're being played by people who are powerful, but aren't necessarily all incredibly bright. They certainly cannot pull off such a complicated and big scam without having holes; without making missteps and misstatements.

 

A savvy public doesn't fall for such things. A drugged public, though, might. An uneducated public certainly does. This is what 'Bread and Circuses' has always been about. Nazis were masters of propaganda. Communists were as well, but to a lesser degree.

 

I post because even those who try to ridicule assist in having others pay more attention. One cannot react to defend against an enemy if one is not aware of the existence of the enemy.

 

It's important not to trust Government, particularly one which has gotten so big and powerful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×