jonnyutah 442 Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said: Nobody has said the roommate turned him in. I think I wrote that the roommate helped the police apprehend him, which is somewhat of a misstatement on my part; what I meant to say is that the roommate’s cooperation with the police helped the police strengthen their case against Robinson- that is according to the governor of Utah. The usual suspects here are trying to focus on your post that the roommate turned him in, which is a false statement. They are doing this not simply to attack you but to avoid the actual fact that the roommate’s cooperation in this matter, which was voluntarily, has been a huge help to the police per the governor. That fact destroys their narrative that this is a tranny crime, trannies are violent, etc. Classic liberal deflection. Ron used the roomate turning him in to prove a grander point. It wasnt a little point in a long post. It was the whole of his evidence. Literally 100% That isnt true. So therefore his point is crap. As far as giving credit to the tranny, it is ridiculous. Once the killer was turned in they would have gone into his records. The text conversation would have been uncovered . So the tranny isnt being noble by cooperating. He is self preserving. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonnyutah 442 Posted 11 hours ago Tim is showing us in real time how liberals came to love being morally correct instead of factually accurate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,877 Posted 11 hours ago 14 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Wasn’t there an old poster that became a politician in TX or something and some of his old comments were dug up? ~Stick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonnyutah 442 Posted 11 hours ago A logical person making an argument based on A would then abandon that argument once A is proven false. But for liberals, A wasnt really important anyway. They simply start with priors and then try and make the pieces fit. That is why when A is proven false they get mad and make excuses. Another move in the liberal playbook is to look at somebody's argument based on ABCD and then nitpick at A using less then cedible means. Then pretend A is false and use that to defeat the whole argument. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,721 Posted 11 hours ago 2 hours ago, TimHauck said: Who said the roommate turned him in? (Honest question) Gutterboy/ Ron Artest. A few posts above this one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,721 Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said: Nobody has said the roommate turned him in. I think I wrote that the roommate helped the police apprehend him, which is somewhat of a misstatement on my part; what I meant to say is that the roommate’s cooperation with the police helped the police strengthen their case against Robinson- that is according to the governor of Utah. The usual suspects here are trying to focus on your post that the roommate turned him in, which is a false statement. They are doing this not simply to attack you but to avoid the actual fact that the roommate’s cooperation in this matter, which was voluntarily, has been a huge help to the police per the governor. That fact destroys their narrative that this is a tranny crime, trannies are violent, etc. Gutterboy / Ron Artest did. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,721 Posted 11 hours ago 4 hours ago, Ron_Artest said: If these texts are real, we must also accept that the tranny turned the guy in, which shatters the "evil murderous tranny death cult" narrative. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 2,008 Posted 10 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Gutterboy / Ron Artest did. Aka Corky Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fnord 2,376 Posted 10 hours ago 17 minutes ago, jonnyutah said: A logical person making an argument based on A would then abandon that argument once A is proven false. But for liberals, A wasnt really important anyway. They simply start with priors and then try and make the pieces fit. That is why when A is proven false they get mad and make excuses. Another move in the liberal playbook is to look at somebody's argument based on ABCD and then nitpick at A using less then cedible means. Then pretend A is false and use that to defeat the whole argument. I'll just point out that you're explaining the MAGA/Trump defender playbook perfectly. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,714 Posted 10 hours ago 1 hour ago, Grace Under Pressure said: It shouldn't have taken this tragic event to finally call out these online platform garbage bins of the Internet. Regardless of "sides", those hell holes are radicalizing kids like we never had to deal with. Will there always be new ones popping up? It seems impossible to call in the CEOs of 100% of these places. And all the future places that don't even exist yet. That's why it's a scourge to promote the divisive rhetoric. The call is coming from inside the house. Children shouldn’t have endless free access to the internet 24/7 on whatever platform they want. Platforms need to start using ID me and you need to be a certain age to certain platforms, that’s the solution. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,346 Posted 10 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Fnord said: I'll just point out that you're explaining the MAGA/Trump defender playbook perfectly. I'd add that broad generalizations aren't usually part of a how a "logical person" wins an argument. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,877 Posted 10 hours ago 26 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: OK I was wrong about the tranny turning him in, like I said I thought someone posted that here which was confusing because the original story was the dad turned him in. Regardless, the tranny did the right thing and shared everything and confessed what she knew. Not a murderous leftist like you want us to believe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonnyutah 442 Posted 10 hours ago 23 minutes ago, Fnord said: I'll just point out that you're explaining the MAGA/Trump defender playbook perfectly. Some truth to that for sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonnyutah 442 Posted 10 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: I'd add that broad generalizations aren't usually part of a how a "logical person" wins an argument. Broad generalizations are a problem when they are grossly inaccurate. "Blacks love taffy" is obviously a made up nonsense statement. "Blacks vote democrat" isnt 100% true every time, but pointing out it isnt true 100% of the time makes you a moron. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,132 Posted 9 hours ago Has there been any indication of what made him drop out of college? He apparently had good standardized test scores. I’m surprised @nobody hasn’t brought up a potential Covid lockdown angle, considering I believe the semester he attended was in 2021. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,877 Posted 9 hours ago 8 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Has there been any indication of what made him drop out of college? He apparently had good standardized test scores. I’m surprised @nobody hasn’t brought up a potential Covid lockdown angle, considering I believe the semester he attended was in 2021. Probably realized he could make more money just by saying outrageous things. Also attending college for the first time at 26 when you've already made a career does seem kinda pointless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,132 Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, Ron_Artest said: Probably realized he could make more money just by saying outrageous things. Also attending college for the first time at 26 when you've already made a career does seem kinda pointless. Lol, I mean the shooter, not Kirk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ron_Artest 1,877 Posted 9 hours ago 1 minute ago, TimHauck said: Lol, I mean the shooter, not Kirk. DOH. nvm. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 3,254 Posted 9 hours ago 3 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Lol, I mean the shooter, not Kirk. Just now, Ron_Artest said: DOH. nvm. 2 of the 3 stooges at work. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,132 Posted 8 hours ago 10 hours ago, TimHauck said: Alternate theory, from this person who claims to be a MAGA tranny: I see Matt Walsh has mentioned this theory. I guess it’s possible, but I kinda think if they were planning it out in advance they would still talk like they normally would, no? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,439 Posted 7 hours ago ABC This is such a touching love story https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/news/abc-reporter-calls-text-messages-between-suspected-charlie-kirks-assassin-and-his-transgender-partner-as-very-touching/vi-AA1MGwFA?ocid=socialshare guess this might have been covered yesterday, I wasn't around much focking disgusting news network Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 4,439 Posted 7 hours ago CNN's Montel Williams called it a love story too Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,721 Posted 7 hours ago 1 minute ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said: CNN's Montel Williams called it a love story too Kamala was his side piece. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,721 Posted 7 hours ago 8 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said: ABC This is such a touching love story https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/news/abc-reporter-calls-text-messages-between-suspected-charlie-kirks-assassin-and-his-transgender-partner-as-very-touching/vi-AA1MGwFA?ocid=socialshare guess this might have been covered yesterday, I wasn't around much focking disgusting news network Can’t wait for the movie. Romeo and Romeo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 490 Posted 7 hours ago 8 hours ago, TimHauck said: Does anyone have the original source for the text messages in this format? This is clearly AI-generated from the transcript, but not sure if it was law enforcement who put them in this format. Law enforcement produced it with ellipses in plain text. I don’t think the public has seen the full thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,787 Posted 6 hours ago I assumed the ellipses were them talking about their favorite lube or something less relevant to the case. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BirdGang 402 Posted 6 hours ago Jimmy Kimmel really get canned? This cancel culture isn’t working out so well for the Libtards anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 3,132 Posted 6 hours ago 57 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: Law enforcement produced it with ellipses in plain text. I don’t think the public has seen the full thread. That’s my understanding, but I’ve now seen multiple high follower accounts post it in that format, but no clue where they got it from. Maybe one of them did it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gepetto 1,420 Posted 5 hours ago 30 minutes ago, BirdGang said: Jimmy Kimmel really get canned? This cancel culture isn’t working out so well for the Libtards anymore. Sort of. Technically, his show got suspended indefinitely. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,787 Posted 47 minutes ago 5 hours ago, BirdGang said: Jimmy Kimmel really get canned? This cancel culture isn’t working out so well for the Libtards anymore. He'll be back. He's probably sucking his way back as we speak. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,254 Posted 21 minutes ago YouTube video, by Frank Turek, called, the greatness of Charlie Kirk: an eyewitness account of His life and martyrdom. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites