drobeski 3,061 Posted October 8, 2019 59 minutes ago, The Observer said: Too bad he isn't a man of integrity like Devin Nunes, am I right? First time and Big time Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted October 8, 2019 22 minutes ago, drobeski said: Evidence doesnt matter ? Yeah you're a lawyer. Evidence? The fock you talking about nimrod? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 8, 2019 11 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: Evidence? The fock you talking about Haha ...is was just taking the first part of the discussion you were having and associating it with the second. Got a problem with that ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OldMaid 2,130 Posted October 8, 2019 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49934203 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 8, 2019 21 minutes ago, OldMaid said: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49934203 So the rule wasn't changed, the wording was. You people are so dense you cant even see the idiocy of the links you post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OldMaid 2,130 Posted October 8, 2019 1 minute ago, drobeski said: So the rule wasn't changed, the wording was. You people are so dense you cant even see the idiocy of the links you post. Read the whole article you lunkhead. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted October 8, 2019 57 minutes ago, drobeski said: Haha ...is was just taking the first part of the discussion you were having and associating it with the second. Got a problem with that ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted October 8, 2019 They’ve now subpoenaed Sodland so as I understand if he doesn’t turn over documents by next Monday and appear for a deposition next Wednesday then he’ll be in contempt. UNLESS the White House does something like invoke executive privilege although I think Sodland would technically still have to appear Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Intense Observer 344 Posted October 8, 2019 9 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said: Biden is not the President, I won't vote for him and I don't think he's going to win so why put a lot of focus on it. Makes a huge difference when you are the President. It's almost as if he has some kind of standards he should be held to. Biden was the VP when he held a billion dollars from Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor who was responsible for investigating the gas company that his son was collecting $50k/mo from. So you think it is okay for the VP to commit quid pro quo (admitted on video) but it is an impeachable offense for the President (allegedly, according to anonymous 3rd party heresay) to do the same? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OldMaid 2,130 Posted October 8, 2019 Hey Drobs... did you read the entire article yet? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted October 8, 2019 WASHINGTON — A White House official who listened to President Trump’s July phone call with Ukraine’s leader described it as “crazy,” “frightening” and “completely lacking in substance related to national security,” according to a memo written by the whistle-blower at the center of the Ukraine scandal, a C.I.A. officer who spoke to the White House official. The official was “visibly shaken by what had transpired,” the C.I.A. officer wrote in his memo, one day after Mr. Trump pressured President Volodymyr Zelenskyof Ukraine in a July 25 phone call to open investigations that would benefit him politically. A palpable sense of concern had already taken hold among at least some in the White House that the call had veered well outside the bounds of traditional diplomacy, the officer wrote. “The official stated that there was already a conversation underway with White House lawyers about how to handle the discussion because, in the official’s view, the president had clearly committed a criminal act by urging a foreign power to investigate a U.S. person for the purposes of advancing his own re-election bid in 2020,” the C.I.A. officer wrote. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Intense Observer 344 Posted October 8, 2019 8 hours ago, The Observer said: Seems to me that if I were innocent and had a way to make the Democrats look pathetic and get a much-needed 'win' in the public eye, I'd be cooperating and not hiding and stonewalling. But your excuse is nice too. The Dems already look pathetic with their failed CIA "whistleblower", their standard WB#2, the State Dept IG exposing their Ukraine ties, Volker destroying their quid pro quo, and Biden admitting on video that he withheld a billion dollars unless the prosecutor who was investigating the Ukraine gas company paying his son $50k/mo was fired. Not to mention their failed Stormy-gate, 25th-gate, Cohen-gate, kids in cages-gate, and the mother of all failures, muh Russian collusion-gate. If the Dems want cooperation in their latest witch hunt they can follow proper channels. That means vote to impeach. Except that opens the floodgates on who is called to testify and what documents are entered into the public realm. Be careful what you wish for. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Intense Observer 344 Posted October 8, 2019 7 hours ago, The Observer said: You are the guy he meant when he said he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue. Wow. Anyway, the words, "I need a favor, though" before talking about investigating Biden were the gotcha moment. Of course, Trump will deny it, and his band of sheep will follow. But I wonder, why was there only a note provided and not the actual transcript? This is all stuff that the impeachment committee would like to know. Stuff that Trump and the state department will attempt to hide. Like they did today by not allowing Sondland to appear. I posted several days ago, there is no exact word for word transcript for presidential phone calls Multiple people take hand notes, then those are compared and combined, to produce the transcript. Nothing about the format of the Ukraine transcript is out of the ordinary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OldMaid 2,130 Posted October 8, 2019 Just stop. Shokin was fired because he wasn’t investigating Burisma, not the other way around. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/03/what-really-happened-when-biden-forced-out-ukraines-top-prosecutor/3785620002/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Intense Observer 344 Posted October 8, 2019 7 hours ago, IGotWorms said: We know why they won’t produce Sodland—he was knee deep in it. I mean this is the guy that when someone texts him saying “gee I’m real uncomfortable how we’re withholding military aid from the Ukraine as part of a shakedown to investigate Trump’s political rival,” Gordo says “shhhh not by text — call me”. Yeah, I could see why Trump’s trying to silence that guy And.....the rest of the story: [9/9/19, 12:47:11 AM] Bill Taylor: As I said on the phone, I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign. [9/9/19, 5:19:35 AM] Gordon Sondland: Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The President has been crystal clear no quid pro quo’s of any kind. The President is trying to evaluate whether Ukraine is truly going to adopt the transparency and reforms that President Zelensky promised during his campaign I suggest we stop the back and forth by text If you still have concerns I recommend you give Lisa Kenna or S a call to discuss them directly. Thanks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,400 Posted October 8, 2019 25 minutes ago, Intense Observer said: Biden was the VP when he held a billion dollars from Ukraine unless they fired the prosecutor who was responsible for investigating the gas company that his son was collecting $50k/mo from. So you think it is okay for the VP to commit quid pro quo (admitted on video) but it is an impeachable offense for the President (allegedly, according to anonymous 3rd party heresay) to do the same? Didn’t say that is okay at all. If he’s guilty of that then he should pay for it. Wtf is wrong with you guys? You act as if I’m defending Biden or something. It’s really pathetic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Intense Observer 344 Posted October 8, 2019 Taylor's texts come across as the criminal trying to lay cover. All of his texts are "OMG! What if OMB!" As if designed to be a talking points for the propaganda outlets and useful idiots. Nobody else in the texts seem to share his out of the blue concerns about quid pro Joe. And Volkner already disputed them in his testimony the other day. Same with Rudy and his copies of the texts regarding Ukraine. Nyt link with the texts What is Taylor's background? I wouldn't be shocked if he was appointed by someone involved with the Ukraine corruption and interference in 2016. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,942 Posted October 8, 2019 Call the fukking vote, Nancy. Do it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted October 9, 2019 27 minutes ago, Intense Observer said: I posted several days ago, there is no exact word for word transcript for presidential phone calls Multiple people take hand notes, then those are compared and combined, to produce the transcript. Nothing about the format of the Ukraine transcript is out of the ordinary. And your last paragraph was likely wrong then as it’s likely wrong now. An analysis said that these types of summaries are usually double the length of the one provided for calls lasting a similar length of time. And they used ellipses when that isn’t common practice. How is that not highly suspicious? Also, Trump himself stated it was an exact verbatim transcript, “word for word, comma for comma.” That is a LIE even under your own post! But it does raise the question of whether such a true verbatim transcript exists and was withheld. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/10/03/odd-markings-ellipses-fuel-doubts-about-rough-transcript-trumps-ukraine-call/%3foutputType=amp Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gladiators 1,995 Posted October 9, 2019 Did you guys get to the bottom of it? Did they get him this time? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,513 Posted October 9, 2019 Looks like they got him this time. I would assume the impeachment vote is imminent ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,140 Posted October 9, 2019 32 minutes ago, IGotWorms said: And your last paragraph was likely wrong then as it’s likely wrong now. An analysis said that these types of summaries are usually double the length of the one provided for calls lasting a similar length of time. And they used ellipses when that isn’t common practice. How is that not highly suspicious? Also, Trump himself stated it was an exact verbatim transcript, “word for word, comma for comma.” That is a LIE even under your own post! But it does raise the question of whether such a true verbatim transcript exists and was withheld. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/10/03/odd-markings-ellipses-fuel-doubts-about-rough-transcript-trumps-ukraine-call/%3foutputType=amp Thanks for quoting the Washington Post. You also got any proof of "we got'eem now" from The Daily Kos? Vox? MSNBC? Communist Party? Jesus. You actually believe the shite they feed you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,400 Posted October 9, 2019 4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Thanks for quoting the Washington Post. You also got any proof of "we got'eem now" from The Daily Kos? Vox? MSNBC? Communist Party? Jesus. You actually believe the shite they feed you? I’m curious, what exactly is a reputable source for news now. I’m being honest. No matter what someone posts for their source it always gets ridiculed by the opposing side. No one trusts any news source anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted October 9, 2019 7 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Thanks for quoting the Washington Post. You also got any proof of "we got'eem now" from The Daily Kos? Vox? MSNBC? Communist Party? Jesus. You actually believe the shite they feed you? The quote is from Trump ya focking ‘tard Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,140 Posted October 9, 2019 Just now, Hawkeye21 said: I’m curious, what exactly is a reputable source for news now. I’m being honest. No matter what someone posts for their source it always gets ridiculed by the opposing side. No one trusts any news source anymore. You can't trust any of them. They're nothing but propoganda arms of the DNC. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,513 Posted October 9, 2019 MSDNC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted October 9, 2019 1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said: I’m curious, what exactly is a reputable source for news now. I’m being honest. No matter what someone posts for their source it always gets ridiculed by the opposing side. No one trusts any news source anymore. Preferably some unknown wack job on Twitter. That’s where the deep state exposes occur Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,140 Posted October 9, 2019 Just now, IGotWorms said: The quote is from Trump ya focking ‘tard You're the one reading WaPo so that makes YOU the tard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,140 Posted October 9, 2019 1 minute ago, IGotWorms said: Preferably some unknown wack job on Twitter. That’s where the deep state exposes occur This is funny seeing as how it's YOUR side of the political aisle that the Twitter mob belongs to. Your side is the only one that believes EVERYTHING it reads on Twitter, and then gets all outraged when directed to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Casual Observer 597 Posted October 9, 2019 1 hour ago, IGotWorms said: They’ve now subpoenaed Sodland so as I understand if he doesn’t turn over documents by next Monday and appear for a deposition next Wednesday then he’ll be in contempt. UNLESS the White House does something like invoke executive privilege although I think Sodland would technically still have to appear A page later and you're talking about subpoenas again. I'll ask one more time if these Turkeys even have subpoena power. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted October 9, 2019 13 hours ago, The Observer said: But I have friends on Facebook posting memes about how generous he is for forfeiting his presidential salary. LOL That's sofa cushion change compared to the millions he's taking in with is properties. Yep. The millions in rent that the secret service has to pay at Trump tower and the various other Trump properties alone dwarfs his salary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herbivore 1,142 Posted October 9, 2019 1 hour ago, OldMaid said: Just stop. Shokin was fired because he wasn’t investigating Burisma, not the other way around. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/03/what-really-happened-when-biden-forced-out-ukraines-top-prosecutor/3785620002/ nice posts Old Maid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,059 Posted October 9, 2019 37 minutes ago, Casual Observer said: A page later and you're talking about subpoenas again. I'll ask one more time if these Turkeys even have subpoena power. Well I reckon they do since they went ahead and did it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,297 Posted October 9, 2019 You guys are arguing with people who deny even the most basic of facts. Your time would be better spent explaining quantum physics to the Mad Hatter. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 4,140 Posted October 9, 2019 34 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: You guys are arguing with people who deny even the most basic of facts. Your time would be better spent explaining quantum physics to the Mad Hatter. Remember when you guys said you had all of those "facts " about Russian collusion and pee tapes? Yeah, I do too. Good times. you wouldn't know what a fact was if it fell out of the sky, sat on your face and wiggled. you just have to accept the fact that no one believes any of the b******* lies you guys spread. Your fellow liberal sheep might fall for your talking points but the smart people aren't. 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 9, 2019 They hold a vote yet or is Nancy still playing high school drama club to get her nerd base all excited ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 9, 2019 8 hours ago, Herbivore said: nice posts Old Maid Yeah, great sources too. I think one was the Easter bunny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 9, 2019 12 hours ago, OldMaid said: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49934203 "This did change as part of a review that was already going on before Mr Trump called the Ukrainian leader, according to a statement from the Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community." I've posted this before and I'll post it again; https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/intel-community-inspector-general-stonewalls-congress-refuses-to-explain-why-he-backdated-secret-changes-to-whistleblower-form/ The article you posted cited 'according to a statement from the Office of the Inspector General of the Intel Comm'. The article I posted here in response shows that the I.C. I.G. won't answer why he back dated the change to August for a change made in September. You along with other liberals conveniently look past the obvious reason the I.C.I.G. would backdate a change to prior to the whistleblower's complaint. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 9, 2019 Not sure if this was posted already but now it's being revealed the whistle blower has ties to a 2020 Presidential Candidate. AGAIN...............the Dems accuse Trump of something they themselves are guilty of and you numbnuts on the left keep swallowing it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 9, 2019 https://www.foxnews.com/media/john-solomon-says-new-hunter-biden-related-doc-shows-significant-shift-in-factual-timeline Another narrative blown. Ukraine had reopened the Biden probe MONTHS before the phone call. Trump is curb stomping these retards by setting them up left and right. "The leaks are real, the news is fake." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites