Political Persecution? Schiff

[RLLD 4,230]

Mortgage Fraud

Pure political cronyism.  This is what I did not want to see.  Doing the very thing your enemies did to you is not who we want to be......  

We should all oppose this

[TheNewGirl 1,494]

Schiff is a terrible man, another CA politician that figures "rules for thee." 

Also, he's one of those guys that I never have to meet, but he skeeves me out. There is something about him that I get strong gut feelings for; smarmy, gross. 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,859]

Republicans have taken the high road too long.  Schiff is a scumbag.  

[RLLD 4,230]

I do not concur we should revisit the lawfare liberals have used back upon them.  I agree that Schiff is  an absolute scumbag.

But just because we hate him does not mean we should abuse systems of government and law to take him down.

That is what liberals do, and while it might seem rewarding to so it back....to what end?  We cannot become the thing we oppose. Its more challenging to be the good people, I get that, but we have to do it. 

We should oppose this move. 

[TheNewGirl 1,494]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I do not concur we should revisit the lawfare liberals have used back upon them.  I agree that Schiff is  an absolute scumbag.

But just because we hate him does not mean we should abuse systems of government and law to take him down.

 

I agree. 

 

[seafoam1 3,031]

15 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I do not concur we should revisit the lawfare liberals have used back upon them.  I agree that Schiff is  an absolute scumbag.

But just because we hate him does not mean we should abuse systems of government and law to take him down.

That is what liberals do, and while it might seem rewarding to so it back....to what end?  We cannot become the thing we oppose. Its more challenging to be the good people, I get that, but we have to do it. 

We should oppose this move. 

If he's breaking the law. Go get him. If he's not, no need to make shlt up because you hate his disgusting life. 

[squistion 2,203]

Political persecution?

Of course it is. And if anyone believes otherwise I have a bridge to sell you. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,439]

I’m very happy to see this lawfare. I’m hoping for much, much more.  

[Cdub100 3,909]

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

Mortgage Fraud

Pure political cronyism.  This is what I did not want to see.  Doing the very thing your enemies did to you is not who we want to be......  

We should all oppose this

At some point you have to fight back. Trump and Republicans can't just sit there and let the Democrats run them through the courts. 

 

[MDC 7,431]

If it’s true, throw the book at him.

This sort of thing is so common in DC I doubt much happens beyond a fine. 

[Strike 5,553]

I don't want reverse lawfare, but I don't want laws and prosecution ignored just because someone is in a position of power or in the other party either.  Based upon what I've read the case on Leticia James is legit.  If this one is it should go forward as well.   FTA:

Quote

But a confidential Fannie Mae memo, shared with The Post by another administration official also on condition of anonymity, said that Schiff “engaged in a sustained pattern of possible occupancy misrepresentation on 5 Fannie Mae loans.

This sounds like a pattern of misconduct.  But I'll wait for more facts before passing final judgment.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,351]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

If it’s true, throw the book at him.

This sort of thing is so common in DC I doubt much happens beyond a fine. 

Agree to both comments 

[The Real timschochet 6,770]

Nobody here yet has taken the correct position which is: 

If Schiff is charged with a crime that will be a political prosecution. But when Trump was charged with crimes it was not political, it was because Trump committed crimes. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,439]

6 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Nobody here yet has taken the correct position which is: 

If Schiff is charged with a crime that will be a political prosecution. But when Trump was charged with crimes it was not political, it was because Trump committed crimes. 

Trump bad, Schiff good.  Just say it you wuss. 

[TheNewGirl 1,494]

It was 100% political with Trump. But then I am not shocked that this is coming from you. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,107]

2 hours ago, TheNewGirl said:

Schiff is a terrible man, another CA politician that figures "rules for thee." 

Also, he's one of those guys that I never have to meet, but he skeeves me out. There is something about him that I get strong gut feelings for; smarmy, gross. 

He's Lady Squidtard's FAVORITE politician, hand's down.

He literally reported people at the other forum for calling Schiff "bug-eyed" and got them suspended.  True story.

[weepaws 3,194]

Another reason why California needs to sink

[Strike 5,553]

https://x.com/LL_PATRIOT/status/1945149712744509501

[The Real timschochet 6,770]

14 hours ago, TheNewGirl said:

It was 100% political with Trump. But then I am not shocked that this is coming from you. 

And I’m not shocked you think this. But I honestly do believe that Trump committed crimes and it was only the DELAY in his prosecution that was political. And this has nothing whatsoever to do with my view of him as a politician or person. 

