*Official 2020 Election Thread*

[tanatastic 2,061]

4 minutes ago, drobeski said:

https://hereistheevidence.com/

Well that’s wrap then and we should start seeing those states flip any day now right?

[OldMaid 1,838]

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I'm gonna' have to see some real evidence, not just talk and hearsay.  I'm anticipating a Biden transition.

My gut tells me something ain't right.  I can't believe more people voted for Biden than Barack Obama.  Trump rallies numbered in the thousands while Biden rallies were only in the double digits.  Votes being cast JUST for Biden but no other Democratic down tickets for Senate or House?  Wut?

However, with all that being said I still need to see evidence.  Powel has her reputation on the line here - she better come up big because if she doesn't then she's done.  Also, if they don't then this will sink ANY chances of really taking a serious look into voter fraud and seriously tightening up the security around our elections.

More people voted for Biden than Obama for several reasons. One, there’s more people now than there were then. Two, the hate on the left for Trump is REAL, three, black women voted for Harris, and there are more women in the world than men. And four, mail in ballots made it easier for people to vote.

I could be wrong, but the Biden rallies were small by design. I would think the party that was preaching covid safety, would be seen as hypocrites if they hosted big rallies. 

Also, if you feel like reading up on the KKK, you will find out it wasn’t started by the Democratic party. It was however adopted by the southern democrats, which went on to form their own short lived party, the Dixiecrats, which was absorbed into the Republican party, during the southern strategy. It’s actually a little more complicated than that, but that’s the gist of it.

[Fireballer 2,367]

Woops! This week should be interesting.  I wonder if they drew the line with her accusation against GA governor of taking bribes.

 

[OldMaid 1,838]

8 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, I know, but the GOP needs to prove something IN COURT.  

If I wasn’t out of likes, I’d give them all to you. 

[Gepetto 977]

3 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Woops! This week should be interesting.  I wonder if they drew the line with her accusation against GA governor of taking bribes.

 

Who is Dinesh D"Souza?  Where did he "just saw this"?

[Fireballer 2,367]

Just now, Gepetto said:

Who is Dinesh D"Souza?  Where did he "just saw this"?

Its all over Twitter.  Its a news release from the official campaign

[tanatastic 2,061]

I’m officially coining “Muh proof!”. Every day there’s a new link to a alleged mountain of hard irrefutable proof yet in reality nothing happens in court.

[Gepetto 977]

3 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Its all over Twitter.  Its a news release from the official campaign

OK, thanks.

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

Nobody knows. Could be creating another flank. One on cyber and one on ballots from two entities. Flank and break the frontal attack from the center from two sides. Fairly common tactic when outnumbered. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,492]

15 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Woops! This week should be interesting.  I wonder if they drew the line with her accusation against GA governor of taking bribes.

 

Yeah, that's not good.  That pretty much seals it for anyone hoping Trump could pull this out with evidence.  No way that happens now.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

39 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I'm gonna' have to see some real evidence, not just talk and hearsay. 

The democrats have already admitted the evidence themselves. They fully admit to inconsistencies in how votes were watched, counted, etc.  That is already settled.  We are just waiting for that to get to the supreme court and see if they think the problems are big enough to block certifications or instruct state legislatures to ignore the vote counts or who knows what.  We are past evidence here.  Everyone agrees things were out of control with these ballot rules.  Everyone agrees that ballot counting and even REcounting was handled differently even in the same county in some instances.  That is not up for debate. 

Again, both sides agree that this massive changeover to lots of mail in ballots was not handled in a consistent bases.  This violates the equal protection clause.

A lot of these other legal challenges are low probability but to be thorough we are going thru the process.

The high probability shot:  the equal protection clause was violated due to wide inconsistent rules regarding mail in ballots.
Lower probability shots: Dominion Scandal, fraud, foreign interference, etc.

Just because you have the high probability shot lined up doesn't mean you do not take the other shots.

[Fireballer 2,367]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, that's not good.  That pretty much seals it for anyone hoping Trump could pull this out with evidence.  No way that happens now.

Something must have really blown up.  Just the other day, Trump mentioned her in tweets as part of the team. I think she may have gotten a little over her skis with the Kemp thing.  

[MDC 5,875]

27 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, I know, but the GOP needs to prove something IN COURT.  

Haven’t they proven enough in the court of feelings?  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,492]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

Haven’t they proven enough in the court of feelings?  

I feel like they've made a good case!  

[Rusty Syringes 478]

45 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Sorry, you lose again.  You try so hard, but fail so mightily.  It's like you're a child.

The KKK was started as the violent arm of the Democratic Party. They even endorsed Tulsi Gabbard this year.  

Owning you is like taking candy from a very, very ugly baby.

ESC - 45

Rusty Unhinged - -3

Pro-Tip:  Quit and save yourself further embarrassment.

1.) Clownzo lickspittle posts Wikipedia links to so-called left-wing dictators but includes Adolph Hitler, who helped create the far-right Nazi party and invent the bloodiest conflict the world has ever known, including the extermination of 6 million Jews. Never mind that the discussion is about MODERN left- and right-wing extremism in the United States, with plenty of link to facts showing that far-right extremism has been far more deadly and dangerous to this country than the left-wing extremism. 

2.) Rusty uses CL's own information source against him, providing a Wikipedia link to information that actually identifies the Nazis as far-right extremists. Rusty also references the KKK.

3.) CL tries to assert that the KKK is a left-wing group because the Democratic Party allegedly started it. CL fails here on several levels, one of them being that the Democratic Party of today is nothing like the Democratic Party in the late 1800s, but that's irrelevant because:

4.) Rusty provides the following link in regard to the KKK origins:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/30/fact-check-democratic-party-did-not-found-kkk-start-civil-war/3253803001/

Quote

Historians agree that although factions of the Democratic Party did majorly contribute to the Civil War's start and the KKK's founding, it is inaccurate to say the party is responsible for either.

Quote

Princeton University Edwards Professor of American History Tera Hunter told USA TODAY that this trope is a fallback argument used to discredit current Democratic Party policies.

5.) Rusty again uses CL's own information source against him regarding the KKK's current ideology:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan

Quote

The Ku Klux Klan (/ˌkuː klʌks ˈklæn, ˌkjuː-/),^[a] commonly shortened to the KKK or the Klan, is an American white supremacist hate group whose primary targets are African Americans, as well as Jews, immigrants, LEFTISTS, homosexuals, Muslims and Catholics.^[21] 

Leftists are their enemies! 

Quote

The Klan has existed in three distinct eras at different points in time during the history of the United States. Each has advocated extremist reactionary positions such as white nationalism, anti-immigration and – especially in later iterations – Nordicism,^[22][23] antisemitism, prohibition, right-wing populism ...

As for right-wing populism, according to Wikipedia:

Quote

[P]opulism is like fascism in being a response to liberal and socialist explanations of the political. And also like fascism, populism does not recognize a legitimate political place for an opposition that it regards as acting against the desires of the people and that it also accuses of being tyrannical, conspiratorial, and antidemocratic. ... 

It's sad you fell out of the fail tree and hit every branch going down, but I take joy in all of the figurative crashing sounds as you desperately tried to stop your fall before that loud thud of you hitting the ground of futility nurturing your sad, pitiful fail tree.

I hope for the sake of embarrassment to those related to you that your family tree isn't actually a fail forest.

[MDC 5,875]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I feel like they've made a good case!  

I’m sad. That means unfair fraud happened  right? 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,492]

3 minutes ago, Rusty Syringes said:

1.) Clownzo lickspittle posts Wikipedia links to so-called left-wing dictators but includes Adolph Hitler, who helped create the far-right Nazi party and invent the bloodiest conflict the world has ever known, including the extermination of 6 million Jews. Never mind that the discussion is about MODERN left- and right-wing extremism in the United States, with plenty of link to facts showing that far-right extremism has been far more deadly and dangerous to this country than the left-wing extremism. 

2.) Rusty uses CL's own information source against him, providing a Wikipedia link to information that actually identifies the Nazis as far-right extremists. Rusty also references the KKK.

3.) CL tries to assert that the KKK is a left-wing group because the Democratic Party allegedly started it. CL fails here on several levels, one of them being that the Democratic Party of today is nothing like the Democratic Party in the late 1800s, but that's irrelevant because:

4.) Rusty provides the following link in regard to the KKK origins:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/30/fact-check-democratic-party-did-not-found-kkk-start-civil-war/3253803001/

5.) Rusty again uses CL's own information source against him regarding the KKK's current ideology:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan

Leftists are their enemies! 

As for right-wing populism, according to Wikipedia:

It's sad you fell out of the fail tree and hit every branch going down, but I take joy in all of the figurative crashing sounds as you desperately tried to stop your fall before that loud thud of you hitting the ground of futility nurturing your sad, pitiful fail tree.

I hope for the sake of embarrassment to those related to you that your family tree isn't actually a fail forest.

It's cute you try so hard and fail.   Fail Army should make a youtube video of all your posts.  I bet it would get 10 million views!

[JustinCharge 2,397]

To me the question is John Roberts.  He is a coward.  But in which way will he be a coward?

1.  He could vote against Trump, the SC goes 5-4 and gives Trump a sweeping victory written by someone like Alito.  Roberts can say he had nothing to do with it.
2.  He could vote for Trump, the SC goes 6-3, so that he can write the opinion and water it down to try to split the middle and ultimately anger absolutely everyone on both sides and likely destroy his career by trying to save his career by hiding.  And cowards do that.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,492]

Just now, JustinCharge said:

To me the question is John Roberts.  He is a coward.  But in which way will he be a coward?

1.  He could vote against Trump, the SC goes 5-4 and gives Trump a sweeping victory written by someone like Alito.  Roberts can say he had nothing to do with it.
2.  He could vote for Trump, the SC goes 6-3, so that he can write the opinion and water it down to try to split the middle and ultimately anger absolutely everyone on both sides and likely destroy his career by trying to save his career by hiding.  And cowards do that.

there is no doubt he will vote with the Dems, even after all Obama put him thru and embarrassed him by calling him out he still carries their water.

[Rusty Syringes 478]

12 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

The democrats have already admitted the evidence themselves. They fully admit to inconsistencies in how votes were watched, counted, etc.  That is already settled. 

More unsubstantiated platitudes from our resident Nostradamus. lol.

 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

1 minute ago, Rusty Syringes said:

More unsubstantiated platitudes from our resident Nostradamus. lol.

 

What?  The evidence is settled.  Deal with it.

[Rusty Syringes 478]

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

It's cute you try so hard and fail.   Fail Army should make a youtube video of all your posts.  I bet it would get 10 million views!

Did you run down to Dollar General and snatch up these gems from the bargain-bin section of the Cleverness Aisle?

[Mike Honcho 4,007]

30 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

More people voted for Biden than Obama for several reasons. One, there’s more people now than there were then. Two, the hate on the left for Trump is REAL, three, black women voted for Harris, and there are more women in the world than men. And four, mail in ballots made it easier for people to vote.

I could be wrong, but the Biden rallies were small by design. I would think the party that was preaching covid safety, would be seen as hypocrites if they hosted big rallies. 

Also, if you feel like reading up on the KKK, you will find out it wasn’t started by the Democratic party. It was however adopted by the southern democrats, which went on to form their own short lived party, the Dixiecrats, which was absorbed into the Republican party, during the southern strategy. It’s actually a little more complicated than that, but that’s the gist of it.

That history lesson is going to be as effective as convincing these guys that this GOP isn't the same one that Lincoln represented.

[Rusty Syringes 478]

Just now, JustinCharge said:

What?  The evidence is settled.  Deal with it.

Did you see that in a meme at Infowars?

[Fireballer 2,367]

16 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, that's not good.  That pretty much seals it for anyone hoping Trump could pull this out with evidence.  No way that happens now.

 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,492]

1 minute ago, Rusty Syringes said:

Did you run down to Dollar General and snatch up these gems from the bargain-bin section of the Cleverness Aisle?

No, I got them at Rusty Unhinged mom's house.  When I was there she told me that the doctor turned around and slapped her when you were born.

[OldMaid 1,838]

3 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

That history lesson is going to be as effective as convincing these guys that this GOP isn't the same one that Lincoln represented.

Meh... Shiny is at least open to hearing different opinions and making up his own mind.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,492]

Just now, OldMaid said:

Meh... Shiny is at least opening to hearing different opinions and making up his own mind.

For sure. 

[Rusty Syringes 478]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

No, I got them at Rusty Unhinged mom's house.  When I was there she told me that the doctor turned around and slapped her when you were born.

A mom joke, shored up by a baby joke.

Solid.

[drobeski 3,061]

56 minutes ago, tanatastic said:

Well that’s wrap then and we should start seeing those states flip any day now right?

Its links to evidence. 

If you're on the "there is none" team, this only verifies you're an idiot 

[BeenHereBefore 1,329]

Biden reminds me of Jim from Taxi.

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

Sidney is saying she is still working on the Dominion front with a private team on her own for free. The Dominion aspect is a long long game. It will not be resolved anytime soon. He was never going to get closure on it in the time he needed and that was her dept. She is flanking and the rest of the team will focus on the ballot irregularities.

It's a good strategy. No matter what happens the financial legal costs of fighting her in multiple states will become a harsh burden. Dominion and voting machines ain't going away anytime soon.

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

Impossible to have a rational conversation anymore. No matter how much fraud is exposed, problems with the machines, hacking of the machines there isn't enough Q tips on the planet to clear audio canals of the media. Guess we become like China and Russia. 0 problems with voting ever.

[Fireballer 2,367]

 

[Reality 2,710]

59 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

That history lesson is going to be as effective as convincing these guys that this GOP isn't the same one that Lincoln represented.

I always love this one.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

30 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

Impossible to have a rational conversation anymore. No matter how much fraud is exposed, problems with the machines, hacking of the machines there isn't enough Q tips on the planet to clear audio canals of the media. Guess we become like China and Russia. 0 problems with voting ever.

1. educated people tell us that it is important that everyone vote so that everyone has a voice.
2. the closer we get to everyone voting, the worse the national discourse becomes as the media and everyone else try to cater to the lowest common denominator until everyone is shouting and screaming and fighting and punching.

If we had 100% voting participation, the president would wear a leather jacket, spiked hair, smoke, get into bar fights, and this would collapse into a dictatorship.

[Casual Observer 597]

2 hours ago, OldMaid said:

More people voted for Biden than Obama for several reasons. One, there’s more people now than there were then. Two, the hate on the left for Trump is REAL, three, black women voted for Harris, and there are more women in the world than men. And four, mail in ballots made it easier for people to vote.

I could be wrong, but the Biden rallies were small by design. I would think the party that was preaching covid safety, would be seen as hypocrites if they hosted big rallies. 

Also, if you feel like reading up on the KKK, you will find out it wasn’t started by the Democratic party. It was however adopted by the southern democrats, which went on to form their own short lived party, the Dixiecrats, which was absorbed into the Republican party, during the southern strategy. It’s actually a little more complicated than that, but that’s the gist of it.

Cutting edge insight we've been missing for the past four years.  Great job, swoosie.

[Casual Observer 597]

1 hour ago, Rusty Syringes said:

1.) Clownzo lickspittle posts Wikipedia links to so-called left-wing dictators but includes Adolph Hitler, who helped create the far-right Nazi party and invent the bloodiest conflict the world has ever known, including the extermination of 6 million Jews. Never mind that the discussion is about MODERN left- and right-wing extremism in the United States, with plenty of link to facts showing that far-right extremism has been far more deadly and dangerous to this country than the left-wing extremism. 

2.) Rusty uses CL's own information source against him, providing a Wikipedia link to information that actually identifies the Nazis as far-right extremists. Rusty also references the KKK.

3.) CL tries to assert that the KKK is a left-wing group because the Democratic Party allegedly started it. CL fails here on several levels, one of them being that the Democratic Party of today is nothing like the Democratic Party in the late 1800s, but that's irrelevant because:

4.) Rusty provides the following link in regard to the KKK origins:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/30/fact-check-democratic-party-did-not-found-kkk-start-civil-war/3253803001/

5.) Rusty again uses CL's own information source against him regarding the KKK's current ideology:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan

Leftists are their enemies! 

As for right-wing populism, according to Wikipedia:

It's sad you fell out of the fail tree and hit every branch going down, but I take joy in all of the figurative crashing sounds as you desperately tried to stop your fall before that loud thud of you hitting the ground of futility nurturing your sad, pitiful fail tree.

I hope for the sake of embarrassment to those related to you that your family tree isn't actually a fail forest.

Everyone you don't like is a fascist.  Complete with Wiki links to prove it.  Do you recall using the term "fascist" prior to Trump's election in anything other than a term paper?  Are you using that term unironically now, or is this a parody account?

[OldMaid 1,838]

7 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

Cutting edge insight we've been missing for the past four years.  Great job, swoosie.

It’s about time someone noticed.

[Utilit99 4,099]

14 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

Cutting edge insight we've been missing for the past four years.  Great job, swoosie.

Yeah. Cutting edge TDS is real. Liberal minds are so susceptable to hating an intelligent approach to running this country.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.