Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 2, 2018 Multiple people signed off in the initial and renewals of this FISA warrant. There appears to be no illegal issue in what was done even if this memo is 100% truthful (which is not likely given its being disputed by Schiff who has seen the underlyzing documentation) Have a link to McCabes own words? The claim in the memo is being disputed. No FISA no Russia Investigation? Your own little memo here refutes that claim. This FISA was after Oage was even part of the campaign. The memo states it was Papa that initiated the investigation not this FISA warrant and Page. Sessions has turned what over to the IG? The IG appears to be focusing only on the Weiner laptop and timing. Im going to bet that also wont go well for you. Since you claimed you missed it. Try again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted February 2, 2018 Do you believe the underlying documentation will be released? I doubt they want McCabes testimony out either. The text messages have already been torn apart...but that was by that liberal rag WSJ. Yes it will. McCabes testimony will be released too. Both the underlying docs and McCabes testimony will destroy the MSM and desperate shills yet again. The text messages got 3 people demoted or fired. lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 2, 2018 I fall back on my previous assertion there should be a criminal reference IMMEDIATELY and use the RICO statute. This isn't about Dem or Repub.....this is about preserving our liberties. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 2, 2018 Should have stopped right here. A 4th Amendment nerd doesn't care about abuse of the FISA system used to spy on American citicizens. Skimmed the rest and she compares a bunch of federal cases, yet none of the have anything to do with the FISA courts. Nice try Slo. At least you made the effort to provide a link this time. Court cases have a lot to do with legal authority. Very little to know what happens in a FISA court and for good reason. But thenpounts made are well done and counters much of what you all keep arguing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 2, 2018 Yes it will. McCabes testimony will be released too. Both the underlying docs and McCabes testimony will destroy the MSM and desperate shills yet again. The text messages got 3 people demoted or fired. lol The underlying documents are classified...Nunes didnt wven take the time to review them. Schiff did. Gowdy too and you saw his words today...not too clowning and then defended Mueller more. I think you will be wrong in what the transcript will show. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted February 2, 2018 Court cases have a lot to do with legal authority. Very little to know what happens in a FISA court and for good reason. But thenpounts made are well done and counters much of what you all keep arguing. If you don't understand the difference between the FISA courts and every other court in America then you are dumber than HF. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted February 2, 2018 The underlying documents are classified...Nunes didnt wven take the time to review them. Schiff did. Gowdy too and you saw his words today...not too clowning and then defended Mueller more. I think you will be wrong in what the transcript will show. Nunes didn't review them? Okay. You are either 100% troll or 100% autistic. Either way, adios for now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 2, 2018 If you don't understand the difference between the FISA courts and every other court in America then you are dumber than HF. Do you understand the FISA court? No...yiu know nothing about them. HF = Henry Ford? Yeah...very smart guy...guessing he whipped you up pretty good before you were banned..just another reason you are afraid to reveal your fbg identity. I already have one guess. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 2, 2018 James Comey signed a fisa warrent using the same dossier he publicly called salacious and unverified. This cannot be argued. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 6,030 Posted February 2, 2018 James Comey signed a fisa warrent using the same dossier he publicly called salacious and unverified. This cannot be argued. Have you met Slo Tard? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 2, 2018 James Comey signed a fisa warrent using the same dossier he publicly called salacious and unverified. This cannot be argued. Drobs just donkey punched the left. Oof Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 2, 2018 I hear Comey is going on a double date soon. He's going to be introduced to some chick named Miranda and later some guy named Bubba. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 2, 2018 Nunes didn't review them? Okay. You are either 100% troll or 100% autistic. Either way, adios for now. As shown by the DOJ letter to him...link already been posted before but here you go again. https://www.google.com/amp/thehill.com/homenews/administration/370614-doj-official-tells-nunes-itd-be-reckless-to-release-memo-without%3Famp Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 2, 2018 James Comey signed a fisa warrent using the same dossier he publicly called salacious and unverified. This cannot be argued. Its actually can be...do you have evidence that his warrant was signed using thendossier(that cold be highly inaccurate) Could he have signed it kno one there were verified parts of the dossier used? Do you understand the difference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 2, 2018 Have you met Slo Tard? If you want to claim to ignore me...I suggest you stop with the childish nicknames. It only makes you look foolish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 2, 2018 Gotta love how these fockers thought they were so slick. Feeding FISA judge same info from 'two sources' that were the same unverified Dossier. Was the Yahoo story paid for by Fusion GPS? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted February 2, 2018 James Comey signed a fisa warrent using the same dossier he publicly called salacious and unverified. This cannot be argued. Its actually can be...do you have evidence that his warrant was signed using thendossier(that cold be highly inaccurate) Could he have signed it kno one there were verified parts of the dossier used? Do you understand the difference. Sho is batshite crazy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 2, 2018 Multiple people signed off in the initial and renewals of this FISA warrant. There appears to be no illegal issue in what was done even if this memo is 100% truthful (which is not likely given its being disputed by Schiff who has seen the underlyzing documentation) Have a link to McCabes own words? The claim in the memo is being disputed. No FISA no Russia Investigation? Your own little memo here refutes that claim. This FISA was after Oage was even part of the campaign. The memo states it was Papa that initiated the investigation not this FISA warrant and Page. Sessions has turned what over to the IG? The IG appears to be focusing only on the Weiner laptop and timing. Im going to bet that also wont go well for you. Bump for you again Filthy...direct questions of your post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 2, 2018 Its actually can be...do you have evidence that his warrant was signed using thendossier(that cold be highly inaccurate) Could he have signed it kno one there were verified parts of the dossier used? Do you understand the difference. McCabe's own words....'wouldn't have sought FISA without the Dossier'. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 2, 2018 Bump for you again Filthy...direct questions of your post. I don't have the supporting transcript of McCabe's words. Hopefully they'll release supporting info. As far as Sessions goes, I heard that on talk radio. I'll retract that for now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,711 Posted February 2, 2018 No...I am asking you to show you understood thememo and that which you just quoted (from the Washington examiner...haha). You appear to not want to actually discuss what you post. Do you have anything of substance to add? Any answers to those questions? I laugh at your name...its foolish and childish and you think me asking you questions means something in regards to the name...thats in you for being ignorant. Now how about and try just once to answer questions of items you found important enough to quote and show you have a grasp of the topic. I choose not to argue with stupid people, they will only drag you down to their level. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 3, 2018 Nunes didn't review them? Okay. You are either 100% troll or 100% autistic. Either way, adios for now. Oops...Nunes may have admitted it. https://twitter.com/juddzeez/status/959564674424627200 Care to revise your post? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 3, 2018 McCabe's own words....'wouldn't have sought FISA without the Dossier'.As asked in the earlier questions you dodged ? How do you know those are his own words?They have been disputed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 3, 2018 I don't have the supporting transcript of McCabe's words. Hopefully they'll release supporting info. As far as Sessions goes, I heard that on talk radio. I'll retract that for now. So what we have is Devin Nunes recollection of it and nothing more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 3, 2018 I choose not to argue with stupid people, they will only drag you down to their level.Good thing...you are already below my level.What you are doing is refusing to back up your posts with any opinion of your own. Sad....but pretty much all you ever do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 3, 2018 As asked in the earlier questions you dodged ? How do you know those are his own words? They have been disputed. By those that didn't want us to see ANY of this. They'd dispute ANYTHING at this point after all, why not? They're busted and they're trying to muddy the waters. You come up with a valid reason for all the demotions and firings in the FBI/DOJ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 3, 2018 So what we have is Devin Nunes recollection of it and nothing more. Devin and the majority of the HIC. Less than half of HIC dispute it. What were the names the Dems wanted redacted from the memo? Why? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted February 3, 2018 In honor of Memo Night, this unfinished masterpiece: 'Twas the night before memo, when all through the House Not a creature was stirring, not even a louse; The stories were prepped for the press with great care, In hopes that the cameras soon would be there; Congressmen nestled all snug in their beds; While visions of prostitutes danced in their heads; And Trump on his Twitter, and I on my app, Had just settled our brains for tomorrows big scrap, When on CNN there arose such a clatter, I sprang from my couch to see what was the matter. Away to the laptop I flew like a flash, Tore open the screen and prepared for the clash. Wolf Blitzer was shouting about breaking news, And wild Jim Acosta was shouting Jaccuse! And then to my wondering eyes did appear, One Devin Nunes and his four-page premiere. With some members of Congress so lively and quick, I knew in a moment theyd all make me sick. More rapid than eagles they ran to name names, While Schiff shouted out that he had counterclaims. Now, Comey! Now, Rosenstein! Now Strzuck and Page! On McCabe! On Mueller! Our sources of rage! To the top of the jail! To the top of Trumps wall! Now go away, go away, go away all! https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/959280429944643584.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 2,027 Posted February 3, 2018 What is ShoNuff's end game? Why is he so invested in denying the truth? Why is he the only one defending the guilty? Does he not love America? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 3, 2018 By those that didn't want us to see ANY of this. They'd dispute ANYTHING at this point after all, why not? They're busted and they're trying to muddy the waters. You come up with a valid reason for all the demotions and firings in the FBI/DOJ? So bringing other stuff up now to muddy the waters of the discussion. No thanks. Still waiting for an answer about your own post earlier. No FISA no Russia Investigation? Your own little memo here refutes that claim. This FISA was after Oage was even part of the campaign. The memo states it was Papa that initiated the investigation not this FISA warrant and Page. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
giraldi02 476 Posted February 3, 2018 I love how much these Trump defenders are on tilt that their little memo didn't go their way. Seriously. Keep this thread going. It's the best entertainment I've seen in years. This is even funnier than those that thought Hillary was gonna win. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 3, 2018 Devin and the majority of the HIC. Less than half of HIC dispute it. What were the names the Dems wanted redacted from the memo? Why? No...we have no assurance from the rest of the HIC in those being McCabes words...right now this is only in Nunes. This is his memo. His thoughts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 3, 2018 What is ShoNuff's end game? Why is he so invested in denying the truth? Why is he the only one defending the guilty? Does he not love America? My end game is the actual Truth...because I do love this country. I have not denied any actual proven truth. So quit with the attempted insult about hating this country. Its weak. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 2,027 Posted February 3, 2018 My end game is the actual Truth...because I do love this country. I have not denied any actual proven truth. So quit with the attempted insult about hating this country. Its weak. So you support prosecuting Hillary for her crimes? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 3, 2018 So bringing other stuff up now to muddy the waters of the discussion. No thanks. Still waiting for an answer about your own post earlier. No FISA no Russia Investigation? Your own little memo here refutes that claim. This FISA was after Oage was even part of the campaign. The memo states it was Papa that initiated the investigation not this FISA warrant and Page. it didnt ? What planet are you from ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 3, 2018 So you support prosecuting Hillary for her crimes? If found to have committed crimes...yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 16,007 Posted February 3, 2018 I love how much these Trump defenders are on tilt that their little memo didn't go their way. Seriously. Keep this thread going. It's the best entertainment I've seen in years. This is even funnier than those that thought Hillary was gonna win. You're going to have to do better to get the attention you want so bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 2,027 Posted February 3, 2018 If found to have committed crimes...yes. Now that her people aren't running the FBI and DOJ, she should be investigated and prosecuted. She is guilty as fock, and needs to pay the piper. And to be fair, if the Donald is guilty of anything, lock his ass up too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 3, 2018 it didnt ? What planet are you from ? Your question is unclear. What didn't? What are you referring to. For reference...Im disputing Filthys earlier post. No Dossier = No FISA (McCabe's own words) No FISA = No Russia investigation No Russia Investigation = No Special Counsel Those were his words. In McCabes words we have a disagreement as both sides claim different about what was said. This may be cleared up if the transcript is released. However, No FISA = No Russia Investigation appears to not be accurate. Pages warrant in question was late October 2016, correct? After he had left the campaign and after the Papadapolous info (as this memo even states...this memo refuted the claim that no warrant = no Russian investigation). The dossier isnt what initiated the investigation nor Mueller. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted February 3, 2018 Thats it? Kinda weak, especially for a one-sided bullsh1t hatchet job Share this post Link to post Share on other sites