[5-Points 3,535]

20 hours ago, RLLD said:

I do not concur we should revisit the lawfare liberals have used back upon them.  I agree that Schiff is  an absolute scumbag.

But just because we hate him does not mean we should abuse systems of government and law to take him down.

That is what liberals do, and while it might seem rewarding to so it back....to what end?  We cannot become the thing we oppose. Its more challenging to be the good people, I get that, but we have to do it. 

We should oppose this move. 

I get what you're saying, and, there was a time I agreed with this sentiment. 

But when your opponent is constantly eye gouging, fish hooking, hitting you in the back of the head and below the belt and you keep complaining to the ref but all he does is throw his hands up, those become the new rules of the game. And you better start doing it back if you want to defeat them. 

The Dems turned politics into a street fight. There are no rules in a street fight. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,546]

4 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

And I’m not shocked you think this. But I honestly do believe that Trump committed crimes and it was only the DELAY in his prosecution that was political. And this has nothing whatsoever to do with my view of him as a politician or person. 

We know the Trump trial in NY was a sham the second the judge never sentenced him.  We know this because, if there was a sentence, Trump appeals to a higher court and will be found not guilty.  The trial was 100% election interference. 

[Meglamaniac 510]

21 hours ago, squistion said:

Political persecution?

Of course it is. And if anyone believes otherwise I have a bridge to sell you. 

I told you Trolls need thier bridges, stop selling them

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,107]

Everyone - we have an OFFICIAL Adam Schiff thread here:
 

Please post in there instead.

[squistion 2,203]

14 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Everyone - we have an OFFICIAL Adam Schiff thread here:

Please post in there instead.

No I won't post in a thread that calls him "Bug Eyes"

This thread was started before yours so I'll post about Schiff here instead or perhaps start a thread for each future news item about Schiff. 

[iam90sbaby 2,611]

22 hours ago, RLLD said:

I do not concur we should revisit the lawfare liberals have used back upon them.  I agree that Schiff is  an absolute scumbag.

But just because we hate him does not mean we should abuse systems of government and law to take him down.

That is what liberals do, and while it might seem rewarding to so it back....to what end?  We cannot become the thing we oppose. Its more challenging to be the good people, I get that, but we have to do it. 

We should oppose this move. 

Uhhh yeah we should. 

[peenie 1,915]

Ways to read this article: 

[squistion 2,203]

 

[TBayXXXVII 2,546]

If he's guilty, prosecute... same with all of those corrupt dbags.  If he's not guilty of that (he's probably guilty of something else), then you don't prosecute.  It's not that hard.  Media on both sides will make it political though.

[thegeneral 3,214]

I love the Republicans don’t go after their opponents schtick. Very cute

[RLLD 4,230]

1 hour ago, iam90sbaby said:

Uhhh yeah we should. 

I get it, I do....but then where does it end? We end up with an endless tit-for-tat abuse of our systems just to play political games.  I suggest many voters saw Democrats as being petty and childish for doing it, and that helped Republicans win the election.  JMHO

[RLLD 4,230]

2 hours ago, 5-Points said:

I get what you're saying, and, there was a time I agreed with this sentiment. 

But when your opponent is constantly eye gouging, fish hooking, hitting you in the back of the head and below the belt and you keep complaining to the ref but all he does is throw his hands up, those become the new rules of the game. And you better start doing it back if you want to defeat them. 

The Dems turned politics into a street fight. There are no rules in a street fight. 

I am not discounting your point here.  I get it. I really do.  It always is a good feel when the bully gets it back.

There comes a time when we have to choose between what is easy and what is right.

[Strike 5,553]

5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I am not discounting your point here.  I get it. I really do.  It always is a good feel when the bully gets it back.

There comes a time when we have to choose between what is easy and what is right.

What if Schiff actually committed crimes and it is RIGHT to prosecute him?

[RLLD 4,230]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

What if Schiff actually committed crimes and it is RIGHT to prosecute him?

If it can be proven, and its not a sham trial like Trump had.  Then ok....but on its face, it just seems too much like an act of retribution right now.  JMHO

[Dizkneelande 1,101]

1 hour ago, RLLD said:

If it can be proven, and its not a sham trial like Trump had.  Then ok....but on its face, it just seems too much like an act of retribution right now.  JMHO

He claimed 2 primary residences and did this for 17 years. In addition to mortgage fraud he’s also a hypocritical tax cheat like they all are -

AI Overview

Generally, for tax purposes, you can only claim one primary residence at a time

. The IRS refers to this as your "main home" or "principal residence." 

Here's why this matters

Tax Benefits: Several tax benefits, like the mortgage interest deduction and the exclusion of capital gains when selling, are tied to your primary residence.

Proof of Residency: To claim a primary residence, you'll need to demonstrate you actually live there for the majority of the year. This is typically evidenced by where you spend the most time, your legal address for tax returns and official documents (like your driver's license and voter registration), and proximity to work or family.  

What if you own multiple homes?

If you own more than one home, the others are classified as either: 

Second Homes (Vacation Homes): These are properties you live in for part of the year, but not for the majority. They don't offer the same tax breaks as a primary residence.

Investment Properties: These are homes you own primarily to generate rental income or profit from selling. They have their own set of tax rules and generally don't qualify for primary residence benefits. 

Important considerations

Even if you split your time equally between two homes, you'll need to designate one as your primary residence for tax purposes.

While lenders might allow you to have two mortgages at once in specific circumstances (e.g., job relocation or buying a home for a dependent), this doesn't change the tax rules about having only one primary residence.

If you plan to convert your primary residence into a rental property, it's crucial to understand the mortgage and tax implications and follow the relevant rules, according to Bankrate. 

Key takeaway

While you can own multiple homes, you can only claim one as your primary residence for tax purposes. If you have any doubts about classifying your residence, consulting with a tax professional is recommended. 

[Strike 5,553]

7 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

He claimed 2 primary residences and did this for 17 years. In addition to mortgage fraud he’s also a hypocritical tax cheat like they all are -

AI Overview

Generally, for tax purposes, you can only claim one primary residence at a time

. The IRS refers to this as your "main home" or "principal residence." 

Here's why this matters

Tax Benefits: Several tax benefits, like the mortgage interest deduction and the exclusion of capital gains when selling, are tied to your primary residence.

Proof of Residency: To claim a primary residence, you'll need to demonstrate you actually live there for the majority of the year. This is typically evidenced by where you spend the most time, your legal address for tax returns and official documents (like your driver's license and voter registration), and proximity to work or family.  

What if you own multiple homes?

If you own more than one home, the others are classified as either: 

Second Homes (Vacation Homes): These are properties you live in for part of the year, but not for the majority. They don't offer the same tax breaks as a primary residence.

Investment Properties: These are homes you own primarily to generate rental income or profit from selling. They have their own set of tax rules and generally don't qualify for primary residence benefits. 

Important considerations

Even if you split your time equally between two homes, you'll need to designate one as your primary residence for tax purposes.

While lenders might allow you to have two mortgages at once in specific circumstances (e.g., job relocation or buying a home for a dependent), this doesn't change the tax rules about having only one primary residence.

If you plan to convert your primary residence into a rental property, it's crucial to understand the mortgage and tax implications and follow the relevant rules, according to Bankrate. 

Key takeaway

While you can own multiple homes, you can only claim one as your primary residence for tax purposes. If you have any doubts about classifying your residence, consulting with a tax professional is recommended. 

I'm surprised @RLLD needs this explained to him.  He was the expert on all things housing back in 2006, especially FRAUD.   I'm pretty sure he wanted me thrown in jail and I only owned one home.

[RLLD 4,230]

2 hours ago, Strike said:

I'm surprised @RLLD needs this explained to him.  He was the expert on all things housing back in 2006, especially FRAUD.   I'm pretty sure he wanted me thrown in jail and I only owned one home.

I havent read up on it.  The more I learn then maybe I change my position. I am not a liberal, I dont decide something then refuse to change in the face of evidence. 

Didnt want you thrown in jail, but more so wanted people to learn not to participate in fraud. 

[Strike 5,553]

Just now, RLLD said:

I havent read up on it.  The more I learn then maybe I change my position. I am not a liberal, I dont decide something then refuse to change in the face of evidence. 

Didnt want you thrown in jail, but more so wanted people to learn not to participate in fraud. 

So you don't think people who commit fraud should be prosecuted?  

[RLLD 4,230]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

So you don't think people who commit fraud should be prosecuted?  

What? When did i say that?

[Strike 5,553]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

What? When did i say that?

It's a yes or no question.  Why won't you answer it?

[RLLD 4,230]

1 hour ago, Strike said:

It's a yes or no question.  Why won't you answer it?

Uh, no....I dont think people who commit fraud should not be prosecuted?  I mean, the question itself is odd.....I dont understand it.