Jump to content
Alias Detective

Official President Trump Impeachment Inquiry Thread

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, sderk said:

Trump is so inclusive, he lets everyone join in on the fun.  Particularly those who appear to hate him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, lickin_starfish said:

***Breaking:***

Actor Juicy Smollett to testify that he heard Trump say bad and damning things on phone call to Ukraine.

"I got beat down and I couldn't get up." :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

Trump is so inclusive, he lets everyone join in on the fun.  Particularly those who appear to hate him.

I'm liking Trump more and more every day. No president in history has ever exposed his opposition to the point of them simply flailing around in circles at the mere mention of his name. And the thing is, he is dedicated to those who voted for him and says screw the rest of you if you can't respect that.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Donald J Trump POTUS has ripped the mask off of the Establishment and what we are seeing is disturbing. Unfortunately it seems many Americans aren’t capable of processing what they are seeing and many are in denial. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, sderk said:

I'm liking Trump more and more every day. No president in history has ever exposed his opposition to the point of them simply flailing around in circles at the mere mention of his name. And the thing is, he is dedicated to those who voted for him and says screw the rest of you if you can't respect that.

Almost like DC is a swamp and he is draining it.   This angers a lot of people.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

Donald J Trump POTUS has ripped the mask off of the Establishment and what we are seeing is disturbing. Unfortunately it seems many Americans aren’t capable of processing what they are seeing and many are in denial. 

"It's easier to continue fooling someone than convince them they have been fooled"

Honcho, Worms, Old Maid, ttb......they either claim "I don't know about the rest of that" or refuse to read anything contrary to what they've been led to believe.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Per CNN:

"Alexander Vindman witness is very sketchy. Generally suspected of being “whistle-blower #2”, records show Vindman had numerous contacts with registered foreign agents, while a member of the National Security Council.  [FARA link – pg 4]

Additionally, it is highly likely Vindman leaked the content of presidential phone calls illegally while he was a member of the National Security Council; which explains why Adam Schiff would not permit Vindman to answer questions about who he talked to.

.

The New York Times is reporting that sketchy Vindman attempted to manipulate the CIA transcripts of President Trump’s call with Ukraine President Zelenskyy to meet Vindman’s ideological interpretations. [Vindman had a hidden agenda “spying” while inside the NSC]

In an effort to bolster his very sketchy credibility; and likely in an effort to avoid the appearance of sedition; Schiff’s Lawfare staff recommended Vindman wear his military uniform to the hearing today, though Vindman never wore the uniform for his NSC job."

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

Per CNN:

"Alexander Vindman witness is very sketchy. Generally suspected of being “whistle-blower #2”, records show Vindman had numerous contacts with registered foreign agents, while a member of the National Security Council.  [FARA link – pg 4]

Additionally, it is highly likely Vindman leaked the content of presidential phone calls illegally while he was a member of the National Security Council; which explains why Adam Schiff would not permit Vindman to answer questions about who he talked to.

.

The New York Times is reporting that sketchy Vindman attempted to manipulate the CIA transcripts of President Trump’s call with Ukraine President Zelenskyy to meet Vindman’s ideological interpretations. [Vindman had a hidden agenda “spying” while inside the NSC]

In an effort to bolster his very sketchy credibility; and likely in an effort to avoid the appearance of sedition; Schiff’s Lawfare staff recommended Vindman wear his military uniform to the hearing today, though Vindman never wore the uniform for his NSC job."

Hopefully they hold this traitor accountable and he gets a few year vacation in Leavenworth 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

Per CNN:

"Alexander Vindman witness is very sketchy. Generally suspected of being “whistle-blower #2”, records show Vindman had numerous contacts with registered foreign agents, while a member of the National Security Council.  [FARA link – pg 4]

Additionally, it is highly likely Vindman leaked the content of presidential phone calls illegally while he was a member of the National Security Council; which explains why Adam Schiff would not permit Vindman to answer questions about who he talked to.

