2000 Mules

[5-Points 3,388]

4 hours ago, jonmx said:

Really?  What do you call illegal vote harvesting?

 

 

Russian disinformation. 

[Brad GLuckman 519]

4 hours ago, jonmx said:

Shocking that your sources say what you want to hear so you can intentionally remain ignorant and stay in denial of the truth.  This is why the left hates free speech so much. 

Its a documentary by a filmmaker with an agenda. Left or right doesn't matter, most of these documentaries leave out facts to either make the film more interesting or sell an agenda. Even non-political docs like "Making a Murderer" leave things out intentionally.

Because you agree with the agenda of the documentary you not only refuse to verify the information but you go as far to say that verifying information in the film is being intentionally ignorant. You really don't see the irony here?

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,934]

Even if some of it is true we have an issue with our elections. 

[jonmx 2,424]

6 hours ago, Brad GLuckman said:

Its a documentary by a filmmaker with an agenda. Left or right doesn't matter, most of these documentaries leave out facts to either make the film more interesting or sell an agenda. Even non-political docs like "Making a Murderer" leave things out intentionally.

Because you agree with the agenda of the documentary you not only refuse to verify the information but you go as far to say that verifying information in the film is being intentionally ignorant. You really don't see the irony here?

 

Not all political documentaries are created equal.  Dinesh D'Souza is pretty honest about the shortcoming of his evidence.  He knows it is not definitive proof of fraudulent ballots.  But is is definitive that there was a massive vote harvesting effort by far leftist organizations.  The only real question is were they casting fraudulent ballots or where they illegally harvesting ballots.  There is really no question that these ballots were not cast legally as only the person or immediate family members or a nurse if physically unable are allowed to drop ballots off in these states in question.  The real irony is how stupid you have to be to accept the lame criticism which disproves nothing and to not acknowledge the basic truth presented in the film.  

[Cdub100 3,838]

Haven't watched it, because I already know the election was stolen.

[wiffleball 4,788]

10 hours ago, BunnysBastatrds said:

 Relevance??? Just quit looking for it and blame those like yourself for nothing but you and your lack of transparency and denial. 

Are you drunk?

 

 

 

[TimHauck 2,619]

 

 

[Sean Mooney 1,938]

A movie made by a clear political hack- and a criminal- full of lies.....and yet some people eat it up as gospel. 

What a country. 

[peenie 1,905]

Just want to say as a liberal I was totally disinterested in the video UNTIL I shockingly saw people showing numerous envelopes into a voting mailbox. I haven’t seen the movie, I don’t know if it’s real, for all I know this could be actors and that could be fake or have been filmed on a day that wasn’t during the election or heck, those could’ve been votes for Trump not against. However, seeing it was scary. You’ll be happy to know that Georgia has changed voting rules significantly here to prevent fraud. 

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

1 minute ago, peenie said:

Just want to say as a liberal I was totally disinterested in the video UNTIL I shockingly saw people showing numerous envelopes into a voting mailbox. I haven’t seen the movie, I don’t know if it’s real, for all I know this could be actors and that could be fake or have been filmed on a day that wasn’t during the election or heck, those could’ve been votes for Trump not against. However, seeing it was scary. You’ll be happy to know that Georgia has changed voting rules significantly here to prevent fraud. 

You personally saw them do this?

[peenie 1,905]

3 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

You personally saw them do this?

No, it’s in the clip.

 And I stated that it could be fake.

[dogcows 1,030]

D’Souza is being sued for slander. He claimed that people were illegally voting, but it’s been proven they were not. One of the people was subjected to a criminal investigation (which fully exonerated him) and a barrage of threats. He’s suing D’Souza and “True the Vote.”

D’Souza is a convicted felon; his crime was literally interfering in elections. The fact that people believe his mockumentary falsely accusing others of his type of crime is pathetic.

Hopefully this lawsuit bankrupts him, and his pardon from Trump turns out to be wasted as he lives out his days in a van down by the river.

Oh, and the book version of his movie was recalled by the publisher so they could scrub all sorts of lies from it. They wanted to avoid lawsuits.

https://dailycaller.com/2022/10/27/dsouza-2000-mules-lawsuit-ballot-harvesting/

https://www.npr.org/2022/10/25/1131077739/heres-what-changed-in-dinesh-dsouzas-2-000-mules-book-after-it-was-recalled

[Big Guy 1,410]

I can't believe there are some of you that DOUBT that this happened 

There is so much absolute proof that the left cheats and destroys all within it's path

 

[Sean Mooney 1,938]

I can't believe there are some of you that BELIEVE that this happened.

There is no absolute proof that the left cheated and it is all the whim of one whiny baby who can't accept he lost.

[TimHauck 2,619]

28 minutes ago, Big Guy said:

I can't believe there are some of you that DOUBT that this happened 

There is so much absolute proof that the left cheats and destroys all within it's path

 

People dropping something into a box is “absolute proof”?

[Voltaire 5,198]

19 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

I can't believe there are some of you that BELIEVE that this happened.

There is no absolute proof that the left cheated and it is all the whim of one whiny baby who can't accept he lost.

I thin the problem you're having with that claim is that we all lived through it in real time and remember how things went down before the internet got scrubbed.

[Sean Mooney 1,938]

1 minute ago, Voltaire said:

I thin the problem you're having with that claim is that we all lived through it in real time and remember how things went down before the internet got scrubbed.

Before the court system up and down the country at all levels said "There is nothing here...."?

[TimHauck 2,619]

18 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

I thin the problem you're having with that claim is that we all lived through it in real time and remember how things went down before the internet got scrubbed.

You mean how the mail in vote went in favor of the democrats as expected (unfortunately)?  What was scrubbed?

[Voltaire 5,198]

24 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Before the court system up and down the country at all levels said "There is nothing here...."?

 

7 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You mean how the mail in vote went in favor of the democrats as expected (unfortunately)?  What was scrubbed?

We saw this going on from a mile out before the election, but before word got out that the corporate news media and Big Tech position was to shift into denial and cover up mode, Molly Ball wrote a piece for left wing consumption about the efforts the left took to rig fortify the election. I can't actually read this link to verify it's what I'm looking for because my VPN is for sh*t right now, but this should be available to you.

If it's written by Molly Ball, it's the right story: https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

[dogcows 1,030]

44 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

I thin the problem you're having with that claim is that we all lived through it in real time and remember how things went down before the internet got scrubbed.

The internet got scrubbed?

 

[Fireballer 2,639]

30 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

 

We saw this going on from a mile out before the election, but before word got out that the corporate news media and Big Tech position was to shift into denial and cover up mode, Molly Ball wrote a piece for left wing consumption about the efforts the left took to rig fortify the election. I can't actually read this link to verify it's what I'm looking for because my VPN is for sh*t right now, but this should be available to you.

If it's written by Molly Ball, it's the right story: https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

Yep, that's the right article.

[TimHauck 2,619]

7 hours ago, dogcows said:

The internet got scrubbed?

 

Maybe in China

[The Psychic Observer 496]

 

[BeachGuy23 642]

Just now, The Psychic Observer said:

 

And yet 75% of Republicans believe the election was rigged based on zero evidence.

What a way to live.

SAD

[Herbivore 1,115]

On 5/15/2022 at 3:54 PM, 5-Points said:

They don't refute what was claimed in the movie, they just claim that its dubious.

In addition to the geo-tracking evidence, the movie contained video evidence of those geo-tracked people dropping stacks of ballots into multiple drop boxes. 

They also tracked quite a few of those same people at the antifa riots that took place the previous summer. 

Is it definive? No. Does it suggest an investigation at least on the same scale of the Jan 6th investigation is warranted? Absolutely. 

you were kind of all in backing this movie...any thoughts on this new development?

[Fnord 2,051]

2 hours ago, BeachGuy23 said:

And yet 75% of Republicans believe the election was rigged based on zero evidence.

What a way to live.

SAD

MAGAMOOKS are sad, vulnerable, gullible creatures that require an "ALPHA" to tell them how to think. Unfortunately, they also have no idea what a true ALPHA is, and they still use the term to describe those that are inherently just regular old bullies. The fact that they consider bullies to be sound leaders is due to the inferiority they feel about their own intelligence, ineffectuality, and manhood. This is axiomatic; you can read the feelings of insecurity in between the lines of the boisterous, ignorant, poorly thought-out posts they make here.

[The Psychic Observer 496]

3 minutes ago, Fnord said:

MAGAMOOKS are sad, vulnerable, gullible creatures that require an "ALPHA" to tell them how to think. Unfortunately, they also have no idea what a true ALPHA is, and they still use the term to describe those that are inherently just regular old bullies. The fact that they consider bullies to be sound leaders is due to the inferiority they feel about their own intelligence, ineffectuality, and manhood. This is axiomatic; you can read the feelings of insecurity in between the lines of the boisterous, ignorant, poorly thought-out posts they make here.

Someone here recently posted that an ALPHA is someone who doesn't care about others.  I found that highly amusing.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,934]

Bully. Lol. No one punches down like Biden. 

[Fnord 2,051]

3 hours ago, The Psychic Observer said:

Someone here recently posted that an ALPHA is someone who doesn't care about others.  I found that highly amusing.

Perfect example of the bassackward "thought" process MAGAMOOKS share. Guys that think this are not themselves leaders, despite all of them considering themselves alphas.

[BeachGuy23 642]

3 hours ago, Fnord said:

MAGAMOOKS are sad, vulnerable, gullible creatures that require an "ALPHA" to tell them how to think. Unfortunately, they also have no idea what a true ALPHA is, and they still use the term to describe those that are inherently just regular old bullies. The fact that they consider bullies to be sound leaders is due to the inferiority they feel about their own intelligence, ineffectuality, and manhood. This is axiomatic; you can read the feelings of insecurity in between the lines of the boisterous, ignorant, poorly thought-out posts they make here.

There's literally zero about Trump that says alpha.  He's a phat phuk.  He abuses young girls.  He's a coward who cows to Putin and sucks up to dictators.  He wears orange makeup.  He takes zero responsibility for anything bad.  He cheats on every wife.

He's the legit opposite of alpha.

[Fnord 2,051]

2 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

He's the legit opposite of alpha.

In every imaginable way. And the mooks wonder why we think they're gullible and stupid.

[edjr 6,578]

I WOULD WALK 2000 MULES AND I WOULD WALK 2000 MORE~!

[thegeneral 2,910]

Bunch of dopes believed this movie

[5-Points 3,388]

On 5/15/2022 at 12:54 PM, 5-Points said:

They don't refute what was claimed in the movie, they just claim that its dubious.

In addition to the geo-tracking evidence, the movie contained video evidence of those geo-tracked people dropping stacks of ballots into multiple drop boxes. 

They also tracked quite a few of those same people at the antifa riots that took place the previous summer. 

Is it definive? No. Does it suggest an investigation at least on the same scale of the Jan 6th investigation is warranted? Absolutely. 

 

9 hours ago, Herbivore said:

you were kind of all in backing this movie...any thoughts on this new development?

If that looks like "all in backing" to you, I don't know what to tell you. 

I stand by what I said at the time. I have no opinion on any "new development" as it is water under the bridge, at this point. 

TTV didn’t prove their claims and nobody else has disproved them. 

[Herbivore 1,115]

39 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

 

If that looks like "all in backing" to you, I don't know what to tell you. 

I stand by what I said at the time. I have no opinion on any "new development" as it is water under the bridge, at this point. 

TTV didn’t prove their claims and nobody else has disproved them. 

I was more referring to the 9 posts where you continually point to its validity and that people should watch it, with things like "its compelling", and he did a "bang up job". but yeah there is a hedge in there, and why look back at the story you fell for. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

48 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

 

If that looks like "all in backing" to you, I don't know what to tell you. 

I stand by what I said at the time. I have no opinion on any "new development" as it is water under the bridge, at this point. 

TTV didn’t prove their claims and nobody else has disproved them. 

Bro, the dude admitted he had no actual evidence.

It's not on the election to prove something did not happen FFS.

Cultist gonna cult. 

[5-Points 3,388]

48 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

I was more referring to the 9 posts where you continually point to its validity and that people should watch it, with things like "its compelling", and he did a "bang up job". but yeah there is a hedge in there, and why look back at the story you fell for. 

 

43 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Bro, the dude admitted he had no actual evidence.

It's not on the election to prove something did not happen FFS.

Cultist gonna cult. 

Did anybody prove that, among those admitted ballot drops, that somebody didn't drop a fraudulent ballot or three? 

If so, I must've missed it. Feel free to enlighten me. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

9 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

 

Did anybody prove that, among those admitted ballot drops, that somebody didn't drop a fraudulent ballot or three? 

If so, I must've missed it. Feel free to enlighten me. 

Someone's got to prove a negative?

Is cultist world also bizzaro world?

LOL

[5-Points 3,388]

8 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Someone's got to prove a negative?

Is cultist world also bizzaro world?

LOL

Somebody drops 5 ballots in a drop box. One of which is his and another is his wife's. When questioned he says, "I dropped my wife's and my ballot in the box." They discover that his and his wife's ballots were found in said box. 

"Our investigation has determined that he dropped his and his wife's ballots in the box, which is perfectly legal." 

Bored libs. "Debunked!"

 

 

 

[Herbivore 1,115]

30 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

Somebody drops 5 ballots in a drop box. One of which is his and another is his wife's. When questioned he says, "I dropped my wife's and my ballot in the box." They discover that his and his wife's ballots were found in said box. 

"Our investigation has determined that he dropped his and his wife's ballots in the box, which is perfectly legal." 

Bored libs. "Debunked!"

 

 

 

who are the other 3?