TimmySmith 2,782 Posted October 30, 2019 13 minutes ago, sderk said: I think they were using a Mr. Microphone. So everyone could be included. https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=mr.+microphone+commercial&view=detail&mid=9668A28F28E943F7CDE69668A28F28E943F7CDE6&FORM=VIRE Trump is so inclusive, he lets everyone join in on the fun. Particularly those who appear to hate him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,942 Posted October 30, 2019 ***Breaking:*** Actor Juicy Smollett to testify that he heard Trump say bad and damning things on phone call to Ukraine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted October 30, 2019 Just now, lickin_starfish said: ***Breaking:*** Actor Juicy Smollett to testify that he heard Trump say bad and damning things on phone call to Ukraine. "I got beat down and I couldn't get up." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted October 30, 2019 7 minutes ago, TimmySmith said: Trump is so inclusive, he lets everyone join in on the fun. Particularly those who appear to hate him. I'm liking Trump more and more every day. No president in history has ever exposed his opposition to the point of them simply flailing around in circles at the mere mention of his name. And the thing is, he is dedicated to those who voted for him and says screw the rest of you if you can't respect that. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,704 Posted October 30, 2019 Donald J Trump POTUS has ripped the mask off of the Establishment and what we are seeing is disturbing. Unfortunately it seems many Americans aren’t capable of processing what they are seeing and many are in denial. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted October 30, 2019 19 minutes ago, sderk said: I'm liking Trump more and more every day. No president in history has ever exposed his opposition to the point of them simply flailing around in circles at the mere mention of his name. And the thing is, he is dedicated to those who voted for him and says screw the rest of you if you can't respect that. Almost like DC is a swamp and he is draining it. This angers a lot of people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 30, 2019 57 minutes ago, Baker Boy said: Donald J Trump POTUS has ripped the mask off of the Establishment and what we are seeing is disturbing. Unfortunately it seems many Americans aren’t capable of processing what they are seeing and many are in denial. "It's easier to continue fooling someone than convince them they have been fooled" Honcho, Worms, Old Maid, ttb......they either claim "I don't know about the rest of that" or refuse to read anything contrary to what they've been led to believe. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 30, 2019 Per CNN: "Alexander Vindman witness is very sketchy. Generally suspected of being “whistle-blower #2”, records show Vindman had numerous contacts with registered foreign agents, while a member of the National Security Council. [FARA link – pg 4] Additionally, it is highly likely Vindman leaked the content of presidential phone calls illegally while he was a member of the National Security Council; which explains why Adam Schiff would not permit Vindman to answer questions about who he talked to. . The New York Times is reporting that sketchy Vindman attempted to manipulate the CIA transcripts of President Trump’s call with Ukraine President Zelenskyy to meet Vindman’s ideological interpretations. [Vindman had a hidden agenda “spying” while inside the NSC] In an effort to bolster his very sketchy credibility; and likely in an effort to avoid the appearance of sedition; Schiff’s Lawfare staff recommended Vindman wear his military uniform to the hearing today, though Vindman never wore the uniform for his NSC job." 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 30, 2019 5 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Per CNN: "Alexander Vindman witness is very sketchy. Generally suspected of being “whistle-blower #2”, records show Vindman had numerous contacts with registered foreign agents, while a member of the National Security Council. [FARA link – pg 4] Additionally, it is highly likely Vindman leaked the content of presidential phone calls illegally while he was a member of the National Security Council; which explains why Adam Schiff would not permit Vindman to answer questions about who he talked to. . The New York Times is reporting that sketchy Vindman attempted to manipulate the CIA transcripts of President Trump’s call with Ukraine President Zelenskyy to meet Vindman’s ideological interpretations. [Vindman had a hidden agenda “spying” while inside the NSC] In an effort to bolster his very sketchy credibility; and likely in an effort to avoid the appearance of sedition; Schiff’s Lawfare staff recommended Vindman wear his military uniform to the hearing today, though Vindman never wore the uniform for his NSC job." Hopefully they hold this traitor accountable and he gets a few year vacation in Leavenworth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted October 30, 2019 5 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Per CNN: "Alexander Vindman witness is very sketchy. Generally suspected of being “whistle-blower #2”, records show Vindman had numerous contacts with registered foreign agents, while a member of the National Security Council. [FARA link – pg 4] Additionally, it is highly likely Vindman leaked the content of presidential phone calls illegally while he was a member of the National Security Council; which explains why Adam Schiff would not permit Vindman to answer questions about who he talked to. . The New York Times is reporting that sketchy Vindman attempted to manipulate the CIA transcripts of President Trump’s call with Ukraine President Zelenskyy to meet Vindman’s ideological interpretations. [Vindman had a hidden agenda “spying” while inside the NSC] In an effort to bolster his very sketchy credibility; and likely in an effort to avoid the appearance of sedition; Schiff’s Lawfare staff recommended Vindman wear his military uniform to the hearing today, though Vindman never wore the uniform for his NSC job." Dog and Pony show. With uniforms. Since it's not the Judiciary Committee, I assume it can be run however they want. The odds of this getting to the judiciary committee seem lower and lower each day. I don't see how the intelligence committee testimony or evidence would not be admissible in the judiciary committee. I assume the judiciary committee would be starting fresh. If it ever gets there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 30, 2019 9 minutes ago, TimmySmith said: Dog and Pony show. With uniforms. Since it's not the Judiciary Committee, I assume it can be run however they want. The odds of this getting to the judiciary committee seem lower and lower each day. I don't see how the intelligence committee testimony or evidence would not be admissible in the judiciary committee. I assume the judiciary committee would be starting fresh. If it ever gets there. D.C. Court of Appeals issued injunction on Special Counsel Grand Jury material to the House Judiciary. The Dems/Lawfare group were trying to migrate from House Intel to Judiciary without a vote. Totally illegal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted October 30, 2019 3 hours ago, RLLD said: So this military veteran was insistent that our national security be as fully violated as much as possible? That does not make sense..... So I think he was “insistent” that military aid intended to help the Ukraine fight off Russia’s aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe not be held up as part of Trump‘s illegal scheme to extort a foreign government into interfering in a US presidential election. Seems reasonable to me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted October 30, 2019 It's funny how the left is all about the soldier now. How dare you speak against a decorated lieutenant coronel (errand boy)!! Remember this one from the left? "Sen. Barbara Boxer, California Democrat, gave an Army brigadier general an order this week during a committee hearing: Call me “senator.” Brig. Gen. Michael Walsh of the Army Corps of Engineers had addressed male senators on the Environment and Public Works Committee as “sir” during the Tuesday hearing. When the time came to speak with Mrs. Boxer, the panel’s chairwoman, he called her “ma’am.” Mrs. Boxer quickly interrupted him. “Do me a favor, can you say ‘senator’ instead of ‘ma’am’?” Mrs. Boxer pointedly asked the general. “It’s just a thing. I worked so hard to get that title, so I’d appreciate it. Thank you.” Or what did they say about Petreaus? Or how about Bush" Or how about McCain? All of a sudden now, the left wants us to respect the uniform? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted October 30, 2019 1 minute ago, IGotWorms said: So I think he was “insistent” that military aid intended to help the Ukraine fight off Russia’s aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe not be held up as part of Trump‘s illegal scheme to extort a foreign government into interfering in a US presidential election. Took hours to craft this one. I hope it was on some POS's dime. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted October 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: So I think he was “insistent” that military aid intended to help the Ukraine fight off Russia’s aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe not be held up as part of Trump‘s illegal scheme to extort a foreign government into interfering in a US presidential election. Seems reasonable to me Biden and his kid did what? Something about $1.4 billion or something? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, sderk said: It's funny how the left is all about the soldier now. How dare you speak against a decorated lieutenant coronel (errand boy)!! Remember this one from the left? "Sen. Barbara Boxer, California Democrat, gave an Army brigadier general an order this week during a committee hearing: Call me “senator.” Brig. Gen. Michael Walsh of the Army Corps of Engineers had addressed male senators on the Environment and Public Works Committee as “sir” during the Tuesday hearing. When the time came to speak with Mrs. Boxer, the panel’s chairwoman, he called her “ma’am.” Mrs. Boxer quickly interrupted him. “Do me a favor, can you say ‘senator’ instead of ‘ma’am’?” Mrs. Boxer pointedly asked the general. “It’s just a thing. I worked so hard to get that title, so I’d appreciate it. Thank you.” Or what did they say about Petreaus? Or how about Bush" Or how about McCain? All of a sudden now, the left wants us to respect the uniform? And the big one, Flynn. They are such phony pieces of garbage. They'd be spitting on this guy if was coming out in defense of trump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 30, 2019 1 hour ago, IGotWorms said: So I think he was “insistent” that military aid intended to help the Ukraine fight off Russia’s aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe not be held up as part of Trump‘s illegal scheme to extort a foreign government into interfering in a US presidential election. Seems reasonable to me Investigation was already reopened and they didn't know the money was being held up. Swing and a miss. Guy was altering transcript of the call, meeting with Foriegn agents....yeah, a true patriot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted October 30, 2019 7 minutes ago, TimmySmith said: Took hours to craft this one. I hope it was on some POS's dime. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casual Observer 597 Posted October 30, 2019 1 hour ago, IGotWorms said: So I think he was “insistent” that military aid intended to help the Ukraine fight off Russia’s aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe not be held up as part of Trump‘s illegal scheme to extort a foreign government into interfering in a US presidential election. Seems reasonable to me What aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe? You do understand that the US fomented a coup in the Ukraine and overthrew the gov't. there don't you? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted October 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, Casual Observer said: What aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe? You do understand that the US fomented a coup in the Ukraine and overthrew the gov't. there don't you? Are you a focking idiot or something? Crimea and beyond, dope. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,405 Posted October 30, 2019 Does anyone know what the hell this is all about? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1189601417469841409?s=20 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 30, 2019 6 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said: Does anyone know what the hell this is all about? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1189601417469841409?s=20 Triggering. It always works, and it's fun to watch. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,405 Posted October 30, 2019 Just now, drobeski said: Triggering. It always works, and it's fun to watch. He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people? What is he, 14? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,622 Posted October 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said: He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people? What is he, 14? He’s the greatest sh!tposter of all time https://i.postimg.cc/8cjDmwb4/85-D34006-3227-4501-B474-C5-BC9-B1-C5884.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/vTgFVTQS/C738-E6-C2-B871-45-B2-8-CE0-CD9-FA97-ABEB3.jpg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,607 Posted October 30, 2019 3 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said: He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people? What is he, 14? Maybe another website did it, he found it humorous, and retweeted it. Did that ever occur to you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 30, 2019 6 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said: He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people? What is he, 14? Yeah I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess he didnt photo shop it. Why do his tweets trigger you ? What are you a 12 year old girl ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,405 Posted October 30, 2019 1 minute ago, Strike said: Maybe another website did it, he found it humorous, and retweeted it. Did that ever occur to you? It doesn't really make it better. It looked dumb to be honest. It's not a big deal, just seemed odd. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted October 30, 2019 7 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said: He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people? What is he, 14? No wonder the incels love him 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,518 Posted October 30, 2019 7 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said: He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people? What is he, 14? That stick? Might want to get it out of your ass. HTH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 30, 2019 Just now, IGotWorms said: No wonder the incels love him Incelsaywhat? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,405 Posted October 30, 2019 Just now, drobeski said: Yeah I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess he didnt photo shop it. Why do his tweets trigger you ? What are you a 12 year old girl ? If I'm "triggered" right now, what do you consider what you are when you post on her half the time? I posted about it because I found it strange. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gladiators 1,995 Posted October 30, 2019 17 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said: Does anyone know what the hell this is all about? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1189601417469841409?s=20 Impeach him!!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,405 Posted October 30, 2019 Just now, Hardcore troubadour said: That stick? Might want to get it out of your ass. HTH. Why are you thinking about my ass? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 30, 2019 9 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said: He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people? What is he, 14? Why are you triggered over him liking honoring a K-9 soldier who was injured in combat? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted October 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said: It doesn't really make it better. It looked dumb to be honest. It's not a big deal, just seemed odd. Just shut up and maybe rethink a few things. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casual Observer 597 Posted October 30, 2019 41 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: Are you a focking idiot or something? Crimea and beyond, dope. First of all Little Buddy, you can shut the fock up, because all you do on these forums is lie, through one device or another. The people of Crimea voted to become part of Russia, overwhelmingly. The US overthrew the elected gov't. of Ukraine in favor of Victor Yanukovych. The only aggression in that Country was perpetrated by the US. Here's a recording of a call by Victoria Nudelman aka Nuland where she's discussing who can be in and out of the gov't. of Ukraine that the US then recently engineered. https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/?fa=54471 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted October 30, 2019 Just now, Filthy Fernadez said: Why are you triggered over him liking honoring a K-9 soldier who was injured in combat? With a dog paw medal. They are just nuts. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,514 Posted October 30, 2019 23 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said: Does anyone know what the hell this is all about? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1189601417469841409?s=20 That guy’s not right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,405 Posted October 30, 2019 4 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Why are you triggered over him liking honoring a K-9 soldier who was injured in combat? I'm not triggered at all actually. He's also not honoring a dog, it's photo shopped. It kind of looked like a joke when I first saw it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted October 30, 2019 Just now, MDC said: That guy’s not right. No question. When a photoshop of a dog getting a dog medal gets at you, it's time to do some soul searching. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites