vuduchile 1,941 Posted September 19, 2019 https://www.yahoo.com/sports/report-nike-ends-shoe-deal-152224435.html They stuck with Big Ben and Kobe when they were accused. They even re-signed Vick when he got out of prison Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 3,979 Posted September 19, 2019 It's pretty sad when Nike has more ethics than you do. And yes, by you I'm referring to the Patriots. 1 1 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted September 19, 2019 23 minutes ago, vuduchile said: https://www.yahoo.com/sports/report-nike-ends-shoe-deal-152224435.html They stuck with Big Ben and Kobe when they were accused. They even re-signed Vick when he got out of prison True, but your instances were both prior to them achieving "woke" status with that retard Kaepernick..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,548 Posted September 19, 2019 Let me know when Kraft does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,117 Posted September 19, 2019 I don't know about you guys, but I live in America. Innocent until proven guilty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kanil 519 Posted September 19, 2019 1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said: I don't know about you guys, but I live in America. Innocent until proven guilty. Guilt or innocence is not relevant for a corporate sponsorship. It's all about whether the person's image brings in more money than they cost. All about the $. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,656 Posted September 19, 2019 1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said: I don't know about you guys, but I live in America. Innocent until proven guilty. In a court of law yeah. Th court of public opinion is just that, an opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,892 Posted September 19, 2019 2 hours ago, Kanil said: Guilt or innocence is not relevant for a corporate sponsorship. It's all about whether the person's image brings in more money than they cost. All about the $. But what about freeze peach? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fireballer 2,383 Posted September 20, 2019 5 hours ago, RLLD said: True, but your instances were both prior to them achieving "woke" status with that retard Kaepernick..... Not woke...go broke Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted September 20, 2019 2 hours ago, Kanil said: Guilt or innocence is not relevant for a corporate sponsorship. It's all about whether the person's image brings in more money than they cost. All about the $. Shows that no society is perfect, companies are influenced by consumer groupings, so a select loud few can take away your rights... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frank 2,145 Posted September 20, 2019 5 hours ago, kutulu said: Let me know when Kraft does. The cheese stands alone. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,737 Posted September 20, 2019 4 hours ago, Kanil said: Guilt or innocence is not relevant for a corporate sponsorship. It's all about whether the person's image brings in more money than they cost. All about the $. BIngo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,315 Posted September 20, 2019 8 hours ago, kutulu said: Let me know when Kraft does. Coffee’s for closers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted September 20, 2019 Chik Fil A Yumm…..Fvck those liberal assh0les like Worms. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,315 Posted September 20, 2019 21 minutes ago, sderk said: Chik Fil A Yumm…..Fvck those liberal assh0les like Worms. The fock you even talking about, halfwit? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted September 20, 2019 Just now, IGotWorms said: The fock you even talking about, halfwit? At least I'm half, Mr. nowit. You have to be one of the biggest idiots on this site next to only be challenged by MDC, Urethra, and Newbie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JustinCharge 2,397 Posted September 20, 2019 5 hours ago, RLLD said: Shows that no society is perfect, companies are influenced by consumer groupings, so a select loud few can take away your rights... At least until the civil war breaks out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TBayXXXVII 2,117 Posted September 20, 2019 15 hours ago, Kanil said: Guilt or innocence is not relevant for a corporate sponsorship. It's all about whether the person's image brings in more money than they cost. All about the $. 15 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said: In a court of law yeah. Th court of public opinion is just that, an opinion. Just because people are pressured by other people to act and feel a certain way, doesn't mean they're right. I don't operate that way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,432 Posted September 20, 2019 Guy is a moron and I expect that he will be on the exempt list very soon (today?). He just can't help himself from being stupid and an a-hole. However, teams should be careful and not just throw a guy on the exempt list or cut them until the investigation is complete. Otherwise, you will have situations where civil suits will be filed against the starting QB of every team right before a big game. If you file a false police report, then you get in trouble with the law. Not the same threshold for civil suits. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,567 Posted September 20, 2019 Josh Gordon even shakes his head when looking at Antonio Clown Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 3,979 Posted September 20, 2019 Now he's sending harrassing/threatening text messages to one of his accusers, including a pic of her kids??? The NFL and/or the Patriots should not let him suit up Sunday. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted September 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, Strike said: Now he's sending harrassing/threatening text messages to one of his accusers, including a pic of her kids??? The NFL and/or the Patriots should not let him suit up Sunday. Link ? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 3,979 Posted September 20, 2019 Just now, drobeski said: Link ? https://www.si.com/nfl/2019/09/19/antonio-brown-accuser-text-messages Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted September 20, 2019 26 minutes ago, Strike said: https://www.si.com/nfl/2019/09/19/antonio-brown-accuser-text-messages It wasn’t threatening. Woman lied about that too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,315 Posted September 20, 2019 4 minutes ago, Djgb13 said: It wasn’t threatening. Woman lied about that too. Threatening or not, it was focking stupid. This man is a lunatic Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,432 Posted September 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, Djgb13 said: It wasn’t threatening. Woman lied about that too. If it wasn't threatening or meant as intimidation, then why copy her on the group text? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,656 Posted September 20, 2019 15 minutes ago, Djgb13 said: It wasn’t threatening. Woman lied about that too. You're dumber than dirt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kutulu 1,548 Posted September 20, 2019 Bump up Dorsett Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 3,979 Posted September 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: You're dumber than dirt. Yeah, but to be fair, he knows all about lieing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,656 Posted September 20, 2019 Just now, Strike said: Yeah, but to be fair, he knows all about lieing. He's no good at it though. But he keeps trying Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted September 20, 2019 47 minutes ago, Strike said: https://www.si.com/nfl/2019/09/19/antonio-brown-accuser-text-messages If she accused him and he contacted her in any way, then he is s focking moron..... Maybe she is lying, maybe she isnt, he just ruined any defense he had by talking to her at all...who is advising this retard? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,315 Posted September 20, 2019 6 minutes ago, kutulu said: Bump up Dorsett And James White. AB was going to seriously eat into his targets Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 3,979 Posted September 20, 2019 2 minutes ago, RLLD said: If she accused him and he contacted her in any way, then he is s focking moron..... Maybe she is lying, maybe she isnt, he just ruined any defense he had by talking to her at all...who is advising this retard? Consider this. She has been kept anonymous in all the reports on their interaction in 2017. He just sent a group text to a bunch of people she doesn't know, identifying her and asking them to "investigate" her. She has no idea if they're just hired thugs. He included a pic of her kids. Don't see how anyone can defend this as NOT being intimidation at best, and potentially a lot worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,656 Posted September 20, 2019 He's threatening kids now. Enough. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted September 20, 2019 54 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: You're dumber than dirt. Sorry but everyone here knows that you are by far the most retarded troll here. Figured you would have left after the savage beating you’ve been taking from everyone all week 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted September 20, 2019 1 hour ago, IGotWorms said: Threatening or not, it was focking stupid. This man is a lunatic Oh by all means he shouldn’t have done it and was stupid as sh1t to do it. But to say it was “threatening” is just a bold faced lie. If “Let’s look into her background” is now considered “threatening” then all of us have been threatened when having background checks done. Still, the guy is a moron for doing that. No one can deny that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,315 Posted September 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Djgb13 said: Oh by all means he shouldn’t have done it and was stupid as sh1t to do it. But to say it was “threatening” is just a bold faced lie. If “Let’s look into her background” is now considered “threatening” then all of us have been threatened when having background checks done. Still, the guy is a moron for doing that. No one can deny that Just admit you were wrong digby Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted September 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: Just admit you were wrong digby Lmfao how was I wrong? Was he threatening her? If you say yes you’re a poosay. Plain and simple. Cause that wasn’t a threat. Not excusing him or saying he is once the right cause he’s not. But he didn’t threaten her HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 3,979 Posted September 20, 2019 7 minutes ago, Djgb13 said: Oh by all means he shouldn’t have done it and was stupid as sh1t to do it. But to say it was “threatening” is just a bold faced lie. If “Let’s look into her background” is now considered “threatening” then all of us have been threatened when having background checks done. Still, the guy is a moron for doing that. No one can deny that If it wasn't threatening, perhaps you'll find the time to answer this question you ignored: Quote If it wasn't threatening or meant as intimidation, then why copy her on the group text? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,338 Posted September 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, Strike said: If it wasn't threatening, perhaps you'll find the time to answer this question you ignored: To let her know that she’s in deep sh1t cause he’s not going to just sit back and let her lie to try and get money? Or he wanted others to see what he’s sending her so she doesn’t try to photoshop it or lie about it? I don’t know what goes on in his focked up mind. But if all you have to go on is “he included her in the group text” then sadly you don’t have anything to go on HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites