Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Cdub100

Release the FISA memo

Recommended Posts

Trump?

Odd...the whole memo was about a warrant on Carter Page that began late in October after he left the Trump campaign.

So...that premise is flawed based on this memo even in its current and likely inaccurate form.

then they can get rid of mueller right? Since page hasnt been charged with anything.

Surely you'd be fine with that since none of their dirty tricks had anything to do with trump. Why is mueller there at all ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

then they can get rid of mueller right? Since page hasnt been charged with anything.

Surely you'd be fine with that since none of their dirty tricks had anything to do with trump. Why is mueller there at all ?

Ok...now you are moving on to something else.

1st. I guess this is your admission that the FISA warrant was not going after a political opponent.

Now...onto your new claims about Mueller. Since Page hasnt been charged with anything...why would that affect Mueller. We had this conversation earlier, no? Do we need to rehash that this Memo even states Page and this warrant did not initiate Muellers investigation.

Papadapolous fun did that. What I stated was this warrant in the memo that you claim was based I. Dirty tricks was about Carter Oage who was ta member of the campaign at the time.

Muellers investigation isnt based in the dossier or the Page warrant.

You are being intellectually dishonest here to argue. Or are you that foolish?

Mueller is there investigating Russias involvement in our election and possible connection to the Trump campaign.

Ive also posted how even Trey Gowdy states this doesnt affect the Mueller investigation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And Carter Page, menace to society, threat to the homeland, consorter with the enemy, is out there walking around right now. Can't some brave FBI agent bring in this supervillain?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we can send Seal Team 6 to corral Carter Page?. He must be very dangerous to have escaped our nations finest law enforcement agency all this time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe we can send Seal Team 6 to corral Carter Page?. He must be very dangerous to have escaped our nations finest law enforcement agency all this time.

that comey what a brave hero, he saved us from that super duper double agent spy :shocking:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that comey what a brave hero, he saved us from that super duper double agent spy :shocking:

It's such a transparent joke. Its just like everything involving the Clintons, some innocent person will be destroyed so they can walk free. How can anyone defend any of this and not wonder what became of this Page investigation that was so important that they went back twice for warrants? What did they find on him when they surveiled him? But not one of the people here defending the FBI have asked that simple, fundamental question. Because they fockin know. They know it was all BS, but they are ok with it because it's Trump.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Himes disputing the memo as well. Especially pertinent in this is directly stating the memo misrepresented thecCabe testimony and pointing out that gettingbthe warrant renewal multiple times would indicate surveillance was producing significant new information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's such a transparent joke. Its just like everything involving the Clintons, some innocent person will be destroyed so they can walk free. How can anyone defend any of this and not wonder what became of this Page investigation that was so important that they went back twice for warrants? What did they find on him when they surveiled him? But not one of the people here defending the FBI have asked that simple, fundamental question. Because they fockin know. They know it was all BS, but they are ok with it because it's Trump.

nailed it, its far from over though. Rosenstien gone next then Mueller

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

666-

 

The mark of the devil.

 

The number of points the Dow dropped today. The same day of the memo was released.

 

The address of the building that is sparking so much collusion between the Trump's and the Russians.

 

Number of days since Trump announced his candidacy.

 

Nuff said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What proof?

Nunes didnt read the evidence...you are struggling with the actually facts again.

And what fake rumor started those things btw?

 

You keep repeating this as if it is some sort of gotcha.

 

Do you know the rules for reading the FISA applications?

 

2 people can see it. That is it.

 

Schiff went on behalf of the minority. Gowdy went on the behalf of the majority.

 

Pretty smart for Nunes to send someone with Gowdy's experience (as a solicitor and US Attorney) to review the FISA applications. Probably a more keen eye than a farm boy for that type of job.

 

 

Left: Oh Noez! Nunes wrote the memo himself, no collaboration!

 

memo is released

 

Left: Oh Noez! Nunes didn't even see the underlying documents!

 

 

Don't ever stop.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nailed it, its far from over though. Rosenstien gone next then Mueller

So you think a judge granted multiple warrants on a guy that was completely innocent of everything?

 

You are certifiably nuts...both of you.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You keep repeating this as if it is some sort of gotcha.

 

Do you know the rules for reading the FISA applications?

 

2 people can see it. That is it.

 

Schiff went on behalf of the minority. Gowdy went on the behalf of the majority.

 

Pretty smart for Nunes to send someone with Gowdy's experience (as a solicitor and US Attorney) to review the FISA applications. Probably a more keen eye than a farm boy for that type of job.

 

 

Left: Oh Noez! Nunes wrote the memo himself, no collaboration!

 

memo is released

 

Left: Oh Noez! Nunes didn't even see the underlying documents!

 

 

Don't ever stop.

So youve moved in from

Claiming I was incorrect?

Now your claim is fisa means only two people see it.

How long should I let that stew before busting you up some more?

Its a gotcha as you called me out as being wrong multiple times...you cant even admit the obvious that I was correct.

 

On to your next bogus theory kiddo...this one didnt work out for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you think a judge granted multiple warrants on a guy that was completely innocent of everything?

 

You are certifiably nuts...both of you.

Great. Where the fock are the indictments? This warrant is expired, has been for a while now. Where's the beef?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You keep repeating this as if it is some sort of gotcha.

 

Do you know the rules for reading the FISA applications?

 

2 people can see it. That is it.

 

Schiff went on behalf of the minority. Gowdy went on the behalf of the majority.

 

Pretty smart for Nunes to send someone with Gowdy's experience (as a solicitor and US Attorney) to review the FISA applications. Probably a more keen eye than a farm boy for that type of job.

 

 

Left: Oh Noez! Nunes wrote the memo himself, no collaboration!

 

memo is released

 

Left: Oh Noez! Nunes didn't even see the underlying documents!

 

 

Don't ever stop.

Even highbrow PBS was touting this "he didn't read it " BS claim. David Brooks, an alleged conservative. They either don't know or don't want to know at this point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you think a judge granted multiple warrants on a guy that was completely innocent of everything?

 

You are certifiably nuts...both of you.

 

Yes. Because they were fed bullshit info to grant the warrants.

 

This is why they are shitting their pants.

 

This is why Flynn's judge, who was also on the FISA courts, was recused.

 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/31/why-was-judge-recused-muellerflynn-case/

 

“I learned over the weekend that he (Contreras) did not recuse himself. He was removed from the case. Now the question for any good reporter at the Washington Post - the alternative universe in DC - is ‘why was Judge Contreras removed from the case by either the Chief Judge or the DC Circuit?’ Have you seen a story written about that? Isn’t it interesting how people in the press are not interested why the one judge who has taken a guilty plea in this case was removed from the case?”

The timing of the recusal is curious, to say the least, especially in light of some of the tidbits that have slipped out recently over the contents of the FISA memo compiled by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee.

Contreras sits on the FISA court. He was assigned to that court in May 2016, months before the FISA warrant was granted to the FBI to spy on members of the Trump campaign and the Trump transition.

It is believed that this surveillance contributed to the evidence that compelled Flynn to enter a plea for making misleading statements to federal investigators. Contreras accepted that plea as the presiding judge of the Mueller/Flynn case on December 2nd. Five days later, Contreras was recused from the case in which he had just accepted a plea.

What changed between December 2nd and December 7th? How could a conflict arise in those five days that had not existed prior to the plea deal?
Was Contreras the presiding judge who granted the FISA warrant that led to the Flynn plea? Was he the judge who accepted the Russian dossier (created by Christopher Steele while in the employ of the Clinton campaign) as objective and credible evidence justifying a FISA surveillance against Flynn and others in Trumpland during a hotly contested presidential campaign?
If so, does this taint the evidence and the circumstances that led Flynn to accept a guilty plea while being squeezed by Special Counsel Mueller’s team?
The court isn’t saying. They announced the recusal with no further statement or explanation. But now that we know what we know regarding the dossier and the FISA warrant, these questions deserve an answer.

 

I am not really posting this for you sho, you wouldn't be able to grasp this kind of stuff. I am posting it for the others here so they can see clearly what is going on.

 

Prediction: Flynn walks.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They wouldn't even accept the fact that Trump tower was being surveilled, which we now know that it was. They have refused to accept anything as truth in this since the beginning. They know if they do accept some truths the thread unravels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brett Baier interview with Devin Nunes. Answers all the objections from the FAKE NEWS brigade and liberal internet warriors. Bottom line, this was phase 1, a lot more to come out. You know you are on target when the left and media are screaming from all sides. (and cucks like McCain and Comey).

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://lawfareblog.com/dubious-legal-claim-behind-releasethememo

Read up Filthy

 

And why ignore the rest of the questions posed to you?

 

 

Gregg Jarrett (lawyer) remarks lying to Federal Judge is a violation of 18 USC 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law. Abuse of power..................Felonies committed by multiple govt officials.

 

I love how much these Trump defenders are on tilt that their little memo didn't go their way.

 

 

I used to respect your opinion and your objective view. Now you're just another hack on the left side of things. :thumbsdown:

 

Read page two of the letter from Boyd. It most certainly does say as I have asserted.

 

Or you can see the recent FoxNews story where he admits it.

 

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/02/nunes-tells-fox-news-memo-was-released-out-public-obligation.html

 

Gowdy and Schiff only

 

Care to admit you were wrong yet?

 

DOJ only permitted one each from the Majority (Gowdy) and Minority (Schiff). BY DESIGN.

 

Nunes played this perfectly and sent Gowdy up there whose regarded as the premier attorney in Congress. Gowdy AND Nunes authored the Memo.

 

So the Memo is wholly based on the supporting material.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 



This is far from over.

https://mobile.twitter.com/fkm63chevy/status/959628944277467136

All the way up to barry, focking rotten treasonous scumbags


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVFJNewX0AAL9zp?format=jpg&name=orig

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Tower


Same address as Trump Tower..................so there's the evidence Trump Tower ITSELF was being wiretapped, NOT just Carter Page.

Was Trump Tower a Russian Agent? :doh:

 

 

ETA: JFC.................read #1 a couple times on that application. "On 28 August 2016 GCHQ/CSO filed for permission to execute Project FULSOME at the request of the US President, seeking intelligence gathering into the Trump Organization and Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., both located at 725 5th Avenue, New York, NY, USA. Activities include foreign and U.S. domestic signals collection, in regards to communication with Russian hostile actors."

 

 

So the GCHQ WAS INDEED involved and Obama ordered it (wiretapping) of not only foreign but DOMESTIC signals.

 

That's a wrap folks.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats it? :dunno:

 

Kinda weak, especially for a one-sided bullsh1t hatchet job

I always wanted to use the word nothingburger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Political Sabotage!

 

Collaborating with foreign spies to defeat a political opponent with manufactured information and lies. This is the type of corruption that brings a Republic down but of course that is the goal of the Left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, super spy Carter Page. When is he getting indicted?

I was wondering the same thing. It's almost as if he was never the real focus of the investigation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also Steele mentioned that the DNC had been infiltrated by agitators. These people would seem to be the key to legitimizing the entire dossier. Where are they?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Yes. Because they were fed bullshit info to grant the warrants.

 

This is why they are shitting their pants.

 

This is why Flynn's judge, who was also on the FISA courts, was recused.

 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/31/why-was-judge-recused-muellerflynn-case/

 

 

I am not really posting this for you sho, you wouldn't be able to grasp this kind of stuff. I am posting it for the others here so they can see clearly what is going on.

 

Prediction: Flynn walks.

 

Joe DiGenova? Que?

Good job...you bought into the ramblings of another conspiracy nut.

Fed BS? Again...for the renewal to occur they would have to show the surveillance was producing results.

 

You are a complete nutjob.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brett Baier interview with Devin Nunes. Answers all the objections from the FAKE NEWS brigade and liberal internet warriors. Bottom line, this was phase 1, a lot more to come out. You know you are on target when the left and media are screaming from all sides. (and cucks like McCain and Comey).

 

 

You mean the interview where he admits to not seeing anything...the admission that shows I was correct and you were full of shot earlier?

BTW...answers all objections by talking with the guy who made the inaccurate claims?

Holy crap you are in deep.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Gregg Jarrett (lawyer) remarks lying to Federal Judge is a violation of 18 USC 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law. Abuse of power..................Felonies committed by multiple govt officials.

 

What was the lie?

 

 

 

 

 

DOJ only permitted one each from the Majority (Gowdy) and Minority (Schiff). BY DESIGN.

 

Nunes played this perfectly and sent Gowdy up there whose regarded as the premier attorney in Congress. Gowdy AND Nunes authored the Memo.

 

So the Memo is wholly based on the supporting material.

Then why didnt Gowdy write the focking memo?

And Schiff who was actually involved reading the information (as a guy very busy and vocal about dealing with surveillance and abuses of the system)...he disagrees with Nunes version.

 

Nunes played it perfectly? Oof...you are blind enough to believe that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DVFJNewX0AAL9zp?format=jpg&name=orig

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Tower

 

 

Same address as Trump Tower..................so there's the evidence Trump Tower ITSELF was being wiretapped, NOT just Carter Page.

 

Was Trump Tower a Russian Agent? :doh:

 

 

ETA: JFC.................read #1 a couple times on that application. "On 28 August 2016 GCHQ/CSO filed for permission to execute Project FULSOME at the request of the US President, seeking intelligence gathering into the Trump Organization and Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., both located at 725 5th Avenue, New York, NY, USA. Activities include foreign and U.S. domestic signals collection, in regards to communication with Russian hostile actors."

 

 

So the GCHQ WAS INDEED involved and Obama ordered it (wiretapping) of not only foreign but DOMESTIC signals.

 

That's a wrap folks.

Nice letter...verified? Oh wait...not it wasnt.

Nor is any background provided about that if it was real...correct?

Anon stuff right?

And you try to contend you arent a conspiracy guy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 



What was the lie?






Then why didnt Gowdy write the focking memo?
And Schiff who was actually involved reading the information (as a guy very busy and vocal about dealing with surveillance and abuses of the system)...he disagrees with Nunes version.

Nunes played it perfectly? Oof...you are blind enough to believe that.


The lie was that the intel was from dual sources which it wasn't. It was one unverified source which NEVER would have been allowed. Perhaps that was why it was first denied.........then they feed the story to Yahoo Isakoff to second source it to get the warrant approved.

Fusion GPS paid journalists to push the Russian stories; known fact. Perhaps Isakoff was one of them. Either way, it was a lie and a felony.

Gowdy DID write the memo FFS. It's being called the Nunes memo because he's the Chairperson and the left wants to paint it as a Nunes hachet job because Schiff knows he didn't read the underlying material. And you bought the MSM story.

 



Nice letter...verified? Oh wait...not it wasnt.
Nor is any background provided about that if it was real...correct?
Anon stuff right?
And you try to contend you arent a conspiracy guy?


:lol:

At some point, Occam's Razor principle should indicate to you there was illegal activity by the previous administration. Or.........you're a conspiracy nut who believes that ALL of this evidence has been made up.

You come up with a valid reason for all the demotions or firings yet?

How about what National Security Issue were the Democrats and FBI talking about in the memo? Nothing in there other than an exposure of corruption and numerous violations of our Constitution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The lie was that the intel was from dual sources which it wasn't. It was one unverified source which NEVER would have been allowed. Perhaps that was why it was first denied.........then they feed the story to Yahoo Isakoff to second source it to get the warrant approved.

 

Fusion GPS paid journalists to push the Russian stories; known fact. Perhaps Isakoff was one of them. Either way, it was a lie and a felony.

 

Gowdy DID write the memo FFS. It's being called the Nunes memo because he's the Chairperson and the left wants to paint it as a Nunes hachet job because Schiff knows he didn't read the underlying material. And you bought the MSM story.

 

 

:lol:

At some point, Occam's Razor principle should indicate to you there was illegal activity by the previous administration. Or.........you're a conspiracy nut who believes that ALL of this evidence has been made up.

 

You come up with a valid reason for all the demotions or firings yet?

 

How about what National Security Issue were the Democrats and FBI talking about in the memo? Nothing in there other than an exposure of corruption and numerous violations of our Constitution.

 

 

Link to a credible claim that it was only from one verified source? Even the memo does not make that claim that it was the only source.

Nor does the memo state that the Yahoo story was the only other source the supposed 2nd time.

You are making claims without basis even in this memo which is highly questionable at this point.

In addition, some information from the dossier is said to have been verified...you have no clue whether that is what was used as part of the justification for the warrant. Even the memo does not fully state that. It proposes no actual lie...that is speculative at best by you.

Gowdy wrote the memo? There is literally nothing saying this? Even Nunes own words don't say that...nor does Gowdy say it.

Its called the Nunes memo...because he wrote it...and signed off on it based on Gowdy's notes and presentation to the committee. This is all what Nunes has said...not some MSM lie.

So...right now it appears you are lying about who even wrote the thing?

 

 

The bolded is funny...coming from the guy literally claiming that all the evidence about Russia has been made up. I mean really.

 

On the firings...seems like you are trying to rehash a different topic and conversation you had with someone else. Id bet Saints addressed this already elsewhere...but you don't accept his conclusion so you are trying to move on to me now.

 

As for what issues the memo can present as far as national security...google it...its been discussed as far as the problems this can cause with intelligence gathering going forward. You won't agree though...you are too far all in with team trump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Rosenstein threatens to subpoena HIC emails/texts because he's tired of dealing with them.

 

:shocking:

 

Reported by FoxNews...of a "congressional source".

And of course you buy it...

Rosenstein now a deep state guy too right? Complete lefty...that Trump appointed?

He and Wray?

 

Do you see how foolish this makes you look when you just believe stuff right away like that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 



The bolded is funny...coming from the guy literally claiming that all the evidence about Russia has been made up. I mean really.

On the firings...seems like you are trying to rehash a different topic and conversation you had with someone else. Id bet Saints addressed this already elsewhere...but you don't accept his conclusion so you are trying to move on to me now.

As for what issues the memo can present as far as national security...google it...its been discussed as far as the problems this can cause with intelligence gathering going forward. You won't agree though...you are too far all in with team trump.


I never claimed "ALL" of it was made up. However I believed the DNC server hack and Trump Jr. meetings were setups and I've been proven right.

And don't play the 'it's all been covered before' crap.

YOUR opinions on the following:

1. Explanation of the firings/demotions within the DOJ/FBI; numerous people sh!tcanned yet no criminal/illegal activities were done? Only two were texting so don't bother going that route.

2. What National Security issues was Schiff and FBI talking about that were at risk with release of this memo? You've got Comey and others calling it a nothing burger so either Schiff is full of sh!t and lying or Comey's full of sh!t and lying.

 




Reported by FoxNews...of a "congressional source".
And of course you buy it...
Rosenstein now a deep state guy too right? Complete lefty...that Trump appointed?
He and Wray?

Do you see how foolish this makes you look when you just believe stuff right away like that?


What position was Rosenstein holding during Uranium One? Who worked with him on that? How long has he been with the the DOJ?

 

 

ETA: You poke fun at 'Congressional Source' yet you bought into the Dossier that was Russian Sourced (unverified per Comey).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it seems as though saints may have accepted the fact that all of this russia garbage has been an illegal treasonous hit job from the start.

Only a true hack ass clown wouldn't.

I mean come on, real world, join it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it seems as though saints may have accepted the fact that all of this russia garbage has been an illegal treasonous hit job from the start.

Only a true hack ass clown wouldn't.

I mean come on, real world, join it.

 

As I said earlier to Sho, you'd have to believe it's ALL false because any one aspect of it means illegal activity by the previous administration.

 

On a related note, I heard someone associated with Q mention RICO (as I did the other day). Charge EVERYONE who played a part with conspiracy. Burn em all out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×