.

The New York Times is reporting that sketchy Vindman attempted to manipulate the CIA transcripts of President Trump’s call with Ukraine President Zelenskyy to meet Vindman’s ideological interpretations. [Vindman had a hidden agenda “spying” while inside the NSC]

In an effort to bolster his very sketchy credibility; and likely in an effort to avoid the appearance of sedition; Schiff’s Lawfare staff recommended Vindman wear his military uniform to the hearing today, though Vindman never wore the uniform for his NSC job."

Dog and Pony show.  With uniforms.  Since it's not the Judiciary Committee, I assume it can be run however they want.  The odds of this getting to the judiciary committee seem lower and lower each day.  I don't see how the intelligence committee testimony or evidence would not be admissible in the judiciary committee.  I assume the judiciary committee would be starting fresh. If it ever gets there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

Dog and Pony show.  With uniforms.  Since it's not the Judiciary Committee, I assume it can be run however they want.  The odds of this getting to the judiciary committee seem lower and lower each day.  I don't see how the intelligence committee testimony or evidence would not be admissible in the judiciary committee.  I assume the judiciary committee would be starting fresh. If it ever gets there.

D.C. Court of Appeals issued injunction on Special Counsel Grand Jury material to the House Judiciary. 

The Dems/Lawfare group were trying to migrate from House Intel to Judiciary without a vote. Totally illegal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, RLLD said:

So this military veteran was insistent that our national security be as fully violated as much as possible? That does not make sense.....

So I think he was “insistent” that military aid intended to help the Ukraine fight off Russia’s aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe not be held up as part of Trump‘s illegal scheme to extort a foreign government into interfering in a US presidential election.

 Seems reasonable to me :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's funny how the left is all about the soldier now. How dare you speak against a decorated lieutenant coronel (errand boy)!! 

Remember this one from the left?

"Sen. Barbara Boxer, California Democrat, gave an Army brigadier general an order this week during a committee hearing: Call me “senator.”

Brig. Gen. Michael Walsh of the Army Corps of Engineers had addressed male senators on the Environment and Public Works Committee as “sir” during the Tuesday hearing. When the time came to speak with Mrs. Boxer, the panel’s chairwoman, he called her “ma’am.”

Mrs. Boxer quickly interrupted him.

 

“Do me a favor, can you say ‘senator’ instead of ‘ma’am’?” Mrs. Boxer pointedly asked the general. “It’s just a thing. I worked so hard to get that title, so I’d appreciate it. Thank you.”

 

Or what did they say about Petreaus?

Or how about Bush"

Or how about McCain?

All of a sudden now, the left wants us to respect the uniform? :lol:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

So I think he was “insistent” that military aid intended to help the Ukraine fight off Russia’s aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe not be held up as part of Trump‘s illegal scheme to extort a foreign government into interfering in a US presidential election. 

:thumbsup:   Took hours to craft this one.  I hope it was on some POS's dime. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

So I think he was “insistent” that military aid intended to help the Ukraine fight off Russia’s aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe not be held up as part of Trump‘s illegal scheme to extort a foreign government into interfering in a US presidential election.

 Seems reasonable to me :dunno:

Biden and his kid did what? Something about $1.4 billion or something?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, sderk said:

It's funny how the left is all about the soldier now. How dare you speak against a decorated lieutenant coronel (errand boy)!! 

Remember this one from the left?

"Sen. Barbara Boxer, California Democrat, gave an Army brigadier general an order this week during a committee hearing: Call me “senator.”

Brig. Gen. Michael Walsh of the Army Corps of Engineers had addressed male senators on the Environment and Public Works Committee as “sir” during the Tuesday hearing. When the time came to speak with Mrs. Boxer, the panel’s chairwoman, he called her “ma’am.”

Mrs. Boxer quickly interrupted him.

 

“Do me a favor, can you say ‘senator’ instead of ‘ma’am’?” Mrs. Boxer pointedly asked the general. “It’s just a thing. I worked so hard to get that title, so I’d appreciate it. Thank you.”

 

Or what did they say about Petreaus?

Or how about Bush"

Or how about McCain?

All of a sudden now, the left wants us to respect the uniform? :lol:

 

And the big one, Flynn.

They are such phony pieces of garbage.  They'd be spitting on this guy if was coming out in defense of trump. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

So I think he was “insistent” that military aid intended to help the Ukraine fight off Russia’s aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe not be held up as part of Trump‘s illegal scheme to extort a foreign government into interfering in a US presidential election.

 Seems reasonable to me :dunno:

Investigation was already reopened and they didn't know the money was being held up. Swing and a miss.

Guy was altering transcript of the call, meeting with Foriegn agents....yeah, a true patriot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

:thumbsup:   Took hours to craft this one.  I hope it was on some POS's dime. 

:huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

So I think he was “insistent” that military aid intended to help the Ukraine fight off Russia’s aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe not be held up as part of Trump‘s illegal scheme to extort a foreign government into interfering in a US presidential election.

 Seems reasonable to me :dunno:

What aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe?  You do understand that the US fomented a coup in the Ukraine and overthrew the gov't. there don't you?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

What aggressive incursions into Eastern Europe?  You do understand that the US fomented a coup in the Ukraine and overthrew the gov't. there don't you?

Are you a focking idiot or something?

Crimea and beyond, dope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, drobeski said:

Triggering. It always works, and it's fun to watch. 

He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people?  What is he, 14?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people?  What is he, 14?

Maybe another website did it, he found it humorous, and retweeted it.  Did that ever occur to you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people?  What is he, 14?

Yeah I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess he didnt photo shop it. 

Why do his tweets trigger you ? What are you a 12 year old girl ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Strike said:

Maybe another website did it, he found it humorous, and retweeted it.  Did that ever occur to you?

It doesn't really make it better.  It looked dumb to be honest.  It's not a big deal, just seemed odd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people?  What is he, 14?

No wonder the incels love him

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people?  What is he, 14?

That stick? Might want to get it out of your ass. HTH. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, drobeski said:

Yeah I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess he didnt photo shop it. 

Why do his tweets trigger you ? What are you a 12 year old girl ?

If I'm "triggered" right now, what do you consider what you are when you post on her half the time?  I posted about it because I found it strange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

That stick? Might want to get it out of your ass. HTH. 

Why are you thinking about my ass?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

He had the dog photo shopped in order to trigger people?  What is he, 14?

Why are you triggered over him liking honoring a K-9 soldier who was injured in combat? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

It doesn't really make it better.  It looked dumb to be honest.  It's not a big deal, just seemed odd.

Just shut up and maybe rethink a few things. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Are you a focking idiot or something?

Crimea and beyond, dope.

First of all Little Buddy, you can shut the fock up, because all you do on these forums is lie, through one device or another.  The people of Crimea voted to become part of Russia, overwhelmingly.  The US overthrew the elected gov't. of Ukraine in favor of Victor Yanukovych.  The only aggression in that Country was perpetrated by the US.  Here's a recording of a call by Victoria Nudelman aka Nuland where she's discussing who can be in and out of the gov't. of Ukraine that the US then recently engineered.

 

https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/?fa=54471

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Filthy Fernadez said:

Why are you triggered over him liking honoring a K-9 soldier who was injured in combat? 

With a dog paw medal.  :overhead: They are just nuts.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

Why are you triggered over him liking honoring a K-9 soldier who was injured in combat? 

I'm not triggered at all actually.  He's also not honoring a dog, it's photo shopped.  It kind of looked like a joke when I first saw it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, MDC said:

That guy’s not right.

No question.  When a photoshop of a dog getting a dog medal gets at you, it's time to do some soul searching.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×