IGotWorms 3,366 Posted October 8, 2019 1 minute ago, drobeski said: Which part. Please post word for word. Highlight the sentence or paragraph that you feel is the smoking gun. Please dont use schiffs dramatics phony reenactment. Damn near all of it, and none of its word for word dummy. It’s a “summary” scrubbed by the White House and yet it’s STILL damning as hell. Have fun standing behind this one 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 8, 2019 1 minute ago, IGotWorms said: Damn near all of it, and none of its word for word dummy. It’s a “summary” scrubbed by the White House and yet it’s STILL damning as hell. Have fun standing behind this one Favor and Biden are in completely different paragraphs. You dont get to associate them dummy. My God are you tds kids desperate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: On Tuesday morning, Mr. Trump attacked the impeachment inquiry. “I would love to send Ambassador Sondland, a really good man and great American, to testify, ” he wrote on Twitter, “but unfortunately he would be testifying before a totally compromised kangaroo court, where Republican’s rights have been taken away.” Don’t tell me you guys are dumb enough to believe this sh1t Narrator: Yes, they were dumb enough to believe that sh1t Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,366 Posted October 8, 2019 2 minutes ago, drobeski said: Favor and Biden are in completely different paragraphs. You dont get to associate them dummy. My God are you tds kids desperate. What a pathetic attempt of parsing out a scrubbed “summary.” If that’s all you’ve got, just give up now and save some dignity 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 8, 2019 Just now, IGotWorms said: What a pathetic attempt of parsing out a scrubbed “summary.” If that’s all you’ve got, just give up now and save some dignity You bought schiffs reenactment what a clown Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,498 Posted October 8, 2019 https://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/topic/464683-what-if-its-found-that-trump-did-help-the-russians/?tab=comments#comment-5908279 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,366 Posted October 8, 2019 Just now, drobeski said: You bought schiffs reenactment what a clown No I read the “summary” you dumb fock. I haven’t seen anything from Schiff and the only people who give a damn about that is you morons. The entire thing was a mafia-style shakedown from start to finish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted October 8, 2019 1 minute ago, IGotWorms said: No I read the “summary” you dumb fock. I haven’t seen anything from Schiff and the only people who give a damn about that is you morons. The entire thing was a mafia-style shakedown from start to finish. That’s not what the President of the Ukraine said. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 8, 2019 I'm happy we have a president with the balls, and the dignity to look into the corrupt activities of the previous administration. Running for the democratic nomination agaisnt 19 other clowns doesnt make you trumps opponent, and running for the democratic nomination does not give you immunity. What kind of assclown thinks that Democrat presidential candidates are immune from investigations or justice? None are even close to running against trump yet, they dont even qualify to be his political opponent yet. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 8, 2019 30 minutes ago, The Observer said: Again, how does that change the things we know from Trump's phone call and what we heard him say to China? It proves there is a conspiracy to overthrow a duly elected President. Again, the Dems are doing this in the House Intel so they can question this guy behind closed doors and selectively leak certain parts. Also, the minority need not be present. Why are the Dems so set against transparency? 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 8, 2019 3 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: No I read the “summary” you dumb fock. I haven’t seen anything from Schiff and the only people who give a damn about that is you morons. The entire thing was a mafia-style shakedown from start to finish. Sure you havent ...hack Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,813 Posted October 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: No I read the “summary” you dumb fock. I haven’t seen anything from Schiff and the only people who give a damn about that is you morons. The entire thing was a mafia-style shakedown from start to finish. Liar. You're running with Schiffs "mafia boss" nonsense 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 8, 2019 5 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: No I read the “summary” you dumb fock. I haven’t seen anything from Schiff and the only people who give a damn about that is you morons. The entire thing was a mafia-style shakedown from start to finish. My favorite part is when they told them they couldn't have a White House meeting until they publicly announced they were reopening the investigation against Biden. Stupid Watergate, indeed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: It proves there is a conspiracy to overthrow a duly elected President. Again, the Dems are doing this in the House Intel so they can question this guy behind closed doors and selectively leak certain parts. Also, the minority need not be present. Why are the Dems so set against transparency? Again, I'll use the cheating analogy. If a married guy is caught red-handed banging another woman, it makes ZERO difference whether or not the person who caught him had a vendetta against the husband. Zero. hth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 8, 2019 11 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: The entire thing was a mafia-style shakedown from start to finish. Biden withholding the funding until fired the prosecutor investigating his kids company? Yep definitely corrupt and mafia style shakedown. Criminal..hopefully trump and Ukraine get to the bottom of it. What a despicable deplorable criminal administration those dirty scumbags Obama and Biden had. Investigate the fock out of all of them. Republicans alike, any involved in the corruption. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herbivore 915 Posted October 8, 2019 10 minutes ago, drobeski said: Biden withholding the funding until fired the prosecutor investigating his kids company? Yep definitely corrupt and mafia style shakedown. Criminal..hopefully trump and Ukraine get to the bottom of it. What a despicable deplorable criminal administration those dirty scumbags Obama and Biden had. Investigate the fock out of all of them. Republicans alike, any involved in the corruption. Tilt 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 8, 2019 6 minutes ago, Herbivore said: Tilt Deflect Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 1,877 Posted October 8, 2019 Just now, drobeski said: Deflect Isn't bringing up Obama and Hilary all the time also a deflection? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted October 8, 2019 Just now, Hawkeye21 said: Isn't bringing up Obama and Hilary all the time also a deflection? No but keep trying to stir the pot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herbivore 915 Posted October 8, 2019 Just now, Hawkeye21 said: Isn't bringing up Obama and Hilary all the time also a deflection? ..right. @drobeski you thing Guiliani takes up Graham's offer...I say no cause he is a liar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 8, 2019 21 minutes ago, The Observer said: Again, I'll use the cheating analogy. If a married guy is caught red-handed banging another woman, it makes ZERO difference whether or not the person who caught him had a vendetta against the husband. Zero. hth The transcript was released and shot their coup attempt (2nd) down. Details now emerge the IC I.G. had to change the whistleblower rules and back date that change to make it eligible. Bottom line is at the time the whistleblower filed the complaint, first hand knowledge was required and it wasn't first hand knowledge. The complaint doesn't qualify as whistle blower therefore the point is moot. Conspiracy to commit sedition by the IC I.G., Schiff, Pelosi and the whistleblower to name a few. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 1,877 Posted October 8, 2019 4 minutes ago, Mr. Hand said: No but keep trying to stir the pot. Oh come on! I'm not much different than all you goofballs. The only difference is that I don't like Trump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herbivore 915 Posted October 8, 2019 5 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: The transcript was released and shot their coup attempt (2nd) down. Details now emerge the IC I.G. had to change the whistleblower rules and back date that change to make it eligible. Bottom line is at the time the whistleblower filed the complaint, first hand knowledge was required and it wasn't first hand knowledge. The complaint doesn't qualify as whistle blower therefore the point is moot. Conspiracy to commit sedition by the IC I.G., Schiff, Pelosi and the whistleblower to name a few. Also tilt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted October 8, 2019 1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said: Oh come on! I'm not much different than all you goofballs. The only difference is that I don't like Trump. You like the Hawkeyes......that’s worse than liking Trump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casual Observer 597 Posted October 8, 2019 5 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: The transcript was released and shot their coup attempt (2nd) down. Details now emerge the IC I.G. had to change the whistleblower rules and back date that change to make it eligible. Bottom line is at the time the whistleblower filed the complaint, first hand knowledge was required and it wasn't first hand knowledge. The complaint doesn't qualify as whistle blower therefore the point is moot. Conspiracy to commit sedition by the IC I.G., Schiff, Pelosi and the whistleblower to name a few. I like where you're going with this. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 1,877 Posted October 8, 2019 Just now, Mr. Hand said: You like the Hawkeyes......that’s worse than liking Trump. Now you've crossed the line, sir! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casual Observer 597 Posted October 8, 2019 3 hours ago, IGotWorms said: Well there’s the question of whether Sodland can be jailed for contempt and then, separately, whether the White House has something to hide. I don’t know the answer to the first question but obviously the answer to the second question is an emphatic “yes.” Don't you have to have a subpoena first? Have you seen an actual subpoena? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted October 8, 2019 1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said: Now you've crossed the line, sir! I’m a Huskers fan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 1,877 Posted October 8, 2019 Just now, Mr. Hand said: I’m a Huskers fan. You have my sympathy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 8, 2019 6 minutes ago, Herbivore said: Also tilt Detail where I'm wrong........... Typical moron..............'I won't read anything on it (i.e. remain ignorant) but any details posted I'll claim conspiracy whacko" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 8, 2019 18 minutes ago, Herbivore said: ..right. @drobeski you thing Guiliani takes up Graham's offer...I say no cause he is a liar. No way in hell. He lies against himself in back to back sentences. Can you imagine him under oath? With Kamela Harris grilling him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 8, 2019 11 minutes ago, Herbivore said: Also tilt Yeah, you are. So titled you cant address the issues. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 8, 2019 23 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said: Isn't bringing up Obama and Hilary all the time also a deflection? Deflect Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herbivore 915 Posted October 8, 2019 3 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Detail where I'm wrong........... Typical moron..............'I won't read anything on it (i.e. remain ignorant) but any details posted I'll claim conspiracy whacko" The list is too long..just kidding. I have and usually do read many of your posts and links Filthy. With this last post you said the complaint is moot...you know it is not moot. You would like it to be..hence tilt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 8, 2019 7 minutes ago, The Observer said: No way in hell. He lies against himself in back to back sentences. Can you imagine him under oath? With Kamela Harris grilling him? Kamela ? cuck Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herbivore 915 Posted October 8, 2019 6 minutes ago, drobeski said: Yeah, you are. So titled you cant address the issues. To late glue. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 1,877 Posted October 8, 2019 5 minutes ago, drobeski said: Deflect Well played. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,813 Posted October 8, 2019 8 minutes ago, The Observer said: No way in hell. He lies against himself in back to back sentences. Can you imagine him under oath? With Kamela Harris grilling him? Holy Cuck Batman! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 8, 2019 1 minute ago, drobeski said: Kamela ? cuck She destroyed William Barr when she questioned him. He was stuttering like a school boy. We know why now. Imagine what she'd do to Giuliani. I'd feel bad for him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites